maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMTargetTransformInfo.h

137 lines
4.0 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
//===-- ARMTargetTransformInfo.h - ARM specific TTI -------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// \file
/// This file a TargetTransformInfo::Concept conforming object specific to the
/// ARM target machine. It uses the target's detailed information to
/// provide more precise answers to certain TTI queries, while letting the
/// target independent and default TTI implementations handle the rest.
///
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#ifndef LLVM_LIB_TARGET_ARM_ARMTARGETTRANSFORMINFO_H
#define LLVM_LIB_TARGET_ARM_ARMTARGETTRANSFORMINFO_H
#include "ARM.h"
#include "ARMTargetMachine.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h"
namespace llvm {
class ARMTTIImpl : public BasicTTIImplBase<ARMTTIImpl> {
typedef BasicTTIImplBase<ARMTTIImpl> BaseT;
typedef TargetTransformInfo TTI;
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
friend BaseT;
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
const ARMBaseTargetMachine *TM;
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
const ARMSubtarget *ST;
const ARMTargetLowering *TLI;
/// Estimate the overhead of scalarizing an instruction. Insert and Extract
/// are set if the result needs to be inserted and/or extracted from vectors.
unsigned getScalarizationOverhead(Type *Ty, bool Insert, bool Extract);
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
const ARMBaseTargetMachine *getTM() const { return TM; }
const ARMTargetLowering *getTLI() const { return TLI; }
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
public:
[multiversion] Switch all of the targets over to use the TargetIRAnalysis access path directly rather than implementing getTTI. This even removes getTTI from the interface. It's more efficient for each target to just register a precise callback that creates their specific TTI. As part of this, all of the targets which are building their subtargets individually per-function now build their TTI instance with the function and thus look up the correct subtarget and cache it. NVPTX, R600, and XCore currently don't leverage this functionality, but its trivial for them to add it now. llvm-svn: 227735
2015-02-01 21:20:00 +08:00
explicit ARMTTIImpl(const ARMBaseTargetMachine *TM, Function &F)
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
: BaseT(TM), TM(TM), ST(TM->getSubtargetImpl(F)),
TLI(ST->getTargetLowering()) {}
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
// Provide value semantics. MSVC requires that we spell all of these out.
ARMTTIImpl(const ARMTTIImpl &Arg)
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
: BaseT(static_cast<const BaseT &>(Arg)), TM(Arg.TM), ST(Arg.ST), TLI(Arg.TLI) {}
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
ARMTTIImpl(ARMTTIImpl &&Arg)
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
: BaseT(std::move(static_cast<BaseT &>(Arg))), TM(std::move(Arg.TM)),
ST(std::move(Arg.ST)), TLI(std::move(Arg.TLI)) {}
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
ARMTTIImpl &operator=(const ARMTTIImpl &RHS) {
BaseT::operator=(static_cast<const BaseT &>(RHS));
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
TM = RHS.TM;
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
ST = RHS.ST;
TLI = RHS.TLI;
return *this;
}
ARMTTIImpl &operator=(ARMTTIImpl &&RHS) {
BaseT::operator=(std::move(static_cast<BaseT &>(RHS)));
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
TM = std::move(RHS.TM);
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
ST = std::move(RHS.ST);
TLI = std::move(RHS.TLI);
return *this;
}
/// \name Scalar TTI Implementations
/// @{
using BaseT::getIntImmCost;
unsigned getIntImmCost(const APInt &Imm, Type *Ty);
/// @}
/// \name Vector TTI Implementations
/// @{
unsigned getNumberOfRegisters(bool Vector) {
if (Vector) {
if (ST->hasNEON())
return 16;
return 0;
}
if (ST->isThumb1Only())
return 8;
return 13;
}
unsigned getRegisterBitWidth(bool Vector) {
if (Vector) {
if (ST->hasNEON())
return 128;
return 0;
}
return 32;
}
unsigned getMaxInterleaveFactor() {
// These are out of order CPUs:
if (ST->isCortexA15() || ST->isSwift())
return 2;
return 1;
}
unsigned getShuffleCost(TTI::ShuffleKind Kind, Type *Tp, int Index,
Type *SubTp);
unsigned getCastInstrCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Dst, Type *Src);
unsigned getCmpSelInstrCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *ValTy, Type *CondTy);
unsigned getVectorInstrCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Val, unsigned Index);
unsigned getAddressComputationCost(Type *Val, bool IsComplex);
unsigned getArithmeticInstrCost(
unsigned Opcode, Type *Ty,
TTI::OperandValueKind Op1Info = TTI::OK_AnyValue,
TTI::OperandValueKind Op2Info = TTI::OK_AnyValue,
TTI::OperandValueProperties Opd1PropInfo = TTI::OP_None,
TTI::OperandValueProperties Opd2PropInfo = TTI::OP_None);
unsigned getMemoryOpCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Src, unsigned Alignment,
unsigned AddressSpace);
/// @}
};
} // end namespace llvm
#endif