llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-line.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

332 lines
7.6 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -w -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -std=c++11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -S -mllvm -no-discriminators -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple %itanium_abi_triple | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -w -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -std=c++11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -S -mllvm -no-discriminators -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple i686-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -w -debug-info-kind=line-directives-only -std=c++11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -S -mllvm -no-discriminators -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple %itanium_abi_triple | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -w -debug-info-kind=line-directives-only -std=c++11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -S -mllvm -no-discriminators -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple i686-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s
Reapply r225000 (reverted in r225555): DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling (and follow-up commits). Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting which usually lead to incorrect line information anyway. So I've fixed those (in r225955 and r225845) separately which should pave the way for this commit to be cleanly reapplied. The reason these implicit dependencies resulted in crashes with this patch is that the debug location would no longer implicitly leak from one place to another, but be set back to invalid. Once a call with no/invalid location was emitted, if that call was ever inlined it could produce invalid debugloc chains and assert during LLVM's codegen. There may be further cases of such bugs in this patch - they're hard to flush out with regression testing, so I'll keep an eye out for reports and investigate/fix them ASAP if they come up. Original commit message: Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling" Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of the more general solution). Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the change. Original commit message: This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for subexpressions. This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm going to tackle removing that just now. I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll investigate that as it comes up. Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one statement. I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers. llvm-svn: 225956
2015-01-14 15:38:27 +08:00
int &src();
int *sink();
extern "C" __complex float complex_src();
extern "C" __complex float *complex_sink();
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f1() {
DebugInfo: Use the preferred location rather than the start location for expression line info This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example. There were essentially 3 options for this: * The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression, etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be where the actual addition occurred)). * The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders, etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y and z after the respective loads. The problem with this is that the user would still have to think fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan backtrace. * The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going 'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+ were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of its operands. (actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons, but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex assignments and other plain operators right) llvm-svn: 227027
2015-01-25 09:19:10 +08:00
*sink()
// CHECK: store {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F1:!.*]]
DebugInfo: Use the preferred location rather than the start location for expression line info This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example. There were essentially 3 options for this: * The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression, etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be where the actual addition occurred)). * The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders, etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y and z after the respective loads. The problem with this is that the user would still have to think fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan backtrace. * The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going 'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+ were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of its operands. (actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons, but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex assignments and other plain operators right) llvm-svn: 227027
2015-01-25 09:19:10 +08:00
#line 100
= //
src();
}
struct foo {
int i;
int &j;
__complex float k;
foo();
};
// CHECK-LABEL: define
foo::foo()
:
#line 200
i // CHECK: store i32 {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_FOO_VALUE:!.*]]
(src()),
j // CHECK: store i32* {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_FOO_REF:!.*]]
(src()),
k // CHECK: store float {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_FOO_COMPLEX:!.*]]
(complex_src()) {
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}}f2{{.*}}
void f2() {
DebugInfo: Use the preferred location rather than the start location for expression line info This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example. There were essentially 3 options for this: * The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression, etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be where the actual addition occurred)). * The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders, etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y and z after the respective loads. The problem with this is that the user would still have to think fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan backtrace. * The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going 'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+ were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of its operands. (actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons, but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex assignments and other plain operators right) llvm-svn: 227027
2015-01-25 09:19:10 +08:00
// CHECK: store float {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F2:!.*]]
*complex_sink()
#line 300
DebugInfo: Use the preferred location rather than the start location for expression line info This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example. There were essentially 3 options for this: * The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression, etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be where the actual addition occurred)). * The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders, etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y and z after the respective loads. The problem with this is that the user would still have to think fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan backtrace. * The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going 'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+ were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of its operands. (actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons, but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex assignments and other plain operators right) llvm-svn: 227027
2015-01-25 09:19:10 +08:00
= //
complex_src();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f3() {
DebugInfo: Use the preferred location rather than the start location for expression line info This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example. There were essentially 3 options for this: * The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression, etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be where the actual addition occurred)). * The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders, etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y and z after the respective loads. The problem with this is that the user would still have to think fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan backtrace. * The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going 'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+ were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of its operands. (actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons, but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex assignments and other plain operators right) llvm-svn: 227027
2015-01-25 09:19:10 +08:00
// CHECK: store float {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F3:!.*]]
*complex_sink()
#line 400
DebugInfo: Use the preferred location rather than the start location for expression line info This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example. There were essentially 3 options for this: * The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression, etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be where the actual addition occurred)). * The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders, etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y and z after the respective loads. The problem with this is that the user would still have to think fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan backtrace. * The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going 'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+ were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of its operands. (actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons, but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex assignments and other plain operators right) llvm-svn: 227027
2015-01-25 09:19:10 +08:00
+= //
complex_src();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f4() {
#line 500
auto x // CHECK: store {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F4:!.*]]
= src();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f5() {
#line 600
auto x // CHECK: store float {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F5:!.*]]
= complex_src();
}
struct agg { int i; };
agg agg_src();
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f6() {
agg x;
// CHECK: call void @llvm.memcpy{{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F6:!.*]]
x
#line 700
= //
agg_src();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f7() {
int *src1();
int src2();
#line 800
int x = ( // CHECK: load {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F7:!.*]]
src1())[src2()];
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f8() {
int src1[1];
int src2();
#line 900
int x = ( // CHECK: load {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F8:!.*]]
src1)[src2()];
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f9(int i) {
int src1[1][i];
int src2();
#line 1000
auto x = ( // CHECK: getelementptr {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F9:!.*]]
src1)[src2()];
}
inline void *operator new(decltype(sizeof(1)), void *p) noexcept { return p; }
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f10() {
void *void_src();
(
// CHECK: store {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F10_STORE:!.*]]
#line 1100
new (void_src()) int(src()));
}
// noexcept just to simplify the codegen a bit
void fn() noexcept(true);
struct bar {
bar();
// noexcept(false) to convolute the global dtor
~bar() noexcept(false);
};
// global ctor cleanup
// CHECK-LABEL: define
// CHECK: invoke{{ }}
// CHECK: invoke{{ }}
// CHECK: to label {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_GLBL_CTOR_B:!.*]]
Reapply r225000 (reverted in r225555): DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling (and follow-up commits). Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting which usually lead to incorrect line information anyway. So I've fixed those (in r225955 and r225845) separately which should pave the way for this commit to be cleanly reapplied. The reason these implicit dependencies resulted in crashes with this patch is that the debug location would no longer implicitly leak from one place to another, but be set back to invalid. Once a call with no/invalid location was emitted, if that call was ever inlined it could produce invalid debugloc chains and assert during LLVM's codegen. There may be further cases of such bugs in this patch - they're hard to flush out with regression testing, so I'll keep an eye out for reports and investigate/fix them ASAP if they come up. Original commit message: Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling" Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of the more general solution). Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the change. Original commit message: This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for subexpressions. This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm going to tackle removing that just now. I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll investigate that as it comes up. Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one statement. I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers. llvm-svn: 225956
2015-01-14 15:38:27 +08:00
// terminate caller
// CHECK-LABEL: define
// global dtor cleanup
// CHECK-LABEL: define
// CHECK: invoke{{ }}
// CHECK: invoke{{ }}
// CHECK: to label {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_GLBL_DTOR_B:!.*]]
#line 1200
bar b[1] = { //
(fn(), //
bar())};
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}}f11
Reapply r225000 (reverted in r225555): DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling (and follow-up commits). Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting which usually lead to incorrect line information anyway. So I've fixed those (in r225955 and r225845) separately which should pave the way for this commit to be cleanly reapplied. The reason these implicit dependencies resulted in crashes with this patch is that the debug location would no longer implicitly leak from one place to another, but be set back to invalid. Once a call with no/invalid location was emitted, if that call was ever inlined it could produce invalid debugloc chains and assert during LLVM's codegen. There may be further cases of such bugs in this patch - they're hard to flush out with regression testing, so I'll keep an eye out for reports and investigate/fix them ASAP if they come up. Original commit message: Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling" Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of the more general solution). Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the change. Original commit message: This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for subexpressions. This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm going to tackle removing that just now. I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll investigate that as it comes up. Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one statement. I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers. llvm-svn: 225956
2015-01-14 15:38:27 +08:00
__complex double f11() {
__complex double f;
// CHECK: store {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F11:!.*]]
#line 1300
Reapply r225000 (reverted in r225555): DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling (and follow-up commits). Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting which usually lead to incorrect line information anyway. So I've fixed those (in r225955 and r225845) separately which should pave the way for this commit to be cleanly reapplied. The reason these implicit dependencies resulted in crashes with this patch is that the debug location would no longer implicitly leak from one place to another, but be set back to invalid. Once a call with no/invalid location was emitted, if that call was ever inlined it could produce invalid debugloc chains and assert during LLVM's codegen. There may be further cases of such bugs in this patch - they're hard to flush out with regression testing, so I'll keep an eye out for reports and investigate/fix them ASAP if they come up. Original commit message: Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling" Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of the more general solution). Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the change. Original commit message: This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for subexpressions. This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm going to tackle removing that just now. I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll investigate that as it comes up. Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one statement. I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers. llvm-svn: 225956
2015-01-14 15:38:27 +08:00
return f;
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f12() {
int f12_1();
void f12_2(int = f12_1());
// CHECK: call {{.*}}{{(signext )?}}i32 {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F12:!.*]]
#line 1400
Reapply r225000 (reverted in r225555): DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling (and follow-up commits). Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting which usually lead to incorrect line information anyway. So I've fixed those (in r225955 and r225845) separately which should pave the way for this commit to be cleanly reapplied. The reason these implicit dependencies resulted in crashes with this patch is that the debug location would no longer implicitly leak from one place to another, but be set back to invalid. Once a call with no/invalid location was emitted, if that call was ever inlined it could produce invalid debugloc chains and assert during LLVM's codegen. There may be further cases of such bugs in this patch - they're hard to flush out with regression testing, so I'll keep an eye out for reports and investigate/fix them ASAP if they come up. Original commit message: Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling" Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of the more general solution). Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the change. Original commit message: This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for subexpressions. This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm going to tackle removing that just now. I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll investigate that as it comes up. Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one statement. I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers. llvm-svn: 225956
2015-01-14 15:38:27 +08:00
f12_2();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f13() {
// CHECK: call {{.*}} !dbg [[DBG_F13:!.*]]
#define F13_IMPL 1, src()
1,
#line 1500
Reapply r225000 (reverted in r225555): DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling (and follow-up commits). Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting which usually lead to incorrect line information anyway. So I've fixed those (in r225955 and r225845) separately which should pave the way for this commit to be cleanly reapplied. The reason these implicit dependencies resulted in crashes with this patch is that the debug location would no longer implicitly leak from one place to another, but be set back to invalid. Once a call with no/invalid location was emitted, if that call was ever inlined it could produce invalid debugloc chains and assert during LLVM's codegen. There may be further cases of such bugs in this patch - they're hard to flush out with regression testing, so I'll keep an eye out for reports and investigate/fix them ASAP if they come up. Original commit message: Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling" Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of the more general solution). Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the change. Original commit message: This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for subexpressions. This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm going to tackle removing that just now. I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll investigate that as it comes up. Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one statement. I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers. llvm-svn: 225956
2015-01-14 15:38:27 +08:00
F13_IMPL;
}
struct f14_impl {
f14_impl(int);
};
// CHECK-LABEL: define
struct f14_use {
// CHECK: call {{.*}}f14_impl{{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F14_CTOR_CALL:![0-9]*]]
#line 1600
f14_impl v{//
1};
f14_use();
};
f14_use::f14_use() = default;
// CHECK-LABEL: define
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void func(foo);
void f15(foo *f) {
func(
// CHECK: getelementptr {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F15:![0-9]*]]
#line 1700
f[3]);
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f16(__complex float f) {
__complex float g = //
// CHECK: add {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F16:![0-9]*]]
#line 1800
f + 1;
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f17(int *x) {
1,
// CHECK: getelementptr {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F17:![0-9]*]]
#line 1900
x[1];
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f18(int a, int b) {
// CHECK: icmp {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F18_1:![0-9]*]]
// CHECK: br {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F18_2:![0-9]*]]
#line 2000
if (a //
&& //
b)
;
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f19(int a, int b) {
// CHECK: icmp {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F19_1:![0-9]*]]
// CHECK: br {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F19_2:![0-9]*]]
#line 2100
if (a //
|| //
b)
;
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f20(int a, int b, int c) {
// CHECK: icmp {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F20_1:![0-9]*]]
// FIXME: Conditional operator's exprloc should be the '?' not the start of the
// expression, then this would go in the right place. (but adding getExprLoc to
// the ConditionalOperator breaks the ARC migration tool - need to investigate
// further).
// CHECK: br {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F20_1]]
#line 2200
if (a //
? //
b : c)
;
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
int f21_a(int = 0);
void f21_b(int = f21_a());
void f21() {
// CHECK: call {{.*}}f21_b{{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F21:![0-9]*]]
#line 2300
f21_b();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
struct f22_dtor {
~f22_dtor();
};
void f22() {
{
f22_dtor f;
src();
// CHECK: invoke {{.*}}src
// CHECK: call {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F22:![0-9]*]]
// CHECK: call {{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F22]]
#line 2400
}
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
struct f23_struct {
};
f23_struct f23_a();
void f23_b(f23_struct = f23_a());
void f23() {
// CHECK: call {{.*}}f23_a{{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F23:![0-9]*]]
#line 2500
f23_b();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f24_a(__complex float = complex_src());
void f24() {
// CHECK: call {{.*}}complex_src{{.*}}, !dbg [[DBG_F24:![0-9]*]]
#line 2600
f24_a();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define
void f25_a(int x = __builtin_LINE()) {}
void f25() {
// CHECK: call void @_Z5f25_ai(i32 {{(signext )?}}2700)
#line 2700
f25_a();
}
// CHECK: [[DBG_F1]] = !DILocation(line: 100,
// CHECK: [[DBG_FOO_VALUE]] = !DILocation(line: 200,
// CHECK: [[DBG_FOO_REF]] = !DILocation(line: 202,
// CHECK: [[DBG_FOO_COMPLEX]] = !DILocation(line: 204,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F2]] = !DILocation(line: 300,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F3]] = !DILocation(line: 400,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F4]] = !DILocation(line: 500,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F5]] = !DILocation(line: 600,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F6]] = !DILocation(line: 700,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F7]] = !DILocation(line: 800,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F8]] = !DILocation(line: 900,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F9]] = !DILocation(line: 1000,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F10_STORE]] = !DILocation(line: 1100,
// CHECK: [[DBG_GLBL_CTOR_B]] = !DILocation(line: 1200,
// CHECK: [[DBG_GLBL_DTOR_B]] = !DILocation(line: 0,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F11]] = !DILocation(line: 1300,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F12]] = !DILocation(line: 1400,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F13]] = !DILocation(line: 1500,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F14_CTOR_CALL]] = !DILocation(line: 1600,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F15]] = !DILocation(line: 1700,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F16]] = !DILocation(line: 1800,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F17]] = !DILocation(line: 1900,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F18_1]] = !DILocation(line: 2000,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F18_2]] = !DILocation(line: 2001,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F19_1]] = !DILocation(line: 2100,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F19_2]] = !DILocation(line: 2101,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F20_1]] = !DILocation(line: 2200,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F23]] = !DILocation(line: 2500,
// CHECK: [[DBG_F24]] = !DILocation(line: 2600,