[Hexagon] Avoid creating invalid offsets in packetizer

Two memory instructions with a dependency only on the address register
between the two (the first one of them being post-incrememnt) can be
packetized together after the offset on the second was updated to the
incremement value. Make sure that the new offset is valid for the
instruction.

llvm-svn: 328897
This commit is contained in:
Krzysztof Parzyszek 2018-03-30 19:28:37 +00:00
parent 95f9a68b1f
commit 0f983d69a4
2 changed files with 37 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -530,6 +530,9 @@ bool HexagonPacketizerList::updateOffset(SUnit *SUI, SUnit *SUJ) {
return false;
int64_t Offset = MI.getOperand(OPI).getImm();
if (!HII->isValidOffset(MI.getOpcode(), Offset+Incr, HRI))
return false;
MI.getOperand(OPI).setImm(Offset + Incr);
ChangedOffset = Offset;
return true;

View File

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
# RUN: llc -march=hexagon -run-pass hexagon-packetizer %s -o - | FileCheck %s
# Make sure that we don't try to packetize the two stores together. The
# dependence on $r0 could be broken by updating the offset in the storeiri,
# but then the offset would become invalid for that instruction (it has to
# be a multiple of 4).
# CHECK: S4_storeiri_io killed renamable $r0, 0, 0
--- |
define void @fred() {
ret void
}
@g0 = global i8 zeroinitializer, align 2
@g1 = global i32 zeroinitializer, align 4
...
---
name: fred
tracksRegLiveness: true
body: |
bb.0:
successors: %bb.0, %bb.1
liveins: $lc0, $r0, $r27
$r1 = A2_addi $r0, 24
$r0 = S2_storerb_pi $r0, 2, $r27 :: (store 1 into @g0, align 2)
S4_storeiri_io killed $r0, 0, 0 :: (store 4 into @g1, align 4)
$r0 = A2_tfr killed $r1
ENDLOOP0 %bb.0, implicit-def $pc, implicit-def $lc0, implicit $sa0, implicit $lc0
bb.1:
...