2018-04-21 05:24:08 +08:00
|
|
|
// REQUIRES: x86
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-24 18:15:50 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64-unknown-linux %s -o %t.o
|
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64-unknown-linux %p/Inputs/shared.s -o %t2.o
|
|
|
|
// RUN: ld.lld -shared %t2.o -o %t2.so
|
2018-04-21 05:24:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// RUN: ld.lld %t.o %t2.so -z now -z norelro -z relro -o %t
|
2019-05-01 14:02:16 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-readelf -l %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=FULLRELRO %s
|
2018-04-21 05:24:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// RUN: ld.lld %t.o %t2.so -z norelro -z relro -o %t
|
2019-05-01 14:02:16 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-readelf -l %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=PARTRELRO %s
|
2018-04-21 05:24:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-11-24 18:15:50 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: ld.lld %t.o %t2.so -z norelro -o %t
|
2019-05-01 14:02:16 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-readelf -l %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=NORELRO %s
|
2015-11-24 18:15:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 07:52:21 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: Program Headers:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Type
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: PHDR
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: LOAD
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: LOAD
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: LOAD
|
[ELF] Split RW PT_LOAD on the PT_GNU_RELRO boundary
Summary:
Based on Peter Collingbourne's suggestion in D56828.
Before D56828: PT_LOAD(.data PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) .bss)
Old: PT_LOAD(PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) .data .bss)
New: PT_LOAD(PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro)) PT_LOAD(.data. .bss)
The new layout reflects the runtime memory mappings.
By having two PT_LOAD segments, we can utilize the NOBITS part of the
first PT_LOAD and save bytes for .bss.rel.ro.
.bss.rel.ro is currently small and only used by copy relocations of
symbols in read-only segments, but it can be used for other purposes in
the future, e.g. if a relro section's statically relocated data is all
zeros, we can move it to .bss.rel.ro.
Reviewers: espindola, ruiu, pcc
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, kbarton, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58892
llvm-svn: 356226
2019-03-15 09:29:57 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: LOAD
|
2016-12-13 07:52:21 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: DYNAMIC
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: GNU_RELRO
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: Section to Segment mapping:
|
2015-11-24 18:15:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
[ELF] Split RW PT_LOAD on the PT_GNU_RELRO boundary
Summary:
Based on Peter Collingbourne's suggestion in D56828.
Before D56828: PT_LOAD(.data PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) .bss)
Old: PT_LOAD(PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro) .data .bss)
New: PT_LOAD(PT_GNU_RELRO(.data.rel.ro .bss.rel.ro)) PT_LOAD(.data. .bss)
The new layout reflects the runtime memory mappings.
By having two PT_LOAD segments, we can utilize the NOBITS part of the
first PT_LOAD and save bytes for .bss.rel.ro.
.bss.rel.ro is currently small and only used by copy relocations of
symbols in read-only segments, but it can be used for other purposes in
the future, e.g. if a relro section's statically relocated data is all
zeros, we can move it to .bss.rel.ro.
Reviewers: espindola, ruiu, pcc
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, kbarton, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58892
llvm-svn: 356226
2019-03-15 09:29:57 +08:00
|
|
|
// FULLRELRO: 03 .openbsd.randomdata .dynamic .got .got.plt {{$}}
|
|
|
|
// PARTRELRO: 03 .openbsd.randomdata .dynamic .got {{$}}
|
2015-11-24 18:15:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 07:52:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// NORELRO-NOT: GNU_RELRO
|
2015-11-24 18:15:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.global _start
|
|
|
|
_start:
|
|
|
|
.long bar
|
2016-05-06 03:41:49 +08:00
|
|
|
jmp *bar2@GOTPCREL(%rip)
|
2015-11-24 18:15:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.section .data,"aw"
|
|
|
|
.quad 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.zero 4
|
|
|
|
.section .foo,"aw"
|
|
|
|
.section .bss,"",@nobits
|
2016-12-20 19:28:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.section .openbsd.randomdata, "aw"
|
|
|
|
.quad 0
|