maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/seh-safe-div.ll

171 lines
5.3 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

Re-commit "[SEH] Remove the old __C_specific_handler code now that WinEHPrepare works" This reverts commit r235617. r235649 should have addressed the problems. llvm-svn: 235667
2015-04-24 07:22:33 +08:00
; RUN: llc -mtriple x86_64-pc-windows-msvc < %s | FileCheck %s
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
; This test case is also intended to be run manually as a complete functional
; test. It should link, print something, and exit zero rather than crashing.
; It is the hypothetical lowering of a C source program that looks like:
;
; int safe_div(int *n, int *d) {
; int r;
; __try {
; __try {
; r = *n / *d;
; } __except(GetExceptionCode() == EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) {
; puts("EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION");
; r = -1;
; }
; } __except(GetExceptionCode() == EXCEPTION_INT_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO) {
; puts("EXCEPTION_INT_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO");
; r = -2;
; }
; return r;
; }
@str1 = internal constant [27 x i8] c"EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION\00"
@str2 = internal constant [29 x i8] c"EXCEPTION_INT_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO\00"
Move the personality function from LandingPadInst to Function The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst. This isn't desirable because: - All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the first has an operand which produces no additional information. - There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an exceptional function. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429 llvm-svn: 239940
2015-06-18 04:52:32 +08:00
define i32 @safe_div(i32* %n, i32* %d) personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__C_specific_handler to i8*) {
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
entry:
%r = alloca i32, align 4
invoke void @try_body(i32* %r, i32* %n, i32* %d)
[SEH] Update SEH codegen tests to use the new IR Also Fix a buglet where SEH tables had ranges that spanned funclets. The remaining tests using the old landingpad IR are preparation tests, and will be deleted along with the old preparation. llvm-svn: 249917
2015-10-10 07:05:54 +08:00
to label %__try.cont unwind label %lpad0
lpad0:
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%cs0 = catchswitch within none [label %handler0] unwind label %lpad1
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
handler0:
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%p0 = catchpad within %cs0 [i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @safe_div_filt0 to i8*)]
[WinEH] Use operand bundles to describe call sites SimplifyCFG allows tail merging with code which terminates in unreachable which, in turn, makes it possible for an invoke to end up in a funclet which it was not originally part of. Using operand bundles on invokes allows us to determine whether or not an invoke was part of a funclet in the source program. Furthermore, it allows us to unambiguously answer questions about the legality of inlining into call sites which the personality may have trouble with. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15517 llvm-svn: 255674
2015-12-16 05:27:27 +08:00
call void @puts(i8* getelementptr ([27 x i8], [27 x i8]* @str1, i32 0, i32 0)) [ "funclet"(token %p0) ]
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
store i32 -1, i32* %r, align 4
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
catchret from %p0 to label %__try.cont
[SEH] Update SEH codegen tests to use the new IR Also Fix a buglet where SEH tables had ranges that spanned funclets. The remaining tests using the old landingpad IR are preparation tests, and will be deleted along with the old preparation. llvm-svn: 249917
2015-10-10 07:05:54 +08:00
lpad1:
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %handler1] unwind to caller
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
handler1:
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%p1 = catchpad within %cs1 [i8* bitcast (i32 (i8*, i8*)* @safe_div_filt1 to i8*)]
[WinEH] Use operand bundles to describe call sites SimplifyCFG allows tail merging with code which terminates in unreachable which, in turn, makes it possible for an invoke to end up in a funclet which it was not originally part of. Using operand bundles on invokes allows us to determine whether or not an invoke was part of a funclet in the source program. Furthermore, it allows us to unambiguously answer questions about the legality of inlining into call sites which the personality may have trouble with. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15517 llvm-svn: 255674
2015-12-16 05:27:27 +08:00
call void @puts(i8* getelementptr ([29 x i8], [29 x i8]* @str2, i32 0, i32 0)) [ "funclet"(token %p1) ]
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
store i32 -2, i32* %r, align 4
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
catchret from %p1 to label %__try.cont
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
__try.cont:
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786. A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278) import fileinput import sys import re pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)") for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line)) Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649 llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-28 05:17:42 +08:00
%safe_ret = load i32, i32* %r, align 4
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
ret i32 %safe_ret
}
; Normal path code
; CHECK: {{^}}safe_div:
; CHECK: .seh_proc safe_div
; CHECK: .seh_handler __C_specific_handler, @unwind, @except
; CHECK: .Ltmp0:
[SEH] Update SEH codegen tests to use the new IR Also Fix a buglet where SEH tables had ranges that spanned funclets. The remaining tests using the old landingpad IR are preparation tests, and will be deleted along with the old preparation. llvm-svn: 249917
2015-10-10 07:05:54 +08:00
; CHECK: leaq [[rloc:.*\(%rbp\)]], %rcx
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
; CHECK: callq try_body
; CHECK-NEXT: .Ltmp1
Re-land r235154-r235156 under the existing -sehprepare flag Keep the old SEH fan-in lowering on by default for now, since projects rely on it. This will make it easy to test this change with a simple flag flip. llvm-svn: 235399
2015-04-22 02:23:57 +08:00
; CHECK: [[cont_bb:\.LBB0_[0-9]+]]:
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
; CHECK: movl [[rloc]], %eax
; CHECK: retq
; Landing pad code
Do not select EhPad BB in MachineBlockPlacement when there is regular BB to schedule Summary: EHPad BB are not entered the classic way and therefor do not need to be placed after their predecessors. This patch make sure EHPad BB are not chosen amongst successors to form chains, and are selected as last resort when selecting the best candidate. EHPad are scheduled in reverse probability order in order to have them flow into each others naturally. Reviewers: chandlerc, majnemer, rafael, MatzeB, escha, silvas Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17625 llvm-svn: 265726
2016-04-08 05:29:39 +08:00
; CHECK: [[handler1:\.LBB0_[0-9]+]]: # %handler1
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
; CHECK: callq puts
Do not select EhPad BB in MachineBlockPlacement when there is regular BB to schedule Summary: EHPad BB are not entered the classic way and therefor do not need to be placed after their predecessors. This patch make sure EHPad BB are not chosen amongst successors to form chains, and are selected as last resort when selecting the best candidate. EHPad are scheduled in reverse probability order in order to have them flow into each others naturally. Reviewers: chandlerc, majnemer, rafael, MatzeB, escha, silvas Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17625 llvm-svn: 265726
2016-04-08 05:29:39 +08:00
; CHECK: movl $-2, [[rloc]]
Re-land r235154-r235156 under the existing -sehprepare flag Keep the old SEH fan-in lowering on by default for now, since projects rely on it. This will make it easy to test this change with a simple flag flip. llvm-svn: 235399
2015-04-22 02:23:57 +08:00
; CHECK: jmp [[cont_bb]]
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
Do not select EhPad BB in MachineBlockPlacement when there is regular BB to schedule Summary: EHPad BB are not entered the classic way and therefor do not need to be placed after their predecessors. This patch make sure EHPad BB are not chosen amongst successors to form chains, and are selected as last resort when selecting the best candidate. EHPad are scheduled in reverse probability order in order to have them flow into each others naturally. Reviewers: chandlerc, majnemer, rafael, MatzeB, escha, silvas Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17625 llvm-svn: 265726
2016-04-08 05:29:39 +08:00
; CHECK: [[handler0:\.LBB0_[0-9]+]]: # %handler0
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
; CHECK: callq puts
Do not select EhPad BB in MachineBlockPlacement when there is regular BB to schedule Summary: EHPad BB are not entered the classic way and therefor do not need to be placed after their predecessors. This patch make sure EHPad BB are not chosen amongst successors to form chains, and are selected as last resort when selecting the best candidate. EHPad are scheduled in reverse probability order in order to have them flow into each others naturally. Reviewers: chandlerc, majnemer, rafael, MatzeB, escha, silvas Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17625 llvm-svn: 265726
2016-04-08 05:29:39 +08:00
; CHECK: movl $-1, [[rloc]]
Re-land r235154-r235156 under the existing -sehprepare flag Keep the old SEH fan-in lowering on by default for now, since projects rely on it. This will make it easy to test this change with a simple flag flip. llvm-svn: 235399
2015-04-22 02:23:57 +08:00
; CHECK: jmp [[cont_bb]]
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
; CHECK: .seh_handlerdata
[WinEH] Make llvm.x86.seh.recoverfp work on x64 It adjusts from RSP-after-prologue to RBP, which is what SEH filters need to do before they can use llvm.localrecover. Fixes SEH filter captures, which were broken in r250088. Issue reported by Alex Crichton. llvm-svn: 255707
2015-12-16 07:40:58 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: .Lsafe_div$parent_frame_offset
[SEH] Update SEH codegen tests to use the new IR Also Fix a buglet where SEH tables had ranges that spanned funclets. The remaining tests using the old landingpad IR are preparation tests, and will be deleted along with the old preparation. llvm-svn: 249917
2015-10-10 07:05:54 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: .long (.Llsda_end0-.Llsda_begin0)/16
; CHECK-NEXT: .Llsda_begin0:
; CHECK-NEXT: .long .Ltmp0@IMGREL+1
Re-land r235154-r235156 under the existing -sehprepare flag Keep the old SEH fan-in lowering on by default for now, since projects rely on it. This will make it easy to test this change with a simple flag flip. llvm-svn: 235399
2015-04-22 02:23:57 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: .long .Ltmp1@IMGREL+1
; CHECK-NEXT: .long safe_div_filt0@IMGREL
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: .long [[handler0]]@IMGREL
[SEH] Update SEH codegen tests to use the new IR Also Fix a buglet where SEH tables had ranges that spanned funclets. The remaining tests using the old landingpad IR are preparation tests, and will be deleted along with the old preparation. llvm-svn: 249917
2015-10-10 07:05:54 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: .long .Ltmp0@IMGREL+1
Re-land r235154-r235156 under the existing -sehprepare flag Keep the old SEH fan-in lowering on by default for now, since projects rely on it. This will make it easy to test this change with a simple flag flip. llvm-svn: 235399
2015-04-22 02:23:57 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: .long .Ltmp1@IMGREL+1
; CHECK-NEXT: .long safe_div_filt1@IMGREL
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: .long [[handler1]]@IMGREL
[SEH] Update SEH codegen tests to use the new IR Also Fix a buglet where SEH tables had ranges that spanned funclets. The remaining tests using the old landingpad IR are preparation tests, and will be deleted along with the old preparation. llvm-svn: 249917
2015-10-10 07:05:54 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: .Llsda_end0:
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
; CHECK: .text
; CHECK: .seh_endproc
define void @try_body(i32* %r, i32* %n, i32* %d) {
entry:
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786. A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278) import fileinput import sys import re pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)") for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line)) Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649 llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-28 05:17:42 +08:00
%0 = load i32, i32* %n, align 4
%1 = load i32, i32* %d, align 4
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
%div = sdiv i32 %0, %1
store i32 %div, i32* %r, align 4
ret void
}
; The prototype of these filter functions is:
; int filter(EXCEPTION_POINTERS *eh_ptrs, void *rbp);
; The definition of EXCEPTION_POINTERS is:
; typedef struct _EXCEPTION_POINTERS {
; EXCEPTION_RECORD *ExceptionRecord;
; CONTEXT *ContextRecord;
; } EXCEPTION_POINTERS;
; The definition of EXCEPTION_RECORD is:
; typedef struct _EXCEPTION_RECORD {
; DWORD ExceptionCode;
; ...
; } EXCEPTION_RECORD;
; The exception code can be retreived with two loads, one for the record
; pointer and one for the code. The values of local variables can be
; accessed via rbp, but that would require additional not yet implemented LLVM
; support.
define i32 @safe_div_filt0(i8* %eh_ptrs, i8* %rbp) {
%eh_ptrs_c = bitcast i8* %eh_ptrs to i32**
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786. A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278) import fileinput import sys import re pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)") for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line)) Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649 llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-28 05:17:42 +08:00
%eh_rec = load i32*, i32** %eh_ptrs_c
%eh_code = load i32, i32* %eh_rec
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
; EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION = 0xC0000005
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %eh_code, 3221225477
%filt.res = zext i1 %cmp to i32
ret i32 %filt.res
}
define i32 @safe_div_filt1(i8* %eh_ptrs, i8* %rbp) {
%eh_ptrs_c = bitcast i8* %eh_ptrs to i32**
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786. A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278) import fileinput import sys import re pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)") for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line)) Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649 llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-28 05:17:42 +08:00
%eh_rec = load i32*, i32** %eh_ptrs_c
%eh_code = load i32, i32* %eh_rec
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
; EXCEPTION_INT_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO = 0xC0000094
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %eh_code, 3221225620
%filt.res = zext i1 %cmp to i32
ret i32 %filt.res
}
@str_result = internal constant [21 x i8] c"safe_div result: %d\0A\00"
define i32 @main() {
%d.addr = alloca i32, align 4
%n.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 10, i32* %n.addr, align 4
store i32 2, i32* %d.addr, align 4
%r1 = call i32 @safe_div(i32* %n.addr, i32* %d.addr)
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to the call instruction See r230786 and r230794 for similar changes to gep and load respectively. Call is a bit different because it often doesn't have a single explicit type - usually the type is deduced from the arguments, and just the return type is explicit. In those cases there's no need to change the IR. When that's not the case, the IR usually contains the pointer type of the first operand - but since typed pointers are going away, that representation is insufficient so I'm just stripping the "pointerness" of the explicit type away. This does make the IR a bit weird - it /sort of/ reads like the type of the first operand: "call void () %x(" but %x is actually of type "void ()*" and will eventually be just of type "ptr". But this seems not too bad and I don't think it would benefit from repeating the type ("void (), void () * %x(" and then eventually "void (), ptr %x(") as has been done with gep and load. This also has a side benefit: since the explicit type is no longer a pointer, there's no ambiguity between an explicit type and a function that returns a function pointer. Previously this case needed an explicit type (eg: a function returning a void() function was written as "call void () () * @x(" rather than "call void () * @x(" because of the ambiguity between a function returning a pointer to a void() function and a function returning void). No ambiguity means even function pointer return types can just be written alone, without writing the whole function's type. This leaves /only/ the varargs case where the explicit type is required. Given the special type syntax in call instructions, the regex-fu used for migration was a bit more involved in its own unique way (as every one of these is) so here it is. Use it in conjunction with the apply.sh script and associated find/xargs commands I've provided in rr230786 to migrate your out of tree tests. Do let me know if any of this doesn't cover your cases & we can iterate on a more general script/regexes to help others with out of tree tests. About 9 test cases couldn't be automatically migrated - half of those were functions returning function pointers, where I just had to manually delete the function argument types now that we didn't need an explicit function type there. The other half were typedefs of function types used in calls - just had to manually drop the * from those. import fileinput import sys import re pat = re.compile(r'((?:=|:|^|\s)call\s(?:[^@]*?))(\s*$|\s*(?:(?:\[\[[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\]\]|[@%](?:(")?[\\\?@a-zA-Z0-9_.]*?(?(3)"|)|{{.*}}))(?:\(|$)|undef|inttoptr|bitcast|null|asm).*$)') addrspace_end = re.compile(r"addrspace\(\d+\)\s*\*$") func_end = re.compile("(?:void.*|\)\s*)\*$") def conv(match, line): if not match or re.search(addrspace_end, match.group(1)) or not re.search(func_end, match.group(1)): return line return line[:match.start()] + match.group(1)[:match.group(1).rfind('*')].rstrip() + match.group(2) + line[match.end():] for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(conv(re.search(pat, line), line)) llvm-svn: 235145
2015-04-17 07:24:18 +08:00
call void (i8*, ...) @printf(i8* getelementptr ([21 x i8], [21 x i8]* @str_result, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %r1)
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
store i32 10, i32* %n.addr, align 4
store i32 0, i32* %d.addr, align 4
%r2 = call i32 @safe_div(i32* %n.addr, i32* %d.addr)
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to the call instruction See r230786 and r230794 for similar changes to gep and load respectively. Call is a bit different because it often doesn't have a single explicit type - usually the type is deduced from the arguments, and just the return type is explicit. In those cases there's no need to change the IR. When that's not the case, the IR usually contains the pointer type of the first operand - but since typed pointers are going away, that representation is insufficient so I'm just stripping the "pointerness" of the explicit type away. This does make the IR a bit weird - it /sort of/ reads like the type of the first operand: "call void () %x(" but %x is actually of type "void ()*" and will eventually be just of type "ptr". But this seems not too bad and I don't think it would benefit from repeating the type ("void (), void () * %x(" and then eventually "void (), ptr %x(") as has been done with gep and load. This also has a side benefit: since the explicit type is no longer a pointer, there's no ambiguity between an explicit type and a function that returns a function pointer. Previously this case needed an explicit type (eg: a function returning a void() function was written as "call void () () * @x(" rather than "call void () * @x(" because of the ambiguity between a function returning a pointer to a void() function and a function returning void). No ambiguity means even function pointer return types can just be written alone, without writing the whole function's type. This leaves /only/ the varargs case where the explicit type is required. Given the special type syntax in call instructions, the regex-fu used for migration was a bit more involved in its own unique way (as every one of these is) so here it is. Use it in conjunction with the apply.sh script and associated find/xargs commands I've provided in rr230786 to migrate your out of tree tests. Do let me know if any of this doesn't cover your cases & we can iterate on a more general script/regexes to help others with out of tree tests. About 9 test cases couldn't be automatically migrated - half of those were functions returning function pointers, where I just had to manually delete the function argument types now that we didn't need an explicit function type there. The other half were typedefs of function types used in calls - just had to manually drop the * from those. import fileinput import sys import re pat = re.compile(r'((?:=|:|^|\s)call\s(?:[^@]*?))(\s*$|\s*(?:(?:\[\[[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\]\]|[@%](?:(")?[\\\?@a-zA-Z0-9_.]*?(?(3)"|)|{{.*}}))(?:\(|$)|undef|inttoptr|bitcast|null|asm).*$)') addrspace_end = re.compile(r"addrspace\(\d+\)\s*\*$") func_end = re.compile("(?:void.*|\)\s*)\*$") def conv(match, line): if not match or re.search(addrspace_end, match.group(1)) or not re.search(func_end, match.group(1)): return line return line[:match.start()] + match.group(1)[:match.group(1).rfind('*')].rstrip() + match.group(2) + line[match.end():] for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(conv(re.search(pat, line), line)) llvm-svn: 235145
2015-04-17 07:24:18 +08:00
call void (i8*, ...) @printf(i8* getelementptr ([21 x i8], [21 x i8]* @str_result, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %r2)
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
%r3 = call i32 @safe_div(i32* %n.addr, i32* null)
[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to the call instruction See r230786 and r230794 for similar changes to gep and load respectively. Call is a bit different because it often doesn't have a single explicit type - usually the type is deduced from the arguments, and just the return type is explicit. In those cases there's no need to change the IR. When that's not the case, the IR usually contains the pointer type of the first operand - but since typed pointers are going away, that representation is insufficient so I'm just stripping the "pointerness" of the explicit type away. This does make the IR a bit weird - it /sort of/ reads like the type of the first operand: "call void () %x(" but %x is actually of type "void ()*" and will eventually be just of type "ptr". But this seems not too bad and I don't think it would benefit from repeating the type ("void (), void () * %x(" and then eventually "void (), ptr %x(") as has been done with gep and load. This also has a side benefit: since the explicit type is no longer a pointer, there's no ambiguity between an explicit type and a function that returns a function pointer. Previously this case needed an explicit type (eg: a function returning a void() function was written as "call void () () * @x(" rather than "call void () * @x(" because of the ambiguity between a function returning a pointer to a void() function and a function returning void). No ambiguity means even function pointer return types can just be written alone, without writing the whole function's type. This leaves /only/ the varargs case where the explicit type is required. Given the special type syntax in call instructions, the regex-fu used for migration was a bit more involved in its own unique way (as every one of these is) so here it is. Use it in conjunction with the apply.sh script and associated find/xargs commands I've provided in rr230786 to migrate your out of tree tests. Do let me know if any of this doesn't cover your cases & we can iterate on a more general script/regexes to help others with out of tree tests. About 9 test cases couldn't be automatically migrated - half of those were functions returning function pointers, where I just had to manually delete the function argument types now that we didn't need an explicit function type there. The other half were typedefs of function types used in calls - just had to manually drop the * from those. import fileinput import sys import re pat = re.compile(r'((?:=|:|^|\s)call\s(?:[^@]*?))(\s*$|\s*(?:(?:\[\[[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\]\]|[@%](?:(")?[\\\?@a-zA-Z0-9_.]*?(?(3)"|)|{{.*}}))(?:\(|$)|undef|inttoptr|bitcast|null|asm).*$)') addrspace_end = re.compile(r"addrspace\(\d+\)\s*\*$") func_end = re.compile("(?:void.*|\)\s*)\*$") def conv(match, line): if not match or re.search(addrspace_end, match.group(1)) or not re.search(func_end, match.group(1)): return line return line[:match.start()] + match.group(1)[:match.group(1).rfind('*')].rstrip() + match.group(2) + line[match.end():] for line in sys.stdin: sys.stdout.write(conv(re.search(pat, line), line)) llvm-svn: 235145
2015-04-17 07:24:18 +08:00
call void (i8*, ...) @printf(i8* getelementptr ([21 x i8], [21 x i8]* @str_result, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %r3)
CodeGen support for x86_64 SEH catch handlers in LLVM This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will catch the exception. The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in the EH selector that the landing pad block expects. Missing functionality: - Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters - Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require outlining and parent frame access - Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution. Reviewers: majnemer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300 llvm-svn: 225904
2015-01-14 09:05:27 +08:00
ret i32 0
}
declare i32 @__C_specific_handler(...)
declare i32 @llvm.eh.typeid.for(i8*) readnone nounwind
declare void @puts(i8*)
declare void @printf(i8*, ...)
declare void @abort()