llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopRotation.cpp

735 lines
28 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- LoopRotation.cpp - Loop Rotation Pass ------------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements Loop Rotation Pass.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/LoopRotation.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionCache.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/CodeMetrics.h"
[PM/AA] Rebuild LLVM's alias analysis infrastructure in a way compatible with the new pass manager, and no longer relying on analysis groups. This builds essentially a ground-up new AA infrastructure stack for LLVM. The core ideas are the same that are used throughout the new pass manager: type erased polymorphism and direct composition. The design is as follows: - FunctionAAResults is a type-erasing alias analysis results aggregation interface to walk a single query across a range of results from different alias analyses. Currently this is function-specific as we always assume that aliasing queries are *within* a function. - AAResultBase is a CRTP utility providing stub implementations of various parts of the alias analysis result concept, notably in several cases in terms of other more general parts of the interface. This can be used to implement only a narrow part of the interface rather than the entire interface. This isn't really ideal, this logic should be hoisted into FunctionAAResults as currently it will cause a significant amount of redundant work, but it faithfully models the behavior of the prior infrastructure. - All the alias analysis passes are ported to be wrapper passes for the legacy PM and new-style analysis passes for the new PM with a shared result object. In some cases (most notably CFL), this is an extremely naive approach that we should revisit when we can specialize for the new pass manager. - BasicAA has been restructured to reflect that it is much more fundamentally a function analysis because it uses dominator trees and loop info that need to be constructed for each function. All of the references to getting alias analysis results have been updated to use the new aggregation interface. All the preservation and other pass management code has been updated accordingly. The way the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass works is to detect the available alias analyses when run, and add them to the results object. This means that we should be able to continue to respect when various passes are added to the pipeline, for example adding CFL or adding TBAA passes should just cause their results to be available and to get folded into this. The exception to this rule is BasicAA which really needs to be a function pass due to using dominator trees and loop info. As a consequence, the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass directly depends on BasicAA and always includes it in the aggregation. This has significant implications for preserving analyses. Generally, most passes shouldn't bother preserving FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass because rebuilding the results just updates the set of known AA passes. The exception to this rule are LoopPass instances which need to preserve all the function analyses that the loop pass manager will end up needing. This means preserving both BasicAAWrapperPass and the aggregating FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass. Now, when preserving an alias analysis, you do so by directly preserving that analysis. This is only necessary for non-immutable-pass-provided alias analyses though, and there are only three of interest: BasicAA, GlobalsAA (formerly GlobalsModRef), and SCEVAA. Usually BasicAA is preserved when needed because it (like DominatorTree and LoopInfo) is marked as a CFG-only pass. I've expanded GlobalsAA into the preserved set everywhere we previously were preserving all of AliasAnalysis, and I've added SCEVAA in the intersection of that with where we preserve SCEV itself. One significant challenge to all of this is that the CGSCC passes were actually using the alias analysis implementations by taking advantage of a pretty amazing set of loop holes in the old pass manager's analysis management code which allowed analysis groups to slide through in many cases. Moving away from analysis groups makes this problem much more obvious. To fix it, I've leveraged the flexibility the design of the new PM components provides to just directly construct the relevant alias analyses for the relevant functions in the IPO passes that need them. This is a bit hacky, but should go away with the new pass manager, and is already in many ways cleaner than the prior state. Another significant challenge is that various facilities of the old alias analysis infrastructure just don't fit any more. The most significant of these is the alias analysis 'counter' pass. That pass relied on the ability to snoop on AA queries at different points in the analysis group chain. Instead, I'm planning to build printing functionality directly into the aggregation layer. I've not included that in this patch merely to keep it smaller. Note that all of this needs a nearly complete rewrite of the AA documentation. I'm planning to do that, but I'd like to make sure the new design settles, and to flesh out a bit more of what it looks like in the new pass manager first. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12080 llvm-svn: 247167
2015-09-10 01:55:00 +08:00
#include "llvm/Analysis/GlobalsModRef.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
[PM/AA] Rebuild LLVM's alias analysis infrastructure in a way compatible with the new pass manager, and no longer relying on analysis groups. This builds essentially a ground-up new AA infrastructure stack for LLVM. The core ideas are the same that are used throughout the new pass manager: type erased polymorphism and direct composition. The design is as follows: - FunctionAAResults is a type-erasing alias analysis results aggregation interface to walk a single query across a range of results from different alias analyses. Currently this is function-specific as we always assume that aliasing queries are *within* a function. - AAResultBase is a CRTP utility providing stub implementations of various parts of the alias analysis result concept, notably in several cases in terms of other more general parts of the interface. This can be used to implement only a narrow part of the interface rather than the entire interface. This isn't really ideal, this logic should be hoisted into FunctionAAResults as currently it will cause a significant amount of redundant work, but it faithfully models the behavior of the prior infrastructure. - All the alias analysis passes are ported to be wrapper passes for the legacy PM and new-style analysis passes for the new PM with a shared result object. In some cases (most notably CFL), this is an extremely naive approach that we should revisit when we can specialize for the new pass manager. - BasicAA has been restructured to reflect that it is much more fundamentally a function analysis because it uses dominator trees and loop info that need to be constructed for each function. All of the references to getting alias analysis results have been updated to use the new aggregation interface. All the preservation and other pass management code has been updated accordingly. The way the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass works is to detect the available alias analyses when run, and add them to the results object. This means that we should be able to continue to respect when various passes are added to the pipeline, for example adding CFL or adding TBAA passes should just cause their results to be available and to get folded into this. The exception to this rule is BasicAA which really needs to be a function pass due to using dominator trees and loop info. As a consequence, the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass directly depends on BasicAA and always includes it in the aggregation. This has significant implications for preserving analyses. Generally, most passes shouldn't bother preserving FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass because rebuilding the results just updates the set of known AA passes. The exception to this rule are LoopPass instances which need to preserve all the function analyses that the loop pass manager will end up needing. This means preserving both BasicAAWrapperPass and the aggregating FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass. Now, when preserving an alias analysis, you do so by directly preserving that analysis. This is only necessary for non-immutable-pass-provided alias analyses though, and there are only three of interest: BasicAA, GlobalsAA (formerly GlobalsModRef), and SCEVAA. Usually BasicAA is preserved when needed because it (like DominatorTree and LoopInfo) is marked as a CFG-only pass. I've expanded GlobalsAA into the preserved set everywhere we previously were preserving all of AliasAnalysis, and I've added SCEVAA in the intersection of that with where we preserve SCEV itself. One significant challenge to all of this is that the CGSCC passes were actually using the alias analysis implementations by taking advantage of a pretty amazing set of loop holes in the old pass manager's analysis management code which allowed analysis groups to slide through in many cases. Moving away from analysis groups makes this problem much more obvious. To fix it, I've leveraged the flexibility the design of the new PM components provides to just directly construct the relevant alias analyses for the relevant functions in the IPO passes that need them. This is a bit hacky, but should go away with the new pass manager, and is already in many ways cleaner than the prior state. Another significant challenge is that various facilities of the old alias analysis infrastructure just don't fit any more. The most significant of these is the alias analysis 'counter' pass. That pass relied on the ability to snoop on AA queries at different points in the analysis group chain. Instead, I'm planning to build printing functionality directly into the aggregation layer. I've not included that in this patch merely to keep it smaller. Note that all of this needs a nearly complete rewrite of the AA documentation. I'm planning to do that, but I'd like to make sure the new design settles, and to flesh out a bit more of what it looks like in the new pass manager first. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12080 llvm-svn: 247167
2015-09-10 01:55:00 +08:00
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
#include "llvm/IR/CFG.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
[LPM] Factor all of the loop analysis usage updates into a common helper routine. We were getting this wrong in small ways and generally being very inconsistent about it across loop passes. Instead, let's have a common place where we do this. One minor downside is that this will require some analyses like SCEV in more places than they are strictly needed. However, this seems benign as these analyses are complete no-ops, and without this consistency we can in many cases end up with the legacy pass manager scheduling deciding to split up a loop pass pipeline in order to run the function analysis half-way through. It is very, very annoying to fix these without just being very pedantic across the board. The only loop passes I've not updated here are ones that use AU.setPreservesAll() such as IVUsers (an analysis) and the pass printer. They seemed less relevant. With this patch, almost all of the problems in PR24804 around loop pass pipelines are fixed. The one remaining issue is that we run simplify-cfg and instcombine in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. We've recently added some loop variants of these passes that would seem substantially cleaner to use, but this at least gets us much closer to the previous state. Notably, the seven loop pass managers is down to three. I've not updated the loop passes using LoopAccessAnalysis because that analysis hasn't been fully wired into LoopSimplify/LCSSA, and it isn't clear that those transforms want to support those forms anyways. They all run late anyways, so this is harmless. Similarly, LSR is left alone because it already carefully manages its forms and doesn't need to get fused into a single loop pass manager with a bunch of other loop passes. LoopReroll didn't use loop simplified form previously, and I've updated the test case to match the trivially different output. Finally, I've also factored all the pass initialization for the passes that use this technique as well, so that should be done regularly and reliably. Thanks to James for the help reviewing and thinking about this stuff, and Ben for help thinking about it as well! Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17435 llvm-svn: 261316
2016-02-19 18:45:18 +08:00
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/SSAUpdater.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/ValueMapper.h"
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-rotate"
static cl::opt<unsigned> DefaultRotationThreshold(
"rotation-max-header-size", cl::init(16), cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("The default maximum header size for automatic loop rotation"));
STATISTIC(NumRotated, "Number of loops rotated");
namespace {
/// A simple loop rotation transformation.
class LoopRotate {
const unsigned MaxHeaderSize;
LoopInfo *LI;
const TargetTransformInfo *TTI;
AssumptionCache *AC;
DominatorTree *DT;
ScalarEvolution *SE;
public:
LoopRotate(unsigned MaxHeaderSize, LoopInfo *LI,
const TargetTransformInfo *TTI, AssumptionCache *AC,
DominatorTree *DT, ScalarEvolution *SE)
: MaxHeaderSize(MaxHeaderSize), LI(LI), TTI(TTI), AC(AC), DT(DT), SE(SE) {
}
bool processLoop(Loop *L);
private:
bool rotateLoop(Loop *L, bool SimplifiedLatch);
bool simplifyLoopLatch(Loop *L);
};
} // end anonymous namespace
/// RewriteUsesOfClonedInstructions - We just cloned the instructions from the
/// old header into the preheader. If there were uses of the values produced by
/// these instruction that were outside of the loop, we have to insert PHI nodes
/// to merge the two values. Do this now.
static void RewriteUsesOfClonedInstructions(BasicBlock *OrigHeader,
BasicBlock *OrigPreheader,
ValueToValueMapTy &ValueMap,
SmallVectorImpl<PHINode*> *InsertedPHIs) {
// Remove PHI node entries that are no longer live.
BasicBlock::iterator I, E = OrigHeader->end();
for (I = OrigHeader->begin(); PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I)
PN->removeIncomingValue(PN->getBasicBlockIndex(OrigPreheader));
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// Now fix up users of the instructions in OrigHeader, inserting PHI nodes
// as necessary.
SSAUpdater SSA(InsertedPHIs);
for (I = OrigHeader->begin(); I != E; ++I) {
Value *OrigHeaderVal = &*I;
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// If there are no uses of the value (e.g. because it returns void), there
// is nothing to rewrite.
if (OrigHeaderVal->use_empty())
continue;
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
Value *OrigPreHeaderVal = ValueMap.lookup(OrigHeaderVal);
// The value now exits in two versions: the initial value in the preheader
// and the loop "next" value in the original header.
SSA.Initialize(OrigHeaderVal->getType(), OrigHeaderVal->getName());
SSA.AddAvailableValue(OrigHeader, OrigHeaderVal);
SSA.AddAvailableValue(OrigPreheader, OrigPreHeaderVal);
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// Visit each use of the OrigHeader instruction.
for (Value::use_iterator UI = OrigHeaderVal->use_begin(),
UE = OrigHeaderVal->use_end();
UI != UE;) {
// Grab the use before incrementing the iterator.
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
Use &U = *UI;
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// Increment the iterator before removing the use from the list.
++UI;
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// SSAUpdater can't handle a non-PHI use in the same block as an
// earlier def. We can easily handle those cases manually.
Instruction *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
if (!isa<PHINode>(UserInst)) {
BasicBlock *UserBB = UserInst->getParent();
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// The original users in the OrigHeader are already using the
// original definitions.
if (UserBB == OrigHeader)
continue;
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// Users in the OrigPreHeader need to use the value to which the
// original definitions are mapped.
if (UserBB == OrigPreheader) {
U = OrigPreHeaderVal;
continue;
}
}
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// Anything else can be handled by SSAUpdater.
SSA.RewriteUse(U);
}
// Replace MetadataAsValue(ValueAsMetadata(OrigHeaderVal)) uses in debug
// intrinsics.
LLVMContext &C = OrigHeader->getContext();
if (auto *VAM = ValueAsMetadata::getIfExists(OrigHeaderVal)) {
if (auto *MAV = MetadataAsValue::getIfExists(C, VAM)) {
for (auto UI = MAV->use_begin(), E = MAV->use_end(); UI != E;) {
// Grab the use before incrementing the iterator. Otherwise, altering
// the Use will invalidate the iterator.
Use &U = *UI++;
DbgInfoIntrinsic *UserInst = dyn_cast<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(U.getUser());
if (!UserInst)
continue;
// The original users in the OrigHeader are already using the original
// definitions.
BasicBlock *UserBB = UserInst->getParent();
if (UserBB == OrigHeader)
continue;
// Users in the OrigPreHeader need to use the value to which the
// original definitions are mapped and anything else can be handled by
// the SSAUpdater. To avoid adding PHINodes, check if the value is
// available in UserBB, if not substitute undef.
Value *NewVal;
if (UserBB == OrigPreheader)
NewVal = OrigPreHeaderVal;
else if (SSA.HasValueForBlock(UserBB))
NewVal = SSA.GetValueInMiddleOfBlock(UserBB);
else
NewVal = UndefValue::get(OrigHeaderVal->getType());
U = MetadataAsValue::get(C, ValueAsMetadata::get(NewVal));
}
}
}
}
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
}
/// Propagate dbg.value intrinsics through the newly inserted Phis.
static void insertDebugValues(BasicBlock *OrigHeader,
SmallVectorImpl<PHINode*> &InsertedPHIs) {
ValueToValueMapTy DbgValueMap;
// Map existing PHI nodes to their dbg.values.
for (auto &I : *OrigHeader) {
if (auto DbgII = dyn_cast<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(&I)) {
if (auto *Loc = dyn_cast_or_null<PHINode>(DbgII->getVariableLocation()))
DbgValueMap.insert({Loc, DbgII});
}
}
// Then iterate through the new PHIs and look to see if they use one of the
// previously mapped PHIs. If so, insert a new dbg.value intrinsic that will
// propagate the info through the new PHI.
LLVMContext &C = OrigHeader->getContext();
for (auto PHI : InsertedPHIs) {
for (auto VI : PHI->operand_values()) {
auto V = DbgValueMap.find(VI);
if (V != DbgValueMap.end()) {
auto *DbgII = cast<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(V->second);
Instruction *NewDbgII = DbgII->clone();
auto PhiMAV = MetadataAsValue::get(C, ValueAsMetadata::get(PHI));
NewDbgII->setOperand(0, PhiMAV);
BasicBlock *Parent = PHI->getParent();
NewDbgII->insertBefore(Parent->getFirstNonPHIOrDbgOrLifetime());
}
}
}
}
2007-05-12 05:10:54 +08:00
/// Rotate loop LP. Return true if the loop is rotated.
Rotate multi-exit loops even if the latch was simplified. Test case by Michele Scandale! Fixes PR10293: Load not hoisted out of loop with multiple exits. There are few regressions with this patch, now tracked by rdar:13817079, and a roughly equal number of improvements. The regressions are almost certainly back luck because LoopRotate has very little idea of whether rotation is profitable. Doing better requires a more comprehensive solution. This checkin is a quick fix that lacks generality (PR10293 has a counter-example). But it trivially fixes the case in PR10293 without interfering with other cases, and it does satify the criteria that LoopRotate is a loop canonicalization pass that should avoid heuristics and special cases. I can think of two approaches that would probably be better in the long run. Ultimately they may both make sense. (1) LoopRotate should check that the current header would make a good loop guard, and that the loop does not already has a sufficient guard. The artifical SimplifiedLoopLatch check would be unnecessary, and the design would be more general and canonical. Two difficulties: - We need a strong guarantee that we won't endlessly rotate, so the analysis would need to be precise in order to avoid the SimplifiedLoopLatch precondition. - Analysis like this are usually based on SCEV, which we don't want to rely on. (2) Rotate on-demand in late loop passes. This could even be done by shoving the loop back on the queue after the optimization that needs it. This could work well when we find LICM opportunities in multi-branch loops. This requires some work, and it doesn't really solve the problem of SCEV wanting a loop guard before the analysis. llvm-svn: 181230
2013-05-07 01:58:18 +08:00
///
/// \param SimplifiedLatch is true if the latch was just folded into the final
/// loop exit. In this case we may want to rotate even though the new latch is
/// now an exiting branch. This rotation would have happened had the latch not
/// been simplified. However, if SimplifiedLatch is false, then we avoid
/// rotating loops in which the latch exits to avoid excessive or endless
/// rotation. LoopRotate should be repeatable and converge to a canonical
/// form. This property is satisfied because simplifying the loop latch can only
/// happen once across multiple invocations of the LoopRotate pass.
bool LoopRotate::rotateLoop(Loop *L, bool SimplifiedLatch) {
2009-06-25 08:22:44 +08:00
// If the loop has only one block then there is not much to rotate.
if (L->getBlocks().size() == 1)
return false;
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
BasicBlock *OrigHeader = L->getHeader();
BasicBlock *OrigLatch = L->getLoopLatch();
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(OrigHeader->getTerminator());
if (!BI || BI->isUnconditional())
return false;
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
2009-06-25 08:22:44 +08:00
// If the loop header is not one of the loop exiting blocks then
// either this loop is already rotated or it is not
// suitable for loop rotation transformations.
if (!L->isLoopExiting(OrigHeader))
return false;
// If the loop latch already contains a branch that leaves the loop then the
// loop is already rotated.
if (!OrigLatch)
Rotate multi-exit loops even if the latch was simplified. Test case by Michele Scandale! Fixes PR10293: Load not hoisted out of loop with multiple exits. There are few regressions with this patch, now tracked by rdar:13817079, and a roughly equal number of improvements. The regressions are almost certainly back luck because LoopRotate has very little idea of whether rotation is profitable. Doing better requires a more comprehensive solution. This checkin is a quick fix that lacks generality (PR10293 has a counter-example). But it trivially fixes the case in PR10293 without interfering with other cases, and it does satify the criteria that LoopRotate is a loop canonicalization pass that should avoid heuristics and special cases. I can think of two approaches that would probably be better in the long run. Ultimately they may both make sense. (1) LoopRotate should check that the current header would make a good loop guard, and that the loop does not already has a sufficient guard. The artifical SimplifiedLoopLatch check would be unnecessary, and the design would be more general and canonical. Two difficulties: - We need a strong guarantee that we won't endlessly rotate, so the analysis would need to be precise in order to avoid the SimplifiedLoopLatch precondition. - Analysis like this are usually based on SCEV, which we don't want to rely on. (2) Rotate on-demand in late loop passes. This could even be done by shoving the loop back on the queue after the optimization that needs it. This could work well when we find LICM opportunities in multi-branch loops. This requires some work, and it doesn't really solve the problem of SCEV wanting a loop guard before the analysis. llvm-svn: 181230
2013-05-07 01:58:18 +08:00
return false;
// Rotate if either the loop latch does *not* exit the loop, or if the loop
// latch was just simplified.
if (L->isLoopExiting(OrigLatch) && !SimplifiedLatch)
return false;
// Check size of original header and reject loop if it is very big or we can't
// duplicate blocks inside it.
{
SmallPtrSet<const Value *, 32> EphValues;
CodeMetrics::collectEphemeralValues(L, AC, EphValues);
CodeMetrics Metrics;
Metrics.analyzeBasicBlock(OrigHeader, *TTI, EphValues);
if (Metrics.notDuplicatable) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "LoopRotation: NOT rotating - contains non-duplicatable"
<< " instructions: ";
L->dump());
return false;
}
if (Metrics.convergent) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "LoopRotation: NOT rotating - contains convergent "
"instructions: ";
L->dump());
return false;
}
if (Metrics.NumInsts > MaxHeaderSize)
return false;
}
// Now, this loop is suitable for rotation.
BasicBlock *OrigPreheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// If the loop could not be converted to canonical form, it must have an
// indirectbr in it, just give up.
if (!OrigPreheader)
return false;
// Anything ScalarEvolution may know about this loop or the PHI nodes
// in its header will soon be invalidated.
if (SE)
SE->forgetLoop(L);
DEBUG(dbgs() << "LoopRotation: rotating "; L->dump());
// Find new Loop header. NewHeader is a Header's one and only successor
// that is inside loop. Header's other successor is outside the
// loop. Otherwise loop is not suitable for rotation.
BasicBlock *Exit = BI->getSuccessor(0);
BasicBlock *NewHeader = BI->getSuccessor(1);
if (L->contains(Exit))
std::swap(Exit, NewHeader);
2009-01-26 09:38:24 +08:00
assert(NewHeader && "Unable to determine new loop header");
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
assert(L->contains(NewHeader) && !L->contains(Exit) &&
"Unable to determine loop header and exit blocks");
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
2009-06-25 08:22:44 +08:00
// This code assumes that the new header has exactly one predecessor.
// Remove any single-entry PHI nodes in it.
assert(NewHeader->getSinglePredecessor() &&
"New header doesn't have one pred!");
FoldSingleEntryPHINodes(NewHeader);
// Begin by walking OrigHeader and populating ValueMap with an entry for
// each Instruction.
BasicBlock::iterator I = OrigHeader->begin(), E = OrigHeader->end();
ValueToValueMapTy ValueMap;
// For PHI nodes, the value available in OldPreHeader is just the
// incoming value from OldPreHeader.
for (; PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I)
ValueMap[PN] = PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(OrigPreheader);
const DataLayout &DL = L->getHeader()->getModule()->getDataLayout();
// For the rest of the instructions, either hoist to the OrigPreheader if
// possible or create a clone in the OldPreHeader if not.
TerminatorInst *LoopEntryBranch = OrigPreheader->getTerminator();
while (I != E) {
Instruction *Inst = &*I++;
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// If the instruction's operands are invariant and it doesn't read or write
// memory, then it is safe to hoist. Doing this doesn't change the order of
// execution in the preheader, but does prevent the instruction from
// executing in each iteration of the loop. This means it is safe to hoist
// something that might trap, but isn't safe to hoist something that reads
// memory (without proving that the loop doesn't write).
if (L->hasLoopInvariantOperands(Inst) && !Inst->mayReadFromMemory() &&
!Inst->mayWriteToMemory() && !isa<TerminatorInst>(Inst) &&
!isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(Inst) && !isa<AllocaInst>(Inst)) {
Inst->moveBefore(LoopEntryBranch);
continue;
}
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// Otherwise, create a duplicate of the instruction.
Instruction *C = Inst->clone();
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// Eagerly remap the operands of the instruction.
RemapInstruction(C, ValueMap,
RF_NoModuleLevelChanges | RF_IgnoreMissingLocals);
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
// With the operands remapped, see if the instruction constant folds or is
// otherwise simplifyable. This commonly occurs because the entry from PHI
// nodes allows icmps and other instructions to fold.
// FIXME: Provide TLI, DT, AC to SimplifyInstruction.
Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(C, DL);
if (V && LI->replacementPreservesLCSSAForm(C, V)) {
// If so, then delete the temporary instruction and stick the folded value
// in the map.
ValueMap[Inst] = V;
if (!C->mayHaveSideEffects()) {
delete C;
C = nullptr;
}
} else {
ValueMap[Inst] = C;
}
if (C) {
// Otherwise, stick the new instruction into the new block!
C->setName(Inst->getName());
C->insertBefore(LoopEntryBranch);
if (auto *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(C))
if (II->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::assume)
AC->registerAssumption(II);
}
}
// Along with all the other instructions, we just cloned OrigHeader's
// terminator into OrigPreHeader. Fix up the PHI nodes in each of OrigHeader's
// successors by duplicating their incoming values for OrigHeader.
TerminatorInst *TI = OrigHeader->getTerminator();
for (BasicBlock *SuccBB : TI->successors())
for (BasicBlock::iterator BI = SuccBB->begin();
PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BI); ++BI)
PN->addIncoming(PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(OrigHeader), OrigPreheader);
// Now that OrigPreHeader has a clone of OrigHeader's terminator, remove
// OrigPreHeader's old terminator (the original branch into the loop), and
// remove the corresponding incoming values from the PHI nodes in OrigHeader.
LoopEntryBranch->eraseFromParent();
SmallVector<PHINode*, 2> InsertedPHIs;
// If there were any uses of instructions in the duplicated block outside the
// loop, update them, inserting PHI nodes as required
RewriteUsesOfClonedInstructions(OrigHeader, OrigPreheader, ValueMap,
&InsertedPHIs);
// Attach dbg.value intrinsics to the new phis if that phi uses a value that
// previously had debug metadata attached. This keeps the debug info
// up-to-date in the loop body.
if (!InsertedPHIs.empty())
insertDebugValues(OrigHeader, InsertedPHIs);
// NewHeader is now the header of the loop.
L->moveToHeader(NewHeader);
assert(L->getHeader() == NewHeader && "Latch block is our new header");
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
// At this point, we've finished our major CFG changes. As part of cloning
// the loop into the preheader we've simplified instructions and the
// duplicated conditional branch may now be branching on a constant. If it is
// branching on a constant and if that constant means that we enter the loop,
// then we fold away the cond branch to an uncond branch. This simplifies the
// loop in cases important for nested loops, and it also means we don't have
// to split as many edges.
BranchInst *PHBI = cast<BranchInst>(OrigPreheader->getTerminator());
assert(PHBI->isConditional() && "Should be clone of BI condbr!");
if (!isa<ConstantInt>(PHBI->getCondition()) ||
PHBI->getSuccessor(cast<ConstantInt>(PHBI->getCondition())->isZero()) !=
NewHeader) {
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
// The conditional branch can't be folded, handle the general case.
// Update DominatorTree to reflect the CFG change we just made. Then split
// edges as necessary to preserve LoopSimplify form.
if (DT) {
// Everything that was dominated by the old loop header is now dominated
// by the original loop preheader. Conceptually the header was merged
// into the preheader, even though we reuse the actual block as a new
// loop latch.
DomTreeNode *OrigHeaderNode = DT->getNode(OrigHeader);
SmallVector<DomTreeNode *, 8> HeaderChildren(OrigHeaderNode->begin(),
OrigHeaderNode->end());
DomTreeNode *OrigPreheaderNode = DT->getNode(OrigPreheader);
for (unsigned I = 0, E = HeaderChildren.size(); I != E; ++I)
DT->changeImmediateDominator(HeaderChildren[I], OrigPreheaderNode);
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
assert(DT->getNode(Exit)->getIDom() == OrigPreheaderNode);
assert(DT->getNode(NewHeader)->getIDom() == OrigPreheaderNode);
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
// Update OrigHeader to be dominated by the new header block.
DT->changeImmediateDominator(OrigHeader, OrigLatch);
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
}
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
// Right now OrigPreHeader has two successors, NewHeader and ExitBlock, and
2012-07-24 18:51:42 +08:00
// thus is not a preheader anymore.
// Split the edge to form a real preheader.
BasicBlock *NewPH = SplitCriticalEdge(
OrigPreheader, NewHeader,
CriticalEdgeSplittingOptions(DT, LI).setPreserveLCSSA());
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
NewPH->setName(NewHeader->getName() + ".lr.ph");
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
2012-07-24 18:51:42 +08:00
// Preserve canonical loop form, which means that 'Exit' should have only
[LPM] Fix PR18643, another scary place where loop transforms failed to preserve loop simplify of enclosing loops. The problem here starts with LoopRotation which ends up cloning code out of the latch into the new preheader it is buidling. This can create a new edge from the preheader into the exit block of the loop which breaks LoopSimplify form. The code tries to fix this by splitting the critical edge between the latch and the exit block to get a new exit block that only the latch dominates. This sadly isn't sufficient. The exit block may be an exit block for multiple nested loops. When we clone an edge from the latch of the inner loop to the new preheader being built in the outer loop, we create an exiting edge from the outer loop to this exit block. Despite breaking the LoopSimplify form for the inner loop, this is fine for the outer loop. However, when we split the edge from the inner loop to the exit block, we create a new block which is in neither the inner nor outer loop as the new exit block. This is a predecessor to the old exit block, and so the split itself takes the outer loop out of LoopSimplify form. We need to split every edge entering the exit block from inside a loop nested more deeply than the exit block in order to preserve all of the loop simplify constraints. Once we try to do that, a problem with splitting critical edges surfaces. Previously, we tried a very brute force to update LoopSimplify form by re-computing it for all exit blocks. We don't need to do this, and doing this much will sometimes but not always overlap with the LoopRotate bug fix. Instead, the code needs to specifically handle the cases which can start to violate LoopSimplify -- they aren't that common. We need to see if the destination of the split edge was a loop exit block in simplified form for the loop of the source of the edge. For this to be true, all the predecessors need to be in the exact same loop as the source of the edge being split. If the dest block was originally in this form, we have to split all of the deges back into this loop to recover it. The old mechanism of doing this was conservatively correct because at least *one* of the exiting blocks it rewrote was the DestBB and so the DestBB's predecessors were fixed. But this is a much more targeted way of doing it. Making it targeted is important, because ballooning the set of edges touched prevents LoopRotate from being able to split edges *it* needs to split to preserve loop simplify in a coherent way -- the critical edge splitting would sometimes find the other edges in need of splitting but not others. Many, *many* thanks for help from Nick reducing these test cases mightily. And helping lots with the analysis here as this one was quite tricky to track down. llvm-svn: 200393
2014-01-29 21:16:53 +08:00
// one predecessor. Note that Exit could be an exit block for multiple
// nested loops, causing both of the edges to now be critical and need to
// be split.
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> ExitPreds(pred_begin(Exit), pred_end(Exit));
bool SplitLatchEdge = false;
for (BasicBlock *ExitPred : ExitPreds) {
[LPM] Fix PR18643, another scary place where loop transforms failed to preserve loop simplify of enclosing loops. The problem here starts with LoopRotation which ends up cloning code out of the latch into the new preheader it is buidling. This can create a new edge from the preheader into the exit block of the loop which breaks LoopSimplify form. The code tries to fix this by splitting the critical edge between the latch and the exit block to get a new exit block that only the latch dominates. This sadly isn't sufficient. The exit block may be an exit block for multiple nested loops. When we clone an edge from the latch of the inner loop to the new preheader being built in the outer loop, we create an exiting edge from the outer loop to this exit block. Despite breaking the LoopSimplify form for the inner loop, this is fine for the outer loop. However, when we split the edge from the inner loop to the exit block, we create a new block which is in neither the inner nor outer loop as the new exit block. This is a predecessor to the old exit block, and so the split itself takes the outer loop out of LoopSimplify form. We need to split every edge entering the exit block from inside a loop nested more deeply than the exit block in order to preserve all of the loop simplify constraints. Once we try to do that, a problem with splitting critical edges surfaces. Previously, we tried a very brute force to update LoopSimplify form by re-computing it for all exit blocks. We don't need to do this, and doing this much will sometimes but not always overlap with the LoopRotate bug fix. Instead, the code needs to specifically handle the cases which can start to violate LoopSimplify -- they aren't that common. We need to see if the destination of the split edge was a loop exit block in simplified form for the loop of the source of the edge. For this to be true, all the predecessors need to be in the exact same loop as the source of the edge being split. If the dest block was originally in this form, we have to split all of the deges back into this loop to recover it. The old mechanism of doing this was conservatively correct because at least *one* of the exiting blocks it rewrote was the DestBB and so the DestBB's predecessors were fixed. But this is a much more targeted way of doing it. Making it targeted is important, because ballooning the set of edges touched prevents LoopRotate from being able to split edges *it* needs to split to preserve loop simplify in a coherent way -- the critical edge splitting would sometimes find the other edges in need of splitting but not others. Many, *many* thanks for help from Nick reducing these test cases mightily. And helping lots with the analysis here as this one was quite tricky to track down. llvm-svn: 200393
2014-01-29 21:16:53 +08:00
// We only need to split loop exit edges.
Loop *PredLoop = LI->getLoopFor(ExitPred);
[LPM] Fix PR18643, another scary place where loop transforms failed to preserve loop simplify of enclosing loops. The problem here starts with LoopRotation which ends up cloning code out of the latch into the new preheader it is buidling. This can create a new edge from the preheader into the exit block of the loop which breaks LoopSimplify form. The code tries to fix this by splitting the critical edge between the latch and the exit block to get a new exit block that only the latch dominates. This sadly isn't sufficient. The exit block may be an exit block for multiple nested loops. When we clone an edge from the latch of the inner loop to the new preheader being built in the outer loop, we create an exiting edge from the outer loop to this exit block. Despite breaking the LoopSimplify form for the inner loop, this is fine for the outer loop. However, when we split the edge from the inner loop to the exit block, we create a new block which is in neither the inner nor outer loop as the new exit block. This is a predecessor to the old exit block, and so the split itself takes the outer loop out of LoopSimplify form. We need to split every edge entering the exit block from inside a loop nested more deeply than the exit block in order to preserve all of the loop simplify constraints. Once we try to do that, a problem with splitting critical edges surfaces. Previously, we tried a very brute force to update LoopSimplify form by re-computing it for all exit blocks. We don't need to do this, and doing this much will sometimes but not always overlap with the LoopRotate bug fix. Instead, the code needs to specifically handle the cases which can start to violate LoopSimplify -- they aren't that common. We need to see if the destination of the split edge was a loop exit block in simplified form for the loop of the source of the edge. For this to be true, all the predecessors need to be in the exact same loop as the source of the edge being split. If the dest block was originally in this form, we have to split all of the deges back into this loop to recover it. The old mechanism of doing this was conservatively correct because at least *one* of the exiting blocks it rewrote was the DestBB and so the DestBB's predecessors were fixed. But this is a much more targeted way of doing it. Making it targeted is important, because ballooning the set of edges touched prevents LoopRotate from being able to split edges *it* needs to split to preserve loop simplify in a coherent way -- the critical edge splitting would sometimes find the other edges in need of splitting but not others. Many, *many* thanks for help from Nick reducing these test cases mightily. And helping lots with the analysis here as this one was quite tricky to track down. llvm-svn: 200393
2014-01-29 21:16:53 +08:00
if (!PredLoop || PredLoop->contains(Exit))
continue;
if (isa<IndirectBrInst>(ExitPred->getTerminator()))
continue;
SplitLatchEdge |= L->getLoopLatch() == ExitPred;
BasicBlock *ExitSplit = SplitCriticalEdge(
ExitPred, Exit,
CriticalEdgeSplittingOptions(DT, LI).setPreserveLCSSA());
[LPM] Fix PR18643, another scary place where loop transforms failed to preserve loop simplify of enclosing loops. The problem here starts with LoopRotation which ends up cloning code out of the latch into the new preheader it is buidling. This can create a new edge from the preheader into the exit block of the loop which breaks LoopSimplify form. The code tries to fix this by splitting the critical edge between the latch and the exit block to get a new exit block that only the latch dominates. This sadly isn't sufficient. The exit block may be an exit block for multiple nested loops. When we clone an edge from the latch of the inner loop to the new preheader being built in the outer loop, we create an exiting edge from the outer loop to this exit block. Despite breaking the LoopSimplify form for the inner loop, this is fine for the outer loop. However, when we split the edge from the inner loop to the exit block, we create a new block which is in neither the inner nor outer loop as the new exit block. This is a predecessor to the old exit block, and so the split itself takes the outer loop out of LoopSimplify form. We need to split every edge entering the exit block from inside a loop nested more deeply than the exit block in order to preserve all of the loop simplify constraints. Once we try to do that, a problem with splitting critical edges surfaces. Previously, we tried a very brute force to update LoopSimplify form by re-computing it for all exit blocks. We don't need to do this, and doing this much will sometimes but not always overlap with the LoopRotate bug fix. Instead, the code needs to specifically handle the cases which can start to violate LoopSimplify -- they aren't that common. We need to see if the destination of the split edge was a loop exit block in simplified form for the loop of the source of the edge. For this to be true, all the predecessors need to be in the exact same loop as the source of the edge being split. If the dest block was originally in this form, we have to split all of the deges back into this loop to recover it. The old mechanism of doing this was conservatively correct because at least *one* of the exiting blocks it rewrote was the DestBB and so the DestBB's predecessors were fixed. But this is a much more targeted way of doing it. Making it targeted is important, because ballooning the set of edges touched prevents LoopRotate from being able to split edges *it* needs to split to preserve loop simplify in a coherent way -- the critical edge splitting would sometimes find the other edges in need of splitting but not others. Many, *many* thanks for help from Nick reducing these test cases mightily. And helping lots with the analysis here as this one was quite tricky to track down. llvm-svn: 200393
2014-01-29 21:16:53 +08:00
ExitSplit->moveBefore(Exit);
}
assert(SplitLatchEdge &&
"Despite splitting all preds, failed to split latch exit?");
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
} else {
// We can fold the conditional branch in the preheader, this makes things
// simpler. The first step is to remove the extra edge to the Exit block.
Exit->removePredecessor(OrigPreheader, true /*preserve LCSSA*/);
BranchInst *NewBI = BranchInst::Create(NewHeader, PHBI);
NewBI->setDebugLoc(PHBI->getDebugLoc());
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
PHBI->eraseFromParent();
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
// With our CFG finalized, update DomTree if it is available.
if (DT) {
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
// Update OrigHeader to be dominated by the new header block.
DT->changeImmediateDominator(NewHeader, OrigPreheader);
DT->changeImmediateDominator(OrigHeader, OrigLatch);
// Brute force incremental dominator tree update. Call
// findNearestCommonDominator on all CFG predecessors of each child of the
// original header.
DomTreeNode *OrigHeaderNode = DT->getNode(OrigHeader);
SmallVector<DomTreeNode *, 8> HeaderChildren(OrigHeaderNode->begin(),
OrigHeaderNode->end());
bool Changed;
do {
Changed = false;
for (unsigned I = 0, E = HeaderChildren.size(); I != E; ++I) {
DomTreeNode *Node = HeaderChildren[I];
BasicBlock *BB = Node->getBlock();
pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB);
BasicBlock *NearestDom = *PI;
for (pred_iterator PE = pred_end(BB); PI != PE; ++PI)
NearestDom = DT->findNearestCommonDominator(NearestDom, *PI);
// Remember if this changes the DomTree.
if (Node->getIDom()->getBlock() != NearestDom) {
DT->changeImmediateDominator(BB, NearestDom);
Changed = true;
}
}
// If the dominator changed, this may have an effect on other
// predecessors, continue until we reach a fixpoint.
} while (Changed);
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
}
}
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
When loop rotation happens, it is *very* common for the duplicated condbr to be foldable into an uncond branch. When this happens, we can make a much simpler CFG for the loop, which is important for nested loop cases where we want the outer loop to be aggressively optimized. Handle this case more aggressively. For example, previously on phi-duplicate.ll we would get this: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: %cmp1 = icmp slt i64 1, 1000 br i1 %cmp1, label %bb.nph, label %for.end bb.nph: ; preds = %entry br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond %j.02 = phi i64 [ 1, %bb.nph ], [ %inc, %for.cond ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.02, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.02 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.02, 1 br label %for.cond for.cond: ; preds = %for.body %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry ret void } Now we get the much nicer: define void @test(i32 %N, double* %G) nounwind ssp { entry: br label %for.body for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body %j.01 = phi i64 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 %tmp3 = load double* %arrayidx %sub = sub i64 %j.01, 1 %arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %sub %tmp7 = load double* %arrayidx6 %add = fadd double %tmp3, %tmp7 %arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds double* %G, i64 %j.01 store double %add, double* %arrayidx10 %inc = add nsw i64 %j.01, 1 %cmp = icmp slt i64 %inc, 1000 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %for.body ret void } With all of these recent changes, we are now able to compile: void foo(char *X) { for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i) for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j) X[j+i*100] = 0; } into a single memset of 10000 bytes. This series of changes should also be helpful for other nested loop scenarios as well. llvm-svn: 123079
2011-01-09 03:59:06 +08:00
assert(L->getLoopPreheader() && "Invalid loop preheader after loop rotation");
assert(L->getLoopLatch() && "Invalid loop latch after loop rotation");
// Now that the CFG and DomTree are in a consistent state again, try to merge
// the OrigHeader block into OrigLatch. This will succeed if they are
// connected by an unconditional branch. This is just a cleanup so the
// emitted code isn't too gross in this common case.
MergeBlockIntoPredecessor(OrigHeader, DT, LI);
2012-02-14 08:00:19 +08:00
DEBUG(dbgs() << "LoopRotation: into "; L->dump());
++NumRotated;
return true;
}
/// Determine whether the instructions in this range may be safely and cheaply
/// speculated. This is not an important enough situation to develop complex
/// heuristics. We handle a single arithmetic instruction along with any type
/// conversions.
static bool shouldSpeculateInstrs(BasicBlock::iterator Begin,
BasicBlock::iterator End, Loop *L) {
bool seenIncrement = false;
bool MultiExitLoop = false;
if (!L->getExitingBlock())
MultiExitLoop = true;
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Begin; I != End; ++I) {
if (!isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(&*I))
return false;
if (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(I))
continue;
switch (I->getOpcode()) {
default:
return false;
case Instruction::GetElementPtr:
// GEPs are cheap if all indices are constant.
if (!cast<GEPOperator>(I)->hasAllConstantIndices())
return false;
// fall-thru to increment case
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
case Instruction::Add:
case Instruction::Sub:
case Instruction::And:
case Instruction::Or:
case Instruction::Xor:
case Instruction::Shl:
case Instruction::LShr:
case Instruction::AShr: {
Value *IVOpnd =
!isa<Constant>(I->getOperand(0))
? I->getOperand(0)
: !isa<Constant>(I->getOperand(1)) ? I->getOperand(1) : nullptr;
if (!IVOpnd)
return false;
// If increment operand is used outside of the loop, this speculation
// could cause extra live range interference.
if (MultiExitLoop) {
for (User *UseI : IVOpnd->users()) {
auto *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(UseI);
if (!L->contains(UserInst))
return false;
}
}
if (seenIncrement)
return false;
seenIncrement = true;
break;
}
case Instruction::Trunc:
case Instruction::ZExt:
case Instruction::SExt:
// ignore type conversions
break;
}
}
return true;
}
/// Fold the loop tail into the loop exit by speculating the loop tail
/// instructions. Typically, this is a single post-increment. In the case of a
/// simple 2-block loop, hoisting the increment can be much better than
/// duplicating the entire loop header. In the case of loops with early exits,
/// rotation will not work anyway, but simplifyLoopLatch will put the loop in
/// canonical form so downstream passes can handle it.
///
/// I don't believe this invalidates SCEV.
bool LoopRotate::simplifyLoopLatch(Loop *L) {
BasicBlock *Latch = L->getLoopLatch();
if (!Latch || Latch->hasAddressTaken())
return false;
BranchInst *Jmp = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(Latch->getTerminator());
if (!Jmp || !Jmp->isUnconditional())
return false;
BasicBlock *LastExit = Latch->getSinglePredecessor();
if (!LastExit || !L->isLoopExiting(LastExit))
return false;
BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(LastExit->getTerminator());
if (!BI)
return false;
if (!shouldSpeculateInstrs(Latch->begin(), Jmp->getIterator(), L))
return false;
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Folding loop latch " << Latch->getName() << " into "
<< LastExit->getName() << "\n");
// Hoist the instructions from Latch into LastExit.
LastExit->getInstList().splice(BI->getIterator(), Latch->getInstList(),
Latch->begin(), Jmp->getIterator());
unsigned FallThruPath = BI->getSuccessor(0) == Latch ? 0 : 1;
BasicBlock *Header = Jmp->getSuccessor(0);
assert(Header == L->getHeader() && "expected a backward branch");
// Remove Latch from the CFG so that LastExit becomes the new Latch.
BI->setSuccessor(FallThruPath, Header);
Latch->replaceSuccessorsPhiUsesWith(LastExit);
Jmp->eraseFromParent();
// Nuke the Latch block.
assert(Latch->empty() && "unable to evacuate Latch");
LI->removeBlock(Latch);
if (DT)
DT->eraseNode(Latch);
Latch->eraseFromParent();
return true;
}
/// Rotate \c L, and return true if any modification was made.
bool LoopRotate::processLoop(Loop *L) {
// Save the loop metadata.
MDNode *LoopMD = L->getLoopID();
// Simplify the loop latch before attempting to rotate the header
// upward. Rotation may not be needed if the loop tail can be folded into the
// loop exit.
bool SimplifiedLatch = simplifyLoopLatch(L);
bool MadeChange = rotateLoop(L, SimplifiedLatch);
assert((!MadeChange || L->isLoopExiting(L->getLoopLatch())) &&
"Loop latch should be exiting after loop-rotate.");
// Restore the loop metadata.
// NB! We presume LoopRotation DOESN'T ADD its own metadata.
if ((MadeChange || SimplifiedLatch) && LoopMD)
L->setLoopID(LoopMD);
return MadeChange;
}
[PM] Introduce a reasonable port of the main per-module pass pipeline from the old pass manager in the new one. I'm not trying to support (initially) the numerous options that are currently available to customize the pass pipeline. If we end up really wanting them, we can add them later, but I suspect many are no longer interesting. The simplicity of omitting them will help a lot as we sort out what the pipeline should look like in the new PM. I've also documented to the best of my ability *why* each pass or group of passes is used so that reading the pipeline is more helpful. In many cases I think we have some questionable choices of ordering and I've left FIXME comments in place so we know what to come back and revisit going forward. But for now, I've left it as similar to the current pipeline as I could. Lastly, I've had to comment out several places where passes are not ported to the new pass manager or where the loop pass infrastructure is not yet ready. I did at least fix a few bugs in the loop pass infrastructure uncovered by running the full pipeline, but I didn't want to go too far in this patch -- I'll come back and re-enable these as the infrastructure comes online. But I'd like to keep the comments in place because I don't want to lose track of which passes need to be enabled and where they go. One thing that seemed like a significant API improvement was to require that we don't build pipelines for O0. It seems to have no real benefit. I've also switched back to returning pass managers by value as at this API layer it feels much more natural to me for composition. But if others disagree, I'm happy to go back to an output parameter. I'm not 100% happy with the testing strategy currently, but it seems at least OK. I may come back and try to refactor or otherwise improve this in subsequent patches but I wanted to at least get a good starting point in place. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28042 llvm-svn: 290325
2016-12-22 14:59:15 +08:00
LoopRotatePass::LoopRotatePass(bool EnableHeaderDuplication)
: EnableHeaderDuplication(EnableHeaderDuplication) {}
[PM] Rewrite the loop pass manager to use a worklist and augmented run arguments much like the CGSCC pass manager. This is a major redesign following the pattern establish for the CGSCC layer to support updates to the set of loops during the traversal of the loop nest and to support invalidation of analyses. An additional significant burden in the loop PM is that so many passes require access to a large number of function analyses. Manually ensuring these are cached, available, and preserved has been a long-standing burden in LLVM even with the help of the automatic scheduling in the old pass manager. And it made the new pass manager extremely unweildy. With this design, we can package the common analyses up while in a function pass and make them immediately available to all the loop passes. While in some cases this is unnecessary, I think the simplicity afforded is worth it. This does not (yet) address loop simplified form or LCSSA form, but those are the next things on my radar and I have a clear plan for them. While the patch is very large, most of it is either mechanically updating loop passes to the new API or the new testing for the loop PM. The code for it is reasonably compact. I have not yet updated all of the loop passes to correctly leverage the update mechanisms demonstrated in the unittests. I'll do that in follow-up patches along with improved FileCheck tests for those passes that ensure things work in more realistic scenarios. In many cases, there isn't much we can do with these until the loop simplified form and LCSSA form are in place. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28292 llvm-svn: 291651
2017-01-11 14:23:21 +08:00
PreservedAnalyses LoopRotatePass::run(Loop &L, LoopAnalysisManager &AM,
LoopStandardAnalysisResults &AR,
LPMUpdater &) {
[PM] Introduce a reasonable port of the main per-module pass pipeline from the old pass manager in the new one. I'm not trying to support (initially) the numerous options that are currently available to customize the pass pipeline. If we end up really wanting them, we can add them later, but I suspect many are no longer interesting. The simplicity of omitting them will help a lot as we sort out what the pipeline should look like in the new PM. I've also documented to the best of my ability *why* each pass or group of passes is used so that reading the pipeline is more helpful. In many cases I think we have some questionable choices of ordering and I've left FIXME comments in place so we know what to come back and revisit going forward. But for now, I've left it as similar to the current pipeline as I could. Lastly, I've had to comment out several places where passes are not ported to the new pass manager or where the loop pass infrastructure is not yet ready. I did at least fix a few bugs in the loop pass infrastructure uncovered by running the full pipeline, but I didn't want to go too far in this patch -- I'll come back and re-enable these as the infrastructure comes online. But I'd like to keep the comments in place because I don't want to lose track of which passes need to be enabled and where they go. One thing that seemed like a significant API improvement was to require that we don't build pipelines for O0. It seems to have no real benefit. I've also switched back to returning pass managers by value as at this API layer it feels much more natural to me for composition. But if others disagree, I'm happy to go back to an output parameter. I'm not 100% happy with the testing strategy currently, but it seems at least OK. I may come back and try to refactor or otherwise improve this in subsequent patches but I wanted to at least get a good starting point in place. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28042 llvm-svn: 290325
2016-12-22 14:59:15 +08:00
int Threshold = EnableHeaderDuplication ? DefaultRotationThreshold : 0;
[PM] Rewrite the loop pass manager to use a worklist and augmented run arguments much like the CGSCC pass manager. This is a major redesign following the pattern establish for the CGSCC layer to support updates to the set of loops during the traversal of the loop nest and to support invalidation of analyses. An additional significant burden in the loop PM is that so many passes require access to a large number of function analyses. Manually ensuring these are cached, available, and preserved has been a long-standing burden in LLVM even with the help of the automatic scheduling in the old pass manager. And it made the new pass manager extremely unweildy. With this design, we can package the common analyses up while in a function pass and make them immediately available to all the loop passes. While in some cases this is unnecessary, I think the simplicity afforded is worth it. This does not (yet) address loop simplified form or LCSSA form, but those are the next things on my radar and I have a clear plan for them. While the patch is very large, most of it is either mechanically updating loop passes to the new API or the new testing for the loop PM. The code for it is reasonably compact. I have not yet updated all of the loop passes to correctly leverage the update mechanisms demonstrated in the unittests. I'll do that in follow-up patches along with improved FileCheck tests for those passes that ensure things work in more realistic scenarios. In many cases, there isn't much we can do with these until the loop simplified form and LCSSA form are in place. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28292 llvm-svn: 291651
2017-01-11 14:23:21 +08:00
LoopRotate LR(Threshold, &AR.LI, &AR.TTI, &AR.AC, &AR.DT, &AR.SE);
bool Changed = LR.processLoop(&L);
if (!Changed)
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
return getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses();
}
namespace {
class LoopRotateLegacyPass : public LoopPass {
unsigned MaxHeaderSize;
public:
static char ID; // Pass ID, replacement for typeid
LoopRotateLegacyPass(int SpecifiedMaxHeaderSize = -1) : LoopPass(ID) {
initializeLoopRotateLegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
if (SpecifiedMaxHeaderSize == -1)
MaxHeaderSize = DefaultRotationThreshold;
else
MaxHeaderSize = unsigned(SpecifiedMaxHeaderSize);
}
// LCSSA form makes instruction renaming easier.
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
AU.addRequired<AssumptionCacheTracker>();
AU.addRequired<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>();
[LPM] Factor all of the loop analysis usage updates into a common helper routine. We were getting this wrong in small ways and generally being very inconsistent about it across loop passes. Instead, let's have a common place where we do this. One minor downside is that this will require some analyses like SCEV in more places than they are strictly needed. However, this seems benign as these analyses are complete no-ops, and without this consistency we can in many cases end up with the legacy pass manager scheduling deciding to split up a loop pass pipeline in order to run the function analysis half-way through. It is very, very annoying to fix these without just being very pedantic across the board. The only loop passes I've not updated here are ones that use AU.setPreservesAll() such as IVUsers (an analysis) and the pass printer. They seemed less relevant. With this patch, almost all of the problems in PR24804 around loop pass pipelines are fixed. The one remaining issue is that we run simplify-cfg and instcombine in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. We've recently added some loop variants of these passes that would seem substantially cleaner to use, but this at least gets us much closer to the previous state. Notably, the seven loop pass managers is down to three. I've not updated the loop passes using LoopAccessAnalysis because that analysis hasn't been fully wired into LoopSimplify/LCSSA, and it isn't clear that those transforms want to support those forms anyways. They all run late anyways, so this is harmless. Similarly, LSR is left alone because it already carefully manages its forms and doesn't need to get fused into a single loop pass manager with a bunch of other loop passes. LoopReroll didn't use loop simplified form previously, and I've updated the test case to match the trivially different output. Finally, I've also factored all the pass initialization for the passes that use this technique as well, so that should be done regularly and reliably. Thanks to James for the help reviewing and thinking about this stuff, and Ben for help thinking about it as well! Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17435 llvm-svn: 261316
2016-02-19 18:45:18 +08:00
getLoopAnalysisUsage(AU);
}
bool runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) override {
if (skipLoop(L))
return false;
Function &F = *L->getHeader()->getParent();
auto *LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo();
const auto *TTI = &getAnalysis<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>().getTTI(F);
auto *AC = &getAnalysis<AssumptionCacheTracker>().getAssumptionCache(F);
auto *DTWP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
auto *DT = DTWP ? &DTWP->getDomTree() : nullptr;
auto *SEWP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>();
auto *SE = SEWP ? &SEWP->getSE() : nullptr;
LoopRotate LR(MaxHeaderSize, LI, TTI, AC, DT, SE);
return LR.processLoop(L);
}
};
}
char LoopRotateLegacyPass::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LoopRotateLegacyPass, "loop-rotate", "Rotate Loops",
false, false)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(AssumptionCacheTracker)
[LPM] Factor all of the loop analysis usage updates into a common helper routine. We were getting this wrong in small ways and generally being very inconsistent about it across loop passes. Instead, let's have a common place where we do this. One minor downside is that this will require some analyses like SCEV in more places than they are strictly needed. However, this seems benign as these analyses are complete no-ops, and without this consistency we can in many cases end up with the legacy pass manager scheduling deciding to split up a loop pass pipeline in order to run the function analysis half-way through. It is very, very annoying to fix these without just being very pedantic across the board. The only loop passes I've not updated here are ones that use AU.setPreservesAll() such as IVUsers (an analysis) and the pass printer. They seemed less relevant. With this patch, almost all of the problems in PR24804 around loop pass pipelines are fixed. The one remaining issue is that we run simplify-cfg and instcombine in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. We've recently added some loop variants of these passes that would seem substantially cleaner to use, but this at least gets us much closer to the previous state. Notably, the seven loop pass managers is down to three. I've not updated the loop passes using LoopAccessAnalysis because that analysis hasn't been fully wired into LoopSimplify/LCSSA, and it isn't clear that those transforms want to support those forms anyways. They all run late anyways, so this is harmless. Similarly, LSR is left alone because it already carefully manages its forms and doesn't need to get fused into a single loop pass manager with a bunch of other loop passes. LoopReroll didn't use loop simplified form previously, and I've updated the test case to match the trivially different output. Finally, I've also factored all the pass initialization for the passes that use this technique as well, so that should be done regularly and reliably. Thanks to James for the help reviewing and thinking about this stuff, and Ben for help thinking about it as well! Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17435 llvm-svn: 261316
2016-02-19 18:45:18 +08:00
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopRotateLegacyPass, "loop-rotate", "Rotate Loops", false,
false)
Pass *llvm::createLoopRotatePass(int MaxHeaderSize) {
return new LoopRotateLegacyPass(MaxHeaderSize);
}