forked from OSchip/llvm-project
clang-format: Don't indent relative to unary operators.
It seems like most people see unary operators more like part of the subsequent identifier and find relative indentation odd. Before: aaaaaaaaaa(!aaaaaaaaaa( // break aaaaa)); After: aaaaaaaaaa(!aaaaaaaaaa( // break aaaaa)); llvm-svn: 200840
This commit is contained in:
parent
3bb8fbfa3e
commit
0c214fa2e3
|
@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ void ContinuationIndenter::addTokenOnCurrentLine(LineState &State, bool DryRun,
|
|||
State.Stack.back().LastSpace = State.Column;
|
||||
else if ((Previous.Type == TT_BinaryOperator ||
|
||||
Previous.Type == TT_ConditionalExpr ||
|
||||
Previous.Type == TT_UnaryOperator ||
|
||||
Previous.Type == TT_CtorInitializerColon) &&
|
||||
(Previous.getPrecedence() != prec::Assignment ||
|
||||
Current.StartsBinaryExpression))
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4219,14 +4219,12 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, UnderstandsUnaryOperators) {
|
|||
verifyFormat("int a = i /* confusing comment */++;");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(FormatTest, IndentsRelativeToUnaryOperators) {
|
||||
TEST_F(FormatTest, DoesNotIndentRelativeToUnaryOperators) {
|
||||
verifyFormat("if (!aaaaaaaaaa( // break\n"
|
||||
" aaaaa)) {\n"
|
||||
" aaaaa)) {\n"
|
||||
"}");
|
||||
verifyFormat("aaaaaaaaaa(!aaaaaaaaaa( // break\n"
|
||||
" aaaaa));");
|
||||
|
||||
// Only indent relative to unary operators if the expression is nested.
|
||||
" aaaaa));");
|
||||
verifyFormat("*aaa = aaaaaaa( // break\n"
|
||||
" bbbbbb);");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue