maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/funclet-layout.ll

159 lines
4.4 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

[WinEH] Add a funclet layout pass Windows EH funclets need to be contiguous. The FuncletLayout pass will ensure that the funclets are together and begin with a funclet entry MBB. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12943 llvm-svn: 247937
2015-09-18 04:45:18 +08:00
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-windows-msvc < %s | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:w-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-pc-windows-msvc"
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
%eh.ThrowInfo = type { i32, i32, i32, i32 }
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
%rtti.TypeDescriptor2 = type { i8**, i8*, [3 x i8] }
@"\01??_7type_info@@6B@" = external constant i8*
@"\01??_R0H@8" = internal global %rtti.TypeDescriptor2 { i8** @"\01??_7type_info@@6B@", i8* null, [3 x i8] c".H\00" }
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
define void @test1(i1 %B) personality i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 {
[WinEH] Add a funclet layout pass Windows EH funclets need to be contiguous. The FuncletLayout pass will ensure that the funclets are together and begin with a funclet entry MBB. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12943 llvm-svn: 247937
2015-09-18 04:45:18 +08:00
entry:
invoke void @g()
to label %unreachable unwind label %catch.dispatch
catch.dispatch:
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind to caller
[WinEH] Add a funclet layout pass Windows EH funclets need to be contiguous. The FuncletLayout pass will ensure that the funclets are together and begin with a funclet entry MBB. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12943 llvm-svn: 247937
2015-09-18 04:45:18 +08:00
catch:
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%cp = catchpad within %cs1 [i8* null, i32 64, i8* null]
br label %catch.loop
catch.loop:
br i1 %B, label %catchret, label %catch.loop
[WinEH] Add a funclet layout pass Windows EH funclets need to be contiguous. The FuncletLayout pass will ensure that the funclets are together and begin with a funclet entry MBB. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12943 llvm-svn: 247937
2015-09-18 04:45:18 +08:00
catchret:
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
catchret from %cp to label %try.cont
[WinEH] Add a funclet layout pass Windows EH funclets need to be contiguous. The FuncletLayout pass will ensure that the funclets are together and begin with a funclet entry MBB. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12943 llvm-svn: 247937
2015-09-18 04:45:18 +08:00
try.cont:
ret void
unreachable:
unreachable
}
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
; CHECK-LABEL: test1:
[WinEH] Add a funclet layout pass Windows EH funclets need to be contiguous. The FuncletLayout pass will ensure that the funclets are together and begin with a funclet entry MBB. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12943 llvm-svn: 247937
2015-09-18 04:45:18 +08:00
; The entry funclet contains %entry and %try.cont
; CHECK: # %entry
; CHECK: # %try.cont
; CHECK: retq
; The catch funclet contains %catch and %catchret
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
; CHECK: # %catch{{$}}
[WinEH] Add a funclet layout pass Windows EH funclets need to be contiguous. The FuncletLayout pass will ensure that the funclets are together and begin with a funclet entry MBB. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12943 llvm-svn: 247937
2015-09-18 04:45:18 +08:00
; CHECK: # %catchret
; CHECK: retq
declare void @g()
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
define i32 @test2(i1 %B) personality i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 {
entry:
invoke void @_CxxThrowException(i8* null, %eh.ThrowInfo* null) #1
to label %unreachable unwind label %catch.dispatch
catch.dispatch: ; preds = %entry
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind to caller
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
catch: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%0 = catchpad within %cs1 [i8* null, i32 64, i8* null]
[WinEH] Use operand bundles to describe call sites SimplifyCFG allows tail merging with code which terminates in unreachable which, in turn, makes it possible for an invoke to end up in a funclet which it was not originally part of. Using operand bundles on invokes allows us to determine whether or not an invoke was part of a funclet in the source program. Furthermore, it allows us to unambiguously answer questions about the legality of inlining into call sites which the personality may have trouble with. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15517 llvm-svn: 255674
2015-12-16 05:27:27 +08:00
invoke void @_CxxThrowException(i8* null, %eh.ThrowInfo* null) #1 ["funclet"(token %0)]
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
to label %unreachable unwind label %catch.dispatch.1
catch.dispatch.1: ; preds = %catch
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%cs2 = catchswitch within %0 [label %catch.3] unwind to caller
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
catch.3: ; preds = %catch.dispatch.1
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%1 = catchpad within %cs2 [i8* null, i32 64, i8* null]
catchret from %1 to label %try.cont
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
try.cont: ; preds = %catch.3
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
catchret from %0 to label %try.cont.5
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
try.cont.5: ; preds = %try.cont
ret i32 0
unreachable: ; preds = %catch, %entry
unreachable
}
; CHECK-LABEL: test2:
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
; The parent function contains %entry and %try.cont.5
; CHECK: .seh_proc
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
; CHECK: # %entry
; CHECK: # %try.cont.5
; CHECK: retq
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
; The inner catch funclet contains %catch.3
; CHECK: .seh_proc
; CHECK: # %catch.3{{$}}
; CHECK: retq
; The outer catch funclet contains %catch
; CHECK: .seh_proc
; CHECK: # %catch{{$}}
[WinEH] Create a separate MBB for funclet prologues Our current emission strategy is to emit the funclet prologue in the CatchPad's normal destination. This is problematic because intra-funclet control flow to the normal destination is not erroneous and results in us reevaluating the prologue if said control flow is taken. Instead, use the CatchPad's location for the funclet prologue. This correctly models our desire to have unwind edges evaluate the prologue but edges to the normal destination result in typical control flow. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13424 llvm-svn: 249483
2015-10-07 07:31:59 +08:00
; CHECK: callq _CxxThrowException
; CHECK: # %unreachable
; CHECK: ud2
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
[WinEH] Permit branch folding in the face of funclets Track which basic blocks belong to which funclets. Permit branch folding to fire but only if it can prove that doing so will not cause code in one funclet to be reused in another. llvm-svn: 249257
2015-10-04 10:22:52 +08:00
define void @test3(i1 %V) #0 personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 to i8*) {
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
entry:
invoke void @g()
to label %try.cont unwind label %catch.dispatch
catch.dispatch: ; preds = %entry
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch.2] unwind label %catch.dispatch.1
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
catch.2: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%0 = catchpad within %cs1 [%rtti.TypeDescriptor2* @"\01??_R0H@8", i32 0, i8* null]
[WinEH] Use operand bundles to describe call sites SimplifyCFG allows tail merging with code which terminates in unreachable which, in turn, makes it possible for an invoke to end up in a funclet which it was not originally part of. Using operand bundles on invokes allows us to determine whether or not an invoke was part of a funclet in the source program. Furthermore, it allows us to unambiguously answer questions about the legality of inlining into call sites which the personality may have trouble with. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15517 llvm-svn: 255674
2015-12-16 05:27:27 +08:00
tail call void @exit(i32 0) #2 [ "funclet"(token %0) ]
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
unreachable
catch.dispatch.1: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%cs2 = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind to caller
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
catch: ; preds = %catch.dispatch.1
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
%1 = catchpad within %cs2 [i8* null, i32 64, i8* null]
[WinEH] Use operand bundles to describe call sites SimplifyCFG allows tail merging with code which terminates in unreachable which, in turn, makes it possible for an invoke to end up in a funclet which it was not originally part of. Using operand bundles on invokes allows us to determine whether or not an invoke was part of a funclet in the source program. Furthermore, it allows us to unambiguously answer questions about the legality of inlining into call sites which the personality may have trouble with. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15517 llvm-svn: 255674
2015-12-16 05:27:27 +08:00
tail call void @exit(i32 0) #2 [ "funclet"(token %1) ]
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
unreachable
try.cont: ; preds = %entry
[WinEH] Permit branch folding in the face of funclets Track which basic blocks belong to which funclets. Permit branch folding to fire but only if it can prove that doing so will not cause code in one funclet to be reused in another. llvm-svn: 249257
2015-10-04 10:22:52 +08:00
br i1 %V, label %exit_one, label %exit_two
exit_one:
tail call void @exit(i32 0)
unreachable
exit_two:
tail call void @exit(i32 0)
unreachable
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
}
; CHECK-LABEL: test3:
; The entry funclet contains %entry and %try.cont
; CHECK: # %entry
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
; CHECK: # %try.cont
[WinEH] Permit branch folding in the face of funclets Track which basic blocks belong to which funclets. Permit branch folding to fire but only if it can prove that doing so will not cause code in one funclet to be reused in another. llvm-svn: 249257
2015-10-04 10:22:52 +08:00
; CHECK: callq exit
; CHECK-NOT: # exit_one
; CHECK-NOT: # exit_two
; CHECK: ud2
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
; The catch(...) funclet contains %catch.2
; CHECK: # %catch.2{{$}}
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
; CHECK: callq exit
[WinEH] Permit branch folding in the face of funclets Track which basic blocks belong to which funclets. Permit branch folding to fire but only if it can prove that doing so will not cause code in one funclet to be reused in another. llvm-svn: 249257
2015-10-04 10:22:52 +08:00
; CHECK: ud2
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies: - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM experts. - catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes. This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation. - catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward. It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other funclets. - The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a representation which forbade them upfront. Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following: - Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable. - Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model the constraints of funclet oriented EH. - Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume the token produced by the funclet which contains them. - Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred implicitly using coloring information. N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a look to make sure the results are reasonable. Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139 llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 13:38:55 +08:00
; The catch(int) funclet contains %catch
; CHECK: # %catch{{$}}
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
; CHECK: callq exit
[WinEH] Permit branch folding in the face of funclets Track which basic blocks belong to which funclets. Permit branch folding to fire but only if it can prove that doing so will not cause code in one funclet to be reused in another. llvm-svn: 249257
2015-10-04 10:22:52 +08:00
; CHECK: ud2
[WinEH] Stop BranchFolding from merging across funclets BranchFolding would merge two funclets together, this is not OK. Disable this and strengthen the assertion in FuncletLayout. llvm-svn: 249069
2015-10-02 05:04:13 +08:00
declare void @exit(i32) noreturn nounwind
[WinEH] Make FuncletLayout more robust against catchret Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet. However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node. llvm-svn: 249052
2015-10-02 02:44:59 +08:00
declare void @_CxxThrowException(i8*, %eh.ThrowInfo*)
[WinEH] Add a funclet layout pass Windows EH funclets need to be contiguous. The FuncletLayout pass will ensure that the funclets are together and begin with a funclet entry MBB. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12943 llvm-svn: 247937
2015-09-18 04:45:18 +08:00
declare i32 @__CxxFrameHandler3(...)