Don't look for a destructor in a dependent type. Fixes PR7198.

llvm-svn: 104445

clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp

@@ -4795,7 +4795,7 @@ bool Sema::InitializeVarWithConstructor(VarDecl *VD,
 void Sema::FinalizeVarWithDestructor(VarDecl *VD, const RecordType *Record) {
   CXXRecordDecl *ClassDecl = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Record->getDecl());
   if (!ClassDecl->isInvalidDecl() && !VD->isInvalidDecl() &&
-      !ClassDecl->hasTrivialDestructor()) {
+      !ClassDecl->hasTrivialDestructor() && !ClassDecl->isDependentContext()) {
     CXXDestructorDecl *Destructor = ClassDecl->getDestructor(Context);
     MarkDeclarationReferenced(VD->getLocation(), Destructor);
     CheckDestructorAccess(VD->getLocation(), Destructor,

clang/test/SemaTemplate/dependent-expr.cpp

@@ -24,3 +24,19 @@ namespace PR6045 {
     (void)(k % member);
   }
 }
+
+namespace PR7198 {
+  struct A
+  {
+    ~A() { }
+  };
+
+  template<typename T>
+  struct B {
+    struct C : A {};
+    void f()
+    {
+      C c = C();
+    }
+  };
+}