llvm-project/llvm/utils/TableGen/GlobalISelEmitter.cpp

542 lines
18 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- GlobalISelEmitter.cpp - Generate an instruction selector -----------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
/// \file
/// This tablegen backend emits code for use by the GlobalISel instruction
/// selector. See include/llvm/CodeGen/TargetGlobalISel.td.
///
/// This file analyzes the patterns recognized by the SelectionDAGISel tablegen
/// backend, filters out the ones that are unsupported, maps
/// SelectionDAG-specific constructs to their GlobalISel counterpart
/// (when applicable: MVT to LLT; SDNode to generic Instruction).
///
/// Not all patterns are supported: pass the tablegen invocation
/// "-warn-on-skipped-patterns" to emit a warning when a pattern is skipped,
/// as well as why.
///
/// The generated file defines a single method:
/// bool <Target>InstructionSelector::selectImpl(MachineInstr &I) const;
/// intended to be used in InstructionSelector::select as the first-step
/// selector for the patterns that don't require complex C++.
///
/// FIXME: We'll probably want to eventually define a base
/// "TargetGenInstructionSelector" class.
///
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "CodeGenDAGPatterns.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineValueType.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/TableGen/Error.h"
#include "llvm/TableGen/Record.h"
#include "llvm/TableGen/TableGenBackend.h"
#include <string>
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "gisel-emitter"
STATISTIC(NumPatternTotal, "Total number of patterns");
STATISTIC(NumPatternSkipped, "Number of patterns skipped");
STATISTIC(NumPatternEmitted, "Number of patterns emitted");
static cl::opt<bool> WarnOnSkippedPatterns(
"warn-on-skipped-patterns",
cl::desc("Explain why a pattern was skipped for inclusion "
"in the GlobalISel selector"),
cl::init(false));
namespace {
class GlobalISelEmitter {
public:
explicit GlobalISelEmitter(RecordKeeper &RK);
void run(raw_ostream &OS);
private:
const RecordKeeper &RK;
const CodeGenDAGPatterns CGP;
const CodeGenTarget &Target;
/// Keep track of the equivalence between SDNodes and Instruction.
/// This is defined using 'GINodeEquiv' in the target description.
DenseMap<Record *, const CodeGenInstruction *> NodeEquivs;
void gatherNodeEquivs();
const CodeGenInstruction *findNodeEquiv(Record *N);
struct SkipReason {
std::string Reason;
};
/// Analyze pattern \p P, possibly emitting matching code for it to \p OS.
/// Otherwise, return a reason why this pattern was skipped for emission.
Optional<SkipReason> runOnPattern(const PatternToMatch &P,
raw_ostream &OS);
};
} // end anonymous namespace
//===- Helper functions ---------------------------------------------------===//
/// Convert an MVT to an equivalent LLT if possible, or the invalid LLT() for
/// MVTs that don't map cleanly to an LLT (e.g., iPTR, *any, ...).
static Optional<std::string> MVTToLLT(MVT::SimpleValueType SVT) {
std::string TyStr;
raw_string_ostream OS(TyStr);
MVT VT(SVT);
if (VT.isVector() && VT.getVectorNumElements() != 1) {
OS << "LLT::vector(" << VT.getVectorNumElements() << ", "
<< VT.getScalarSizeInBits() << ")";
} else if (VT.isInteger() || VT.isFloatingPoint()) {
OS << "LLT::scalar(" << VT.getSizeInBits() << ")";
} else {
return None;
}
OS.flush();
return TyStr;
}
static bool isTrivialOperatorNode(const TreePatternNode *N) {
return !N->isLeaf() && !N->hasAnyPredicate() && !N->getTransformFn();
}
//===- Matchers -----------------------------------------------------------===//
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
template <class PredicateTy> class PredicateListMatcher {
private:
typedef std::vector<std::unique_ptr<PredicateTy>> PredicateVec;
PredicateVec Predicates;
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
public:
/// Construct a new operand predicate and add it to the matcher.
template <class Kind, class... Args>
Kind &addPredicate(Args&&... args) {
Predicates.emplace_back(
llvm::make_unique<Kind>(std::forward<Args>(args)...));
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
return *static_cast<Kind *>(Predicates.back().get());
}
typename PredicateVec::const_iterator predicates_begin() const { return Predicates.begin(); }
typename PredicateVec::const_iterator predicates_end() const { return Predicates.end(); }
iterator_range<typename PredicateVec::const_iterator> predicates() const {
return make_range(predicates_begin(), predicates_end());
}
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
/// Emit a C++ expression that tests whether all the predicates are met.
template <class... Args>
void emitCxxPredicateListExpr(raw_ostream &OS, Args &&... args) const {
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
if (Predicates.empty()) {
OS << "true";
return;
}
StringRef Separator = "";
for (const auto &Predicate : predicates()) {
OS << Separator << "(";
Predicate->emitCxxPredicateExpr(OS, std::forward<Args>(args)...);
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
OS << ")";
Separator = " && ";
}
}
};
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
/// Generates code to check a predicate of an operand.
///
/// Typical predicates include:
/// * Operand is a particular register.
/// * Operand is assigned a particular register bank.
/// * Operand is an MBB.
class OperandPredicateMatcher {
public:
virtual ~OperandPredicateMatcher() {}
/// Emit a C++ expression that checks the predicate for the OpIdx operand of
/// the instruction given in InsnVarName.
virtual void emitCxxPredicateExpr(raw_ostream &OS,
const StringRef InsnVarName,
unsigned OpIdx) const = 0;
};
/// Generates code to check that an operand is a particular LLT.
class LLTOperandMatcher : public OperandPredicateMatcher {
protected:
std::string Ty;
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
public:
LLTOperandMatcher(std::string Ty) : Ty(Ty) {}
void emitCxxPredicateExpr(raw_ostream &OS, const StringRef InsnVarName,
unsigned OpIdx) const override {
OS << "MRI.getType(" << InsnVarName << ".getOperand(" << OpIdx
<< ").getReg()) == (" << Ty << ")";
}
};
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
/// Generates code to check that an operand is in a particular register bank.
class RegisterBankOperandMatcher : public OperandPredicateMatcher {
protected:
const CodeGenRegisterClass &RC;
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
public:
RegisterBankOperandMatcher(const CodeGenRegisterClass &RC) : RC(RC) {}
void emitCxxPredicateExpr(raw_ostream &OS, const StringRef InsnVarName,
unsigned OpIdx) const override {
OS << "(&RBI.getRegBankFromRegClass(" << RC.getQualifiedName()
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
<< "RegClass) == RBI.getRegBank(" << InsnVarName << ".getOperand("
<< OpIdx << ").getReg(), MRI, TRI))";
}
};
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
/// Generates code to check that an operand is a basic block.
class MBBOperandMatcher : public OperandPredicateMatcher {
public:
void emitCxxPredicateExpr(raw_ostream &OS, const StringRef InsnVarName,
unsigned OpIdx) const override {
OS << InsnVarName << ".getOperand(" << OpIdx << ").isMBB()";
}
};
/// Generates code to check that a set of predicates match for a particular
/// operand.
class OperandMatcher : public PredicateListMatcher<OperandPredicateMatcher> {
protected:
unsigned OpIdx;
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
public:
OperandMatcher(unsigned OpIdx) : OpIdx(OpIdx) {}
/// Emit a C++ expression that tests whether the instruction named in
/// InsnVarName matches all the predicate and all the operands.
void emitCxxPredicateExpr(raw_ostream &OS, const StringRef InsnVarName) const {
OS << "(";
emitCxxPredicateListExpr(OS, InsnVarName, OpIdx);
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
OS << ")";
}
};
/// Generates code to check a predicate on an instruction.
///
/// Typical predicates include:
/// * The opcode of the instruction is a particular value.
/// * The nsw/nuw flag is/isn't set.
class InstructionPredicateMatcher {
public:
virtual ~InstructionPredicateMatcher() {}
/// Emit a C++ expression that tests whether the instruction named in
/// InsnVarName matches the predicate.
virtual void emitCxxPredicateExpr(raw_ostream &OS,
const StringRef InsnVarName) const = 0;
};
/// Generates code to check the opcode of an instruction.
class InstructionOpcodeMatcher : public InstructionPredicateMatcher {
protected:
const CodeGenInstruction *I;
public:
InstructionOpcodeMatcher(const CodeGenInstruction *I) : I(I) {}
void emitCxxPredicateExpr(raw_ostream &OS,
const StringRef InsnVarName) const override {
OS << InsnVarName << ".getOpcode() == " << I->Namespace
<< "::" << I->TheDef->getName();
}
};
/// Generates code to check that a set of predicates and operands match for a
/// particular instruction.
///
/// Typical predicates include:
/// * Has a specific opcode.
/// * Has an nsw/nuw flag or doesn't.
class InstructionMatcher
: public PredicateListMatcher<InstructionPredicateMatcher> {
protected:
std::vector<OperandMatcher> Operands;
public:
/// Add an operand to the matcher.
OperandMatcher &addOperand(unsigned OpIdx) {
Operands.emplace_back(OpIdx);
return Operands.back();
}
/// Emit a C++ expression that tests whether the instruction named in
/// InsnVarName matches all the predicates and all the operands.
void emitCxxPredicateExpr(raw_ostream &OS, const StringRef InsnVarName) const {
emitCxxPredicateListExpr(OS, InsnVarName);
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
for (const auto &Operand : Operands) {
OS << " && (";
Operand.emitCxxPredicateExpr(OS, InsnVarName);
OS << ")";
}
}
};
//===- Actions ------------------------------------------------------------===//
class MatchAction {
public:
virtual ~MatchAction() {}
virtual void emitCxxActionStmts(raw_ostream &OS) const = 0;
};
class MutateOpcodeAction : public MatchAction {
private:
const CodeGenInstruction *I;
public:
MutateOpcodeAction(const CodeGenInstruction *I) : I(I) {}
virtual void emitCxxActionStmts(raw_ostream &OS) const {
OS << "I.setDesc(TII.get(" << I->Namespace << "::" << I->TheDef->getName()
<< "));";
}
};
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
/// Generates code to check that a match rule matches.
///
/// This currently supports a single match position but could be extended to
/// support multiple positions to support div/rem fusion or load-multiple
/// instructions.
class RuleMatcher {
const PatternToMatch &P;
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
std::vector<std::unique_ptr<InstructionMatcher>> Matchers;
std::vector<std::unique_ptr<MatchAction>> Actions;
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
public:
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
RuleMatcher(const PatternToMatch &P) : P(P) {}
InstructionMatcher &addInstructionMatcher() {
Matchers.emplace_back(new InstructionMatcher());
return *Matchers.back();
}
template <class Kind, class... Args>
Kind &addAction(Args&&... args) {
Actions.emplace_back(llvm::make_unique<Kind>(std::forward<Args>(args)...));
return *static_cast<Kind *>(Actions.back().get());
}
void emit(raw_ostream &OS) {
if (Matchers.empty())
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected empty matcher!");
OS << " // Src: " << *P.getSrcPattern() << "\n"
<< " // Dst: " << *P.getDstPattern() << "\n";
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
// The representation supports rules that require multiple roots such as:
// %ptr(p0) = ...
// %elt0(s32) = G_LOAD %ptr
// %1(p0) = G_ADD %ptr, 4
// %elt1(s32) = G_LOAD p0 %1
// which could be usefully folded into:
// %ptr(p0) = ...
// %elt0(s32), %elt1(s32) = TGT_LOAD_PAIR %ptr
// on some targets but we don't need to make use of that yet.
assert(Matchers.size() == 1 && "Cannot handle multi-root matchers yet");
OS << " if (";
Matchers.front()->emitCxxPredicateExpr(OS, "I");
OS << ") {\n";
for (const auto &MA : Actions) {
OS << " ";
MA->emitCxxActionStmts(OS);
OS << "\n";
}
OS << " constrainSelectedInstRegOperands(I, TII, TRI, RBI);\n";
OS << " return true;\n";
OS << " }\n";
}
};
//===- GlobalISelEmitter class --------------------------------------------===//
void GlobalISelEmitter::gatherNodeEquivs() {
assert(NodeEquivs.empty());
for (Record *Equiv : RK.getAllDerivedDefinitions("GINodeEquiv"))
NodeEquivs[Equiv->getValueAsDef("Node")] =
&Target.getInstruction(Equiv->getValueAsDef("I"));
}
const CodeGenInstruction *GlobalISelEmitter::findNodeEquiv(Record *N) {
return NodeEquivs.lookup(N);
}
GlobalISelEmitter::GlobalISelEmitter(RecordKeeper &RK)
: RK(RK), CGP(RK), Target(CGP.getTargetInfo()) {}
//===- Emitter ------------------------------------------------------------===//
Optional<GlobalISelEmitter::SkipReason>
GlobalISelEmitter::runOnPattern(const PatternToMatch &P, raw_ostream &OS) {
// Keep track of the matchers and actions to emit.
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
RuleMatcher M(P);
// First, analyze the whole pattern.
// If the entire pattern has a predicate (e.g., target features), ignore it.
if (!P.getPredicates()->getValues().empty())
return SkipReason{"Pattern has a predicate"};
// Physreg imp-defs require additional logic. Ignore the pattern.
if (!P.getDstRegs().empty())
return SkipReason{"Pattern defines a physical register"};
// Next, analyze the pattern operators.
TreePatternNode *Src = P.getSrcPattern();
TreePatternNode *Dst = P.getDstPattern();
// If the root of either pattern isn't a simple operator, ignore it.
if (!isTrivialOperatorNode(Dst))
return SkipReason{"Dst pattern root isn't a trivial operator"};
if (!isTrivialOperatorNode(Src))
return SkipReason{"Src pattern root isn't a trivial operator"};
Record *DstOp = Dst->getOperator();
if (!DstOp->isSubClassOf("Instruction"))
return SkipReason{"Pattern operator isn't an instruction"};
auto &DstI = Target.getInstruction(DstOp);
auto SrcGIOrNull = findNodeEquiv(Src->getOperator());
if (!SrcGIOrNull)
return SkipReason{"Pattern operator lacks an equivalent Instruction"};
auto &SrcGI = *SrcGIOrNull;
// The operators look good: match the opcode and mutate it to the new one.
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
InstructionMatcher &InsnMatcher = M.addInstructionMatcher();
InsnMatcher.addPredicate<InstructionOpcodeMatcher>(&SrcGI);
M.addAction<MutateOpcodeAction>(&DstI);
// Next, analyze the children, only accepting patterns that don't require
// any change to operands.
if (Src->getNumChildren() != Dst->getNumChildren())
return SkipReason{"Src/dst patterns have a different # of children"};
unsigned OpIdx = 0;
// Start with the defined operands (i.e., the results of the root operator).
if (DstI.Operands.NumDefs != Src->getExtTypes().size())
return SkipReason{"Src pattern results and dst MI defs are different"};
for (const EEVT::TypeSet &Ty : Src->getExtTypes()) {
Record *DstIOpRec = DstI.Operands[OpIdx].Rec;
if (!DstIOpRec->isSubClassOf("RegisterClass"))
return SkipReason{"Dst MI def isn't a register class"};
auto OpTyOrNone = MVTToLLT(Ty.getConcrete());
if (!OpTyOrNone)
return SkipReason{"Dst operand has an unsupported type"};
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
OperandMatcher &OM = InsnMatcher.addOperand(OpIdx);
OM.addPredicate<LLTOperandMatcher>(*OpTyOrNone);
OM.addPredicate<RegisterBankOperandMatcher>(
Target.getRegisterClass(DstIOpRec));
++OpIdx;
}
// Finally match the used operands (i.e., the children of the root operator).
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Src->getNumChildren(); i != e; ++i) {
auto *SrcChild = Src->getChild(i);
auto *DstChild = Dst->getChild(i);
// Patterns can reorder operands. Ignore those for now.
if (SrcChild->getName() != DstChild->getName())
return SkipReason{"Src/dst pattern children not in same order"};
// The only non-leaf child we accept is 'bb': it's an operator because
// BasicBlockSDNode isn't inline, but in MI it's just another operand.
if (!SrcChild->isLeaf()) {
if (DstChild->isLeaf() ||
SrcChild->getOperator() != DstChild->getOperator())
return SkipReason{"Src/dst pattern child operator mismatch"};
if (SrcChild->getOperator()->isSubClassOf("SDNode")) {
auto &ChildSDNI = CGP.getSDNodeInfo(SrcChild->getOperator());
if (ChildSDNI.getSDClassName() == "BasicBlockSDNode") {
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
InsnMatcher.addOperand(OpIdx++).addPredicate<MBBOperandMatcher>();
continue;
}
}
return SkipReason{"Src pattern child isn't a leaf node"};
}
if (SrcChild->getLeafValue() != DstChild->getLeafValue())
return SkipReason{"Src/dst pattern child leaf mismatch"};
// Otherwise, we're looking for a bog-standard RegisterClass operand.
if (SrcChild->hasAnyPredicate())
return SkipReason{"Src pattern child has predicate"};
auto *ChildRec = cast<DefInit>(SrcChild->getLeafValue())->getDef();
if (!ChildRec->isSubClassOf("RegisterClass"))
return SkipReason{"Src pattern child isn't a RegisterClass"};
ArrayRef<EEVT::TypeSet> ChildTypes = SrcChild->getExtTypes();
if (ChildTypes.size() != 1)
return SkipReason{"Src pattern child has multiple results"};
auto OpTyOrNone = MVTToLLT(ChildTypes.front().getConcrete());
if (!OpTyOrNone)
return SkipReason{"Src operand has an unsupported type"};
[globalisel] Re-factor ISel matchers into a hierarchy. NFC Summary: This should make it possible to easily add everything needed to import all the existing SelectionDAG rules. It should also serve the likely kinds of GlobalISel rules (some of which are not currently representable in SelectionDAG) once we've nailed down the tablegen definition for that. The hierarchy is as follows: MatcherRule - A matching rule. Currently used to emit C++ ISel code but will | also be used to emit test cases and tablegen definitions in the | near future. |- Instruction(s) - Represents the instruction to be matched. |- Instruction Predicate(s) - Test the opcode, arithmetic flags, etc. of an | instruction. \- Operand(s) - Represents a particular operand of the instruction. In the | future, there may be subclasses to test the same predicates | on multiple operands (including for variadic instructions). \ Operand Predicate(s) - Test the type, register bank, etc. of an operand. This is where the ComplexPattern equivalent will be represented. It's also nested-instruction matching will live as a predicate that follows the DefUse chain to the Def and tests a MatcherRule from that position. Support for multiple instruction matchers in a rule has been retained from the existing code but has been adjusted to assert when it is used. Previously it would silently drop all but the first instruction matcher. The tablegen-erated file is not functionally changed but has more parentheses and no longer attempts to format the if-statements since keeping track of the indentation is tricky in the presence of the matcher hierarchy. It would be nice to have CMakes tablegen() run the output through clang-format (when available) so we don't have to complicate TableGen with pretty-printing. It's also worth mentioning that this hierarchy will also be able to emit TableGen definitions and test cases in the near future. This is the reason for favouring explicit emit*() calls rather than the << operator. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, rovka, t.p.northover, qcolombet, ab Reviewed By: ab Subscribers: igorb, dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28942 llvm-svn: 293172
2017-01-26 19:10:14 +08:00
OperandMatcher &OM = InsnMatcher.addOperand(OpIdx);
OM.addPredicate<LLTOperandMatcher>(*OpTyOrNone);
OM.addPredicate<RegisterBankOperandMatcher>(
Target.getRegisterClass(ChildRec));
++OpIdx;
}
// We're done with this pattern! Emit the processed result.
M.emit(OS);
++NumPatternEmitted;
return None;
}
void GlobalISelEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
// Track the GINodeEquiv definitions.
gatherNodeEquivs();
emitSourceFileHeader(("Global Instruction Selector for the " +
Target.getName() + " target").str(), OS);
OS << "bool " << Target.getName()
<< "InstructionSelector::selectImpl"
"(MachineInstr &I) const {\n const MachineRegisterInfo &MRI = "
"I.getParent()->getParent()->getRegInfo();\n";
// Look through the SelectionDAG patterns we found, possibly emitting some.
for (const PatternToMatch &Pat : CGP.ptms()) {
++NumPatternTotal;
if (auto SkipReason = runOnPattern(Pat, OS)) {
if (WarnOnSkippedPatterns) {
PrintWarning(Pat.getSrcRecord()->getLoc(),
"Skipped pattern: " + SkipReason->Reason);
}
++NumPatternSkipped;
}
}
OS << " return false;\n}\n";
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
namespace llvm {
void EmitGlobalISel(RecordKeeper &RK, raw_ostream &OS) {
GlobalISelEmitter(RK).run(OS);
}
} // End llvm namespace