forked from OSchip/llvm-project
When factoring multiply expressions across adds, factor both
positive and negative forms of constants together. This allows us to compile: int foo(int x, int y) { return (x-y) + (x-y) + (x-y); } into: _foo: ## @foo subl %esi, %edi leal (%rdi,%rdi,2), %eax ret instead of (where the 3 and -3 were not factored): _foo: imull $-3, 8(%esp), %ecx imull $3, 4(%esp), %eax addl %ecx, %eax ret this started out as: movl 12(%ebp), %ecx imull $3, 8(%ebp), %eax subl %ecx, %eax subl %ecx, %eax subl %ecx, %eax ret This comes from PR5359. llvm-svn: 92381
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f03e64094
commit
0c59ac3f41
|
@ -510,7 +510,8 @@ static Instruction *ConvertShiftToMul(Instruction *Shl,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Scan backwards and forwards among values with the same rank as element i to
|
||||
// see if X exists. If X does not exist, return i.
|
||||
// see if X exists. If X does not exist, return i. This is useful when
|
||||
// scanning for 'x' when we see '-x' because they both get the same rank.
|
||||
static unsigned FindInOperandList(SmallVectorImpl<ValueEntry> &Ops, unsigned i,
|
||||
Value *X) {
|
||||
unsigned XRank = Ops[i].Rank;
|
||||
|
@ -518,7 +519,7 @@ static unsigned FindInOperandList(SmallVectorImpl<ValueEntry> &Ops, unsigned i,
|
|||
for (unsigned j = i+1; j != e && Ops[j].Rank == XRank; ++j)
|
||||
if (Ops[j].Op == X)
|
||||
return j;
|
||||
// Scan backwards
|
||||
// Scan backwards.
|
||||
for (unsigned j = i-1; j != ~0U && Ops[j].Rank == XRank; --j)
|
||||
if (Ops[j].Op == X)
|
||||
return j;
|
||||
|
@ -547,28 +548,47 @@ Value *Reassociate::RemoveFactorFromExpression(Value *V, Value *Factor) {
|
|||
LinearizeExprTree(BO, Factors);
|
||||
|
||||
bool FoundFactor = false;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Factors.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
||||
bool NeedsNegate = false;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Factors.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
if (Factors[i].Op == Factor) {
|
||||
FoundFactor = true;
|
||||
Factors.erase(Factors.begin()+i);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If this is a negative version of this factor, remove it.
|
||||
if (ConstantInt *FC1 = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Factor))
|
||||
if (ConstantInt *FC2 = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Factors[i].Op))
|
||||
if (FC1->getValue() == -FC2->getValue()) {
|
||||
FoundFactor = NeedsNegate = true;
|
||||
Factors.erase(Factors.begin()+i);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!FoundFactor) {
|
||||
// Make sure to restore the operands to the expression tree.
|
||||
RewriteExprTree(BO, Factors);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = BO; ++InsertPt;
|
||||
|
||||
// If this was just a single multiply, remove the multiply and return the only
|
||||
// remaining operand.
|
||||
if (Factors.size() == 1) {
|
||||
ValueRankMap.erase(BO);
|
||||
BO->eraseFromParent();
|
||||
return Factors[0].Op;
|
||||
V = Factors[0].Op;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
RewriteExprTree(BO, Factors);
|
||||
V = BO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
RewriteExprTree(BO, Factors);
|
||||
return BO;
|
||||
if (NeedsNegate)
|
||||
V = BinaryOperator::CreateNeg(V, "neg", InsertPt);
|
||||
|
||||
return V;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// FindSingleUseMultiplyFactors - If V is a single-use multiply, recursively
|
||||
|
@ -645,6 +665,9 @@ Value *Reassociate::OptimizeAdd(Instruction *I,
|
|||
// Scan the operand lists looking for X and -X pairs. If we find any, we
|
||||
// can simplify the expression. X+-X == 0. While we're at it, scan for any
|
||||
// duplicates. We want to canonicalize Y+Y+Y+Z -> 3*Y+Z.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// TODO: We could handle "X + ~X" -> "-1" if we wanted, since "-X = ~X+1".
|
||||
//
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ops.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
Value *TheOp = Ops[i].Op;
|
||||
// Check to see if we've seen this operand before. If so, we factor all
|
||||
|
@ -730,21 +753,26 @@ Value *Reassociate::OptimizeAdd(Instruction *I,
|
|||
assert(Factors.size() > 1 && "Bad linearize!");
|
||||
|
||||
// Add one to FactorOccurrences for each unique factor in this op.
|
||||
if (Factors.size() == 2) {
|
||||
unsigned Occ = ++FactorOccurrences[Factors[0]];
|
||||
if (Occ > MaxOcc) { MaxOcc = Occ; MaxOccVal = Factors[0]; }
|
||||
if (Factors[0] != Factors[1]) { // Don't double count A*A.
|
||||
Occ = ++FactorOccurrences[Factors[1]];
|
||||
if (Occ > MaxOcc) { MaxOcc = Occ; MaxOccVal = Factors[1]; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
SmallPtrSet<Value*, 4> Duplicates;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Factors.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
if (!Duplicates.insert(Factors[i])) continue;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned Occ = ++FactorOccurrences[Factors[i]];
|
||||
if (Occ > MaxOcc) { MaxOcc = Occ; MaxOccVal = Factors[i]; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
SmallPtrSet<Value*, 8> Duplicates;
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Factors.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
Value *Factor = Factors[i];
|
||||
if (!Duplicates.insert(Factor)) continue;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned Occ = ++FactorOccurrences[Factor];
|
||||
if (Occ > MaxOcc) { MaxOcc = Occ; MaxOccVal = Factor; }
|
||||
|
||||
// If Factor is a negative constant, add the negated value as a factor
|
||||
// because we can percolate the negate out. Watch for minint, which
|
||||
// cannot be positivified.
|
||||
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Factor))
|
||||
if (CI->getValue().isNegative() && !CI->getValue().isMinSignedValue()) {
|
||||
Factor = ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), -CI->getValue());
|
||||
assert(!Duplicates.count(Factor) &&
|
||||
"Shouldn't have two constant factors, missed a canonicalize");
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned Occ = ++FactorOccurrences[Factor];
|
||||
if (Occ > MaxOcc) { MaxOcc = Occ; MaxOccVal = Factor; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -191,3 +191,16 @@ define i32 @test13(i32 %X1, i32 %X2, i32 %X3) {
|
|||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; PR5359
|
||||
define i32 @test14(i32 %X1, i32 %X2) {
|
||||
%B = mul i32 %X1, 47 ; X1*47
|
||||
%C = mul i32 %X2, -47 ; X2*-47
|
||||
%D = add i32 %B, %C ; X1*47 + X2*-47 -> 47*(X1-X2)
|
||||
ret i32 %D
|
||||
; CHECK: @test14
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: sub i32 %X1, %X2
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: mul i32 {{.*}}, 47
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue