forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[mlir][complex] Canonicalization for consecutive complex.add and sub
Add basic canonicalization for consecutive complex.add and sub operations. Reviewed By: pifon2a Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128702
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ae9b42efb
commit
036a699675
|
@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ def AddOp : ComplexArithmeticOp<"add"> {
|
|||
%a = complex.add %b, %c : complex<f32>
|
||||
```
|
||||
}];
|
||||
|
||||
let hasFolder = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#include "mlir/Dialect/Complex/IR/Complex.h"
|
||||
#include "mlir/IR/Builders.h"
|
||||
#include "mlir/IR/Matchers.h"
|
||||
|
||||
using namespace mlir;
|
||||
using namespace mlir::complex;
|
||||
|
@ -103,6 +104,26 @@ OpFoldResult ReOp::fold(ArrayRef<Attribute> operands) {
|
|||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
// AddOp
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
OpFoldResult AddOp::fold(ArrayRef<Attribute> operands) {
|
||||
assert(operands.size() == 2 && "binary op takes 2 operands");
|
||||
|
||||
// complex.add(complex.sub(a, b), b) -> a
|
||||
if (auto sub = getLhs().getDefiningOp<SubOp>())
|
||||
if (getRhs() == sub.getRhs())
|
||||
return sub.getLhs();
|
||||
|
||||
// complex.add(b, complex.sub(a, b)) -> a
|
||||
if (auto sub = getRhs().getDefiningOp<SubOp>())
|
||||
if (getLhs() == sub.getRhs())
|
||||
return sub.getLhs();
|
||||
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
// TableGen'd op method definitions
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -62,3 +62,25 @@ func.func @imag_of_create_op() -> f32 {
|
|||
%1 = complex.im %complex : complex<f32>
|
||||
return %1 : f32
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK-LABEL: func @complex_add_sub_lhs
|
||||
func.func @complex_add_sub_lhs() -> complex<f32> {
|
||||
%complex1 = complex.constant [1.0 : f32, 0.0 : f32] : complex<f32>
|
||||
%complex2 = complex.constant [0.0 : f32, 2.0 : f32] : complex<f32>
|
||||
// CHECK: %[[CPLX:.*]] = complex.constant [1.000000e+00 : f32, 0.000000e+00 : f32] : complex<f32>
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: return %[[CPLX:.*]] : complex<f32>
|
||||
%sub = complex.sub %complex1, %complex2 : complex<f32>
|
||||
%add = complex.add %sub, %complex2 : complex<f32>
|
||||
return %add : complex<f32>
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK-LABEL: func @complex_add_sub_rhs
|
||||
func.func @complex_add_sub_rhs() -> complex<f32> {
|
||||
%complex1 = complex.constant [1.0 : f32, 0.0 : f32] : complex<f32>
|
||||
%complex2 = complex.constant [0.0 : f32, 2.0 : f32] : complex<f32>
|
||||
// CHECK: %[[CPLX:.*]] = complex.constant [1.000000e+00 : f32, 0.000000e+00 : f32] : complex<f32>
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: return %[[CPLX:.*]] : complex<f32>
|
||||
%sub = complex.sub %complex1, %complex2 : complex<f32>
|
||||
%add = complex.add %complex2, %sub : complex<f32>
|
||||
return %add : complex<f32>
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue