eliminate the CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher code and have each

ComplexPattern at the root be generated multiple times, once
for each opcode they are part of.  This encourages factoring
because the opcode checks get treated just like everything
else in the matcher.

llvm-svn: 97439
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2010-03-01 07:17:40 +00:00
parent f4d1775263
commit 053a28a397
8 changed files with 46 additions and 88 deletions

View File

@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ public:
OPC_CheckPredicate,
OPC_CheckOpcode,
OPC_SwitchOpcode,
OPC_CheckMultiOpcode,
OPC_CheckType,
OPC_CheckChild0Type, OPC_CheckChild1Type, OPC_CheckChild2Type,
OPC_CheckChild3Type, OPC_CheckChild4Type, OPC_CheckChild5Type,

View File

@ -1787,15 +1787,6 @@ SelectCodeCommon(SDNode *NodeToMatch, const unsigned char *MatcherTable,
continue;
}
case OPC_CheckMultiOpcode: {
unsigned NumOps = MatcherTable[MatcherIndex++];
bool OpcodeEquals = false;
for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumOps; ++i)
OpcodeEquals |= N->getOpcode() == MatcherTable[MatcherIndex++];
if (!OpcodeEquals) break;
continue;
}
case OPC_CheckType: {
MVT::SimpleValueType VT =
(MVT::SimpleValueType)MatcherTable[MatcherIndex++];

View File

@ -1959,10 +1959,17 @@ void DAGISelEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
PatternSortingPredicate2(CGP));
// Convert each pattern into Matcher's.
// Convert each variant of each pattern into a Matcher.
std::vector<Matcher*> PatternMatchers;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Patterns.size(); i != e; ++i)
PatternMatchers.push_back(ConvertPatternToMatcher(*Patterns[i], CGP));
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Patterns.size(); i != e; ++i) {
for (unsigned Variant = 0; ; ++Variant) {
if (Matcher *M = ConvertPatternToMatcher(*Patterns[i], Variant, CGP))
PatternMatchers.push_back(M);
else
break;
}
}
Matcher *TheMatcher = new ScopeMatcher(&PatternMatchers[0],
PatternMatchers.size());

View File

@ -98,10 +98,6 @@ void SwitchOpcodeMatcher::printImpl(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned indent) const {
}
void CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher::printImpl(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned indent) const{
OS.indent(indent) << "CheckMultiOpcode <todo args>\n";
}
void CheckTypeMatcher::printImpl(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned indent) const {
OS.indent(indent) << "CheckType " << getEnumName(Type) << '\n';
}
@ -221,13 +217,6 @@ unsigned CheckOpcodeMatcher::getHashImpl() const {
return HashString(Opcode.getEnumName());
}
unsigned CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher::getHashImpl() const {
unsigned Result = 0;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Opcodes.size(); i != e; ++i)
Result |= HashString(Opcodes[i]->getEnumName());
return Result;
}
unsigned CheckCondCodeMatcher::getHashImpl() const {
return HashString(CondCodeName);
}
@ -311,8 +300,6 @@ bool CheckOpcodeMatcher::isContradictoryImpl(const Matcher *M) const {
return COM->getOpcode().getEnumName() != getOpcode().getEnumName();
}
// TODO: CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher?
// If the node has a known type, and if the type we're checking for is
// different, then we know they contradict. For example, a check for
// ISD::STORE will never be true at the same time a check for Type i32 is.

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ namespace llvm {
class Record;
class SDNodeInfo;
Matcher *ConvertPatternToMatcher(const PatternToMatch &Pattern,
Matcher *ConvertPatternToMatcher(const PatternToMatch &Pattern,unsigned Variant,
const CodeGenDAGPatterns &CGP);
Matcher *OptimizeMatcher(Matcher *Matcher, const CodeGenDAGPatterns &CGP);
void EmitMatcherTable(const Matcher *Matcher, const CodeGenDAGPatterns &CGP,
@ -449,33 +449,6 @@ private:
virtual unsigned getHashImpl() const { return 4123; }
};
/// CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher - This checks to see if the current node has one
/// of the specified opcode, if not it fails to match.
class CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher : public Matcher {
SmallVector<const SDNodeInfo*, 4> Opcodes;
public:
CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher(const SDNodeInfo * const *opcodes, unsigned numops)
: Matcher(CheckMultiOpcode), Opcodes(opcodes, opcodes+numops) {}
unsigned getNumOpcodes() const { return Opcodes.size(); }
const SDNodeInfo &getOpcode(unsigned i) const { return *Opcodes[i]; }
static inline bool classof(const Matcher *N) {
return N->getKind() == CheckMultiOpcode;
}
virtual bool isSafeToReorderWithPatternPredicate() const { return true; }
private:
virtual void printImpl(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned indent) const;
virtual bool isEqualImpl(const Matcher *M) const {
return cast<CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher>(M)->Opcodes == Opcodes;
}
virtual unsigned getHashImpl() const;
};
/// CheckTypeMatcher - This checks to see if the current node has the
/// specified type, if not it fails to match.
class CheckTypeMatcher : public Matcher {

View File

@ -282,16 +282,7 @@ EmitMatcher(const Matcher *N, unsigned Indent, unsigned CurrentIdx,
return CurrentIdx-StartIdx;
}
case Matcher::CheckMultiOpcode: {
const CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher *CMO = cast<CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher>(N);
OS << "OPC_CheckMultiOpcode, " << CMO->getNumOpcodes() << ", ";
for (unsigned i = 0, e = CMO->getNumOpcodes(); i != e; ++i)
OS << CMO->getOpcode(i).getEnumName() << ", ";
OS << '\n';
return 2 + CMO->getNumOpcodes();
}
case Matcher::CheckType:
case Matcher::CheckType:
OS << "OPC_CheckType, "
<< getEnumName(cast<CheckTypeMatcher>(N)->getType()) << ",\n";
return 2;
@ -623,7 +614,6 @@ void MatcherTableEmitter::EmitHistogram(formatted_raw_ostream &OS) {
case Matcher::CheckPredicate: OS << "OPC_CheckPredicate"; break;
case Matcher::CheckOpcode: OS << "OPC_CheckOpcode"; break;
case Matcher::SwitchOpcode: OS << "OPC_SwitchOpcode"; break;
case Matcher::CheckMultiOpcode: OS << "OPC_CheckMultiOpcode"; break;
case Matcher::CheckType: OS << "OPC_CheckType"; break;
case Matcher::CheckChildType: OS << "OPC_CheckChildType"; break;
case Matcher::CheckInteger: OS << "OPC_CheckInteger"; break;

View File

@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ namespace {
delete PatWithNoTypes;
}
void EmitMatcherCode();
bool EmitMatcherCode(unsigned Variant);
void EmitResultCode();
Matcher *GetMatcher() const { return TheMatcher; }
@ -247,20 +247,6 @@ void MatcherGen::EmitLeafMatchCode(const TreePatternNode *N) {
// Handle complex pattern.
const ComplexPattern &CP = CGP.getComplexPattern(LeafRec);
// If we're at the root of the pattern, we have to check that the opcode
// is a one of the ones requested to be matched.
if (N == Pattern.getSrcPattern()) {
const std::vector<Record*> &OpNodes = CP.getRootNodes();
if (OpNodes.size() == 1) {
AddMatcher(new CheckOpcodeMatcher(CGP.getSDNodeInfo(OpNodes[0])));
} else if (!OpNodes.empty()) {
SmallVector<const SDNodeInfo*, 4> OpNames;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = OpNodes.size(); i != e; i++)
OpNames.push_back(&CGP.getSDNodeInfo(OpNodes[i]));
AddMatcher(new CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher(OpNames.data(), OpNames.size()));
}
}
// Emit a CheckComplexPat operation, which does the match (aborting if it
// fails) and pushes the matched operands onto the recorded nodes list.
@ -495,7 +481,30 @@ void MatcherGen::EmitMatchCode(const TreePatternNode *N,
EmitOperatorMatchCode(N, NodeNoTypes);
}
void MatcherGen::EmitMatcherCode() {
/// EmitMatcherCode - Generate the code that matches the predicate of this
/// pattern for the specified Variant. If the variant is invalid this returns
/// true and does not generate code, if it is valid, it returns false.
bool MatcherGen::EmitMatcherCode(unsigned Variant) {
// If the root of the pattern is a ComplexPattern and if it is specified to
// match some number of root opcodes, these are considered to be our variants.
// Depending on which variant we're generating code for, emit the root opcode
// check.
if (const ComplexPattern *CP =
Pattern.getSrcPattern()->getComplexPatternInfo(CGP)) {
const std::vector<Record*> &OpNodes = CP->getRootNodes();
if (OpNodes.empty()) {
// FIXME: Empty OpNodes runs on everything, is this even valid?
if (Variant != 0) return true;
} else {
if (Variant >= OpNodes.size()) return true;
AddMatcher(new CheckOpcodeMatcher(CGP.getSDNodeInfo(OpNodes[Variant])));
}
} else {
if (Variant != 0) return true;
}
// If the pattern has a predicate on it (e.g. only enabled when a subtarget
// feature is around, do the check).
// FIXME: This should get emitted after the match code below to encourage
@ -503,11 +512,11 @@ void MatcherGen::EmitMatcherCode() {
// dag combine, eliminating the horrible side-effect-full stuff from
// X86's MatchAddress.
if (!Pattern.getPredicateCheck().empty())
AddMatcher(new
CheckPatternPredicateMatcher(Pattern.getPredicateCheck()));
AddMatcher(new CheckPatternPredicateMatcher(Pattern.getPredicateCheck()));
// Emit the matcher for the pattern structure and types.
EmitMatchCode(Pattern.getSrcPattern(), PatWithNoTypes);
return false;
}
@ -849,13 +858,16 @@ void MatcherGen::EmitResultCode() {
}
/// ConvertPatternToMatcher - Create the matcher for the specified pattern with
/// the specified variant. If the variant number is invalid, this returns null.
Matcher *llvm::ConvertPatternToMatcher(const PatternToMatch &Pattern,
unsigned Variant,
const CodeGenDAGPatterns &CGP) {
MatcherGen Gen(Pattern, CGP);
// Generate the code for the matcher.
Gen.EmitMatcherCode();
if (Gen.EmitMatcherCode(Variant))
return 0;
// FIXME2: Kill extra MoveParent commands at the end of the matcher sequence.
// FIXME2: Split result code out to another table, and make the matcher end

View File

@ -153,8 +153,7 @@ static void ContractNodes(OwningPtr<Matcher> &MatcherPtr,
// like X86 where many operations are valid on multiple types.
if ((isa<CheckTypeMatcher>(N) || isa<CheckChildTypeMatcher>(N) ||
isa<RecordMatcher>(N)) &&
(isa<CheckOpcodeMatcher>(N->getNext()) ||
isa<CheckMultiOpcodeMatcher>(N->getNext()))) {
isa<CheckOpcodeMatcher>(N->getNext())) {
// Unlink the two nodes from the list.
Matcher *CheckType = MatcherPtr.take();
Matcher *CheckOpcode = CheckType->takeNext();