llvm-project/llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

161 lines
4.4 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

=========================
LLVM 12.0.0 Release Notes
=========================
.. contents::
:local:
.. warning::
These are in-progress notes for the upcoming LLVM 12 release.
Release notes for previous releases can be found on
`the Download Page <https://releases.llvm.org/download.html>`_.
Introduction
============
This document contains the release notes for the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure,
release 12.0.0. Here we describe the status of LLVM, including major improvements
from the previous release, improvements in various subprojects of LLVM, and
some of the current users of the code. All LLVM releases may be downloaded
from the `LLVM releases web site <https://llvm.org/releases/>`_.
For more information about LLVM, including information about the latest
release, please check out the `main LLVM web site <https://llvm.org/>`_. If you
have questions or comments, the `LLVM Developer's Mailing List
<https://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>`_ is a good place to send
them.
Note that if you are reading this file from a Git checkout or the main
LLVM web page, this document applies to the *next* release, not the current
one. To see the release notes for a specific release, please see the `releases
page <https://llvm.org/releases/>`_.
Non-comprehensive list of changes in this release
=================================================
.. NOTE
For small 1-3 sentence descriptions, just add an entry at the end of
this list. If your description won't fit comfortably in one bullet
point (e.g. maybe you would like to give an example of the
functionality, or simply have a lot to talk about), see the `NOTE` below
for adding a new subsection.
* ...
.. NOTE
If you would like to document a larger change, then you can add a
subsection about it right here. You can copy the following boilerplate
and un-indent it (the indentation causes it to be inside this comment).
Special New Feature
-------------------
Makes programs 10x faster by doing Special New Thing.
Changes to the LLVM IR
----------------------
* ...
IR: Define byref parameter attribute This allows tracking the in-memory type of a pointer argument to a function for ABI purposes. This is essentially a stripped down version of byval to remove some of the stack-copy implications in its definition. This includes the base IR changes, and some tests for places where it should be treated similarly to byval. Codegen support will be in a future patch. My original attempt at solving some of these problems was to repurpose byval with a different address space from the stack. However, it is technically permitted for the callee to introduce a write to the argument, although nothing does this in reality. There is also talk of removing and replacing the byval attribute, so a new attribute would need to take its place anyway. This is intended avoid some optimization issues with the current handling of aggregate arguments, as well as fixes inflexibilty in how frontends can specify the kernel ABI. The most honest representation of the amdgpu_kernel convention is to expose all kernel arguments as loads from constant memory. Today, these are raw, SSA Argument values and codegen is responsible for turning these into loads. Background: There currently isn't a satisfactory way to represent how arguments for the amdgpu_kernel calling convention are passed. In reality, arguments are passed in a single, flat, constant memory buffer implicitly passed to the function. It is also illegal to call this function in the IR, and this is only ever invoked by a driver of some kind. It does not make sense to have a stack passed parameter in this context as is implied by byval. It is never valid to write to the kernel arguments, as this would corrupt the inputs seen by other dispatches of the kernel. These argumets are also not in the same address space as the stack, so a copy is needed to an alloca. From a source C-like language, the kernel parameters are invisible. Semantically, a copy is always required from the constant argument memory to a mutable variable. The current clang calling convention lowering emits raw values, including aggregates into the function argument list, since using byval would not make sense. This has some unfortunate consequences for the optimizer. In the aggregate case, we end up with an aggregate store to alloca, which both SROA and instcombine turn into a store of each aggregate field. The optimizer never pieces this back together to see that this is really just a copy from constant memory, so we end up stuck with expensive stack usage. This also means the backend dictates the alignment of arguments, and arbitrarily picks the LLVM IR ABI type alignment. By allowing an explicit alignment, frontends can make better decisions. For example, there's real no advantage to an aligment higher than 4, so a frontend could choose to compact the argument layout. Similarly, there is a high penalty to using an alignment lower than 4, so a frontend could opt into more padding for small arguments. Another design consideration is when it is appropriate to expose the fact that these arguments are all really passed in adjacent memory. Currently we have a late IR optimization pass in codegen to rewrite the kernel argument values into explicit loads to enable vectorization. In most programs, unrelated argument loads can be merged together. However, exposing this property directly from the frontend has some disadvantages. We still need a way to track the original argument sizes and alignments to report to the driver. I find using some side-channel, metadata mechanism to track this unappealing. If the kernel arguments were exposed as a single buffer to begin with, alias analysis would be unaware that the padding bits betewen arguments are meaningless. Another family of problems is there are still some gaps in replacing all of the available parameter attributes with metadata equivalents once lowered to loads. The immediate plan is to start using this new attribute to handle all aggregate argumets for kernels. Long term, it makes sense to migrate all kernel arguments, including scalars, to be passed indirectly in the same manner. Additional context is in D79744.
2020-06-06 04:58:47 +08:00
* Added the ``byref`` attribute to better represent argument passing
for the `amdgpu_kernel` calling convention.
Changes to building LLVM
------------------------
Changes to the ARM Backend
--------------------------
During this release ...
Changes to the MIPS Target
--------------------------
During this release ...
Changes to the PowerPC Target
-----------------------------
During this release ...
Changes to the X86 Target
-------------------------
During this release ...
* The 'mpx' feature was removed from the backend. It had been removed from clang
frontend in 10.0. Mention of the 'mpx' feature in an IR file will print a
message to stderr, but IR should still compile.
Changes to the AMDGPU Target
-----------------------------
During this release ...
IR: Define byref parameter attribute This allows tracking the in-memory type of a pointer argument to a function for ABI purposes. This is essentially a stripped down version of byval to remove some of the stack-copy implications in its definition. This includes the base IR changes, and some tests for places where it should be treated similarly to byval. Codegen support will be in a future patch. My original attempt at solving some of these problems was to repurpose byval with a different address space from the stack. However, it is technically permitted for the callee to introduce a write to the argument, although nothing does this in reality. There is also talk of removing and replacing the byval attribute, so a new attribute would need to take its place anyway. This is intended avoid some optimization issues with the current handling of aggregate arguments, as well as fixes inflexibilty in how frontends can specify the kernel ABI. The most honest representation of the amdgpu_kernel convention is to expose all kernel arguments as loads from constant memory. Today, these are raw, SSA Argument values and codegen is responsible for turning these into loads. Background: There currently isn't a satisfactory way to represent how arguments for the amdgpu_kernel calling convention are passed. In reality, arguments are passed in a single, flat, constant memory buffer implicitly passed to the function. It is also illegal to call this function in the IR, and this is only ever invoked by a driver of some kind. It does not make sense to have a stack passed parameter in this context as is implied by byval. It is never valid to write to the kernel arguments, as this would corrupt the inputs seen by other dispatches of the kernel. These argumets are also not in the same address space as the stack, so a copy is needed to an alloca. From a source C-like language, the kernel parameters are invisible. Semantically, a copy is always required from the constant argument memory to a mutable variable. The current clang calling convention lowering emits raw values, including aggregates into the function argument list, since using byval would not make sense. This has some unfortunate consequences for the optimizer. In the aggregate case, we end up with an aggregate store to alloca, which both SROA and instcombine turn into a store of each aggregate field. The optimizer never pieces this back together to see that this is really just a copy from constant memory, so we end up stuck with expensive stack usage. This also means the backend dictates the alignment of arguments, and arbitrarily picks the LLVM IR ABI type alignment. By allowing an explicit alignment, frontends can make better decisions. For example, there's real no advantage to an aligment higher than 4, so a frontend could choose to compact the argument layout. Similarly, there is a high penalty to using an alignment lower than 4, so a frontend could opt into more padding for small arguments. Another design consideration is when it is appropriate to expose the fact that these arguments are all really passed in adjacent memory. Currently we have a late IR optimization pass in codegen to rewrite the kernel argument values into explicit loads to enable vectorization. In most programs, unrelated argument loads can be merged together. However, exposing this property directly from the frontend has some disadvantages. We still need a way to track the original argument sizes and alignments to report to the driver. I find using some side-channel, metadata mechanism to track this unappealing. If the kernel arguments were exposed as a single buffer to begin with, alias analysis would be unaware that the padding bits betewen arguments are meaningless. Another family of problems is there are still some gaps in replacing all of the available parameter attributes with metadata equivalents once lowered to loads. The immediate plan is to start using this new attribute to handle all aggregate argumets for kernels. Long term, it makes sense to migrate all kernel arguments, including scalars, to be passed indirectly in the same manner. Additional context is in D79744.
2020-06-06 04:58:47 +08:00
* The new ``byref`` attribute is now the preferred method for
representing aggregate kernel arguments.
Changes to the AVR Target
-----------------------------
During this release ...
Changes to the WebAssembly Target
---------------------------------
During this release ...
Changes to the OCaml bindings
-----------------------------
Changes to the C API
--------------------
Changes to the Go bindings
--------------------------
Changes to the DAG infrastructure
---------------------------------
Changes to the Debug Info
---------------------------------
During this release ...
Changes to the LLVM tools
---------------------------------
* llvm-readobj and llvm-readelf behavior has changed to report an error when
executed with no input files instead of reading an input from stdin.
Reading from stdin can still be achieved by specifying `-` as an input file.
Changes to LLDB
---------------------------------
External Open Source Projects Using LLVM 12
===========================================
* A project...
Additional Information
======================
A wide variety of additional information is available on the `LLVM web page
<https://llvm.org/>`_, in particular in the `documentation
<https://llvm.org/docs/>`_ section. The web page also contains versions of the
API documentation which is up-to-date with the Git version of the source
code. You can access versions of these documents specific to this release by
going into the ``llvm/docs/`` directory in the LLVM tree.
If you have any questions or comments about LLVM, please feel free to contact
us via the `mailing lists <https://llvm.org/docs/#mailing-lists>`_.