maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/emulation-arm.s

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

28 lines
1.0 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

[ELF] Split up emulation.s per backend emulation.s is testing multiple architectures, which means it needs all the corresponding backends enabled, which might not be true for all developers (for example, I don't have PPC or MIPS enabled). Rather than marking the entire test as unsupported for such developers, split it up per backend to get better testing granularity. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53544 llvm-svn: 344986
2018-10-23 09:19:18 +08:00
# REQUIRES: arm
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=armv7-unknown-linux %s -o %tarm
# RUN: ld.lld -m armelf %tarm -o %t2arm
[test] Change llvm-readobj -long-option to --long-option or well-known short options. NFC Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode: -s => -S -t => --symbols -sd => --section-data llvm-svn: 359651
2019-05-01 13:49:01 +08:00
# RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers %t2arm | FileCheck --check-prefix=ARM %s
[ELF] Split up emulation.s per backend emulation.s is testing multiple architectures, which means it needs all the corresponding backends enabled, which might not be true for all developers (for example, I don't have PPC or MIPS enabled). Rather than marking the entire test as unsupported for such developers, split it up per backend to get better testing granularity. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53544 llvm-svn: 344986
2018-10-23 09:19:18 +08:00
# RUN: ld.lld -m armelf_linux_eabi %tarm -o %t3arm
[test] Change llvm-readobj -long-option to --long-option or well-known short options. NFC Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode: -s => -S -t => --symbols -sd => --section-data llvm-svn: 359651
2019-05-01 13:49:01 +08:00
# RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers %t3arm | FileCheck --check-prefix=ARM %s
[ELF] Split up emulation.s per backend emulation.s is testing multiple architectures, which means it needs all the corresponding backends enabled, which might not be true for all developers (for example, I don't have PPC or MIPS enabled). Rather than marking the entire test as unsupported for such developers, split it up per backend to get better testing granularity. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53544 llvm-svn: 344986
2018-10-23 09:19:18 +08:00
# RUN: ld.lld %tarm -o %t4arm
[test] Change llvm-readobj -long-option to --long-option or well-known short options. NFC Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode: -s => -S -t => --symbols -sd => --section-data llvm-svn: 359651
2019-05-01 13:49:01 +08:00
# RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers %t4arm | FileCheck --check-prefix=ARM %s
[ELF] Split up emulation.s per backend emulation.s is testing multiple architectures, which means it needs all the corresponding backends enabled, which might not be true for all developers (for example, I don't have PPC or MIPS enabled). Rather than marking the entire test as unsupported for such developers, split it up per backend to get better testing granularity. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53544 llvm-svn: 344986
2018-10-23 09:19:18 +08:00
# RUN: echo 'OUTPUT_FORMAT(elf32-littlearm)' > %t5arm.script
# RUN: ld.lld %t5arm.script %tarm -o %t5arm
[test] Change llvm-readobj -long-option to --long-option or well-known short options. NFC Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode: -s => -S -t => --symbols -sd => --section-data llvm-svn: 359651
2019-05-01 13:49:01 +08:00
# RUN: llvm-readobj --file-headers %t5arm | FileCheck --check-prefix=ARM %s
[ELF] Split up emulation.s per backend emulation.s is testing multiple architectures, which means it needs all the corresponding backends enabled, which might not be true for all developers (for example, I don't have PPC or MIPS enabled). Rather than marking the entire test as unsupported for such developers, split it up per backend to get better testing granularity. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53544 llvm-svn: 344986
2018-10-23 09:19:18 +08:00
# ARM: ElfHeader {
# ARM-NEXT: Ident {
# ARM-NEXT: Magic: (7F 45 4C 46)
# ARM-NEXT: Class: 32-bit (0x1)
# ARM-NEXT: DataEncoding: LittleEndian (0x1)
# ARM-NEXT: FileVersion: 1
# ARM-NEXT: OS/ABI: SystemV (0x0)
# ARM-NEXT: ABIVersion: 0
# ARM-NEXT: Unused: (00 00 00 00 00 00 00)
# ARM-NEXT: }
# ARM-NEXT: Type: Executable (0x2)
# ARM-NEXT: Machine: EM_ARM (0x28)
# ARM-NEXT: Version: 1
.globl _start
_start: