If we're resolving all outstanding fixups, and there are multiple fixups

for the same destination, then we must potentially rewrite the initial branch
of every fixup.  Without this patch, a short-circuit check meant to prevent
a switch case from being redundantly added was preventing later fixups from
being processed.  Fixes PR8175 (again).

llvm-svn: 115586
This commit is contained in:
John McCall 2010-10-05 02:33:56 +00:00
parent 1e8b44e470
commit 0077b22aa4
1 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1340,11 +1340,9 @@ static void ResolveAllBranchFixups(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::BasicBlock*, 4> CasesAdded;
for (unsigned I = 0, E = CGF.EHStack.getNumBranchFixups(); I != E; ++I) {
// Skip this fixup if its destination isn't set or if we've
// already treated it.
// Skip this fixup if its destination isn't set.
BranchFixup &Fixup = CGF.EHStack.getBranchFixup(I);
if (Fixup.Destination == 0) continue;
if (!CasesAdded.insert(Fixup.Destination)) continue;
// If there isn't an OptimisticBranchBlock, then InitialBranch is
// still pointing directly to its destination; forward it to the
@ -1361,6 +1359,9 @@ static void ResolveAllBranchFixups(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
Fixup.InitialBranch->setSuccessor(0, CleanupEntry);
}
// Don't add this case to the switch statement twice.
if (!CasesAdded.insert(Fixup.Destination)) continue;
Switch->addCase(CGF.Builder.getInt32(Fixup.DestinationIndex),
Fixup.Destination);
}