maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/alloc-size.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

494 lines
16 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -emit-llvm %s -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -DDYNAMIC -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -emit-llvm %s -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
#ifdef DYNAMIC
#define OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN __builtin_dynamic_object_size
#else
#define OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN __builtin_object_size
#endif
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
#define NULL ((void *)0)
int gi;
typedef unsigned long size_t;
// CHECK-DAG-RE: define void @my_malloc({{.*}}) #[[MALLOC_ATTR_NUMBER:[0-9]+]]
// N.B. LLVM's allocsize arguments are base-0, whereas ours are base-1 (for
// compat with GCC)
// CHECK-DAG-RE: attributes #[[MALLOC_ATTR_NUMBER]] = {.*allocsize(0).*}
void *my_malloc(size_t) __attribute__((alloc_size(1)));
// CHECK-DAG-RE: define void @my_calloc({{.*}}) #[[CALLOC_ATTR_NUMBER:[0-9]+]]
// CHECK-DAG-RE: attributes #[[CALLOC_ATTR_NUMBER]] = {.*allocsize(0, 1).*}
void *my_calloc(size_t, size_t) __attribute__((alloc_size(1, 2)));
// CHECK-LABEL: @test1
void test1() {
void *const vp = my_malloc(100);
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
void *const arr = my_calloc(100, 5);
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_malloc(100), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_malloc(100), 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_malloc(100), 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_malloc(100), 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_calloc(100, 5), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_calloc(100, 5), 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_calloc(100, 5), 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_calloc(100, 5), 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
void *const zeroPtr = my_malloc(0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(zeroPtr, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_malloc(0), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
void *const zeroArr1 = my_calloc(0, 1);
void *const zeroArr2 = my_calloc(1, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(zeroArr1, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(zeroArr2, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_calloc(1, 0), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_calloc(0, 1), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test2
void test2() {
void *const vp = my_malloc(gi);
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
void *const arr1 = my_calloc(gi, 1);
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr1, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
void *const arr2 = my_calloc(1, gi);
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr2, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test3
void test3() {
char *const buf = (char *)my_calloc(100, 5);
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
struct Data {
int a;
int t[10];
char pad[3];
char end[1];
};
// CHECK-LABEL: @test5
void test5() {
struct Data *const data = my_malloc(sizeof(*data));
// CHECK: store i32 48
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 48
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 48
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 48
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 40
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(&data->t[1], 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 36
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(&data->t[1], 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 40
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(&data->t[1], 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 36
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(&data->t[1], 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
struct Data *const arr = my_calloc(sizeof(*data), 2);
// CHECK: store i32 96
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 96
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 96
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 96
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 88
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(&arr->t[1], 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 36
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(&arr->t[1], 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 88
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(&arr->t[1], 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 36
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(&arr->t[1], 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test6
void test6() {
// Things that would normally trigger conservative estimates don't need to do
// so when we know the source of the allocation.
struct Data *const data = my_malloc(sizeof(*data) + 10);
// CHECK: store i32 11
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data->end, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 11
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data->end, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 11
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data->end, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 11
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data->end, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
struct Data *const arr = my_calloc(sizeof(*arr) + 5, 3);
// AFAICT, GCC treats malloc and calloc identically. So, we should do the
// same.
//
// Additionally, GCC ignores the initial array index when determining whether
// we're writing off the end of an alloc_size base. e.g.
// arr[0].end
// arr[1].end
// arr[2].end
// ...Are all considered "writing off the end", because there's no way to tell
// with high accuracy if the user meant "allocate a single N-byte `Data`",
// or "allocate M smaller `Data`s with extra padding".
// CHECK: store i32 112
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr->end, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 112
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr->end, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 112
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr->end, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 112
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr->end, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 112
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[0].end, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 112
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[0].end, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 112
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[0].end, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 112
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[0].end, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 64
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[1].end, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 64
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[1].end, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 64
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[1].end, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 64
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[1].end, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 16
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[2].end, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 16
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[2].end, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 16
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[2].end, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 16
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr[2].end, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test7
void test7() {
struct Data *const data = my_malloc(sizeof(*data) + 5);
// CHECK: store i32 9
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data->pad, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 3
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data->pad, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 9
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data->pad, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 3
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(data->pad, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test8
void test8() {
// Non-const pointers aren't currently supported.
void *buf = my_calloc(100, 5);
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize.i64.p0i8(i8* %{{.*}}, i1 false, i1 true, i1
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test9
void test9() {
// Check to be sure that we unwrap things correctly.
short *const buf0 = (my_malloc(100));
short *const buf1 = (short*)(my_malloc(100));
short *const buf2 = ((short*)(my_malloc(100)));
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf0, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf1, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf2, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
// CHECK-LABEL: @test10
void test10() {
// Yay overflow
short *const arr = my_calloc((size_t)-1 / 2 + 1, 2);
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// As an implementation detail, CharUnits can't handle numbers greater than or
// equal to 2**63. Realistically, this shouldn't be a problem, but we should
// be sure we don't emit crazy results for this case.
short *const buf = my_malloc((size_t)-1);
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(buf, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
short *const arr_big = my_calloc((size_t)-1 / 2 - 1, 2);
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr_big, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr_big, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr_big, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 0
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr_big, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
void *my_tiny_malloc(char) __attribute__((alloc_size(1)));
void *my_tiny_calloc(char, char) __attribute__((alloc_size(1, 2)));
// CHECK-LABEL: @test11
void test11() {
void *const vp = my_tiny_malloc(100);
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// N.B. This causes char overflow, but not size_t overflow, so it should be
// supported.
void *const arr = my_tiny_calloc(100, 5);
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 1);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 2);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr, 3);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
void *my_signed_malloc(long) __attribute__((alloc_size(1)));
void *my_signed_calloc(long, long) __attribute__((alloc_size(1, 2)));
// CHECK-LABEL: @test12
void test12() {
// CHECK: store i32 100
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_signed_malloc(100), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 500
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_signed_calloc(100, 5), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
void *const vp = my_signed_malloc(-2);
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(vp, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// N.B. These get lowered to -1 because the function calls may have
// side-effects, and we can't determine the objectsize.
// CHECK: store i32 -1
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_signed_malloc(-2), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
void *const arr1 = my_signed_calloc(-2, 1);
void *const arr2 = my_signed_calloc(1, -2);
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr1, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: @llvm.objectsize
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(arr2, 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 -1
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_signed_calloc(1, -2), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
// CHECK: store i32 -1
Add a new builtin: __builtin_dynamic_object_size This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance, __builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the following function: void f(size_t alloc) { char* p = malloc(alloc); strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0)) } This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to -1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to __builtin___strcpy_chk. rdar://32212419 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760 llvm-svn: 352665
2019-01-31 04:34:53 +08:00
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(my_signed_calloc(-2, 1), 0);
Add the alloc_size attribute to clang, attempt 2. This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan failures. msan was failing because we were calling `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in `isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more easily in the future. Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :) Original commit message: This patch does three things: - Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user functions that act in a similar manner. - Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in person. - Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when combined with our new eagerness in the face of const. llvm-svn: 290297
2016-12-22 10:50:20 +08:00
}
[APSInt][OpenMP] Fix isNegative, etc. for unsigned types Without this patch, APSInt inherits APInt::isNegative, which merely checks the sign bit without regard to whether the type is actually signed. isNonNegative and isStrictlyPositive call isNegative and so are also affected. This patch adjusts APSInt to override isNegative, isNonNegative, and isStrictlyPositive with implementations that consider whether the type is signed. A large set of Clang OpenMP tests are affected. Without this patch, these tests assume that `true` is not a valid argument for clauses like `collapse`. Indeed, `true` fails APInt::isStrictlyPositive but not APSInt::isStrictlyPositive. This patch adjusts those tests to assume `true` should be accepted. This patch also adds tests revealing various other similar fixes due to APSInt::isNegative calls in Clang's ExprConstant.cpp and SemaExpr.cpp: `++` and `--` overflow in `constexpr`, evaluated object size based on `alloc_size`, `<<` and `>>` shift count validation, and OpenMP array section validation. Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, ABataev, hfinkel Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59712 llvm-svn: 359012
2019-04-24 01:04:15 +08:00
void *alloc_uchar(unsigned char) __attribute__((alloc_size(1)));
// CHECK-LABEL: @test13
void test13() {
// If 128 were incorrectly seen as negative, the result would become -1.
// CHECK: store i32 128,
gi = OBJECT_SIZE_BUILTIN(alloc_uchar(128), 0);
}
Handle alloc_size attribute on function pointers I have been trying to statically find and analyze all calls to heap allocation functions to determine how many of them use sizes known at compile time vs only at runtime. While doing so I saw that quite a few projects use replaceable function pointers for heap allocation and noticed that clang was not able to annotate functions pointers with alloc_size. I have changed the Sema checks to allow alloc_size on all function pointers and typedefs for function pointers now and added checks that these attributes are propagated to the LLVM IR correctly. With this patch we can also compute __builtin_object_size() for calls to allocation function pointers with the alloc_size attribute. Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, erik.pilkington Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55212
2018-12-06 20:22:08 +08:00
void *(*malloc_function_pointer)(int)__attribute__((alloc_size(1)));
void *(*calloc_function_pointer)(int, int)__attribute__((alloc_size(1, 2)));
// CHECK-LABEL: @test_fn_pointer
void test_fn_pointer() {
void *const vp = malloc_function_pointer(100);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(vp, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(vp, 1);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(vp, 2);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(vp, 3);
void *const arr = calloc_function_pointer(100, 5);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(arr, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(arr, 1);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(arr, 2);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(arr, 3);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer(100), 0);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer(100), 1);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer(100), 2);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer(100), 3);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer(100, 5), 0);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer(100, 5), 1);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer(100, 5), 2);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer(100, 5), 3);
void *const zeroPtr = malloc_function_pointer(0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(zeroPtr, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer(0), 0);
void *const zeroArr1 = calloc_function_pointer(0, 1);
void *const zeroArr2 = calloc_function_pointer(1, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(zeroArr1, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(zeroArr2, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer(1, 0), 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer(0, 1), 0);
}
typedef void *(__attribute__((warn_unused_result, alloc_size(1))) * my_malloc_function_pointer_type)(int);
typedef void *(__attribute__((alloc_size(1, 2))) * my_calloc_function_pointer_type)(int, int);
extern my_malloc_function_pointer_type malloc_function_pointer_with_typedef;
extern my_calloc_function_pointer_type calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef;
// CHECK-LABEL: @test_fn_pointer_typedef
void test_fn_pointer_typedef() {
malloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100);
void *const vp = malloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(vp, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(vp, 1);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(vp, 2);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(vp, 3);
void *const arr = calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100, 5);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(arr, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(arr, 1);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(arr, 2);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(arr, 3);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100), 0);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100), 1);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100), 2);
// CHECK: store i32 100
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100), 3);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100, 5), 0);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100, 5), 1);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100, 5), 2);
// CHECK: store i32 500
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(100, 5), 3);
void *const zeroPtr = malloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(zeroPtr, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(malloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(0), 0);
void *const zeroArr1 = calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(0, 1);
void *const zeroArr2 = calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(1, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(zeroArr1, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(zeroArr2, 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(1, 0), 0);
// CHECK: store i32 0
gi = __builtin_object_size(calloc_function_pointer_with_typedef(0, 1), 0);
}