llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupLEAs.cpp

642 lines
23 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===-- X86FixupLEAs.cpp - use or replace LEA instructions -----------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file defines the pass that finds instructions that can be
// re-written as LEA instructions in order to reduce pipeline delays.
// It replaces LEAs with ADD/INC/DEC when that is better for size/speed.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "X86.h"
#include "X86InstrInfo.h"
#include "X86Subtarget.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetSchedule.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
using namespace llvm;
#define FIXUPLEA_DESC "X86 LEA Fixup"
#define FIXUPLEA_NAME "x86-fixup-LEAs"
#define DEBUG_TYPE FIXUPLEA_NAME
STATISTIC(NumLEAs, "Number of LEA instructions created");
namespace {
class FixupLEAPass : public MachineFunctionPass {
enum RegUsageState { RU_NotUsed, RU_Write, RU_Read };
/// Given a machine register, look for the instruction
/// which writes it in the current basic block. If found,
/// try to replace it with an equivalent LEA instruction.
/// If replacement succeeds, then also process the newly created
/// instruction.
void seekLEAFixup(MachineOperand &p, MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB);
/// Given a memory access or LEA instruction
/// whose address mode uses a base and/or index register, look for
/// an opportunity to replace the instruction which sets the base or index
/// register with an equivalent LEA instruction.
void processInstruction(MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB);
/// Given a LEA instruction which is unprofitable
/// on SlowLEA targets try to replace it with an equivalent ADD instruction.
void processInstructionForSlowLEA(MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB);
/// Given a LEA instruction which is unprofitable
/// on SNB+ try to replace it with other instructions.
/// According to Intel's Optimization Reference Manual:
/// " For LEA instructions with three source operands and some specific
/// situations, instruction latency has increased to 3 cycles, and must
/// dispatch via port 1:
/// - LEA that has all three source operands: base, index, and offset
/// - LEA that uses base and index registers where the base is EBP, RBP,
/// or R13
/// - LEA that uses RIP relative addressing mode
/// - LEA that uses 16-bit addressing mode "
/// This function currently handles the first 2 cases only.
MachineInstr *processInstrForSlow3OpLEA(MachineInstr &MI,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB);
/// Look for LEAs that are really two address LEAs that we might be able to
/// turn into regular ADD instructions.
bool optTwoAddrLEA(MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB, bool OptIncDec,
bool UseLEAForSP) const;
/// Determine if an instruction references a machine register
/// and, if so, whether it reads or writes the register.
RegUsageState usesRegister(MachineOperand &p, MachineBasicBlock::iterator I);
/// Step backwards through a basic block, looking
/// for an instruction which writes a register within
/// a maximum of INSTR_DISTANCE_THRESHOLD instruction latency cycles.
MachineBasicBlock::iterator searchBackwards(MachineOperand &p,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB);
/// if an instruction can be converted to an
/// equivalent LEA, insert the new instruction into the basic block
/// and return a pointer to it. Otherwise, return zero.
MachineInstr *postRAConvertToLEA(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator &MBBI) const;
public:
static char ID;
StringRef getPassName() const override { return FIXUPLEA_DESC; }
FixupLEAPass() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) { }
/// Loop over all of the basic blocks,
/// replacing instructions by equivalent LEA instructions
/// if needed and when possible.
bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override;
// This pass runs after regalloc and doesn't support VReg operands.
MachineFunctionProperties getRequiredProperties() const override {
return MachineFunctionProperties().set(
MachineFunctionProperties::Property::NoVRegs);
}
private:
TargetSchedModel TSM;
const X86InstrInfo *TII;
const X86RegisterInfo *TRI;
};
}
char FixupLEAPass::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS(FixupLEAPass, FIXUPLEA_NAME, FIXUPLEA_DESC, false, false)
MachineInstr *
FixupLEAPass::postRAConvertToLEA(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator &MBBI) const {
MachineInstr &MI = *MBBI;
switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
case X86::MOV32rr:
case X86::MOV64rr: {
const MachineOperand &Src = MI.getOperand(1);
const MachineOperand &Dest = MI.getOperand(0);
MachineInstr *NewMI =
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, MI.getDebugLoc(),
TII->get(MI.getOpcode() == X86::MOV32rr ? X86::LEA32r
: X86::LEA64r))
.add(Dest)
.add(Src)
.addImm(1)
.addReg(0)
.addImm(0)
.addReg(0);
return NewMI;
}
}
if (!MI.isConvertibleTo3Addr())
return nullptr;
switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
case X86::ADD64ri32:
case X86::ADD64ri8:
case X86::ADD64ri32_DB:
case X86::ADD64ri8_DB:
case X86::ADD32ri:
case X86::ADD32ri8:
case X86::ADD32ri_DB:
case X86::ADD32ri8_DB:
case X86::ADD16ri:
case X86::ADD16ri8:
case X86::ADD16ri_DB:
case X86::ADD16ri8_DB:
if (!MI.getOperand(2).isImm()) {
// convertToThreeAddress will call getImm()
// which requires isImm() to be true
return nullptr;
}
break;
case X86::ADD16rr:
case X86::ADD16rr_DB:
if (MI.getOperand(1).getReg() != MI.getOperand(2).getReg()) {
// if src1 != src2, then convertToThreeAddress will
// need to create a Virtual register, which we cannot do
// after register allocation.
return nullptr;
}
}
MachineFunction::iterator MFI = MBB.getIterator();
return TII->convertToThreeAddress(MFI, MI, nullptr);
}
FunctionPass *llvm::createX86FixupLEAs() { return new FixupLEAPass(); }
static bool isLEA(unsigned Opcode) {
return Opcode == X86::LEA32r || Opcode == X86::LEA64r ||
Opcode == X86::LEA64_32r;
}
bool FixupLEAPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
if (skipFunction(MF.getFunction()))
return false;
const X86Subtarget &ST = MF.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>();
bool IsSlowLEA = ST.slowLEA();
bool IsSlow3OpsLEA = ST.slow3OpsLEA();
bool LEAUsesAG = ST.LEAusesAG();
bool OptIncDec = !ST.slowIncDec() || MF.getFunction().hasOptSize();
bool UseLEAForSP = ST.useLeaForSP();
TSM.init(&ST);
TII = ST.getInstrInfo();
TRI = ST.getRegisterInfo();
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Start X86FixupLEAs\n";);
for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) {
// First pass. Try to remove or optimize existing LEAs.
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB.begin(); I != MBB.end(); ++I) {
if (!isLEA(I->getOpcode()))
continue;
if (optTwoAddrLEA(I, MBB, OptIncDec, UseLEAForSP))
continue;
if (IsSlowLEA) {
processInstructionForSlowLEA(I, MBB);
} else if (IsSlow3OpsLEA) {
if (auto *NewMI = processInstrForSlow3OpLEA(*I, MBB)) {
MBB.erase(I);
I = NewMI;
}
}
}
// Second pass for creating LEAs. This may reverse some of the
// transformations above.
if (LEAUsesAG) {
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB.begin(); I != MBB.end(); ++I)
processInstruction(I, MBB);
}
}
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "End X86FixupLEAs\n";);
return true;
}
FixupLEAPass::RegUsageState
FixupLEAPass::usesRegister(MachineOperand &p, MachineBasicBlock::iterator I) {
RegUsageState RegUsage = RU_NotUsed;
MachineInstr &MI = *I;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < MI.getNumOperands(); ++i) {
MachineOperand &opnd = MI.getOperand(i);
if (opnd.isReg() && opnd.getReg() == p.getReg()) {
if (opnd.isDef())
return RU_Write;
RegUsage = RU_Read;
}
}
return RegUsage;
}
/// getPreviousInstr - Given a reference to an instruction in a basic
/// block, return a reference to the previous instruction in the block,
/// wrapping around to the last instruction of the block if the block
/// branches to itself.
static inline bool getPreviousInstr(MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
if (I == MBB.begin()) {
if (MBB.isPredecessor(&MBB)) {
I = --MBB.end();
return true;
} else
return false;
}
--I;
return true;
}
MachineBasicBlock::iterator
FixupLEAPass::searchBackwards(MachineOperand &p, MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
int InstrDistance = 1;
MachineBasicBlock::iterator CurInst;
static const int INSTR_DISTANCE_THRESHOLD = 5;
CurInst = I;
bool Found;
Found = getPreviousInstr(CurInst, MBB);
while (Found && I != CurInst) {
if (CurInst->isCall() || CurInst->isInlineAsm())
break;
if (InstrDistance > INSTR_DISTANCE_THRESHOLD)
break; // too far back to make a difference
if (usesRegister(p, CurInst) == RU_Write) {
return CurInst;
}
InstrDistance += TSM.computeInstrLatency(&*CurInst);
Found = getPreviousInstr(CurInst, MBB);
}
return MachineBasicBlock::iterator();
}
static inline bool isInefficientLEAReg(unsigned Reg) {
return Reg == X86::EBP || Reg == X86::RBP ||
Reg == X86::R13D || Reg == X86::R13;
}
static inline bool isRegOperand(const MachineOperand &Op) {
return Op.isReg() && Op.getReg() != X86::NoRegister;
}
/// Returns true if this LEA uses base an index registers, and the base register
/// is known to be inefficient for the subtarget.
[X86][BtVer2] correctly model the latency/throughput of LEA instructions. This patch fixes the latency/throughput of LEA instructions in the BtVer2 scheduling model. On Jaguar, A 3-operands LEA has a latency of 2cy, and a reciprocal throughput of 1. That is because it uses one cycle of SAGU followed by 1cy of ALU1. An LEA with a "Scale" operand is also slow, and it has the same latency profile as the 3-operands LEA. An LEA16r has a latency of 3cy, and a throughput of 0.5 (i.e. RThrouhgput of 2.0). This patch adds a new TIIPredicate named IsThreeOperandsLEAFn to X86Schedule.td. The tablegen backend (for instruction-info) expands that definition into this (file X86GenInstrInfo.inc): ``` static bool isThreeOperandsLEA(const MachineInstr &MI) { return ( ( MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA32r || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64r || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64_32r || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA16r ) && MI.getOperand(1).isReg() && MI.getOperand(1).getReg() != 0 && MI.getOperand(3).isReg() && MI.getOperand(3).getReg() != 0 && ( ( MI.getOperand(4).isImm() && MI.getOperand(4).getImm() != 0 ) || (MI.getOperand(4).isGlobal()) ) ); } ``` A similar method is generated in the X86_MC namespace, and included into X86MCTargetDesc.cpp (the declaration lives in X86MCTargetDesc.h). Back to the BtVer2 scheduling model: A new scheduling predicate named JSlowLEAPredicate now checks if either the instruction is a three-operands LEA, or it is an LEA with a Scale value different than 1. A variant scheduling class uses that new predicate to correctly select the appropriate latency profile. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49436 llvm-svn: 337469
2018-07-20 00:42:15 +08:00
// TODO: use a variant scheduling class to model the latency profile
// of LEA instructions, and implement this logic as a scheduling predicate.
static inline bool hasInefficientLEABaseReg(const MachineOperand &Base,
const MachineOperand &Index) {
return Base.isReg() && isInefficientLEAReg(Base.getReg()) &&
isRegOperand(Index);
}
static inline bool hasLEAOffset(const MachineOperand &Offset) {
return (Offset.isImm() && Offset.getImm() != 0) || Offset.isGlobal();
}
static inline unsigned getADDrrFromLEA(unsigned LEAOpcode) {
switch (LEAOpcode) {
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected LEA instruction");
case X86::LEA32r:
case X86::LEA64_32r:
return X86::ADD32rr;
case X86::LEA64r:
return X86::ADD64rr;
}
}
static inline unsigned getADDriFromLEA(unsigned LEAOpcode,
const MachineOperand &Offset) {
bool IsInt8 = Offset.isImm() && isInt<8>(Offset.getImm());
switch (LEAOpcode) {
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected LEA instruction");
case X86::LEA32r:
case X86::LEA64_32r:
return IsInt8 ? X86::ADD32ri8 : X86::ADD32ri;
case X86::LEA64r:
return IsInt8 ? X86::ADD64ri8 : X86::ADD64ri32;
}
}
static inline unsigned getINCDECFromLEA(unsigned LEAOpcode, bool IsINC) {
switch (LEAOpcode) {
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected LEA instruction");
case X86::LEA32r:
case X86::LEA64_32r:
return IsINC ? X86::INC32r : X86::DEC32r;
case X86::LEA64r:
return IsINC ? X86::INC64r : X86::DEC64r;
}
}
bool FixupLEAPass::optTwoAddrLEA(MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB, bool OptIncDec,
bool UseLEAForSP) const {
MachineInstr &MI = *I;
const MachineOperand &Base = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrBaseReg);
const MachineOperand &Scale = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrScaleAmt);
const MachineOperand &Index = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrIndexReg);
const MachineOperand &Disp = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrDisp);
const MachineOperand &Segment = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrSegmentReg);
if (Segment.getReg() != 0 || !Disp.isImm() || Scale.getImm() > 1 ||
!TII->isSafeToClobberEFLAGS(MBB, I))
return false;
unsigned DestReg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();
unsigned BaseReg = Base.getReg();
unsigned IndexReg = Index.getReg();
// Don't change stack adjustment LEAs.
if (UseLEAForSP && (DestReg == X86::ESP || DestReg == X86::RSP))
return false;
// LEA64_32 has 64-bit operands but 32-bit result.
if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64_32r) {
if (BaseReg != 0)
BaseReg = TRI->getSubReg(BaseReg, X86::sub_32bit);
if (IndexReg != 0)
IndexReg = TRI->getSubReg(IndexReg, X86::sub_32bit);
}
MachineInstr *NewMI = nullptr;
// Look for lea(%reg1, %reg2), %reg1 or lea(%reg2, %reg1), %reg1
// which can be turned into add %reg2, %reg1
if (BaseReg != 0 && IndexReg != 0 && Disp.getImm() == 0 &&
(DestReg == BaseReg || DestReg == IndexReg)) {
unsigned NewOpcode = getADDrrFromLEA(MI.getOpcode());
if (DestReg != BaseReg)
std::swap(BaseReg, IndexReg);
if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64_32r) {
// TODO: Do we need the super register implicit use?
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, I, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII->get(NewOpcode), DestReg)
.addReg(BaseReg).addReg(IndexReg)
.addReg(Base.getReg(), RegState::Implicit)
.addReg(Index.getReg(), RegState::Implicit);
} else {
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, I, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII->get(NewOpcode), DestReg)
.addReg(BaseReg).addReg(IndexReg);
}
} else if (DestReg == BaseReg && IndexReg == 0) {
// This is an LEA with only a base register and a displacement,
// We can use ADDri or INC/DEC.
// Does this LEA have one these forms:
// lea %reg, 1(%reg)
// lea %reg, -1(%reg)
if (OptIncDec && (Disp.getImm() == 1 || Disp.getImm() == -1)) {
bool IsINC = Disp.getImm() == 1;
unsigned NewOpcode = getINCDECFromLEA(MI.getOpcode(), IsINC);
if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64_32r) {
// TODO: Do we need the super register implicit use?
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, I, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII->get(NewOpcode), DestReg)
.addReg(BaseReg).addReg(Base.getReg(), RegState::Implicit);
} else {
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, I, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII->get(NewOpcode), DestReg)
.addReg(BaseReg);
}
} else {
unsigned NewOpcode = getADDriFromLEA(MI.getOpcode(), Disp);
if (MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64_32r) {
// TODO: Do we need the super register implicit use?
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, I, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII->get(NewOpcode), DestReg)
.addReg(BaseReg).addImm(Disp.getImm())
.addReg(Base.getReg(), RegState::Implicit);
} else {
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, I, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII->get(NewOpcode), DestReg)
.addReg(BaseReg).addImm(Disp.getImm());
}
}
} else
return false;
MBB.erase(I);
I = NewMI;
return true;
}
void FixupLEAPass::processInstruction(MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
// Process a load, store, or LEA instruction.
MachineInstr &MI = *I;
const MCInstrDesc &Desc = MI.getDesc();
int AddrOffset = X86II::getMemoryOperandNo(Desc.TSFlags);
if (AddrOffset >= 0) {
AddrOffset += X86II::getOperandBias(Desc);
MachineOperand &p = MI.getOperand(AddrOffset + X86::AddrBaseReg);
if (p.isReg() && p.getReg() != X86::ESP) {
seekLEAFixup(p, I, MBB);
}
MachineOperand &q = MI.getOperand(AddrOffset + X86::AddrIndexReg);
if (q.isReg() && q.getReg() != X86::ESP) {
seekLEAFixup(q, I, MBB);
}
}
}
void FixupLEAPass::seekLEAFixup(MachineOperand &p,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBI = searchBackwards(p, I, MBB);
if (MBI != MachineBasicBlock::iterator()) {
MachineInstr *NewMI = postRAConvertToLEA(MBB, MBI);
if (NewMI) {
++NumLEAs;
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "FixLEA: Candidate to replace:"; MBI->dump(););
// now to replace with an equivalent LEA...
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "FixLEA: Replaced by: "; NewMI->dump(););
MBB.erase(MBI);
MachineBasicBlock::iterator J =
static_cast<MachineBasicBlock::iterator>(NewMI);
processInstruction(J, MBB);
}
}
}
void FixupLEAPass::processInstructionForSlowLEA(MachineBasicBlock::iterator &I,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
MachineInstr &MI = *I;
const unsigned Opcode = MI.getOpcode();
const MachineOperand &Dst = MI.getOperand(0);
const MachineOperand &Base = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrBaseReg);
const MachineOperand &Scale = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrScaleAmt);
const MachineOperand &Index = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrIndexReg);
const MachineOperand &Offset = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrDisp);
const MachineOperand &Segment = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrSegmentReg);
if (Segment.getReg() != 0 || !Offset.isImm() ||
!TII->isSafeToClobberEFLAGS(MBB, I))
return;
const unsigned DstR = Dst.getReg();
const unsigned SrcR1 = Base.getReg();
const unsigned SrcR2 = Index.getReg();
if ((SrcR1 == 0 || SrcR1 != DstR) && (SrcR2 == 0 || SrcR2 != DstR))
return;
if (Scale.getImm() > 1)
return;
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "FixLEA: Candidate to replace:"; I->dump(););
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "FixLEA: Replaced by: ";);
MachineInstr *NewMI = nullptr;
// Make ADD instruction for two registers writing to LEA's destination
if (SrcR1 != 0 && SrcR2 != 0) {
const MCInstrDesc &ADDrr = TII->get(getADDrrFromLEA(Opcode));
const MachineOperand &Src = SrcR1 == DstR ? Index : Base;
NewMI =
BuildMI(MBB, I, MI.getDebugLoc(), ADDrr, DstR).addReg(DstR).add(Src);
LLVM_DEBUG(NewMI->dump(););
}
// Make ADD instruction for immediate
if (Offset.getImm() != 0) {
const MCInstrDesc &ADDri =
TII->get(getADDriFromLEA(Opcode, Offset));
const MachineOperand &SrcR = SrcR1 == DstR ? Base : Index;
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, I, MI.getDebugLoc(), ADDri, DstR)
.add(SrcR)
.addImm(Offset.getImm());
LLVM_DEBUG(NewMI->dump(););
}
if (NewMI) {
MBB.erase(I);
I = NewMI;
}
}
MachineInstr *
FixupLEAPass::processInstrForSlow3OpLEA(MachineInstr &MI,
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
const unsigned LEAOpcode = MI.getOpcode();
const MachineOperand &Dst = MI.getOperand(0);
const MachineOperand &Base = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrBaseReg);
const MachineOperand &Scale = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrScaleAmt);
const MachineOperand &Index = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrIndexReg);
const MachineOperand &Offset = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrDisp);
const MachineOperand &Segment = MI.getOperand(1 + X86::AddrSegmentReg);
[X86][BtVer2] correctly model the latency/throughput of LEA instructions. This patch fixes the latency/throughput of LEA instructions in the BtVer2 scheduling model. On Jaguar, A 3-operands LEA has a latency of 2cy, and a reciprocal throughput of 1. That is because it uses one cycle of SAGU followed by 1cy of ALU1. An LEA with a "Scale" operand is also slow, and it has the same latency profile as the 3-operands LEA. An LEA16r has a latency of 3cy, and a throughput of 0.5 (i.e. RThrouhgput of 2.0). This patch adds a new TIIPredicate named IsThreeOperandsLEAFn to X86Schedule.td. The tablegen backend (for instruction-info) expands that definition into this (file X86GenInstrInfo.inc): ``` static bool isThreeOperandsLEA(const MachineInstr &MI) { return ( ( MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA32r || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64r || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64_32r || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA16r ) && MI.getOperand(1).isReg() && MI.getOperand(1).getReg() != 0 && MI.getOperand(3).isReg() && MI.getOperand(3).getReg() != 0 && ( ( MI.getOperand(4).isImm() && MI.getOperand(4).getImm() != 0 ) || (MI.getOperand(4).isGlobal()) ) ); } ``` A similar method is generated in the X86_MC namespace, and included into X86MCTargetDesc.cpp (the declaration lives in X86MCTargetDesc.h). Back to the BtVer2 scheduling model: A new scheduling predicate named JSlowLEAPredicate now checks if either the instruction is a three-operands LEA, or it is an LEA with a Scale value different than 1. A variant scheduling class uses that new predicate to correctly select the appropriate latency profile. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49436 llvm-svn: 337469
2018-07-20 00:42:15 +08:00
if (!(TII->isThreeOperandsLEA(MI) ||
hasInefficientLEABaseReg(Base, Index)) ||
!TII->isSafeToClobberEFLAGS(MBB, MI) ||
Segment.getReg() != X86::NoRegister)
return nullptr;
unsigned DstR = Dst.getReg();
unsigned BaseR = Base.getReg();
unsigned IndexR = Index.getReg();
unsigned SSDstR =
(LEAOpcode == X86::LEA64_32r) ? getX86SubSuperRegister(DstR, 64) : DstR;
bool IsScale1 = Scale.getImm() == 1;
bool IsInefficientBase = isInefficientLEAReg(BaseR);
bool IsInefficientIndex = isInefficientLEAReg(IndexR);
// Skip these cases since it takes more than 2 instructions
// to replace the LEA instruction.
if (IsInefficientBase && SSDstR == BaseR && !IsScale1)
return nullptr;
if (LEAOpcode == X86::LEA64_32r && IsInefficientBase &&
(IsInefficientIndex || !IsScale1))
return nullptr;
const DebugLoc DL = MI.getDebugLoc();
const MCInstrDesc &ADDrr = TII->get(getADDrrFromLEA(LEAOpcode));
const MCInstrDesc &ADDri = TII->get(getADDriFromLEA(LEAOpcode, Offset));
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "FixLEA: Candidate to replace:"; MI.dump(););
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "FixLEA: Replaced by: ";);
// First try to replace LEA with one or two (for the 3-op LEA case)
// add instructions:
// 1.lea (%base,%index,1), %base => add %index,%base
// 2.lea (%base,%index,1), %index => add %base,%index
if (IsScale1 && (DstR == BaseR || DstR == IndexR)) {
const MachineOperand &Src = DstR == BaseR ? Index : Base;
MachineInstr *NewMI =
BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, ADDrr, DstR).addReg(DstR).add(Src);
LLVM_DEBUG(NewMI->dump(););
// Create ADD instruction for the Offset in case of 3-Ops LEA.
if (hasLEAOffset(Offset)) {
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, ADDri, DstR).addReg(DstR).add(Offset);
LLVM_DEBUG(NewMI->dump(););
}
return NewMI;
}
// If the base is inefficient try switching the index and base operands,
// otherwise just break the 3-Ops LEA inst into 2-Ops LEA + ADD instruction:
// lea offset(%base,%index,scale),%dst =>
// lea (%base,%index,scale); add offset,%dst
if (!IsInefficientBase || (!IsInefficientIndex && IsScale1)) {
MachineInstr *NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get(LEAOpcode))
.add(Dst)
.add(IsInefficientBase ? Index : Base)
.add(Scale)
.add(IsInefficientBase ? Base : Index)
.addImm(0)
.add(Segment);
LLVM_DEBUG(NewMI->dump(););
// Create ADD instruction for the Offset in case of 3-Ops LEA.
if (hasLEAOffset(Offset)) {
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, ADDri, DstR).addReg(DstR).add(Offset);
LLVM_DEBUG(NewMI->dump(););
}
return NewMI;
}
// Handle the rest of the cases with inefficient base register:
assert(SSDstR != BaseR && "SSDstR == BaseR should be handled already!");
assert(IsInefficientBase && "efficient base should be handled already!");
// lea (%base,%index,1), %dst => mov %base,%dst; add %index,%dst
if (IsScale1 && !hasLEAOffset(Offset)) {
bool BIK = Base.isKill() && BaseR != IndexR;
TII->copyPhysReg(MBB, MI, DL, DstR, BaseR, BIK);
LLVM_DEBUG(MI.getPrevNode()->dump(););
MachineInstr *NewMI =
BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, ADDrr, DstR).addReg(DstR).add(Index);
LLVM_DEBUG(NewMI->dump(););
return NewMI;
}
// lea offset(%base,%index,scale), %dst =>
// lea offset( ,%index,scale), %dst; add %base,%dst
MachineInstr *NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get(LEAOpcode))
.add(Dst)
.addReg(0)
.add(Scale)
.add(Index)
.add(Offset)
.add(Segment);
LLVM_DEBUG(NewMI->dump(););
NewMI = BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, ADDrr, DstR).addReg(DstR).add(Base);
LLVM_DEBUG(NewMI->dump(););
return NewMI;
}