llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/ObjCARC/ProvenanceAnalysis.cpp

186 lines
6.3 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- ProvenanceAnalysis.cpp - ObjC ARC Optimization ---------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
/// \file
///
/// This file defines a special form of Alias Analysis called ``Provenance
/// Analysis''. The word ``provenance'' refers to the history of the ownership
/// of an object. Thus ``Provenance Analysis'' is an analysis which attempts to
/// use various techniques to determine if locally
///
/// WARNING: This file knows about certain library functions. It recognizes them
/// by name, and hardwires knowledge of their semantics.
///
/// WARNING: This file knows about how certain Objective-C library functions are
/// used. Naive LLVM IR transformations which would otherwise be
/// behavior-preserving may break these assumptions.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "ProvenanceAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ObjCARCAnalysisUtils.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Use.h"
#include "llvm/IR/User.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Value.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Casting.h"
#include <utility>
using namespace llvm;
using namespace llvm::objcarc;
bool ProvenanceAnalysis::relatedSelect(const SelectInst *A,
const Value *B) {
const DataLayout &DL = A->getModule()->getDataLayout();
// If the values are Selects with the same condition, we can do a more precise
// check: just check for relations between the values on corresponding arms.
if (const SelectInst *SB = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(B))
if (A->getCondition() == SB->getCondition())
return related(A->getTrueValue(), SB->getTrueValue(), DL) ||
related(A->getFalseValue(), SB->getFalseValue(), DL);
// Check both arms of the Select node individually.
return related(A->getTrueValue(), B, DL) ||
related(A->getFalseValue(), B, DL);
}
bool ProvenanceAnalysis::relatedPHI(const PHINode *A,
const Value *B) {
const DataLayout &DL = A->getModule()->getDataLayout();
// If the values are PHIs in the same block, we can do a more precise as well
// as efficient check: just check for relations between the values on
// corresponding edges.
if (const PHINode *PNB = dyn_cast<PHINode>(B))
if (PNB->getParent() == A->getParent()) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = A->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
if (related(A->getIncomingValue(i),
PNB->getIncomingValueForBlock(A->getIncomingBlock(i)), DL))
return true;
return false;
}
// Check each unique source of the PHI node against B.
SmallPtrSet<const Value *, 4> UniqueSrc;
for (Value *PV1 : A->incoming_values()) {
if (UniqueSrc.insert(PV1).second && related(PV1, B, DL))
return true;
}
// All of the arms checked out.
return false;
}
/// Test if the value of P, or any value covered by its provenance, is ever
/// stored within the function (not counting callees).
static bool IsStoredObjCPointer(const Value *P) {
SmallPtrSet<const Value *, 8> Visited;
SmallVector<const Value *, 8> Worklist;
Worklist.push_back(P);
Visited.insert(P);
do {
P = Worklist.pop_back_val();
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
for (const Use &U : P->uses()) {
const User *Ur = U.getUser();
if (isa<StoreInst>(Ur)) {
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
if (U.getOperandNo() == 0)
// The pointer is stored.
return true;
// The pointed is stored through.
continue;
}
if (isa<CallInst>(Ur))
// The pointer is passed as an argument, ignore this.
continue;
if (isa<PtrToIntInst>(P))
// Assume the worst.
return true;
if (Visited.insert(Ur).second)
Worklist.push_back(Ur);
}
} while (!Worklist.empty());
// Everything checked out.
return false;
}
bool ProvenanceAnalysis::relatedCheck(const Value *A, const Value *B,
const DataLayout &DL) {
// Ask regular AliasAnalysis, for a first approximation.
switch (AA->alias(A, B)) {
case NoAlias:
return false;
case MustAlias:
case PartialAlias:
return true;
case MayAlias:
break;
}
bool AIsIdentified = IsObjCIdentifiedObject(A);
bool BIsIdentified = IsObjCIdentifiedObject(B);
// An ObjC-Identified object can't alias a load if it is never locally stored.
if (AIsIdentified) {
// Check for an obvious escape.
if (isa<LoadInst>(B))
return IsStoredObjCPointer(A);
if (BIsIdentified) {
// Check for an obvious escape.
if (isa<LoadInst>(A))
return IsStoredObjCPointer(B);
// Both pointers are identified and escapes aren't an evident problem.
return false;
}
} else if (BIsIdentified) {
// Check for an obvious escape.
if (isa<LoadInst>(A))
return IsStoredObjCPointer(B);
}
// Special handling for PHI and Select.
if (const PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(A))
return relatedPHI(PN, B);
if (const PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(B))
return relatedPHI(PN, A);
if (const SelectInst *S = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(A))
return relatedSelect(S, B);
if (const SelectInst *S = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(B))
return relatedSelect(S, A);
// Conservative.
return true;
}
bool ProvenanceAnalysis::related(const Value *A, const Value *B,
const DataLayout &DL) {
A = GetUnderlyingObjCPtrCached(A, DL, UnderlyingObjCPtrCache);
B = GetUnderlyingObjCPtrCached(B, DL, UnderlyingObjCPtrCache);
// Quick check.
if (A == B)
return true;
// Begin by inserting a conservative value into the map. If the insertion
// fails, we have the answer already. If it succeeds, leave it there until we
// compute the real answer to guard against recursive queries.
if (A > B) std::swap(A, B);
std::pair<CachedResultsTy::iterator, bool> Pair =
CachedResults.insert(std::make_pair(ValuePairTy(A, B), true));
if (!Pair.second)
return Pair.first->second;
bool Result = relatedCheck(A, B, DL);
CachedResults[ValuePairTy(A, B)] = Result;
return Result;
}