llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/RecordLayout.cpp

91 lines
3.7 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===-- RecordLayout.cpp - Layout information for a struct/union -*- C++ -*-==//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file defines the RecordLayout interface.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
#include "clang/AST/RecordLayout.h"
#include "clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h"
using namespace clang;
void ASTRecordLayout::Destroy(ASTContext &Ctx) {
if (CXXInfo) {
CXXInfo->~CXXRecordLayoutInfo();
Ctx.Deallocate(CXXInfo);
}
this->~ASTRecordLayout();
Ctx.Deallocate(this);
}
ASTRecordLayout::ASTRecordLayout(const ASTContext &Ctx, CharUnits size,
CharUnits alignment,
CharUnits requiredAlignment,
CharUnits datasize,
ArrayRef<uint64_t> fieldoffsets)
: Size(size), DataSize(datasize), Alignment(alignment),
RequiredAlignment(requiredAlignment), CXXInfo(nullptr) {
FieldOffsets.append(Ctx, fieldoffsets.begin(), fieldoffsets.end());
}
// Constructor for C++ records.
ASTRecordLayout::ASTRecordLayout(const ASTContext &Ctx,
CharUnits size, CharUnits alignment,
CharUnits requiredAlignment,
bool hasOwnVFPtr, bool hasExtendableVFPtr,
CharUnits vbptroffset,
CharUnits datasize,
ArrayRef<uint64_t> fieldoffsets,
CharUnits nonvirtualsize,
CharUnits nonvirtualalignment,
CharUnits SizeOfLargestEmptySubobject,
const CXXRecordDecl *PrimaryBase,
bool IsPrimaryBaseVirtual,
const CXXRecordDecl *BaseSharingVBPtr,
[MS ABI] Implement __declspec(empty_bases) and __declspec(layout_version) The layout_version attribute is pretty straightforward: use the layout rules from version XYZ of MSVC when used like struct __declspec(layout_version(XYZ)) S {}; The empty_bases attribute is more interesting. It tries to get the C++ empty base optimization to fire more often by tweaking the MSVC ABI rules in subtle ways: 1. Disable the leading and trailing zero-sized object flags if a class is marked __declspec(empty_bases) and is empty. This means that given: struct __declspec(empty_bases) A {}; struct __declspec(empty_bases) B {}; struct C : A, B {}; 'C' will have size 1 and nvsize 0 despite not being annotated __declspec(empty_bases). 2. When laying out virtual or non-virtual bases, disable the injection of padding between classes if the most derived class is marked __declspec(empty_bases). This means that given: struct A {}; struct B {}; struct __declspec(empty_bases) C : A, B {}; 'C' will have size 1 and nvsize 0. 3. When calculating the offset of a non-virtual base, choose offset zero if the most derived class is marked __declspec(empty_bases) and the base is empty _and_ has an nvsize of 0. Because of the ABI rules, this does not mean that empty bases reliably get placed at offset 0! For example: struct A {}; struct B {}; struct __declspec(empty_bases) C : A, B { virtual ~C(); }; 'C' will be pointer sized to account for the vfptr at offset 0. 'A' and 'B' will _not_ be at offset 0 despite being empty! Instead, they will be located right after the vfptr. This occurs due to the interaction betweeen non-virtual base layout and virtual function pointer injection: injection occurs after the nv-bases and shifts them down by the size of a pointer. llvm-svn: 270457
2016-05-24 01:16:12 +08:00
bool EndsWithZeroSizedObject,
bool LeadsWithZeroSizedBase,
const BaseOffsetsMapTy& BaseOffsets,
const VBaseOffsetsMapTy& VBaseOffsets)
: Size(size), DataSize(datasize), Alignment(alignment),
RequiredAlignment(requiredAlignment), CXXInfo(new (Ctx) CXXRecordLayoutInfo)
{
FieldOffsets.append(Ctx, fieldoffsets.begin(), fieldoffsets.end());
CXXInfo->PrimaryBase.setPointer(PrimaryBase);
CXXInfo->PrimaryBase.setInt(IsPrimaryBaseVirtual);
CXXInfo->NonVirtualSize = nonvirtualsize;
CXXInfo->NonVirtualAlignment = nonvirtualalignment;
CXXInfo->SizeOfLargestEmptySubobject = SizeOfLargestEmptySubobject;
CXXInfo->BaseOffsets = BaseOffsets;
CXXInfo->VBaseOffsets = VBaseOffsets;
CXXInfo->HasOwnVFPtr = hasOwnVFPtr;
CXXInfo->VBPtrOffset = vbptroffset;
CXXInfo->HasExtendableVFPtr = hasExtendableVFPtr;
CXXInfo->BaseSharingVBPtr = BaseSharingVBPtr;
[MS ABI] Implement __declspec(empty_bases) and __declspec(layout_version) The layout_version attribute is pretty straightforward: use the layout rules from version XYZ of MSVC when used like struct __declspec(layout_version(XYZ)) S {}; The empty_bases attribute is more interesting. It tries to get the C++ empty base optimization to fire more often by tweaking the MSVC ABI rules in subtle ways: 1. Disable the leading and trailing zero-sized object flags if a class is marked __declspec(empty_bases) and is empty. This means that given: struct __declspec(empty_bases) A {}; struct __declspec(empty_bases) B {}; struct C : A, B {}; 'C' will have size 1 and nvsize 0 despite not being annotated __declspec(empty_bases). 2. When laying out virtual or non-virtual bases, disable the injection of padding between classes if the most derived class is marked __declspec(empty_bases). This means that given: struct A {}; struct B {}; struct __declspec(empty_bases) C : A, B {}; 'C' will have size 1 and nvsize 0. 3. When calculating the offset of a non-virtual base, choose offset zero if the most derived class is marked __declspec(empty_bases) and the base is empty _and_ has an nvsize of 0. Because of the ABI rules, this does not mean that empty bases reliably get placed at offset 0! For example: struct A {}; struct B {}; struct __declspec(empty_bases) C : A, B { virtual ~C(); }; 'C' will be pointer sized to account for the vfptr at offset 0. 'A' and 'B' will _not_ be at offset 0 despite being empty! Instead, they will be located right after the vfptr. This occurs due to the interaction betweeen non-virtual base layout and virtual function pointer injection: injection occurs after the nv-bases and shifts them down by the size of a pointer. llvm-svn: 270457
2016-05-24 01:16:12 +08:00
CXXInfo->EndsWithZeroSizedObject = EndsWithZeroSizedObject;
CXXInfo->LeadsWithZeroSizedBase = LeadsWithZeroSizedBase;
#ifndef NDEBUG
if (const CXXRecordDecl *PrimaryBase = getPrimaryBase()) {
if (isPrimaryBaseVirtual()) {
if (Ctx.getTargetInfo().getCXXABI().hasPrimaryVBases()) {
assert(getVBaseClassOffset(PrimaryBase).isZero() &&
"Primary virtual base must be at offset 0!");
}
} else {
assert(getBaseClassOffset(PrimaryBase).isZero() &&
"Primary base must be at offset 0!");
}
}
#endif
}