llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/unittests/clangd/CMakeLists.txt

44 lines
766 B
CMake
Raw Normal View History

set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
support
)
get_filename_component(CLANGD_SOURCE_DIR
${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../../clangd REALPATH)
include_directories(
${CLANGD_SOURCE_DIR}
)
add_extra_unittest(ClangdTests
Annotations.cpp
ClangdTests.cpp
ClangdUnitTests.cpp
CodeCompleteTests.cpp
CodeCompletionStringsTests.cpp
ContextTests.cpp
FileIndexTests.cpp
FuzzyMatchTests.cpp
IndexTests.cpp
Adds a json::Expr type to represent intermediate JSON expressions. Summary: This form can be created with a nice clang-format-friendly literal syntax, and gets escaping right. It knows how to call unparse() on our Protocol types. All the places where we pass around JSON internally now use this type. Object properties are sorted (stored as std::map) and so serialization is canonicalized, with optional prettyprinting (triggered by a -pretty flag). This makes the lit tests much nicer to read and somewhat nicer to debug. (Unfortunately the completion tests use CHECK-DAG, which only has line-granularity, so pretty-printing is disabled there. In future we could make completion ordering deterministic, or switch to unittests). Compared to the current approach, it has some efficiencies like avoiding copies of string literals used as object keys, but is probably slower overall. I think the code/test quality benefits are worth it. This patch doesn't attempt to do anything about JSON *parsing*. It takes direction from the proposal in this doc[1], but is limited in scope and visibility, for now. I am of half a mind just to use Expr as the target of a parser, and maybe do a little string deduplication, but not bother with clever memory allocation. That would be simple, and fast enough for clangd... [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OEF9IauWwNuSigZzvvbjc1cVS1uGHRyGTXaoy3DjqM4/edit +cc d0k so he can tell me not to use std::map. Reviewers: ioeric, malaperle Subscribers: bkramer, ilya-biryukov, mgorny, klimek Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39435 llvm-svn: 317486
2017-11-06 23:40:30 +08:00
JSONExprTests.cpp
URITests.cpp
TestFS.cpp
ThreadingTests.cpp
TraceTests.cpp
TUSchedulerTests.cpp
SourceCodeTests.cpp
SymbolCollectorTests.cpp
XRefsTests.cpp
)
target_link_libraries(ClangdTests
[CMake] Use PRIVATE in target_link_libraries for executables We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables. Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface and are transitive. Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables, since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also causes issues for generating install export files when using LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM library dependencies, which are currently added as interface dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use PRIVATE dependencies for executables. Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e., if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg), and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those). Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries. I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a separate change IMO. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823 llvm-svn: 319840
2017-12-06 05:49:56 +08:00
PRIVATE
clangBasic
clangDaemon
clangFormat
clangFrontend
clangIndex
clangSema
clangTooling
clangToolingCore
LLVMSupport
)