maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/IRMemoryMap.cpp

845 lines
26 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
//===-- IRMemoryMap.cpp -----------------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/IRMemoryMap.h"
Replicated the materialization logic for persistent variables in the Materializer. We don't use this code yet, but will soon once the other materializers are online. llvm-svn: 179390
2013-04-13 02:10:34 +08:00
#include "lldb/Core/DataBufferHeap.h"
#include "lldb/Core/DataExtractor.h"
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
#include "lldb/Core/Error.h"
#include "lldb/Core/Log.h"
Replicated the materialization logic for persistent variables in the Materializer. We don't use this code yet, but will soon once the other materializers are online. llvm-svn: 179390
2013-04-13 02:10:34 +08:00
#include "lldb/Core/Scalar.h"
Updated the FindSpace() algorithm to avoid the 0 page when it's unsafe. Previously we eliminated the randomized scheme for finding memory when the underlying process cannot allocate memory, and replaced it with an algorithm that starts the allocations at 00x. This was more determinstic, but runs into problems on embedded targets where the pages near 0x0 are in fact interesting memory. To deal with those cases, this patch does two things: - It makes the default fallback be an address that is less likely than 0x0 to contain interesting information. - Before falling back to this, it adds an algorithm that consults the GetMemoryRegionInfo() API to see if it can find an unmapped area. This should eliminate the randomness (and unpredictable memory accesseas) of the previous scheme while making expressions more likely to return correct results. <rdar://problem/25545573> llvm-svn: 272301
2016-06-10 04:22:25 +08:00
#include "lldb/Target/MemoryRegionInfo.h"
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
#include "lldb/Target/Process.h"
Replicated the materialization logic for persistent variables in the Materializer. We don't use this code yet, but will soon once the other materializers are online. llvm-svn: 179390
2013-04-13 02:10:34 +08:00
#include "lldb/Target/Target.h"
Updated the FindSpace() algorithm to avoid the 0 page when it's unsafe. Previously we eliminated the randomized scheme for finding memory when the underlying process cannot allocate memory, and replaced it with an algorithm that starts the allocations at 00x. This was more determinstic, but runs into problems on embedded targets where the pages near 0x0 are in fact interesting memory. To deal with those cases, this patch does two things: - It makes the default fallback be an address that is less likely than 0x0 to contain interesting information. - Before falling back to this, it adds an algorithm that consults the GetMemoryRegionInfo() API to see if it can find an unmapped area. This should eliminate the randomness (and unpredictable memory accesseas) of the previous scheme while making expressions more likely to return correct results. <rdar://problem/25545573> llvm-svn: 272301
2016-06-10 04:22:25 +08:00
#include "lldb/Utility/LLDBAssert.h"
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
using namespace lldb_private;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
IRMemoryMap::IRMemoryMap(lldb::TargetSP target_sp) : m_target_wp(target_sp) {
if (target_sp)
m_process_wp = target_sp->GetProcessSP();
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
IRMemoryMap::~IRMemoryMap() {
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (process_sp) {
AllocationMap::iterator iter;
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Error err;
Updated the FindSpace() algorithm to avoid the 0 page when it's unsafe. Previously we eliminated the randomized scheme for finding memory when the underlying process cannot allocate memory, and replaced it with an algorithm that starts the allocations at 00x. This was more determinstic, but runs into problems on embedded targets where the pages near 0x0 are in fact interesting memory. To deal with those cases, this patch does two things: - It makes the default fallback be an address that is less likely than 0x0 to contain interesting information. - Before falling back to this, it adds an algorithm that consults the GetMemoryRegionInfo() API to see if it can find an unmapped area. This should eliminate the randomness (and unpredictable memory accesseas) of the previous scheme while making expressions more likely to return correct results. <rdar://problem/25545573> llvm-svn: 272301
2016-06-10 04:22:25 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
while ((iter = m_allocations.begin()) != m_allocations.end()) {
err.Clear();
if (iter->second.m_leak)
m_allocations.erase(iter);
else
Free(iter->first, err);
}
}
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::addr_t IRMemoryMap::FindSpace(size_t size) {
// The FindSpace algorithm's job is to find a region of memory that the
// underlying process is unlikely to be using.
//
// The memory returned by this function will never be written to. The only
// point is that it should not shadow process memory if possible, so that
// expressions processing real values from the process do not use the
// wrong data.
//
// If the process can in fact allocate memory (CanJIT() lets us know this)
// then this can be accomplished just be allocating memory in the inferior.
// Then no guessing is required.
lldb::TargetSP target_sp = m_target_wp.lock();
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
const bool process_is_alive = process_sp && process_sp->IsAlive();
lldb::addr_t ret = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
if (size == 0)
return ret;
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (process_is_alive && process_sp->CanJIT()) {
Error alloc_error;
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
ret = process_sp->AllocateMemory(size, lldb::ePermissionsReadable |
lldb::ePermissionsWritable,
alloc_error);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (!alloc_error.Success())
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
Updated the FindSpace() algorithm to avoid the 0 page when it's unsafe. Previously we eliminated the randomized scheme for finding memory when the underlying process cannot allocate memory, and replaced it with an algorithm that starts the allocations at 00x. This was more determinstic, but runs into problems on embedded targets where the pages near 0x0 are in fact interesting memory. To deal with those cases, this patch does two things: - It makes the default fallback be an address that is less likely than 0x0 to contain interesting information. - Before falling back to this, it adds an algorithm that consults the GetMemoryRegionInfo() API to see if it can find an unmapped area. This should eliminate the randomness (and unpredictable memory accesseas) of the previous scheme while making expressions more likely to return correct results. <rdar://problem/25545573> llvm-svn: 272301
2016-06-10 04:22:25 +08:00
else
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return ret;
}
// At this point we know that we need to hunt.
//
// First, go to the end of the existing allocations we've made if there are
// any allocations. Otherwise start at the beginning of memory.
if (m_allocations.empty()) {
ret = 0x0;
} else {
auto back = m_allocations.rbegin();
lldb::addr_t addr = back->first;
size_t alloc_size = back->second.m_size;
ret = llvm::alignTo(addr + alloc_size, 4096);
}
// Now, if it's possible to use the GetMemoryRegionInfo API to detect mapped
// regions, walk forward through memory until a region is found that
// has adequate space for our allocation.
if (process_is_alive) {
const uint64_t end_of_memory = process_sp->GetAddressByteSize() == 8
? 0xffffffffffffffffull
: 0xffffffffull;
lldbassert(process_sp->GetAddressByteSize() == 4 ||
end_of_memory != 0xffffffffull);
MemoryRegionInfo region_info;
Error err = process_sp->GetMemoryRegionInfo(ret, region_info);
if (err.Success()) {
while (true) {
if (region_info.GetReadable() != MemoryRegionInfo::OptionalBool::eNo ||
region_info.GetWritable() != MemoryRegionInfo::OptionalBool::eNo ||
region_info.GetExecutable() !=
MemoryRegionInfo::OptionalBool::eNo) {
if (region_info.GetRange().GetRangeEnd() - 1 >= end_of_memory) {
ret = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
break;
} else {
ret = region_info.GetRange().GetRangeEnd();
}
} else if (ret + size < region_info.GetRange().GetRangeEnd()) {
return ret;
} else {
// ret stays the same. We just need to walk a bit further.
Updated the FindSpace() algorithm to avoid the 0 page when it's unsafe. Previously we eliminated the randomized scheme for finding memory when the underlying process cannot allocate memory, and replaced it with an algorithm that starts the allocations at 00x. This was more determinstic, but runs into problems on embedded targets where the pages near 0x0 are in fact interesting memory. To deal with those cases, this patch does two things: - It makes the default fallback be an address that is less likely than 0x0 to contain interesting information. - Before falling back to this, it adds an algorithm that consults the GetMemoryRegionInfo() API to see if it can find an unmapped area. This should eliminate the randomness (and unpredictable memory accesseas) of the previous scheme while making expressions more likely to return correct results. <rdar://problem/25545573> llvm-svn: 272301
2016-06-10 04:22:25 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
err = process_sp->GetMemoryRegionInfo(
region_info.GetRange().GetRangeEnd(), region_info);
if (err.Fail()) {
Silence some -Wstring-conversion warnings lldbassert(!"foo") -> lldbassert(0 && "foo") In one case, this actually detected a logic error in the assertion (missing !). llvm-svn: 291102
2017-01-05 21:18:42 +08:00
lldbassert(0 && "GetMemoryRegionInfo() succeeded, then failed");
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
ret = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
break;
Updated the FindSpace() algorithm to avoid the 0 page when it's unsafe. Previously we eliminated the randomized scheme for finding memory when the underlying process cannot allocate memory, and replaced it with an algorithm that starts the allocations at 00x. This was more determinstic, but runs into problems on embedded targets where the pages near 0x0 are in fact interesting memory. To deal with those cases, this patch does two things: - It makes the default fallback be an address that is less likely than 0x0 to contain interesting information. - Before falling back to this, it adds an algorithm that consults the GetMemoryRegionInfo() API to see if it can find an unmapped area. This should eliminate the randomness (and unpredictable memory accesseas) of the previous scheme while making expressions more likely to return correct results. <rdar://problem/25545573> llvm-svn: 272301
2016-06-10 04:22:25 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
Updated the FindSpace() algorithm to avoid the 0 page when it's unsafe. Previously we eliminated the randomized scheme for finding memory when the underlying process cannot allocate memory, and replaced it with an algorithm that starts the allocations at 00x. This was more determinstic, but runs into problems on embedded targets where the pages near 0x0 are in fact interesting memory. To deal with those cases, this patch does two things: - It makes the default fallback be an address that is less likely than 0x0 to contain interesting information. - Before falling back to this, it adds an algorithm that consults the GetMemoryRegionInfo() API to see if it can find an unmapped area. This should eliminate the randomness (and unpredictable memory accesseas) of the previous scheme while making expressions more likely to return correct results. <rdar://problem/25545573> llvm-svn: 272301
2016-06-10 04:22:25 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
// We've tried our algorithm, and it didn't work. Now we have to reset back
// to the end of the allocations we've already reported, or use a 'sensible'
// default if this is our first allocation.
if (m_allocations.empty()) {
uint32_t address_byte_size = GetAddressByteSize();
if (address_byte_size != UINT32_MAX) {
switch (address_byte_size) {
case 8:
ret = 0xffffffff00000000ull;
break;
case 4:
ret = 0xee000000ull;
break;
default:
break;
}
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
} else {
auto back = m_allocations.rbegin();
lldb::addr_t addr = back->first;
size_t alloc_size = back->second.m_size;
ret = llvm::alignTo(addr + alloc_size, 4096);
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return ret;
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
IRMemoryMap::AllocationMap::iterator
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
IRMemoryMap::FindAllocation(lldb::addr_t addr, size_t size) {
if (addr == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS)
return m_allocations.end();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
AllocationMap::iterator iter = m_allocations.lower_bound(addr);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (iter == m_allocations.end() || iter->first > addr) {
if (iter == m_allocations.begin())
return m_allocations.end();
iter--;
}
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (iter->first <= addr && iter->first + iter->second.m_size >= addr + size)
return iter;
Fix a bug in the IRMemoryMap which generated bogus allocations. Previously, only the starting locations of the candidate interval and the existing interval were compared. To correctly detect range intersections, it is necessary to compare the entire range of both intervals against each other. Reviewed by: scallanan Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4286 llvm-svn: 211726
2014-06-26 02:37:19 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return m_allocations.end();
}
Fix a bug in the IRMemoryMap which generated bogus allocations. Previously, only the starting locations of the candidate interval and the existing interval were compared. To correctly detect range intersections, it is necessary to compare the entire range of both intervals against each other. Reviewed by: scallanan Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4286 llvm-svn: 211726
2014-06-26 02:37:19 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool IRMemoryMap::IntersectsAllocation(lldb::addr_t addr, size_t size) const {
if (addr == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS)
Made IRMemoryMap::FindSpace a little cleverer, and made attempts to allocate memory in the process fall back to FindSpace and just allocate memory on the host (but with real-looking pointers, hence FindSpace) if the process doesn't allow allocation. This allows expressions to run on processes that don't support allocation, like core files. This introduces an extremely rare potential problem: If all of the following are true: - The Process doesn't support allocation; - the user writes an expression that refers to an address that does not yet map to anything, or is dynamically generated (e.g., the result of calling a function); and - the randomly-selected address for the static data for that specific expression runs into the address the user was expecting to work with; then dereferencing the pointer later results in the user seeing something unexpected. This is unlikely but possible; as a future piece of work, we should have processes be able to hint to the expression parser where it can allocate temporary data of this kind. llvm-svn: 179827
2013-04-19 09:51:24 +08:00
return false;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
AllocationMap::const_iterator iter = m_allocations.lower_bound(addr);
// Since we only know that the returned interval begins at a location greater
// than or
// equal to where the given interval begins, it's possible that the given
// interval
// intersects either the returned interval or the previous interval. Thus, we
// need to
// check both. Note that we only need to check these two intervals. Since all
// intervals
// are disjoint it is not possible that an adjacent interval does not
// intersect, but a
// non-adjacent interval does intersect.
if (iter != m_allocations.end()) {
if (AllocationsIntersect(addr, size, iter->second.m_process_start,
iter->second.m_size))
return true;
}
if (iter != m_allocations.begin()) {
--iter;
if (AllocationsIntersect(addr, size, iter->second.m_process_start,
iter->second.m_size))
return true;
}
return false;
Made IRMemoryMap::FindSpace a little cleverer, and made attempts to allocate memory in the process fall back to FindSpace and just allocate memory on the host (but with real-looking pointers, hence FindSpace) if the process doesn't allow allocation. This allows expressions to run on processes that don't support allocation, like core files. This introduces an extremely rare potential problem: If all of the following are true: - The Process doesn't support allocation; - the user writes an expression that refers to an address that does not yet map to anything, or is dynamically generated (e.g., the result of calling a function); and - the randomly-selected address for the static data for that specific expression runs into the address the user was expecting to work with; then dereferencing the pointer later results in the user seeing something unexpected. This is unlikely but possible; as a future piece of work, we should have processes be able to hint to the expression parser where it can allocate temporary data of this kind. llvm-svn: 179827
2013-04-19 09:51:24 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool IRMemoryMap::AllocationsIntersect(lldb::addr_t addr1, size_t size1,
lldb::addr_t addr2, size_t size2) {
// Given two half open intervals [A, B) and [X, Y), the only 6 permutations
// that satisfy
Fix a bug in the IRMemoryMap which generated bogus allocations. Previously, only the starting locations of the candidate interval and the existing interval were compared. To correctly detect range intersections, it is necessary to compare the entire range of both intervals against each other. Reviewed by: scallanan Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4286 llvm-svn: 211726
2014-06-26 02:37:19 +08:00
// A<B and X<Y are the following:
// A B X Y
// A X B Y (intersects)
// A X Y B (intersects)
// X A B Y (intersects)
// X A Y B (intersects)
// X Y A B
// The first is B <= X, and the last is Y <= A.
// So the condition is !(B <= X || Y <= A)), or (X < B && A < Y)
return (addr2 < (addr1 + size1)) && (addr1 < (addr2 + size2));
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::ByteOrder IRMemoryMap::GetByteOrder() {
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (process_sp)
return process_sp->GetByteOrder();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::TargetSP target_sp = m_target_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (target_sp)
return target_sp->GetArchitecture().GetByteOrder();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return lldb::eByteOrderInvalid;
Replicated the materialization logic for persistent variables in the Materializer. We don't use this code yet, but will soon once the other materializers are online. llvm-svn: 179390
2013-04-13 02:10:34 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
uint32_t IRMemoryMap::GetAddressByteSize() {
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (process_sp)
return process_sp->GetAddressByteSize();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::TargetSP target_sp = m_target_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (target_sp)
return target_sp->GetArchitecture().GetAddressByteSize();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return UINT32_MAX;
Replicated the materialization logic for persistent variables in the Materializer. We don't use this code yet, but will soon once the other materializers are online. llvm-svn: 179390
2013-04-13 02:10:34 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
ExecutionContextScope *IRMemoryMap::GetBestExecutionContextScope() const {
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (process_sp)
return process_sp.get();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::TargetSP target_sp = m_target_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (target_sp)
return target_sp.get();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return NULL;
Replicated the materialization logic for persistent variables in the Materializer. We don't use this code yet, but will soon once the other materializers are online. llvm-svn: 179390
2013-04-13 02:10:34 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
IRMemoryMap::Allocation::Allocation(lldb::addr_t process_alloc,
lldb::addr_t process_start, size_t size,
uint32_t permissions, uint8_t alignment,
AllocationPolicy policy)
: m_process_alloc(process_alloc), m_process_start(process_start),
m_size(size), m_permissions(permissions), m_alignment(alignment),
m_policy(policy), m_leak(false) {
switch (policy) {
default:
assert(0 && "We cannot reach this!");
case eAllocationPolicyHostOnly:
m_data.SetByteSize(size);
memset(m_data.GetBytes(), 0, size);
break;
case eAllocationPolicyProcessOnly:
break;
case eAllocationPolicyMirror:
m_data.SetByteSize(size);
memset(m_data.GetBytes(), 0, size);
break;
}
Simplified the management of the data buffer for an Allocation to reduce heap fragmentation and make the code less brittle (and to make some buildbots happier). llvm-svn: 179868
2013-04-20 01:44:40 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::addr_t IRMemoryMap::Malloc(size_t size, uint8_t alignment,
uint32_t permissions, AllocationPolicy policy,
bool zero_memory, Error &error) {
lldb_private::Log *log(
lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS));
error.Clear();
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp;
lldb::addr_t allocation_address = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
lldb::addr_t aligned_address = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
size_t alignment_mask = alignment - 1;
size_t allocation_size;
if (size == 0)
allocation_size = alignment;
else
allocation_size = (size & alignment_mask)
? ((size + alignment) & (~alignment_mask))
: size;
switch (policy) {
default:
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't malloc: invalid allocation policy");
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
case eAllocationPolicyHostOnly:
allocation_address = FindSpace(allocation_size);
if (allocation_address == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't malloc: address space is full");
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
}
break;
case eAllocationPolicyMirror:
process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
if (log)
log->Printf("IRMemoryMap::%s process_sp=0x%" PRIx64
", process_sp->CanJIT()=%s, process_sp->IsAlive()=%s",
__FUNCTION__, (lldb::addr_t)process_sp.get(),
process_sp && process_sp->CanJIT() ? "true" : "false",
process_sp && process_sp->IsAlive() ? "true" : "false");
if (process_sp && process_sp->CanJIT() && process_sp->IsAlive()) {
if (!zero_memory)
allocation_address =
process_sp->AllocateMemory(allocation_size, permissions, error);
else
allocation_address =
process_sp->CallocateMemory(allocation_size, permissions, error);
if (!error.Success())
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
} else {
if (log)
log->Printf("IRMemoryMap::%s switching to eAllocationPolicyHostOnly "
"due to failed condition (see previous expr log message)",
__FUNCTION__);
policy = eAllocationPolicyHostOnly;
allocation_address = FindSpace(allocation_size);
if (allocation_address == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't malloc: address space is full");
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
}
break;
case eAllocationPolicyProcessOnly:
process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
if (process_sp) {
if (process_sp->CanJIT() && process_sp->IsAlive()) {
if (!zero_memory)
allocation_address =
process_sp->AllocateMemory(allocation_size, permissions, error);
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
else
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
allocation_address =
process_sp->CallocateMemory(allocation_size, permissions, error);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (!error.Success())
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
} else {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString(
"Couldn't malloc: process doesn't support allocating memory");
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
}
} else {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't malloc: process doesn't exist, and this "
"memory must be in the process");
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
}
break;
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::addr_t mask = alignment - 1;
aligned_address = (allocation_address + mask) & (~mask);
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
m_allocations[aligned_address] =
Allocation(allocation_address, aligned_address, allocation_size,
permissions, alignment, policy);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (zero_memory) {
Error write_error;
std::vector<uint8_t> zero_buf(size, 0);
WriteMemory(aligned_address, zero_buf.data(), size, write_error);
}
Fixed a problem in IRMemoryMap where the flag to zero out memory was ignored. llvm-svn: 272320
2016-06-10 06:22:40 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (log) {
const char *policy_string;
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
switch (policy) {
default:
policy_string = "<invalid policy>";
break;
case eAllocationPolicyHostOnly:
policy_string = "eAllocationPolicyHostOnly";
break;
case eAllocationPolicyProcessOnly:
policy_string = "eAllocationPolicyProcessOnly";
break;
case eAllocationPolicyMirror:
policy_string = "eAllocationPolicyMirror";
break;
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
log->Printf("IRMemoryMap::Malloc (%" PRIu64 ", 0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64
", %s) -> 0x%" PRIx64,
(uint64_t)allocation_size, (uint64_t)alignment,
(uint64_t)permissions, policy_string, aligned_address);
}
return aligned_address;
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void IRMemoryMap::Leak(lldb::addr_t process_address, Error &error) {
error.Clear();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
AllocationMap::iterator iter = m_allocations.find(process_address);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (iter == m_allocations.end()) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't leak: allocation doesn't exist");
return;
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Allocation &allocation = iter->second;
Fixed a bug where persistent variables did not live as long as they needed to. This led to equality tests involving persistent variables often failing or succeeding when they had no business doing so. To do this, I introduced the ability for a memory allocation to "leak" - that is, to persist in the process beyond the lifetime of the expression. Hand-declared persistent variables do this now. <rdar://problem/13956311> llvm-svn: 182528
2013-05-23 06:49:06 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
allocation.m_leak = true;
Fixed a bug where persistent variables did not live as long as they needed to. This led to equality tests involving persistent variables often failing or succeeding when they had no business doing so. To do this, I introduced the ability for a memory allocation to "leak" - that is, to persist in the process beyond the lifetime of the expression. Hand-declared persistent variables do this now. <rdar://problem/13956311> llvm-svn: 182528
2013-05-23 06:49:06 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void IRMemoryMap::Free(lldb::addr_t process_address, Error &error) {
error.Clear();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
AllocationMap::iterator iter = m_allocations.find(process_address);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (iter == m_allocations.end()) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't free: allocation doesn't exist");
return;
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Allocation &allocation = iter->second;
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
switch (allocation.m_policy) {
default:
case eAllocationPolicyHostOnly: {
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
if (process_sp) {
if (process_sp->CanJIT() && process_sp->IsAlive())
process_sp->DeallocateMemory(
allocation.m_process_alloc); // FindSpace allocated this for real
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
break;
}
case eAllocationPolicyMirror:
case eAllocationPolicyProcessOnly: {
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
if (process_sp)
process_sp->DeallocateMemory(allocation.m_process_alloc);
}
}
if (lldb_private::Log *log =
lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS)) {
log->Printf("IRMemoryMap::Free (0x%" PRIx64 ") freed [0x%" PRIx64
"..0x%" PRIx64 ")",
(uint64_t)process_address, iter->second.m_process_start,
iter->second.m_process_start + iter->second.m_size);
}
m_allocations.erase(iter);
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool IRMemoryMap::GetAllocSize(lldb::addr_t address, size_t &size) {
AllocationMap::iterator iter = FindAllocation(address, size);
if (iter == m_allocations.end())
return false;
Expression evaluation, a new ThreadPlanCallFunctionUsingABI for executing a function call on target via register manipulation For Hexagon we want to be able to call functions during debugging, however currently lldb only supports this when there is JIT support. Although emulation using IR interpretation is an alternative, it is currently limited in that it can't make function calls. In this patch we have extended the IR interpreter so that it can execute a function call on the target using register manipulation. To do this we need to handle the Call IR instruction, passing arguments to a new thread plan and collecting any return values to pass back into the IR interpreter. The new thread plan is needed to call an alternative ABI interface of "ABI::PerpareTrivialCall()", allowing more detailed information about arguments and return values. Reviewers: jingham, spyffe Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits, ted, ADodds, deepak2427 Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9404 llvm-svn: 242137
2015-07-14 18:56:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Allocation &al = iter->second;
Expression evaluation, a new ThreadPlanCallFunctionUsingABI for executing a function call on target via register manipulation For Hexagon we want to be able to call functions during debugging, however currently lldb only supports this when there is JIT support. Although emulation using IR interpretation is an alternative, it is currently limited in that it can't make function calls. In this patch we have extended the IR interpreter so that it can execute a function call on the target using register manipulation. To do this we need to handle the Call IR instruction, passing arguments to a new thread plan and collecting any return values to pass back into the IR interpreter. The new thread plan is needed to call an alternative ABI interface of "ABI::PerpareTrivialCall()", allowing more detailed information about arguments and return values. Reviewers: jingham, spyffe Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits, ted, ADodds, deepak2427 Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9404 llvm-svn: 242137
2015-07-14 18:56:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (address > (al.m_process_start + al.m_size)) {
size = 0;
return false;
}
Expression evaluation, a new ThreadPlanCallFunctionUsingABI for executing a function call on target via register manipulation For Hexagon we want to be able to call functions during debugging, however currently lldb only supports this when there is JIT support. Although emulation using IR interpretation is an alternative, it is currently limited in that it can't make function calls. In this patch we have extended the IR interpreter so that it can execute a function call on the target using register manipulation. To do this we need to handle the Call IR instruction, passing arguments to a new thread plan and collecting any return values to pass back into the IR interpreter. The new thread plan is needed to call an alternative ABI interface of "ABI::PerpareTrivialCall()", allowing more detailed information about arguments and return values. Reviewers: jingham, spyffe Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits, ted, ADodds, deepak2427 Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9404 llvm-svn: 242137
2015-07-14 18:56:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (address > al.m_process_start) {
int dif = address - al.m_process_start;
size = al.m_size - dif;
Expression evaluation, a new ThreadPlanCallFunctionUsingABI for executing a function call on target via register manipulation For Hexagon we want to be able to call functions during debugging, however currently lldb only supports this when there is JIT support. Although emulation using IR interpretation is an alternative, it is currently limited in that it can't make function calls. In this patch we have extended the IR interpreter so that it can execute a function call on the target using register manipulation. To do this we need to handle the Call IR instruction, passing arguments to a new thread plan and collecting any return values to pass back into the IR interpreter. The new thread plan is needed to call an alternative ABI interface of "ABI::PerpareTrivialCall()", allowing more detailed information about arguments and return values. Reviewers: jingham, spyffe Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits, ted, ADodds, deepak2427 Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9404 llvm-svn: 242137
2015-07-14 18:56:58 +08:00
return true;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
Expression evaluation, a new ThreadPlanCallFunctionUsingABI for executing a function call on target via register manipulation For Hexagon we want to be able to call functions during debugging, however currently lldb only supports this when there is JIT support. Although emulation using IR interpretation is an alternative, it is currently limited in that it can't make function calls. In this patch we have extended the IR interpreter so that it can execute a function call on the target using register manipulation. To do this we need to handle the Call IR instruction, passing arguments to a new thread plan and collecting any return values to pass back into the IR interpreter. The new thread plan is needed to call an alternative ABI interface of "ABI::PerpareTrivialCall()", allowing more detailed information about arguments and return values. Reviewers: jingham, spyffe Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits, ted, ADodds, deepak2427 Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9404 llvm-svn: 242137
2015-07-14 18:56:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
size = al.m_size;
return true;
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void IRMemoryMap::WriteMemory(lldb::addr_t process_address,
const uint8_t *bytes, size_t size, Error &error) {
error.Clear();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
AllocationMap::iterator iter = FindAllocation(process_address, size);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (iter == m_allocations.end()) {
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (process_sp) {
process_sp->WriteMemory(process_address, bytes, size, error);
return;
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't write: no allocation contains the target "
"range and the process doesn't exist");
return;
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Allocation &allocation = iter->second;
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
uint64_t offset = process_address - allocation.m_process_start;
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp;
switch (allocation.m_policy) {
default:
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't write: invalid allocation policy");
return;
case eAllocationPolicyHostOnly:
if (!allocation.m_data.GetByteSize()) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't write: data buffer is empty");
return;
}
::memcpy(allocation.m_data.GetBytes() + offset, bytes, size);
break;
case eAllocationPolicyMirror:
if (!allocation.m_data.GetByteSize()) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't write: data buffer is empty");
return;
}
::memcpy(allocation.m_data.GetBytes() + offset, bytes, size);
process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
if (process_sp) {
process_sp->WriteMemory(process_address, bytes, size, error);
if (!error.Success())
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
return;
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
break;
case eAllocationPolicyProcessOnly:
process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
if (process_sp) {
process_sp->WriteMemory(process_address, bytes, size, error);
if (!error.Success())
return;
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
break;
}
if (lldb_private::Log *log =
lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS)) {
log->Printf("IRMemoryMap::WriteMemory (0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64
", 0x%" PRId64 ") went to [0x%" PRIx64 "..0x%" PRIx64 ")",
(uint64_t)process_address, (uint64_t)bytes, (uint64_t)size,
(uint64_t)allocation.m_process_start,
(uint64_t)allocation.m_process_start +
(uint64_t)allocation.m_size);
}
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void IRMemoryMap::WriteScalarToMemory(lldb::addr_t process_address,
Scalar &scalar, size_t size,
Error &error) {
error.Clear();
if (size == UINT32_MAX)
size = scalar.GetByteSize();
if (size > 0) {
uint8_t buf[32];
const size_t mem_size =
scalar.GetAsMemoryData(buf, size, GetByteOrder(), error);
if (mem_size > 0) {
return WriteMemory(process_address, buf, mem_size, error);
} else {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString(
"Couldn't write scalar: failed to get scalar as memory data");
}
} else {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't write scalar: its size was zero");
}
return;
Replicated the materialization logic for persistent variables in the Materializer. We don't use this code yet, but will soon once the other materializers are online. llvm-svn: 179390
2013-04-13 02:10:34 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void IRMemoryMap::WritePointerToMemory(lldb::addr_t process_address,
lldb::addr_t address, Error &error) {
error.Clear();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Scalar scalar(address);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
WriteScalarToMemory(process_address, scalar, GetAddressByteSize(), error);
Implemented materialization and dematerialization for variables in the new Materializer. This is much easier now that the ValueObject API is solid. I still have to implement reading bytes into a ValueObject, but committing what I have so far. This code is not yet used, so there will be fixes when I switch the expression parser over to use the new Materializer. llvm-svn: 179416
2013-04-13 05:40:34 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void IRMemoryMap::ReadMemory(uint8_t *bytes, lldb::addr_t process_address,
size_t size, Error &error) {
error.Clear();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
AllocationMap::iterator iter = FindAllocation(process_address, size);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (iter == m_allocations.end()) {
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (process_sp) {
process_sp->ReadMemory(process_address, bytes, size, error);
return;
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::TargetSP target_sp = m_target_wp.lock();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (target_sp) {
Address absolute_address(process_address);
target_sp->ReadMemory(absolute_address, false, bytes, size, error);
return;
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't read: no allocation contains the target "
"range, and neither the process nor the target exist");
return;
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Allocation &allocation = iter->second;
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
uint64_t offset = process_address - allocation.m_process_start;
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (offset > allocation.m_size) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't read: data is not in the allocation");
return;
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp;
switch (allocation.m_policy) {
default:
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't read: invalid allocation policy");
return;
case eAllocationPolicyHostOnly:
if (!allocation.m_data.GetByteSize()) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't read: data buffer is empty");
return;
}
if (allocation.m_data.GetByteSize() < offset + size) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't read: not enough underlying data");
return;
}
::memcpy(bytes, allocation.m_data.GetBytes() + offset, size);
break;
case eAllocationPolicyMirror:
process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
if (process_sp) {
process_sp->ReadMemory(process_address, bytes, size, error);
if (!error.Success())
return;
} else {
if (!allocation.m_data.GetByteSize()) {
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't read: data buffer is empty");
return;
}
::memcpy(bytes, allocation.m_data.GetBytes() + offset, size);
}
break;
case eAllocationPolicyProcessOnly:
process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
if (process_sp) {
process_sp->ReadMemory(process_address, bytes, size, error);
if (!error.Success())
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
return;
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
break;
}
if (lldb_private::Log *log =
lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS)) {
log->Printf("IRMemoryMap::ReadMemory (0x%" PRIx64 ", 0x%" PRIx64
", 0x%" PRId64 ") came from [0x%" PRIx64 "..0x%" PRIx64 ")",
(uint64_t)process_address, (uint64_t)bytes, (uint64_t)size,
(uint64_t)allocation.m_process_start,
(uint64_t)allocation.m_process_start +
(uint64_t)allocation.m_size);
}
Factored out memory access into the target process from IRExecutionUnit into a superclass called IRMemoryMap. IRMemoryMap handles all reading and writing, ensuring that areas are kept track of and memory is properly cached (and deleted). Also fixed several cases where we would simply leak binary data in the target process over time. Now the expression objects explicitly own their IRExecutionUnit and delete it when they go away. This is why I had to modify ClangUserExpression, ClangUtilityFunction, and ClangFunction. As a side effect of this, I am removing the JIT mutex for an IRMemoryMap. If it turns out that we need this mutex, I'll add it in then, but right now it's just adding complexity. This is part of a more general project to make expressions fully reusable. The next step is to make materialization and dematerialization use the IRMemoryMap API rather than writing and reading directly from the process's memory. This will allow the IR interpreter to use the same data, but in the host's memory, without having to use a different set of pointers. llvm-svn: 178832
2013-04-05 10:22:57 +08:00
}
Replicated the materialization logic for persistent variables in the Materializer. We don't use this code yet, but will soon once the other materializers are online. llvm-svn: 179390
2013-04-13 02:10:34 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void IRMemoryMap::ReadScalarFromMemory(Scalar &scalar,
lldb::addr_t process_address,
size_t size, Error &error) {
error.Clear();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (size > 0) {
DataBufferHeap buf(size, 0);
ReadMemory(buf.GetBytes(), process_address, size, error);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (!error.Success())
return;
Replicated the materialization logic for persistent variables in the Materializer. We don't use this code yet, but will soon once the other materializers are online. llvm-svn: 179390
2013-04-13 02:10:34 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
DataExtractor extractor(buf.GetBytes(), buf.GetByteSize(), GetByteOrder(),
GetAddressByteSize());
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
lldb::offset_t offset = 0;
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
switch (size) {
default:
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorStringWithFormat(
"Couldn't read scalar: unsupported size %" PRIu64, (uint64_t)size);
return;
case 1:
scalar = extractor.GetU8(&offset);
break;
case 2:
scalar = extractor.GetU16(&offset);
break;
case 4:
scalar = extractor.GetU32(&offset);
break;
case 8:
scalar = extractor.GetU64(&offset);
break;
}
} else {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't read scalar: its size was zero");
}
return;
}
void IRMemoryMap::ReadPointerFromMemory(lldb::addr_t *address,
lldb::addr_t process_address,
Error &error) {
error.Clear();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Scalar pointer_scalar;
ReadScalarFromMemory(pointer_scalar, process_address, GetAddressByteSize(),
error);
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (!error.Success())
Added logging to each entity in the Materializer to make debugging easier when things go wrong. llvm-svn: 179576
2013-04-16 06:48:23 +08:00
return;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
*address = pointer_scalar.ULongLong();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return;
}
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void IRMemoryMap::GetMemoryData(DataExtractor &extractor,
lldb::addr_t process_address, size_t size,
Error &error) {
error.Clear();
remove trailing whitespace + remove some useless comments llvm-svn: 212411
2014-07-07 01:54:58 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (size > 0) {
AllocationMap::iterator iter = FindAllocation(process_address, size);
if (iter == m_allocations.end()) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorStringWithFormat(
"Couldn't find an allocation containing [0x%" PRIx64 "..0x%" PRIx64
")",
process_address, process_address + size);
return;
Now that ValueObjects permit writing, made the Materializer use that API when dematerializing variables. llvm-svn: 179443
2013-04-13 10:06:42 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Allocation &allocation = iter->second;
switch (allocation.m_policy) {
default:
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString(
"Couldn't get memory data: invalid allocation policy");
return;
case eAllocationPolicyProcessOnly:
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString(
"Couldn't get memory data: memory is only in the target");
return;
case eAllocationPolicyMirror: {
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp = m_process_wp.lock();
if (!allocation.m_data.GetByteSize()) {
Now that ValueObjects permit writing, made the Materializer use that API when dematerializing variables. llvm-svn: 179443
2013-04-13 10:06:42 +08:00
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't get memory data: data buffer is empty");
Now that ValueObjects permit writing, made the Materializer use that API when dematerializing variables. llvm-svn: 179443
2013-04-13 10:06:42 +08:00
return;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
if (process_sp) {
process_sp->ReadMemory(allocation.m_process_start,
allocation.m_data.GetBytes(),
allocation.m_data.GetByteSize(), error);
if (!error.Success())
return;
uint64_t offset = process_address - allocation.m_process_start;
extractor = DataExtractor(allocation.m_data.GetBytes() + offset, size,
GetByteOrder(), GetAddressByteSize());
return;
}
} break;
case eAllocationPolicyHostOnly:
if (!allocation.m_data.GetByteSize()) {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't get memory data: data buffer is empty");
return;
}
uint64_t offset = process_address - allocation.m_process_start;
extractor = DataExtractor(allocation.m_data.GetBytes() + offset, size,
GetByteOrder(), GetAddressByteSize());
return;
}
} else {
error.SetErrorToGenericError();
error.SetErrorString("Couldn't get memory data: its size was zero");
return;
}
Now that ValueObjects permit writing, made the Materializer use that API when dematerializing variables. llvm-svn: 179443
2013-04-13 10:06:42 +08:00
}