forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[DAG] check more operands for cycles when merging stores.
Until now, we've only checked whether merging stores would cause a cycle via the value argument, but the address and indexed offset arguments are also capable of creating cycles in some situations. The addresses are all base+offset with notionally the same base, but the base SDNode may still be different (e.g. via an indexed load in one case, and an ISD::ADD elsewhere). This allows cycles to creep in if one of these sources depends on another. The indexed offset is usually undef (representing a non-indexed store), but on some architectures (e.g. 32-bit ARM-mode ARM) it can be an arbitrary value, again allowing dependency cycles to creep in. llvm-svn: 345200
This commit is contained in:
parent
76ccec07b4
commit
05fe8f918b
|
@ -14316,14 +14316,14 @@ bool DAGCombiner::checkMergeStoreCandidatesForDependencies(
|
|||
// in candidate selection and can be
|
||||
// safely ignored
|
||||
// * Value (Op 1) -> Cycles may happen (e.g. through load chains)
|
||||
// * Address (Op 2) -> Merged addresses may only vary by a fixed constant
|
||||
// and so no cycles are possible.
|
||||
// * (Op 3) -> appears to always be undef. Cannot be source of cycle.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Thus we need only check predecessors of the value operands.
|
||||
auto *Op = N->getOperand(1).getNode();
|
||||
if (Visited.insert(Op).second)
|
||||
Worklist.push_back(Op);
|
||||
// * Address (Op 2) -> Merged addresses may only vary by a fixed constant,
|
||||
// but aren't necessarily fromt the same base node, so
|
||||
// cycles possible (e.g. via indexed store).
|
||||
// * (Op 3) -> Represents the pre or post-indexing offset (or undef for
|
||||
// non-indexed stores). Not constant on all targets (e.g. ARM)
|
||||
// and so can participate in a cycle.
|
||||
for (unsigned j = 1; j < N->getNumOperands(); ++j)
|
||||
Worklist.push_back(N->getOperand(j).getNode());
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Search through DAG. We can stop early if we find a store node.
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumStores; ++i)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue