maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/option-mix.s

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

111 lines
3.6 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv32 | FileCheck -check-prefixes=ASM %s
# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv64 | FileCheck -check-prefixes=ASM %s
# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv32 -mattr=+relax | FileCheck -check-prefix=ASM %s
# RUN: llvm-mc %s -triple=riscv64 -mattr=+relax | FileCheck -check-prefix=ASM %s
[RISCV][MC] Find matching pcrel_hi fixup in more cases. If a symbol points to the end of a fragment, instead of searching for fixups in that fragment, search in the next fragment. Fixes spurious assembler error with subtarget change next to "la" pseudo-instruction, or expanded equivalent. Alternate proposal to fix the problem discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D58759. Testcase by Ana Pazos. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58943 llvm-svn: 355946
2019-03-13 02:14:16 +08:00
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple riscv32 < %s \
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# RUN: | llvm-objdump -d -M no-aliases - | FileCheck -check-prefixes=DISASM,DISASM-NORELAX %s
[RISCV][MC] Find matching pcrel_hi fixup in more cases. If a symbol points to the end of a fragment, instead of searching for fixups in that fragment, search in the next fragment. Fixes spurious assembler error with subtarget change next to "la" pseudo-instruction, or expanded equivalent. Alternate proposal to fix the problem discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D58759. Testcase by Ana Pazos. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58943 llvm-svn: 355946
2019-03-13 02:14:16 +08:00
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple riscv64 < %s \
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# RUN: | llvm-objdump -d -M no-aliases - | FileCheck -check-prefixes=DISASM,DISASM-NORELAX %s
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple riscv32 -mattr=+relax < %s \
# RUN: | llvm-objdump -d -M no-aliases - | FileCheck -check-prefixes=DISASM,DISASM-RELAX %s
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple riscv64 -mattr=+relax < %s \
# RUN: | llvm-objdump -d -M no-aliases - | FileCheck -check-prefixes=DISASM,DISASM-RELAX %s
[RISCV][MC] Find matching pcrel_hi fixup in more cases. If a symbol points to the end of a fragment, instead of searching for fixups in that fragment, search in the next fragment. Fixes spurious assembler error with subtarget change next to "la" pseudo-instruction, or expanded equivalent. Alternate proposal to fix the problem discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D58759. Testcase by Ana Pazos. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58943 llvm-svn: 355946
2019-03-13 02:14:16 +08:00
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# Checks change of options does not cause error: could not find corresponding %pcrel_hi
# when assembling pseudoinstruction and its extended form. Also checks that we
# evaluate the correct value for local symbols in such a situation.
[RISCV][MC] Find matching pcrel_hi fixup in more cases. If a symbol points to the end of a fragment, instead of searching for fixups in that fragment, search in the next fragment. Fixes spurious assembler error with subtarget change next to "la" pseudo-instruction, or expanded equivalent. Alternate proposal to fix the problem discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D58759. Testcase by Ana Pazos. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58943 llvm-svn: 355946
2019-03-13 02:14:16 +08:00
.option push
.option norelax
la a0, a_symbol
.option pop
la a1, another_symbol
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# ASM-LABEL: .Lpcrel_hi0{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# ASM-NEXT: auipc a0, %pcrel_hi(a_symbol)
# ASM-NEXT: addi a0, a0, %pcrel_lo(.Lpcrel_hi0)
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# ASM-LABEL: .Lpcrel_hi1{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# ASM-NEXT: auipc a1, %pcrel_hi(another_symbol)
# ASM-NEXT: addi a1, a1, %pcrel_lo(.Lpcrel_hi1)
[RISCV][MC] Find matching pcrel_hi fixup in more cases. If a symbol points to the end of a fragment, instead of searching for fixups in that fragment, search in the next fragment. Fixes spurious assembler error with subtarget change next to "la" pseudo-instruction, or expanded equivalent. Alternate proposal to fix the problem discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D58759. Testcase by Ana Pazos. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58943 llvm-svn: 355946
2019-03-13 02:14:16 +08:00
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# DISASM-LABEL: <.Lpcrel_hi0>:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# DISASM-NEXT: auipc a0, 0
# DISASM-NEXT: addi a0, a0, 0
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# DISASM-LABEL: <.Lpcrel_hi1>:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# DISASM-NEXT: auipc a1, 0
# DISASM-NEXT: addi a1, a1, 0
[RISCV][MC] Find matching pcrel_hi fixup in more cases. If a symbol points to the end of a fragment, instead of searching for fixups in that fragment, search in the next fragment. Fixes spurious assembler error with subtarget change next to "la" pseudo-instruction, or expanded equivalent. Alternate proposal to fix the problem discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D58759. Testcase by Ana Pazos. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58943 llvm-svn: 355946
2019-03-13 02:14:16 +08:00
.option push
.option norelax
1:auipc a0, %pcrel_hi(a_symbol)
addi a0, a0, %pcrel_lo(1b)
.option pop
2:auipc a1, %pcrel_hi(another_symbol)
addi a1, a1, %pcrel_lo(2b)
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# ASM-LABEL: .Ltmp0{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# ASM-NEXT: auipc a0, %pcrel_hi(a_symbol)
# ASM-NEXT: addi a0, a0, %pcrel_lo(.Ltmp0)
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# ASM-LABEL: .Ltmp1{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# ASM-NEXT: auipc a1, %pcrel_hi(another_symbol)
# ASM-NEXT: addi a1, a1, %pcrel_lo(.Ltmp1)
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# DISASM-LABEL: .Ltmp0{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# DISASM-NEXT: auipc a0, 0
# DISASM-NEXT: addi a0, a0, 0
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# DISASM-LABEL: .Ltmp1{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# DISASM-NEXT: auipc a1, 0
# DISASM-NEXT: addi a1, a1, 0
.option push
.option norelax
la a0, a_symbol
.option pop
la a1, local_symbol1
local_symbol1:
nop
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# ASM-LABEL: .Lpcrel_hi2{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# ASM-NEXT: auipc a0, %pcrel_hi(a_symbol)
# ASM-NEXT: addi a0, a0, %pcrel_lo(.Lpcrel_hi2)
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# ASM-LABEL: .Lpcrel_hi3{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# ASM-NEXT: auipc a1, %pcrel_hi(local_symbol1)
# ASM-NEXT: addi a1, a1, %pcrel_lo(.Lpcrel_hi3)
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# DISASM-LABEL: .Lpcrel_hi2{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# DISASM-NEXT: auipc a0, 0
# DISASM-NEXT: addi a0, a0, 0
# DISASM-NORELAX-NEXT: auipc a1, 0
# DISASM-NORELAX-NEXT: addi a1, a1, 8
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# DISASM-RELAX-LABEL: .Lpcrel_hi3{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# DISASM-RELAX-NEXT: auipc a1, 0
# DISASM-RELAX-NEXT: addi a1, a1, 0
.option push
.option norelax
1:auipc a0, %pcrel_hi(a_symbol)
addi a0, a0, %pcrel_lo(1b)
.option pop
2:auipc a1, %pcrel_hi(local_symbol2)
addi a1, a1, %pcrel_lo(2b)
local_symbol2:
nop
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# ASM-LABEL: .Ltmp2{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# ASM-NEXT: auipc a0, %pcrel_hi(a_symbol)
# ASM-NEXT: addi a0, a0, %pcrel_lo(.Ltmp2)
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# ASM-LABEL: .Ltmp3{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# ASM-NEXT: auipc a1, %pcrel_hi(local_symbol2)
# ASM-NEXT: addi a1, a1, %pcrel_lo(.Ltmp3)
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# DISASM-LABEL: .Ltmp2{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# DISASM-NEXT: auipc a0, 0
# DISASM-NEXT: addi a0, a0, 0
# DISASM-NORELAX-NEXT: auipc a1, 0
# DISASM-NORELAX-NEXT: addi a1, a1, 8
[llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:` The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier. `.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive. Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section` line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail. ``` Disassembly of section .foo: 0000000000001634 .foo: ``` Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right" Reviewed By: rupprecht Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-06 06:18:38 +08:00
# DISASM-RELAX-LABEL: .Ltmp3{{>?}}:
[RISCV] Fix evalutePCRelLo for symbols at the end of a fragment Summary: This is analogous to D58943, which correctly finds the corresponding fixup. However, when linker relaxations are disabled and we evaluate the fixup, we need to also ensure we use an offset of 0 rather than the size of the previous fragment. Reviewers: asb, efriedma, lenary Reviewed By: efriedma Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71978
2020-01-08 12:32:04 +08:00
# DISASM-RELAX-NEXT: auipc a1, 0
# DISASM-RELAX-NEXT: addi a1, a1, 0