maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/ClangUserExpression.cpp

390 lines
12 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
//===-- ClangUserExpression.cpp -------------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// C Includes
#include <stdio.h>
#if HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H
# include <sys/types.h>
#endif
// C++ Includes
#include <cstdlib>
#include <string>
#include <map>
#include "lldb/Core/ConstString.h"
#include "lldb/Core/Log.h"
#include "lldb/Core/StreamString.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/ClangExpressionDeclMap.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/ClangExpressionParser.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/ClangFunction.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/ASTResultSynthesizer.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/ClangUserExpression.h"
#include "lldb/Host/Host.h"
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
#include "lldb/Symbol/VariableList.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "lldb/Target/ExecutionContext.h"
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
#include "lldb/Target/StackFrame.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "lldb/Target/Target.h"
using namespace lldb_private;
ClangUserExpression::ClangUserExpression (const char *expr) :
m_expr_text(expr),
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
m_transformed_text(),
m_jit_addr(LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS),
m_cplusplus(false),
m_objectivec(false),
m_needs_object_ptr(false)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
}
Added a ClangUtilityFunction class that allows the debugger to insert self-contained functions for use by expressions (mainly for error-checking). In order to support detecting whether a crash occurred in one of these helpers -- currently our preferred way of reporting that an error-check failed -- added a bit of support for getting the extent of a JITted function in addition to just its base. llvm-svn: 112324
2010-08-28 07:31:21 +08:00
ClangUserExpression::~ClangUserExpression ()
{
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
clang::ASTConsumer *
ClangUserExpression::ASTTransformer (clang::ASTConsumer *passthrough)
{
return new ASTResultSynthesizer(passthrough);
}
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
void
ClangUserExpression::ScanContext(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx)
{
if (!exe_ctx.frame)
return;
VariableList *vars = exe_ctx.frame->GetVariableList(false);
if (!vars)
return;
if (vars->FindVariable(ConstString("this")).get())
m_cplusplus = true;
else if (vars->FindVariable(ConstString("self")).get())
m_objectivec = true;
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
bool
ClangUserExpression::Parse (Stream &error_stream, ExecutionContext &exe_ctx)
{
Log *log = lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet (LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS);
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
ScanContext(exe_ctx);
StreamString m_transformed_stream;
////////////////////////////////////
// Generate the expression
//
if (m_cplusplus)
{
m_transformed_stream.Printf("void \n"
"___clang_class::%s(void *___clang_arg) \n"
"{ \n"
" %s; \n"
"} \n",
FunctionName(),
m_expr_text.c_str());
m_needs_object_ptr = true;
}
else
{
m_transformed_stream.Printf("void \n"
"%s(void *___clang_arg) \n"
"{ \n"
" %s; \n"
"} \n",
FunctionName(),
m_expr_text.c_str());
}
m_transformed_text = m_transformed_stream.GetData();
if (log)
log->Printf("Parsing the following code:\n%s", m_transformed_text.c_str());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
////////////////////////////////////
// Set up the target and compiler
//
Target *target = exe_ctx.target;
if (!target)
{
error_stream.PutCString ("error: invalid target\n");
return false;
}
ConstString target_triple;
target->GetTargetTriple (target_triple);
if (!target_triple)
target_triple = Host::GetTargetTriple ();
if (!target_triple)
{
error_stream.PutCString ("error: invalid target triple\n");
return false;
}
//////////////////////////
// Parse the expression
//
m_expr_decl_map.reset(new ClangExpressionDeclMap(&exe_ctx));
ClangExpressionParser parser(target_triple.GetCString(), *this);
unsigned num_errors = parser.Parse (error_stream);
if (num_errors)
{
error_stream.Printf ("error: %d errors parsing expression\n", num_errors);
return false;
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////
// Convert the output of the parser to DWARF
//
m_dwarf_opcodes.reset(new StreamString);
m_dwarf_opcodes->SetByteOrder (lldb::eByteOrderHost);
m_dwarf_opcodes->GetFlags ().Set (Stream::eBinary);
m_local_variables.reset(new ClangExpressionVariableStore());
Error dwarf_error = parser.MakeDWARF ();
if (dwarf_error.Success())
{
if (log)
log->Printf("Code can be interpreted.");
return true;
}
//////////////////////////////////
// JIT the output of the parser
//
m_dwarf_opcodes.reset();
Added a ClangUtilityFunction class that allows the debugger to insert self-contained functions for use by expressions (mainly for error-checking). In order to support detecting whether a crash occurred in one of these helpers -- currently our preferred way of reporting that an error-check failed -- added a bit of support for getting the extent of a JITted function in addition to just its base. llvm-svn: 112324
2010-08-28 07:31:21 +08:00
lldb::addr_t jit_end;
Error jit_error = parser.MakeJIT (m_jit_addr, jit_end, exe_ctx);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (jit_error.Success())
{
if (log)
{
log->Printf("Code can be run in the target.");
StreamString disassembly_stream;
Error err = parser.DisassembleFunction(disassembly_stream, exe_ctx);
if (!err.Success())
{
log->Printf("Couldn't disassemble function : %s", err.AsCString("unknown error"));
}
else
{
log->Printf("Function disassembly:\n%s", disassembly_stream.GetData());
}
}
return true;
}
else
{
error_stream.Printf ("error: expression can't be interpreted or run\n", num_errors);
return false;
}
}
bool
ClangUserExpression::Execute (Stream &error_stream,
ExecutionContext &exe_ctx,
ClangExpressionVariable *&result)
{
Log *log = lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet (LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS);
if (m_dwarf_opcodes.get())
{
// TODO execute the JITted opcodes
error_stream.Printf("We don't currently support executing DWARF expressions");
return false;
}
else if (m_jit_addr != LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS)
{
lldb::addr_t struct_address;
Error materialize_error;
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
lldb::addr_t object_ptr = NULL;
if (m_needs_object_ptr && !(m_expr_decl_map->GetObjectPointer(object_ptr, &exe_ctx, materialize_error)))
{
error_stream.Printf("Couldn't get required object pointer: %s\n", materialize_error.AsCString());
return false;
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (!m_expr_decl_map->Materialize(&exe_ctx, struct_address, materialize_error))
{
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
error_stream.Printf("Couldn't materialize struct: %s\n", materialize_error.AsCString());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
return false;
}
if (log)
{
log->Printf("Function address : 0x%llx", (uint64_t)m_jit_addr);
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
if (m_needs_object_ptr)
log->Printf("Object pointer : 0x%llx", (uint64_t)object_ptr);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
log->Printf("Structure address : 0x%llx", (uint64_t)struct_address);
StreamString args;
Error dump_error;
Bugfixes to the expression parser. Fixes include: - If you put a semicolon at the end of an expression, this no longer causes the expression parser to error out. This was a two-part fix: first, ClangExpressionDeclMap::Materialize now handles an empty struct (such as when there is no return value); second, ASTResultSynthesizer walks backward from the end of the ASTs until it reaches something that's not a NullStmt. - ClangExpressionVariable now properly byte-swaps when printing itself. - ClangUtilityFunction now cleans up after itself when it's done compiling itself. - Utility functions can now use external functions just like user expressions. - If you end your expression with a statement that does not return a value, the expression now runs correctly anyway. Also, added the beginnings of an Objective-C object validator function, which is neither installed nor used as yet. llvm-svn: 113789
2010-09-14 05:34:21 +08:00
if (struct_address)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
Bugfixes to the expression parser. Fixes include: - If you put a semicolon at the end of an expression, this no longer causes the expression parser to error out. This was a two-part fix: first, ClangExpressionDeclMap::Materialize now handles an empty struct (such as when there is no return value); second, ASTResultSynthesizer walks backward from the end of the ASTs until it reaches something that's not a NullStmt. - ClangExpressionVariable now properly byte-swaps when printing itself. - ClangUtilityFunction now cleans up after itself when it's done compiling itself. - Utility functions can now use external functions just like user expressions. - If you end your expression with a statement that does not return a value, the expression now runs correctly anyway. Also, added the beginnings of an Objective-C object validator function, which is neither installed nor used as yet. llvm-svn: 113789
2010-09-14 05:34:21 +08:00
if (!m_expr_decl_map->DumpMaterializedStruct(&exe_ctx, args, dump_error))
{
log->Printf("Couldn't extract variable values : %s", dump_error.AsCString("unknown error"));
}
else
{
log->Printf("Structure contents:\n%s", args.GetData());
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
}
}
ClangFunction::ExecutionResults execution_result =
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
ClangFunction::ExecuteFunction (exe_ctx,
m_jit_addr,
struct_address,
true,
true,
10000,
error_stream,
(m_needs_object_ptr ? &object_ptr : NULL));
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (execution_result != ClangFunction::eExecutionCompleted)
{
const char *result_name;
switch (execution_result)
{
case ClangFunction::eExecutionCompleted:
result_name = "eExecutionCompleted";
break;
case ClangFunction::eExecutionDiscarded:
result_name = "eExecutionDiscarded";
break;
case ClangFunction::eExecutionInterrupted:
result_name = "eExecutionInterrupted";
break;
case ClangFunction::eExecutionSetupError:
result_name = "eExecutionSetupError";
break;
case ClangFunction::eExecutionTimedOut:
result_name = "eExecutionTimedOut";
break;
}
error_stream.Printf ("Couldn't execute function; result was %s\n", result_name);
return false;
}
Error expr_error;
if (!m_expr_decl_map->Dematerialize(&exe_ctx, result, expr_error))
{
error_stream.Printf ("Couldn't dematerialize struct : %s\n", expr_error.AsCString("unknown error"));
return false;
}
return true;
}
else
{
error_stream.Printf("Expression can't be run; neither DWARF nor a JIT compiled function are present");
return false;
}
}
StreamString &
ClangUserExpression::DwarfOpcodeStream ()
{
if (!m_dwarf_opcodes.get())
m_dwarf_opcodes.reset(new StreamString());
return *m_dwarf_opcodes.get();
}
Moved expression evaluation from CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate () as a public static function so anyone can evaluate an expression. llvm-svn: 115581
2010-10-05 08:31:29 +08:00
Error
ClangUserExpression::Evaluate (ExecutionContext &exe_ctx, const char *expr_cstr, lldb::ValueObjectSP &result_valobj_sp)
{
Error error;
result_valobj_sp.reset();
ClangUserExpression user_expression (expr_cstr);
StreamString error_stream;
if (!user_expression.Parse (error_stream, exe_ctx))
{
if (error_stream.GetString().empty())
error.SetErrorString ("expression failed to parse, unknown error");
else
error.SetErrorString (error_stream.GetString().c_str());
}
else
{
ClangExpressionVariable *expr_result = NULL;
error_stream.GetString().clear();
if (!user_expression.Execute (error_stream, exe_ctx, expr_result))
{
if (error_stream.GetString().empty())
error.SetErrorString ("expression failed to execute, unknown error");
else
error.SetErrorString (error_stream.GetString().c_str());
}
else
{
// TODO: seems weird to get a pointer to a result object back from
// a function. Do we own it? Feels like we do, but from looking at the
// code we don't. Might be best to make this a reference and state
// explicitly that we don't own it when we get a reference back from
// the execute?
if (expr_result)
{
result_valobj_sp = expr_result->GetExpressionResult (&exe_ctx);
}
else
{
error.SetErrorString ("NULL expression result");
}
}
}
return error;
}