maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MLxExpansionPass.cpp

404 lines
12 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Emacs-tag and some comment fix for all ARM, CellSPU, Hexagon, MBlaze, MSP430, PPC, PTX, Sparc, X86, XCore. llvm-svn: 150878
2012-02-18 20:03:15 +08:00
//===-- MLxExpansionPass.cpp - Expand MLx instrs to avoid hazards ---------===//
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Expand VFP / NEON floating point MLA / MLS instructions (each to a pair of
// multiple and add / sub instructions) when special VMLx hazards are detected.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "ARM.h"
#include "ARMBaseInstrInfo.h"
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
#include "ARMSubtarget.h"
Use the new script to sort the includes of every file under lib. Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes. I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything (I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the API being implemented. Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main module rule does in fact have its merits. =] llvm-svn: 169131
2012-12-04 00:50:05 +08:00
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
Use the new script to sort the includes of every file under lib. Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes. I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything (I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the API being implemented. Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main module rule does in fact have its merits. =] llvm-svn: 169131
2012-12-04 00:50:05 +08:00
#include "llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h"
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
using namespace llvm;
[Modules] Fix potential ODR violations by sinking the DEBUG_TYPE definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Target/... edition. llvm-svn: 206842
2014-04-22 10:41:26 +08:00
#define DEBUG_TYPE "mlx-expansion"
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
static cl::opt<bool>
ForceExapnd("expand-all-fp-mlx", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden);
static cl::opt<unsigned>
ExpandLimit("expand-limit", cl::init(~0U), cl::Hidden);
STATISTIC(NumExpand, "Number of fp MLA / MLS instructions expanded");
namespace {
struct MLxExpansion : public MachineFunctionPass {
static char ID;
MLxExpansion() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {}
[C++11] Add 'override' keyword to virtual methods that override their base class. llvm-svn: 203433
2014-03-10 10:09:33 +08:00
bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &Fn) override;
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
[C++11] Add 'override' keyword to virtual methods that override their base class. llvm-svn: 203433
2014-03-10 10:09:33 +08:00
const char *getPassName() const override {
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
return "ARM MLA / MLS expansion pass";
}
private:
const ARMBaseInstrInfo *TII;
const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI;
MachineRegisterInfo *MRI;
This patch introduces A15 as a target in LLVM. llvm-svn: 163803
2012-09-13 23:05:10 +08:00
bool isLikeA9;
Add LLVM support for Swift. llvm-svn: 164899
2012-09-30 05:43:49 +08:00
bool isSwift;
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
unsigned MIIdx;
MachineInstr* LastMIs[4];
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 4> IgnoreStall;
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
void clearStack();
void pushStack(MachineInstr *MI);
MachineInstr *getAccDefMI(MachineInstr *MI) const;
unsigned getDefReg(MachineInstr *MI) const;
Add LLVM support for Swift. llvm-svn: 164899
2012-09-30 05:43:49 +08:00
bool hasLoopHazard(MachineInstr *MI) const;
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
bool hasRAWHazard(unsigned Reg, MachineInstr *MI) const;
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
bool FindMLxHazard(MachineInstr *MI);
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
void ExpandFPMLxInstruction(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineInstr *MI,
unsigned MulOpc, unsigned AddSubOpc,
bool NegAcc, bool HasLane);
bool ExpandFPMLxInstructions(MachineBasicBlock &MBB);
};
char MLxExpansion::ID = 0;
Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC) Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first. llvm-svn: 240390
2015-06-23 17:49:53 +08:00
}
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
void MLxExpansion::clearStack() {
[C++] Use 'nullptr'. Target edition. llvm-svn: 207197
2014-04-25 13:30:21 +08:00
std::fill(LastMIs, LastMIs + 4, nullptr);
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
MIIdx = 0;
}
void MLxExpansion::pushStack(MachineInstr *MI) {
LastMIs[MIIdx] = MI;
if (++MIIdx == 4)
MIIdx = 0;
}
MachineInstr *MLxExpansion::getAccDefMI(MachineInstr *MI) const {
// Look past COPY and INSERT_SUBREG instructions to find the
// real definition MI. This is important for _sfp instructions.
unsigned Reg = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg))
[C++] Use 'nullptr'. Target edition. llvm-svn: 207197
2014-04-25 13:30:21 +08:00
return nullptr;
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
MachineBasicBlock *MBB = MI->getParent();
MachineInstr *DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(Reg);
while (true) {
if (DefMI->getParent() != MBB)
break;
if (DefMI->isCopyLike()) {
Reg = DefMI->getOperand(1).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg)) {
DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(Reg);
continue;
}
} else if (DefMI->isInsertSubreg()) {
Reg = DefMI->getOperand(2).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg)) {
DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(Reg);
continue;
}
}
break;
}
return DefMI;
}
unsigned MLxExpansion::getDefReg(MachineInstr *MI) const {
unsigned Reg = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg) ||
!MRI->hasOneNonDBGUse(Reg))
return Reg;
MachineBasicBlock *MBB = MI->getParent();
Phase 2 of the great MachineRegisterInfo cleanup. This time, we're changing operator* on the by-operand iterators to return a MachineOperand& rather than a MachineInstr&. At this point they almost behave like normal iterators! Again, this requires making some existing loops more verbose, but should pave the way for the big range-based for-loop cleanups in the future. llvm-svn: 203865
2014-03-14 07:12:04 +08:00
MachineInstr *UseMI = &*MRI->use_instr_nodbg_begin(Reg);
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
if (UseMI->getParent() != MBB)
return Reg;
while (UseMI->isCopy() || UseMI->isInsertSubreg()) {
Reg = UseMI->getOperand(0).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg) ||
!MRI->hasOneNonDBGUse(Reg))
return Reg;
Phase 2 of the great MachineRegisterInfo cleanup. This time, we're changing operator* on the by-operand iterators to return a MachineOperand& rather than a MachineInstr&. At this point they almost behave like normal iterators! Again, this requires making some existing loops more verbose, but should pave the way for the big range-based for-loop cleanups in the future. llvm-svn: 203865
2014-03-14 07:12:04 +08:00
UseMI = &*MRI->use_instr_nodbg_begin(Reg);
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
if (UseMI->getParent() != MBB)
return Reg;
}
return Reg;
}
Add LLVM support for Swift. llvm-svn: 164899
2012-09-30 05:43:49 +08:00
/// hasLoopHazard - Check whether an MLx instruction is chained to itself across
/// a single-MBB loop.
bool MLxExpansion::hasLoopHazard(MachineInstr *MI) const {
unsigned Reg = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg))
return false;
MachineBasicBlock *MBB = MI->getParent();
MachineInstr *DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(Reg);
while (true) {
outer_continue:
if (DefMI->getParent() != MBB)
break;
if (DefMI->isPHI()) {
for (unsigned i = 1, e = DefMI->getNumOperands(); i < e; i += 2) {
if (DefMI->getOperand(i + 1).getMBB() == MBB) {
unsigned SrcReg = DefMI->getOperand(i).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(SrcReg)) {
DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(SrcReg);
goto outer_continue;
}
}
}
} else if (DefMI->isCopyLike()) {
Reg = DefMI->getOperand(1).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg)) {
DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(Reg);
continue;
}
} else if (DefMI->isInsertSubreg()) {
Reg = DefMI->getOperand(2).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg)) {
DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(Reg);
continue;
}
}
break;
}
return DefMI == MI;
}
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
bool MLxExpansion::hasRAWHazard(unsigned Reg, MachineInstr *MI) const {
// FIXME: Detect integer instructions properly.
- Rename TargetInstrDesc, TargetOperandInfo to MCInstrDesc and MCOperandInfo and sink them into MC layer. - Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo. llvm-svn: 134021
2011-06-29 03:10:37 +08:00
const MCInstrDesc &MCID = MI->getDesc();
unsigned Domain = MCID.TSFlags & ARMII::DomainMask;
Add bundle aware API for querying instruction properties and switch the code generator to it. For non-bundle instructions, these behave exactly the same as the MC layer API. For properties like mayLoad / mayStore, look into the bundle and if any of the bundled instructions has the property it would return true. For properties like isPredicable, only return true if *all* of the bundled instructions have the property. For properties like canFoldAsLoad, isCompare, conservatively return false for bundles. llvm-svn: 146026
2011-12-07 15:15:52 +08:00
if (MI->mayStore())
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
return false;
- Rename TargetInstrDesc, TargetOperandInfo to MCInstrDesc and MCOperandInfo and sink them into MC layer. - Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo. llvm-svn: 134021
2011-06-29 03:10:37 +08:00
unsigned Opcode = MCID.getOpcode();
VFP single precision arith instructions can go down to NEON pipeline, but on Cortex-A8 only. llvm-svn: 126238
2011-02-23 03:53:14 +08:00
if (Opcode == ARM::VMOVRS || Opcode == ARM::VMOVRRD)
return false;
if ((Domain & ARMII::DomainVFP) || (Domain & ARMII::DomainNEON))
return MI->readsRegister(Reg, TRI);
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
return false;
}
Add LLVM support for Swift. llvm-svn: 164899
2012-09-30 05:43:49 +08:00
static bool isFpMulInstruction(unsigned Opcode) {
switch (Opcode) {
case ARM::VMULS:
case ARM::VMULfd:
case ARM::VMULfq:
case ARM::VMULD:
case ARM::VMULslfd:
case ARM::VMULslfq:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
bool MLxExpansion::FindMLxHazard(MachineInstr *MI) {
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
if (NumExpand >= ExpandLimit)
return false;
if (ForceExapnd)
return true;
MachineInstr *DefMI = getAccDefMI(MI);
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
if (TII->isFpMLxInstruction(DefMI->getOpcode())) {
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
// r0 = vmla
// r3 = vmla r0, r1, r2
// takes 16 - 17 cycles
//
// r0 = vmla
// r4 = vmul r1, r2
// r3 = vadd r0, r4
// takes about 14 - 15 cycles even with vmul stalling for 4 cycles.
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
IgnoreStall.insert(DefMI);
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
return true;
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
}
Add LLVM support for Swift. llvm-svn: 164899
2012-09-30 05:43:49 +08:00
// On Swift, we mostly care about hazards from multiplication instructions
// writing the accumulator and the pipelining of loop iterations by out-of-
// order execution.
if (isSwift)
return isFpMulInstruction(DefMI->getOpcode()) || hasLoopHazard(MI);
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
if (IgnoreStall.count(MI))
return false;
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
// If a VMLA.F is followed by an VADD.F or VMUL.F with no RAW hazard, the
// VADD.F or VMUL.F will stall 4 cycles before issue. The 4 cycle stall
// preserves the in-order retirement of the instructions.
// Look at the next few instructions, if *most* of them can cause hazards,
// then the scheduler can't *fix* this, we'd better break up the VMLA.
This patch introduces A15 as a target in LLVM. llvm-svn: 163803
2012-09-13 23:05:10 +08:00
unsigned Limit1 = isLikeA9 ? 1 : 4;
unsigned Limit2 = isLikeA9 ? 1 : 4;
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
for (unsigned i = 1; i <= 4; ++i) {
int Idx = ((int)MIIdx - i + 4) % 4;
MachineInstr *NextMI = LastMIs[Idx];
if (!NextMI)
continue;
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
if (TII->canCauseFpMLxStall(NextMI->getOpcode())) {
if (i <= Limit1)
return true;
}
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
// Look for VMLx RAW hazard.
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
if (i <= Limit2 && hasRAWHazard(getDefReg(MI), NextMI))
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
return true;
}
return false;
}
/// ExpandFPMLxInstructions - Expand a MLA / MLS instruction into a pair
/// of MUL + ADD / SUB instructions.
void
MLxExpansion::ExpandFPMLxInstruction(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineInstr *MI,
unsigned MulOpc, unsigned AddSubOpc,
bool NegAcc, bool HasLane) {
unsigned DstReg = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
bool DstDead = MI->getOperand(0).isDead();
unsigned AccReg = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
unsigned Src1Reg = MI->getOperand(2).getReg();
unsigned Src2Reg = MI->getOperand(3).getReg();
bool Src1Kill = MI->getOperand(2).isKill();
bool Src2Kill = MI->getOperand(3).isKill();
unsigned LaneImm = HasLane ? MI->getOperand(4).getImm() : 0;
unsigned NextOp = HasLane ? 5 : 4;
ARMCC::CondCodes Pred = (ARMCC::CondCodes)MI->getOperand(NextOp).getImm();
unsigned PredReg = MI->getOperand(++NextOp).getReg();
- Rename TargetInstrDesc, TargetOperandInfo to MCInstrDesc and MCOperandInfo and sink them into MC layer. - Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo. llvm-svn: 134021
2011-06-29 03:10:37 +08:00
const MCInstrDesc &MCID1 = TII->get(MulOpc);
const MCInstrDesc &MCID2 = TII->get(AddSubOpc);
Add an MF argument to TRI::getPointerRegClass() and TII::getRegClass(). The getPointerRegClass() hook can return register classes that depend on the calling convention of the current function (ptr_rc_tailcall). So far, we have been able to infer the calling convention from the subtarget alone, but as we add support for multiple calling conventions per target, that no longer works. Patch by Yiannis Tsiouris! llvm-svn: 156328
2012-05-08 06:10:26 +08:00
const MachineFunction &MF = *MI->getParent()->getParent();
unsigned TmpReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(
TII->getRegClass(MCID1, 0, TRI, MF));
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
- Add MachineInstrBundle.h and MachineInstrBundle.cpp. This includes a function to finalize MI bundles (i.e. add BUNDLE instruction and computing register def and use lists of the BUNDLE instruction) and a pass to unpack bundles. - Teach more of MachineBasic and MachineInstr methods to be bundle aware. - Switch Thumb2 IT block to MI bundles and delete the hazard recognizer hack to prevent IT blocks from being broken apart. llvm-svn: 146542
2011-12-14 10:11:42 +08:00
MachineInstrBuilder MIB = BuildMI(MBB, MI, MI->getDebugLoc(), MCID1, TmpReg)
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
.addReg(Src1Reg, getKillRegState(Src1Kill))
.addReg(Src2Reg, getKillRegState(Src2Kill));
if (HasLane)
MIB.addImm(LaneImm);
MIB.addImm(Pred).addReg(PredReg);
- Add MachineInstrBundle.h and MachineInstrBundle.cpp. This includes a function to finalize MI bundles (i.e. add BUNDLE instruction and computing register def and use lists of the BUNDLE instruction) and a pass to unpack bundles. - Teach more of MachineBasic and MachineInstr methods to be bundle aware. - Switch Thumb2 IT block to MI bundles and delete the hazard recognizer hack to prevent IT blocks from being broken apart. llvm-svn: 146542
2011-12-14 10:11:42 +08:00
MIB = BuildMI(MBB, MI, MI->getDebugLoc(), MCID2)
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
.addReg(DstReg, getDefRegState(true) | getDeadRegState(DstDead));
if (NegAcc) {
bool AccKill = MRI->hasOneNonDBGUse(AccReg);
MIB.addReg(TmpReg, getKillRegState(true))
.addReg(AccReg, getKillRegState(AccKill));
} else {
MIB.addReg(AccReg).addReg(TmpReg, getKillRegState(true));
}
MIB.addImm(Pred).addReg(PredReg);
DEBUG({
dbgs() << "Expanding: " << *MI;
dbgs() << " to:\n";
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MII = MI;
[C++11] Replace llvm::next and llvm::prior with std::next and std::prev. Remove the old functions. llvm-svn: 202636
2014-03-02 20:27:27 +08:00
MII = std::prev(MII);
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
MachineInstr &MI2 = *MII;
[C++11] Replace llvm::next and llvm::prior with std::next and std::prev. Remove the old functions. llvm-svn: 202636
2014-03-02 20:27:27 +08:00
MII = std::prev(MII);
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
MachineInstr &MI1 = *MII;
dbgs() << " " << MI1;
dbgs() << " " << MI2;
});
MI->eraseFromParent();
++NumExpand;
}
bool MLxExpansion::ExpandFPMLxInstructions(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
bool Changed = false;
clearStack();
This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675. Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9. llvm-svn: 129775
2011-04-20 02:11:57 +08:00
IgnoreStall.clear();
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
unsigned Skip = 0;
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator MII = MBB.rbegin(), E = MBB.rend();
while (MII != E) {
MachineInstr *MI = &*MII;
Replace PROLOG_LABEL with a new CFI_INSTRUCTION. The old system was fairly convoluted: * A temporary label was created. * A single PROLOG_LABEL was created with it. * A few MCCFIInstructions were created with the same label. The semantics were that the cfi instructions were mapped to the PROLOG_LABEL via the temporary label. The output position was that of the PROLOG_LABEL. The temporary label itself was used only for doing the mapping. The new CFI_INSTRUCTION has a 1:1 mapping to MCCFIInstructions and points to one by holding an index into the CFI instructions of this function. I did consider removing MMI.getFrameInstructions completelly and having CFI_INSTRUCTION own a MCCFIInstruction, but MCCFIInstructions have non trivial constructors and destructors and are somewhat big, so the this setup is probably better. The net result is that we don't create temporary labels that are never used. llvm-svn: 203204
2014-03-07 14:08:31 +08:00
if (MI->isPosition() || MI->isImplicitDef() || MI->isCopy()) {
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
++MII;
continue;
}
- Rename TargetInstrDesc, TargetOperandInfo to MCInstrDesc and MCOperandInfo and sink them into MC layer. - Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo. llvm-svn: 134021
2011-06-29 03:10:37 +08:00
const MCInstrDesc &MCID = MI->getDesc();
Add bundle aware API for querying instruction properties and switch the code generator to it. For non-bundle instructions, these behave exactly the same as the MC layer API. For properties like mayLoad / mayStore, look into the bundle and if any of the bundled instructions has the property it would return true. For properties like isPredicable, only return true if *all* of the bundled instructions have the property. For properties like canFoldAsLoad, isCompare, conservatively return false for bundles. llvm-svn: 146026
2011-12-07 15:15:52 +08:00
if (MI->isBarrier()) {
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
clearStack();
Skip = 0;
++MII;
continue;
}
- Rename TargetInstrDesc, TargetOperandInfo to MCInstrDesc and MCOperandInfo and sink them into MC layer. - Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo. llvm-svn: 134021
2011-06-29 03:10:37 +08:00
unsigned Domain = MCID.TSFlags & ARMII::DomainMask;
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
if (Domain == ARMII::DomainGeneral) {
if (++Skip == 2)
// Assume dual issues of non-VFP / NEON instructions.
[C++] Use 'nullptr'. Target edition. llvm-svn: 207197
2014-04-25 13:30:21 +08:00
pushStack(nullptr);
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
} else {
Skip = 0;
unsigned MulOpc, AddSubOpc;
bool NegAcc, HasLane;
- Rename TargetInstrDesc, TargetOperandInfo to MCInstrDesc and MCOperandInfo and sink them into MC layer. - Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo. llvm-svn: 134021
2011-06-29 03:10:37 +08:00
if (!TII->isFpMLxInstruction(MCID.getOpcode(),
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
MulOpc, AddSubOpc, NegAcc, HasLane) ||
!FindMLxHazard(MI))
pushStack(MI);
else {
ExpandFPMLxInstruction(MBB, MI, MulOpc, AddSubOpc, NegAcc, HasLane);
E = MBB.rend(); // May have changed if MI was the 1st instruction.
Changed = true;
continue;
}
}
++MII;
}
return Changed;
}
bool MLxExpansion::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &Fn) {
Add optimization bisect opt-in calls for ARM passes Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19449 llvm-svn: 267480
2016-04-26 06:01:04 +08:00
if (skipFunction(*Fn.getFunction()))
return false;
Have MachineFunction cache a pointer to the subtarget to make lookups shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from the MachineFunction easily. Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer at the same time it runs. llvm-svn: 214838
2014-08-05 10:39:49 +08:00
TII = static_cast<const ARMBaseInstrInfo *>(Fn.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo());
TRI = Fn.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
MRI = &Fn.getRegInfo();
Get the cached subtarget off the MachineFunction rather than inquiring for a new one from the TargetMachine. llvm-svn: 229999
2015-02-20 16:24:37 +08:00
const ARMSubtarget *STI = &Fn.getSubtarget<ARMSubtarget>();
Cleanup and remove a chunk of getARMSubtarget calls in the ARM TargetMachine pass pipeline construction by pushing them down into the appropriate pass. llvm-svn: 231323
2015-03-05 08:23:40 +08:00
// Only run this for CortexA9.
if (!STI->isCortexA9())
return false;
Add LLVM support for Swift. llvm-svn: 164899
2012-09-30 05:43:49 +08:00
isLikeA9 = STI->isLikeA9() || STI->isSwift();
isSwift = STI->isSwift();
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
bool Modified = false;
Range-ify a loop. llvm-svn: 203590
2014-03-12 01:37:48 +08:00
for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : Fn)
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons. 1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen vmul + vadd. 2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart. 3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either: vmul vadd vmla Instead, we want to expand the second vmla: vmla vmul vadd Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles faster. Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable. A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed. B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to compute a fmul and a fmla. C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case). D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards. E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards. Work in progress, only A+B are enabled. llvm-svn: 120960
2010-12-06 06:04:16 +08:00
Modified |= ExpandFPMLxInstructions(MBB);
return Modified;
}
FunctionPass *llvm::createMLxExpansionPass() {
return new MLxExpansion();
}