2010-04-20 15:18:24 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -ftemplate-depth 5 -ftemplate-backtrace-limit 4 %s
|
2011-11-22 03:36:32 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -Xclang -verify -ftemplate-depth-5 -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=4 %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -Xclang -verify -ftemplate-depth=5 -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=4 %s
|
2009-03-10 08:06:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Final piece of core issue 1330: delay computing the exception specification of
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
2012-07-27 12:22:15 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef NOEXCEPT
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-20 15:18:24 +08:00
|
|
|
template<typename T> struct X : X<T*> { }; \
|
|
|
|
// expected-error{{recursive template instantiation exceeded maximum depth of 5}} \
|
|
|
|
// expected-note 3 {{instantiation of template class}} \
|
2010-04-21 13:40:43 +08:00
|
|
|
// expected-note {{skipping 2 contexts in backtrace}} \
|
2011-11-22 03:36:32 +08:00
|
|
|
// expected-note {{use -ftemplate-depth=N to increase recursive template instantiation depth}}
|
2009-03-10 08:06:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Final piece of core issue 1330: delay computing the exception specification of
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
2012-07-27 12:22:15 +08:00
|
|
|
void test() {
|
2009-03-11 02:03:33 +08:00
|
|
|
(void)sizeof(X<int>); // expected-note {{instantiation of template class}}
|
2009-03-10 08:06:19 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
Final piece of core issue 1330: delay computing the exception specification of
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
2012-07-27 12:22:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -ftemplate-depth 5 -ftemplate-backtrace-limit 4 -std=c++11 -DNOEXCEPT %s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template<typename T> struct S {
|
2016-08-31 10:15:21 +08:00
|
|
|
S() noexcept(noexcept(S<S>())); \
|
Final piece of core issue 1330: delay computing the exception specification of
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
2012-07-27 12:22:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// expected-error{{recursive template instantiation exceeded maximum depth of 5}} \
|
2016-08-31 10:15:21 +08:00
|
|
|
// expected-note 3 {{in instantiation of exception spec}} \
|
Final piece of core issue 1330: delay computing the exception specification of
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
2012-07-27 12:22:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// expected-note {{skipping 2 contexts in backtrace}} \
|
|
|
|
// expected-note {{use -ftemplate-depth=N to increase recursive template instantiation depth}}
|
2016-08-31 10:15:21 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
S<void> t; // expected-note {{in instantiation of exception spec}}
|
Final piece of core issue 1330: delay computing the exception specification of
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
2012-07-27 12:22:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|