maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/gdb-index-dwarf5-low-high.s

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

50 lines
1.7 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

Test DWARFv5 with gdb-index and low_pc/high_pc on the CU (rather than ranges) There was a bug in LLVM's libDebugInfo where it did not porpagate the section index through the range query built from low_pc/high_pc. Hard to test in LLVM, so I'm adding a test here. llvm-svn: 350011
2018-12-23 06:20:47 +08:00
# REQUIRES: x86
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64-pc-linux %s -o %t.o
# RUN: ld.lld --gdb-index %t.o -o %t
# RUN: llvm-dwarfdump -gdb-index %t | FileCheck %s
# CHECK: Address area offset = 0x28, has 1 entries:
[ELF][X86] Allow PT_LOAD to have overlapping p_offset ranges on EM_X86_64 Port the D64906 technique to EM_X86_64. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67482 llvm-svn: 371958
2019-09-16 15:05:34 +08:00
# CHECK-NEXT: Low/High address = [0x201120, 0x201121) (Size: 0x1), CU id = 0
Test DWARFv5 with gdb-index and low_pc/high_pc on the CU (rather than ranges) There was a bug in LLVM's libDebugInfo where it did not porpagate the section index through the range query built from low_pc/high_pc. Hard to test in LLVM, so I'm adding a test here. llvm-svn: 350011
2018-12-23 06:20:47 +08:00
[LLD][ELF] - Cleanup gdb-index-dwarf5-low-high.s. NFC. Remove tabs and .debug_macinfo sections. llvm-svn: 350051
2018-12-24 18:18:07 +08:00
.text
.globl main
main: # @main
Test DWARFv5 with gdb-index and low_pc/high_pc on the CU (rather than ranges) There was a bug in LLVM's libDebugInfo where it did not porpagate the section index through the range query built from low_pc/high_pc. Hard to test in LLVM, so I'm adding a test here. llvm-svn: 350011
2018-12-23 06:20:47 +08:00
.Lfunc_begin0:
[LLD][ELF] - Cleanup gdb-index-dwarf5-low-high.s. NFC. Remove tabs and .debug_macinfo sections. llvm-svn: 350051
2018-12-24 18:18:07 +08:00
retq
Test DWARFv5 with gdb-index and low_pc/high_pc on the CU (rather than ranges) There was a bug in LLVM's libDebugInfo where it did not porpagate the section index through the range query built from low_pc/high_pc. Hard to test in LLVM, so I'm adding a test here. llvm-svn: 350011
2018-12-23 06:20:47 +08:00
.Lfunc_end0:
[LLD][ELF] - Cleanup gdb-index-dwarf5-low-high.s. NFC. Remove tabs and .debug_macinfo sections. llvm-svn: 350051
2018-12-24 18:18:07 +08:00
.section .debug_abbrev,"",@progbits
.byte 1 # Abbreviation Code
.byte 17 # DW_TAG_compile_unit
.byte 0 # DW_CHILDREN_no
.byte 115 # DW_AT_addr_base
.byte 23 # DW_FORM_sec_offset
.byte 17 # DW_AT_low_pc
.byte 27 # DW_FORM_addrx
.byte 18 # DW_AT_high_pc
.byte 6 # DW_FORM_data4
.byte 0 # EOM(1)
.byte 0 # EOM(2)
.byte 0 # EOM(3)
.section .debug_info,"",@progbits
Test DWARFv5 with gdb-index and low_pc/high_pc on the CU (rather than ranges) There was a bug in LLVM's libDebugInfo where it did not porpagate the section index through the range query built from low_pc/high_pc. Hard to test in LLVM, so I'm adding a test here. llvm-svn: 350011
2018-12-23 06:20:47 +08:00
.Lcu_begin0:
[LLD][ELF] - Cleanup gdb-index-dwarf5-low-high.s. NFC. Remove tabs and .debug_macinfo sections. llvm-svn: 350051
2018-12-24 18:18:07 +08:00
.long .Ldebug_info_end0-.Ldebug_info_start0 # Length of Unit
Test DWARFv5 with gdb-index and low_pc/high_pc on the CU (rather than ranges) There was a bug in LLVM's libDebugInfo where it did not porpagate the section index through the range query built from low_pc/high_pc. Hard to test in LLVM, so I'm adding a test here. llvm-svn: 350011
2018-12-23 06:20:47 +08:00
.Ldebug_info_start0:
[LLD][ELF] - Cleanup gdb-index-dwarf5-low-high.s. NFC. Remove tabs and .debug_macinfo sections. llvm-svn: 350051
2018-12-24 18:18:07 +08:00
.short 5 # DWARF version number
.byte 1 # DWARF Unit Type
.byte 8 # Address Size (in bytes)
.long .debug_abbrev # Offset Into Abbrev. Section
.byte 1 # Abbrev [1] 0xc:0x2b DW_TAG_compile_unit
.long .Laddr_table_base0 # DW_AT_addr_base
.byte 0 # DW_AT_low_pc
.long .Lfunc_end0-.Lfunc_begin0 # DW_AT_high_pc
Test DWARFv5 with gdb-index and low_pc/high_pc on the CU (rather than ranges) There was a bug in LLVM's libDebugInfo where it did not porpagate the section index through the range query built from low_pc/high_pc. Hard to test in LLVM, so I'm adding a test here. llvm-svn: 350011
2018-12-23 06:20:47 +08:00
.Ldebug_info_end0:
[LLD][ELF] - Cleanup gdb-index-dwarf5-low-high.s. NFC. Remove tabs and .debug_macinfo sections. llvm-svn: 350051
2018-12-24 18:18:07 +08:00
.section .debug_addr,"",@progbits
.long 12
.short 5
.byte 8
.byte 0
.Laddr_table_base0:
.quad .Lfunc_begin0