forked from OSchip/llvm-project
Warn for un-parenthesized '&' inside '|' (a & b | c), rdar://9553326.
Patch by Henry Mason with tweaks by me. llvm-svn: 133453
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7df192279
commit
01bf777597
|
@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ def ExitTimeDestructors : DiagGroup<"exit-time-destructors">;
|
|||
def FourByteMultiChar : DiagGroup<"four-char-constants">;
|
||||
def GlobalConstructors : DiagGroup<"global-constructors">;
|
||||
def : DiagGroup<"idiomatic-parentheses">;
|
||||
def BitwiseOpParentheses: DiagGroup<"bitwise-op-parentheses">;
|
||||
def LogicalOpParentheses: DiagGroup<"logical-op-parentheses">;
|
||||
def IgnoredQualifiers : DiagGroup<"ignored-qualifiers">;
|
||||
def : DiagGroup<"import">;
|
||||
|
@ -195,7 +196,8 @@ def DuplicateArgDecl : DiagGroup<"duplicate-method-arg">;
|
|||
// in -Wparentheses because most users who use -Wparentheses explicitly
|
||||
// do not want these warnings.
|
||||
def Parentheses : DiagGroup<"parentheses",
|
||||
[LogicalOpParentheses]>;
|
||||
[LogicalOpParentheses,
|
||||
BitwiseOpParentheses]>;
|
||||
|
||||
// -Wconversion has its own warnings, but we split a few out for
|
||||
// legacy reasons:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2777,6 +2777,11 @@ def warn_logical_instead_of_bitwise : Warning<
|
|||
"use of logical %0 with constant operand; switch to bitwise %1 or "
|
||||
"remove constant">, InGroup<DiagGroup<"constant-logical-operand">>;
|
||||
|
||||
def warn_bitwise_and_in_bitwise_or : Warning<
|
||||
"'&' within '|'">, InGroup<BitwiseOpParentheses>;
|
||||
def note_bitwise_and_in_bitwise_or_silence : Note<
|
||||
"place parentheses around the '&' expression to silence this warning">;
|
||||
|
||||
def warn_logical_and_in_logical_or : Warning<
|
||||
"'&&' within '||'">, InGroup<LogicalOpParentheses>;
|
||||
def note_logical_and_in_logical_or_silence : Note<
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -9147,6 +9147,20 @@ static void DiagnoseBitwisePrecedence(Sema &Self, BinaryOperatorKind Opc,
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief It accepts a '&' expr that is inside a '|' one.
|
||||
/// Emit a diagnostic together with a fixit hint that wraps the '&' expression
|
||||
/// in parentheses.
|
||||
static void
|
||||
EmitDiagnosticForBitwiseAndInBitwiseOr(Sema &Self, SourceLocation OpLoc,
|
||||
BinaryOperator *Bop) {
|
||||
assert(Bop->getOpcode() == BO_And);
|
||||
Self.Diag(Bop->getOperatorLoc(), diag::warn_bitwise_and_in_bitwise_or)
|
||||
<< Bop->getSourceRange() << OpLoc;
|
||||
SuggestParentheses(Self, Bop->getOperatorLoc(),
|
||||
Self.PDiag(diag::note_bitwise_and_in_bitwise_or_silence),
|
||||
Bop->getSourceRange());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief It accepts a '&&' expr that is inside a '||' one.
|
||||
/// Emit a diagnostic together with a fixit hint that wraps the '&&' expression
|
||||
/// in parentheses.
|
||||
|
@ -9212,13 +9226,28 @@ static void DiagnoseLogicalAndInLogicalOrRHS(Sema &S, SourceLocation OpLoc,
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Look for '&' in the left or right hand of a '|' expr.
|
||||
static void DiagnoseBitwiseAndInBitwiseOr(Sema &S, SourceLocation OpLoc,
|
||||
Expr *OrArg) {
|
||||
if (BinaryOperator *Bop = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(OrArg)) {
|
||||
if (Bop->getOpcode() == BO_And)
|
||||
return EmitDiagnosticForBitwiseAndInBitwiseOr(S, OpLoc, Bop);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// DiagnoseBinOpPrecedence - Emit warnings for expressions with tricky
|
||||
/// precedence.
|
||||
static void DiagnoseBinOpPrecedence(Sema &Self, BinaryOperatorKind Opc,
|
||||
SourceLocation OpLoc, Expr *lhs, Expr *rhs){
|
||||
// Diagnose "arg1 'bitwise' arg2 'eq' arg3".
|
||||
if (BinaryOperator::isBitwiseOp(Opc))
|
||||
return DiagnoseBitwisePrecedence(Self, Opc, OpLoc, lhs, rhs);
|
||||
DiagnoseBitwisePrecedence(Self, Opc, OpLoc, lhs, rhs);
|
||||
|
||||
// Diagnose "arg1 & arg2 | arg3"
|
||||
if (Opc == BO_Or && !OpLoc.isMacroID()/* Don't warn in macros. */) {
|
||||
DiagnoseBitwiseAndInBitwiseOr(Self, OpLoc, lhs);
|
||||
DiagnoseBitwiseAndInBitwiseOr(Self, OpLoc, rhs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Warn about arg1 || arg2 && arg3, as GCC 4.3+ does.
|
||||
// We don't warn for 'assert(a || b && "bad")' since this is safe.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ void bitwise_rel(unsigned i) {
|
|||
(void)(i == 1 | i == 2 | i == 3);
|
||||
(void)(i != 1 & i != 2 & i != 3);
|
||||
|
||||
(void)(i & i | i); // expected-warning {{'&' within '|'}} \
|
||||
// expected-note {{place parentheses around the '&' expression to silence this warning}}
|
||||
|
||||
(void)(i | i & i); // expected-warning {{'&' within '|'}} \
|
||||
// expected-note {{place parentheses around the '&' expression to silence this warning}}
|
||||
|
||||
(void)(i ||
|
||||
i && i); // expected-warning {{'&&' within '||'}} \
|
||||
// expected-note {{place parentheses around the '&&' expression to silence this warning}}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue