maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/DebugInfo/MIR/ARM/split-superreg.mir

124 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[ARM] Add registers to debuginfo MIR test cases. Summary: MIRParserImpl::computeFunctionProperties uses MRI.getNumVirtRegs() to set the NoVReg property. By adding a bunch of registers to the MIR test cases, the NoVReg property is not set when importing the MIR. Otherwise NoVReg is set after instruction selection while the machine instructions still contain virtual registers, causing expensive checks to fail. Reviewers: efriedma, MatzeB, aprantl Reviewed By: MatzeB, aprantl Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36152 llvm-svn: 310178
2017-08-05 20:13:13 +08:00
# RUN: llc -start-before=livedebugvalues -filetype=obj -o - %s | \
# RUN: llvm-dwarfdump - | FileCheck %s
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
# CHECK: .debug_info contents:
# CHECK: DW_TAG_variable
[dwarfdump] Pretty print location expressions and location lists Summary: Based on Fred's patch here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D6771 I can't seem to commandeer the old review, so I'm creating a new one. With that change the locations exrpessions are pretty printed inline in the DIE tree. The output looks like this for debug_loc entries: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_data4] (0x00000000 0x0000000000000001 - 0x000000000000000b: DW_OP_consts +3 0x000000000000000b - 0x0000000000000012: DW_OP_consts +7 0x0000000000000012 - 0x000000000000001b: DW_OP_reg0 RAX, DW_OP_piece 0x4 0x000000000000001b - 0x0000000000000024: DW_OP_breg5 RDI+0) And like this for debug_loc.dwo entries: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000000 Addr idx 2 (w/ length 190): DW_OP_consts +0, DW_OP_stack_value Addr idx 3 (w/ length 23): DW_OP_reg0 RAX, DW_OP_piece 0x4) Simple locations without ranges are printed inline: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_block1] (DW_OP_reg4 RSI, DW_OP_piece 0x4, DW_OP_bit_piece 0x20 0x0) The debug_loc(.dwo) dumping in changed accordingly to factor the code. Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, friss Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37123 llvm-svn: 312042
2017-08-30 05:41:21 +08:00
# CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_location
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
# CHECK-NEXT: [0x00000010, 0x00000018): DW_OP_regx D0, DW_OP_piece 0x8, DW_OP_regx D1, DW_OP_piece 0x8)
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
# CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_name {{.*}}"vec"
[dwarfdump] Pretty print location expressions and location lists Summary: Based on Fred's patch here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D6771 I can't seem to commandeer the old review, so I'm creating a new one. With that change the locations exrpessions are pretty printed inline in the DIE tree. The output looks like this for debug_loc entries: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_data4] (0x00000000 0x0000000000000001 - 0x000000000000000b: DW_OP_consts +3 0x000000000000000b - 0x0000000000000012: DW_OP_consts +7 0x0000000000000012 - 0x000000000000001b: DW_OP_reg0 RAX, DW_OP_piece 0x4 0x000000000000001b - 0x0000000000000024: DW_OP_breg5 RDI+0) And like this for debug_loc.dwo entries: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000000 Addr idx 2 (w/ length 190): DW_OP_consts +0, DW_OP_stack_value Addr idx 3 (w/ length 23): DW_OP_reg0 RAX, DW_OP_piece 0x4) Simple locations without ranges are printed inline: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_block1] (DW_OP_reg4 RSI, DW_OP_piece 0x4, DW_OP_bit_piece 0x20 0x0) The debug_loc(.dwo) dumping in changed accordingly to factor the code. Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, friss Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37123 llvm-svn: 312042
2017-08-30 05:41:21 +08:00
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
--- |
; Generated from:
; typedef float vec2 __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
; vec2 v();
; float f() {
; vec2 vec = v();
; return vec[0] + vec[1];
; }
target datalayout = "e-m:o-p:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:32:64-v128:32:128-a:0:32-n32-S32"
target triple = "thumbv7s-apple-ios5.0.0"
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
define float @f() local_unnamed_addr #0 !dbg !9 {
entry:
%call = tail call <4 x float> bitcast (<4 x float> (...)* @v to <4 x float> ()*)() #0, !dbg !19
tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata <4 x float> %call, i64 0, metadata !14, metadata !20), !dbg !21
%vecext = extractelement <4 x float> %call, i32 0, !dbg !22
%vecext1 = extractelement <4 x float> %call, i32 1, !dbg !23
%add = fadd float %vecext, %vecext1, !dbg !24
ret float %add, !dbg !25
}
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
declare arm_aapcs_vfpcc <4 x float> @v(...) local_unnamed_addr #0
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, i64, metadata, metadata) #0
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
attributes #0 = { nounwind readnone }
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0}
!llvm.module.flags = !{!3, !4, !5, !6, !7}
!llvm.ident = !{!8}
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
!0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 4.0.0 (trunk 286322) (llvm/trunk 286305)", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2)
!1 = !DIFile(filename: "v.c", directory: "/")
!2 = !{}
!3 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 2}
!4 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
!5 = !{i32 1, !"wchar_size", i32 4}
!6 = !{i32 1, !"min_enum_size", i32 4}
!7 = !{i32 1, !"PIC Level", i32 2}
!8 = !{!"clang version 4.0.0 (trunk 286322) (llvm/trunk 286305)"}
[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label. In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly. We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format of DILabel is !DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3) We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block. The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out. The format of the intrinsic is llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1) It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter. We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend. Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024 Patch by Hsiangkai Wang. llvm-svn: 331841
2018-05-09 10:40:45 +08:00
!9 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 3, type: !10, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 3, isOptimized: true, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !13)
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
!10 = !DISubroutineType(types: !11)
!11 = !{!12}
!12 = !DIBasicType(name: "float", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_float)
!13 = !{!14}
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "vec", scope: !9, file: !1, line: 4, type: !15)
!15 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_typedef, name: "vec2", file: !1, line: 1, baseType: !16)
!16 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_array_type, baseType: !12, size: 128, flags: DIFlagVector, elements: !17)
!17 = !{!18}
!18 = !DISubrange(count: 4)
!19 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 13, scope: !9)
!20 = !DIExpression()
!21 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 7, scope: !9)
!22 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 9, scope: !9)
!23 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 18, scope: !9)
!24 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 16, scope: !9)
!25 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 2, scope: !9)
...
---
name: f
alignment: 1
exposesReturnsTwice: false
legalized: false
regBankSelected: false
selected: false
tracksRegLiveness: true
Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil. Discussed here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of named physical register with named vregs. llvm-svn: 323922
2018-02-01 06:04:26 +08:00
calleeSavedRegisters: [ '$lr', '$d8', '$d9', '$d10', '$d11', '$d12', '$d13',
'$d14', '$d15', '$q4', '$q5', '$q6', '$q7', '$r4',
'$r5', '$r6', '$r7', '$r8', '$r10', '$r11', '$s16',
'$s17', '$s18', '$s19', '$s20', '$s21', '$s22',
'$s23', '$s24', '$s25', '$s26', '$s27', '$s28',
'$s29', '$s30', '$s31', '$d8_d10', '$d9_d11', '$d10_d12',
'$d11_d13', '$d12_d14', '$d13_d15', '$q4_q5', '$q5_q6',
'$q6_q7', '$q4_q5_q6_q7', '$r4_r5', '$r6_r7', '$r10_r11',
'$d8_d9_d10', '$d9_d10_d11', '$d10_d11_d12', '$d11_d12_d13',
'$d12_d13_d14', '$d13_d14_d15', '$d8_d10_d12',
'$d9_d11_d13', '$d10_d12_d14', '$d11_d13_d15',
'$d8_d10_d12_d14', '$d9_d11_d13_d15', '$d9_d10',
'$d11_d12', '$d13_d14', '$d9_d10_d11_d12', '$d11_d12_d13_d14' ]
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
frameInfo:
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
isFrameAddressTaken: false
isReturnAddressTaken: false
hasStackMap: false
hasPatchPoint: false
stackSize: 4
offsetAdjustment: 0
maxAlignment: 4
adjustsStack: true
hasCalls: true
maxCallFrameSize: 0
hasOpaqueSPAdjustment: false
hasVAStart: false
hasMustTailInVarArgFunc: false
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
stack:
Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil. Discussed here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of named physical register with named vregs. llvm-svn: 323922
2018-02-01 06:04:26 +08:00
- { id: 0, type: spill-slot, offset: -4, size: 4, alignment: 4, callee-saved-register: '$lr' }
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
body: |
bb.0.entry:
Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil. Discussed here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of named physical register with named vregs. llvm-svn: 323922
2018-02-01 06:04:26 +08:00
liveins: $lr
[DebugInfo] Unify dumping of address ranges Summary: This patch unifies the printing of address ranges as [0x0, 0x1). rdar://34822059 Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42056 llvm-svn: 322543
2018-01-16 19:17:57 +08:00
Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil. Discussed here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of named physical register with named vregs. llvm-svn: 323922
2018-02-01 06:04:26 +08:00
early-clobber $sp = frame-setup t2STR_PRE killed undef $lr, $sp, -4, 14, _
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
frame-setup CFI_INSTRUCTION def_cfa_offset 4
Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil. Discussed here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of named physical register with named vregs. llvm-svn: 323922
2018-02-01 06:04:26 +08:00
frame-setup CFI_INSTRUCTION offset $lr, -4
tBL 14, _, @v, csr_ios, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $r0, implicit-def $r1, implicit-def $r2, implicit-def $r3, debug-location !19
$d1 = VMOVDRR killed $r2, killed $r3, 14, _, implicit-def $q0, debug-location !19
$d0 = VMOVDRR killed $r0, killed $r1, 14, _, implicit killed $q0, implicit-def $q0, debug-location !19
DBG_VALUE debug-use $q0, debug-use _, !14, !20, debug-location !21
$s4 = VMOVS $s1, 14, _, implicit-def $d2, debug-location !24
$d0 = VADDfd $d0, killed $d2, 14, _, implicit killed $q0, debug-location !24
$r0 = VMOVRS $s0, 14, _, implicit killed $d0, debug-location !25
$lr, $sp = t2LDR_POST $sp, 4, 14, _, debug-location !25
tBX_RET 14, _, implicit $r0, debug-location !25
Fix LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece in DWARF expressions. LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the DWARF specification. This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable, thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression. While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly, because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at the top of the stack. As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the value into place manually. This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't exercised before. <rdar://problem/29335809> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550 llvm-svn: 289266
2016-12-10 04:43:40 +08:00
...