maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.td

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

1477 lines
72 KiB
TableGen
Raw Normal View History

Emacs-tag and some comment fix for all ARM, CellSPU, Hexagon, MBlaze, MSP430, PPC, PTX, Sparc, X86, XCore. llvm-svn: 150878
2012-02-18 20:03:15 +08:00
//===-- X86.td - Target definition file for the Intel X86 --*- tablegen -*-===//
Fix whitespace and tabs. llvm-svn: 129517
2011-04-14 22:33:36 +08:00
//
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 16:50:56 +08:00
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
Fix whitespace and tabs. llvm-svn: 129517
2011-04-14 22:33:36 +08:00
//
Added LLVM copyright header. llvm-svn: 9321
2003-10-21 23:17:13 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Initial checkin of X86.td file llvm-svn: 7510
2003-08-03 23:47:49 +08:00
//
Add X86 LZCNT instruction. Including instruction selection support. llvm-svn: 141651
2011-10-11 14:44:02 +08:00
// This is a target description file for the Intel i386 architecture, referred
// to here as the "X86" architecture.
Initial checkin of X86.td file llvm-svn: 7510
2003-08-03 23:47:49 +08:00
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
transition to using let instead of set llvm-svn: 7564
2003-08-04 12:59:56 +08:00
// Get the target-independent interfaces which we are implementing...
Initial checkin of X86.td file llvm-svn: 7510
2003-08-03 23:47:49 +08:00
//
Move target independent td files from lib/Target/ to include/llvm/Target so they can be distributed along with the header files. llvm-svn: 59953
2008-11-24 15:34:46 +08:00
include "llvm/Target/Target.td"
Initial checkin of X86.td file llvm-svn: 7510
2003-08-03 23:47:49 +08:00
Add Mode64Bit feature and sink it down to MC layer. llvm-svn: 134641
2011-07-08 05:06:52 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
(no commit message) llvm-svn: 162010
2012-08-16 11:50:04 +08:00
// X86 Subtarget state
Add Mode64Bit feature and sink it down to MC layer. llvm-svn: 134641
2011-07-08 05:06:52 +08:00
//
def Mode64Bit : SubtargetFeature<"64bit-mode", "In64BitMode", "true",
"64-bit mode (x86_64)">;
[x86] Add basic support for .code16 This is not really expected to work right yet. Mostly because we will still emit the OpSize (0x66) prefix in all the wrong places, along with a number of other corner cases. Those will all be fixed in the subsequent commits. Patch from David Woodhouse. llvm-svn: 198584
2014-01-06 12:55:54 +08:00
def Mode32Bit : SubtargetFeature<"32bit-mode", "In32BitMode", "true",
"32-bit mode (80386)">;
def Mode16Bit : SubtargetFeature<"16bit-mode", "In16BitMode", "true",
"16-bit mode (i8086)">;
Add Mode64Bit feature and sink it down to MC layer. llvm-svn: 134641
2011-07-08 05:06:52 +08:00
Still need to support -mcpu=<> or cross compilation will fail. Doh. llvm-svn: 30764
2006-10-06 17:17:41 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
(no commit message) llvm-svn: 162010
2012-08-16 11:50:04 +08:00
// X86 Subtarget features
Add an "implies" field to features. This indicates that, if the current feature is set, then the features in the implied list should be set also. The opposite is also enforced: if a feature in the implied list isn't set, then the feature that owns that implies list shouldn't be set either. llvm-svn: 36756
2007-05-05 04:38:40 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Add support for modeling whether or not the processor has support for conditional moves as a subtarget feature. This is the easy part of PR4841. llvm-svn: 80763
2009-09-02 13:53:04 +08:00
[X86] Introduction of FeatureX87. Add FeatureX87 in X86 backend to be able to define CPUs which doesn't have x87. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13979 llvm-svn: 264148
2016-03-23 19:13:54 +08:00
def FeatureX87 : SubtargetFeature<"x87","HasX87", "true",
"Enable X87 float instructions">;
[X86] Move HasNOPL to a subtarget feature bit. Plumb MCSubtargetInfo through the MCAsmBackend constructor After D41349, we can no get a MCSubtargetInfo into the MCAsmBackend constructor. This allows us to get NOPL from a subtarget feature rather than a CPU name blacklist. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41721 llvm-svn: 322227
2018-01-11 06:07:16 +08:00
def FeatureNOPL : SubtargetFeature<"nopl", "HasNOPL", "true",
"Enable NOPL instruction">;
Add support for modeling whether or not the processor has support for conditional moves as a subtarget feature. This is the easy part of PR4841. llvm-svn: 80763
2009-09-02 13:53:04 +08:00
def FeatureCMOV : SubtargetFeature<"cmov","HasCMov", "true",
"Enable conditional move instructions">;
[X86] Add CMPXCHG8B feature flag. Set it for all CPUs except i386/i486 including 'generic'. Disable use of CMPXCHG8B when this flag isn't set. CMPXCHG8B was introduced on i586/pentium generation. If its not enabled, limit the atomic width to 32 bits so the AtomicExpandPass will expand to lib calls. Unclear if we should be using a different limit for other configs. The default is 1024 and experimentation shows that using an i256 atomic will cause a crash in SelectionDAG. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59576 llvm-svn: 356631
2019-03-21 07:35:49 +08:00
def FeatureCMPXCHG8B : SubtargetFeature<"cx8", "HasCmpxchg8b", "true",
"Support CMPXCHG8B instructions">;
Add patterns for the x86 popcnt instruction. - Also adds a new POPCNT subtarget feature that is currently enabled if the target supports SSE4.2 (nehalem) or SSE4A (barcelona). llvm-svn: 120917
2010-12-05 04:32:23 +08:00
def FeaturePOPCNT : SubtargetFeature<"popcnt", "HasPOPCNT", "true",
"Support POPCNT instruction">;
[X86] Add fxsr feature flag for fxsave/fxrestore instructions. llvm-svn: 250497
2015-10-16 14:03:09 +08:00
def FeatureFXSR : SubtargetFeature<"fxsr", "HasFXSR", "true",
"Support fxsave/fxrestore instructions">;
[X86] Add XSAVE intrinsic family Add intrinsics for the XSAVE instructions (XSAVE/XSAVE64/XRSTOR/XRSTOR64) XSAVEOPT instructions (XSAVEOPT/XSAVEOPT64) XSAVEC instructions (XSAVEC/XSAVEC64) XSAVES instructions (XSAVES/XSAVES64/XRSTORS/XRSTORS64) Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13012 llvm-svn: 250029
2015-10-12 19:47:46 +08:00
def FeatureXSAVE : SubtargetFeature<"xsave", "HasXSAVE", "true",
"Support xsave instructions">;
def FeatureXSAVEOPT: SubtargetFeature<"xsaveopt", "HasXSAVEOPT", "true",
[X86] Make XSAVEC/XSAVEOPT/XSAVES properly depend on XSAVE in both the frontend and the backend. These features implicitly enabled XSAVE in the frontend, but not the backend. Disabling XSAVE in the frontend disabled XSAVEOPT, but not the other 2. Nothing happened in the backend.
2020-06-26 15:14:58 +08:00
"Support xsaveopt instructions",
[FeatureXSAVE]>;
[X86] Add XSAVE intrinsic family Add intrinsics for the XSAVE instructions (XSAVE/XSAVE64/XRSTOR/XRSTOR64) XSAVEOPT instructions (XSAVEOPT/XSAVEOPT64) XSAVEC instructions (XSAVEC/XSAVEC64) XSAVES instructions (XSAVES/XSAVES64/XRSTORS/XRSTORS64) Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13012 llvm-svn: 250029
2015-10-12 19:47:46 +08:00
def FeatureXSAVEC : SubtargetFeature<"xsavec", "HasXSAVEC", "true",
[X86] Make XSAVEC/XSAVEOPT/XSAVES properly depend on XSAVE in both the frontend and the backend. These features implicitly enabled XSAVE in the frontend, but not the backend. Disabling XSAVE in the frontend disabled XSAVEOPT, but not the other 2. Nothing happened in the backend.
2020-06-26 15:14:58 +08:00
"Support xsavec instructions",
[FeatureXSAVE]>;
[X86] Add XSAVE intrinsic family Add intrinsics for the XSAVE instructions (XSAVE/XSAVE64/XRSTOR/XRSTOR64) XSAVEOPT instructions (XSAVEOPT/XSAVEOPT64) XSAVEC instructions (XSAVEC/XSAVEC64) XSAVES instructions (XSAVES/XSAVES64/XRSTORS/XRSTORS64) Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13012 llvm-svn: 250029
2015-10-12 19:47:46 +08:00
def FeatureXSAVES : SubtargetFeature<"xsaves", "HasXSAVES", "true",
[X86] Make XSAVEC/XSAVEOPT/XSAVES properly depend on XSAVE in both the frontend and the backend. These features implicitly enabled XSAVE in the frontend, but not the backend. Disabling XSAVE in the frontend disabled XSAVEOPT, but not the other 2. Nothing happened in the backend.
2020-06-26 15:14:58 +08:00
"Support xsaves instructions",
[FeatureXSAVE]>;
[X86] Add XSAVE intrinsic family Add intrinsics for the XSAVE instructions (XSAVE/XSAVE64/XRSTOR/XRSTOR64) XSAVEOPT instructions (XSAVEOPT/XSAVEOPT64) XSAVEC instructions (XSAVEC/XSAVEC64) XSAVES instructions (XSAVES/XSAVES64/XRSTORS/XRSTORS64) Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13012 llvm-svn: 250029
2015-10-12 19:47:46 +08:00
Add an "implies" field to features. This indicates that, if the current feature is set, then the features in the implied list should be set also. The opposite is also enforced: if a feature in the implied list isn't set, then the feature that owns that implies list shouldn't be set either. llvm-svn: 36756
2007-05-05 04:38:40 +08:00
def FeatureSSE1 : SubtargetFeature<"sse", "X86SSELevel", "SSE1",
[X86] Add FeatureCMOV explicitly to all CPUs that support it. Remove FeatureCMOV implication from Feature64Bit and FeatureSSE1 Summary: Previously most CPUs inherited cmov support through Feature64Bit(or FeatureCMPXCHG16HB implying Feature64Bit) or FeatureSSE1. This has the surprising side effect that -mattr=-cmov causes an assert to fire in 64-bit mode because it clears the Feature64Bit. Or in 32-bit mode, -mattr=-cmov disables any sse/avx features which seems surprising. This patch removes the implication and instead updates hasCMOV in X86Subtarget to check SSE1 or is64Bit in addition to the regular cmov flag. This should keep most things working the way they did before. I don't believe there is a way to specific "-cmov" directly from clang so this should only effect our lower level tools. This does stop -mattr=cx16(cmpxchg16b) from implying cmov is enabled via the 64bit flag as you can see from one of the changed tests. But that was a 32-bit test so I don't know why it enabled cx16 anyway. For the other test I had to add -sse to override the new sse check in hasCMOV. Reviewers: RKSimon, DavidKreitzer, spatel Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51228 llvm-svn: 340707
2018-08-27 02:29:33 +08:00
"Enable SSE instructions">;
Add an "implies" field to features. This indicates that, if the current feature is set, then the features in the implied list should be set also. The opposite is also enforced: if a feature in the implied list isn't set, then the feature that owns that implies list shouldn't be set either. llvm-svn: 36756
2007-05-05 04:38:40 +08:00
def FeatureSSE2 : SubtargetFeature<"sse2", "X86SSELevel", "SSE2",
"Enable SSE2 instructions",
[FeatureSSE1]>;
def FeatureSSE3 : SubtargetFeature<"sse3", "X86SSELevel", "SSE3",
"Enable SSE3 instructions",
[FeatureSSE2]>;
def FeatureSSSE3 : SubtargetFeature<"ssse3", "X86SSELevel", "SSSE3",
"Enable SSSE3 instructions",
[FeatureSSE3]>;
Rename features to match what gcc and clang use. There is no advantage in being different and using the same names simplifies clang a bit. llvm-svn: 189141
2013-08-24 04:21:34 +08:00
def FeatureSSE41 : SubtargetFeature<"sse4.1", "X86SSELevel", "SSE41",
SSE 4.1 Intrinsics and detection llvm-svn: 46681
2008-02-03 15:18:54 +08:00
"Enable SSE 4.1 instructions",
[FeatureSSSE3]>;
Rename features to match what gcc and clang use. There is no advantage in being different and using the same names simplifies clang a bit. llvm-svn: 189141
2013-08-24 04:21:34 +08:00
def FeatureSSE42 : SubtargetFeature<"sse4.2", "X86SSELevel", "SSE42",
SSE 4.1 Intrinsics and detection llvm-svn: 46681
2008-02-03 15:18:54 +08:00
"Enable SSE 4.2 instructions",
Make SSE42 and SSE4A not imply POPCNT. POPCNT should be able to be disabled on its own without disabling SSE4.2 or SSE4A. llvm-svn: 147339
2011-12-29 23:51:45 +08:00
[FeatureSSE41]>;
Add MMX to the 3dnow enum and propagate changes around. This makes it somewhat more consistent with how the feature is used. llvm-svn: 253122
2015-11-14 11:04:00 +08:00
// The MMX subtarget feature is separate from the rest of the SSE features
// because it's important (for odd compatibility reasons) to be able to
// turn it off explicitly while allowing SSE+ to be on.
def FeatureMMX : SubtargetFeature<"mmx","X863DNowLevel", "MMX",
"Enable MMX instructions">;
Add an "implies" field to features. This indicates that, if the current feature is set, then the features in the implied list should be set also. The opposite is also enforced: if a feature in the implied list isn't set, then the feature that owns that implies list shouldn't be set either. llvm-svn: 36756
2007-05-05 04:38:40 +08:00
def Feature3DNow : SubtargetFeature<"3dnow", "X863DNowLevel", "ThreeDNow",
Add 3DNow! intrinsics. llvm-svn: 129551
2011-04-15 08:32:41 +08:00
"Enable 3DNow! instructions",
[FeatureMMX]>;
Add an "implies" field to features. This indicates that, if the current feature is set, then the features in the implied list should be set also. The opposite is also enforced: if a feature in the implied list isn't set, then the feature that owns that implies list shouldn't be set either. llvm-svn: 36756
2007-05-05 04:38:40 +08:00
def Feature3DNowA : SubtargetFeature<"3dnowa", "X863DNowLevel", "ThreeDNowA",
3DNowA implies 3DNow. 64-bit implies SSE1, SSE2, and I assume MMX. llvm-svn: 36860
2007-05-06 15:56:19 +08:00
"Enable 3DNow! Athlon instructions",
[Feature3DNow]>;
Change Feature64Bit to not imply FeatureSSE2. All x86-64 hardware has SSE2, however it's possible to disable SSE2, and the subtarget support code thinks that if 64-bit implies SSE2 and SSE2 is disabled then 64-bit should also be disabled. Instead, just mark all the 64-bit subtargets as explicitly supporting SSE2. Also, move the code that makes -march=x86-64 enable 64-bit support by default to only apply when there is no explicit subtarget. If you need to specify a subtarget and you want 64-bit code, you'll need to select a subtarget that supports 64-bit code. llvm-svn: 63575
2009-02-03 08:04:43 +08:00
// All x86-64 hardware has SSE2, but we don't mark SSE2 as an implied
// feature, because SSE2 can be disabled (e.g. for compiling OS kernels)
[X86] Make Feature64Bit useful We now only add +64bit to the CPU string for "generic" CPU. All other CPU names are assumed to have the feature flag already set if they support 64-bit. I've remove the implies from CMPXCHG8 so that Feature64Bit only comes in via CPUs or user passing -mattr=+64bit. I've changed the assert to a report_fatal_error so it's not lost in Release builds. The test updates are to fix things that tripped the new error. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51231 llvm-svn: 341022
2018-08-30 14:01:05 +08:00
// without disabling 64-bit mode. Nothing should imply this feature bit. It
// is used to enforce that only 64-bit capable CPUs are used in 64-bit mode.
3DNowA implies 3DNow. 64-bit implies SSE1, SSE2, and I assume MMX. llvm-svn: 36860
2007-05-06 15:56:19 +08:00
def Feature64Bit : SubtargetFeature<"64bit", "HasX86_64", "true",
[X86] Add FeatureCMOV explicitly to all CPUs that support it. Remove FeatureCMOV implication from Feature64Bit and FeatureSSE1 Summary: Previously most CPUs inherited cmov support through Feature64Bit(or FeatureCMPXCHG16HB implying Feature64Bit) or FeatureSSE1. This has the surprising side effect that -mattr=-cmov causes an assert to fire in 64-bit mode because it clears the Feature64Bit. Or in 32-bit mode, -mattr=-cmov disables any sse/avx features which seems surprising. This patch removes the implication and instead updates hasCMOV in X86Subtarget to check SSE1 or is64Bit in addition to the regular cmov flag. This should keep most things working the way they did before. I don't believe there is a way to specific "-cmov" directly from clang so this should only effect our lower level tools. This does stop -mattr=cx16(cmpxchg16b) from implying cmov is enabled via the 64bit flag as you can see from one of the changed tests. But that was a 32-bit test so I don't know why it enabled cx16 anyway. For the other test I had to add -sse to override the new sse check in hasCMOV. Reviewers: RKSimon, DavidKreitzer, spatel Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51228 llvm-svn: 340707
2018-08-27 02:29:33 +08:00
"Support 64-bit instructions">;
Rename this feature to "cx16" to match gcc's flag name. Apparently these strings are directly tied to the flag names in clang with no remapping in between? llvm-svn: 192044
2013-10-06 04:11:44 +08:00
def FeatureCMPXCHG16B : SubtargetFeature<"cx16", "HasCmpxchg16b", "true",
[X86] Make CMPXCHG16B feature imply CMPXCHG8B feature. This fixes znver1 so that it properly enables CMPXHG8B. We can probably remove explicit CMPXCHG8B from CPUs that also have CMPXCHG16B, but keeping this simple to allow cherry pick to 9.0. Fixes PR42935. llvm-svn: 368324
2019-08-09 02:11:17 +08:00
"64-bit with cmpxchg16b",
[FeatureCMPXCHG8B]>;
SHLD/SHRD are VectorPath (microcode) instructions known to have poor latency on certain architectures. While generating SHLD/SHRD instructions is acceptable when optimizing for size, optimizing for speed on these platforms should be implemented using alternative sequences of instructions composed of add, adc, shr, shl, or and lea which are directPath instructions. These alternative instructions not only have a lower latency but they also increase the decode bandwidth by allowing simultaneous decoding of a third directPath instruction. AMD's processors family K7, K8, K10, K12, K15 and K16 are known to have SHLD/SHRD instructions with very poor latency. Optimization guides for these processors recommend using an alternative sequence of instructions. For these AMD's processors, I disabled folding (or (x << c) | (y >> (64 - c))) when we are not optimizing for size. It might be beneficial to disable this folding for some of the Intel's processors. However, since I couldn't find specific recommendations regarding using SHLD/SHRD instructions on Intel's processors, I haven't disabled this peephole for Intel. llvm-svn: 195383
2013-11-22 07:21:26 +08:00
def FeatureSlowSHLD : SubtargetFeature<"slow-shld", "IsSHLDSlow", "true",
"SHLD instruction is slow">;
[X86] Prefer reduced width multiplication over pmulld on Silvermont Summary: Prefer expansions such as: pmullw,pmulhw,unpacklwd,unpackhwd over pmulld. On Silvermont [source: Optimization Reference Manual]: PMULLD has a throughput of 1/11 [instruction/cycles]. PMULHUW/PMULHW/PMULLW have a throughput of 1/2 [instruction/cycles]. Fixes pr31202. Analysis of this issue was done by Fahana Aleen. Reviewers: wmi, delena, mkuper Subscribers: RKSimon, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27203 llvm-svn: 288844
2016-12-07 03:35:20 +08:00
def FeatureSlowPMULLD : SubtargetFeature<"slow-pmulld", "IsPMULLDSlow", "true",
"PMULLD instruction is slow">;
[X86] Remove ProcIntelKNL and replace with a SlowPMADDWD flag to use in the one place it was checked. llvm-svn: 345286
2018-10-26 01:29:00 +08:00
def FeatureSlowPMADDWD : SubtargetFeature<"slow-pmaddwd", "IsPMADDWDSlow",
"true",
"PMADDWD is slower than PMULLD">;
rename "slow-unaligned-mem-under-32" to slow-unaligned-mem-16" (NFCI) This is a follow-on suggested by: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12154 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL245729 ) http://reviews.llvm.org/D10662 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL245075 ) This makes the attribute name match most of the existing lowering logic and regression test expectations. But the current use of this attribute is inconsistent; see the FIXME comment for "allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses()". That change will result in functional changes and should be coming soon. llvm-svn: 246585
2015-09-02 04:51:51 +08:00
// FIXME: This should not apply to CPUs that do not have SSE.
def FeatureSlowUAMem16 : SubtargetFeature<"slow-unaligned-mem-16",
"IsUAMem16Slow", "true",
"Slow unaligned 16-byte memory access">;
Add a feature flag for slow 32-byte unaligned memory accesses [x86]. This patch adds a feature flag to avoid unaligned 32-byte load/store AVX codegen for Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge. There is no functionality change intended for those chips. Previously, the absence of AVX2 was being used as a proxy to detect this feature. But that hindered codegen for AVX-enabled AMD chips such as btver2 that do not have the 32-byte unaligned access slowdown. Performance measurements are included in PR21541 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21541 ). Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6355 llvm-svn: 222544
2014-11-22 01:40:04 +08:00
def FeatureSlowUAMem32 : SubtargetFeature<"slow-unaligned-mem-32",
[x86] invert logic for attribute 'FeatureFastUAMem' This is a 'no functional change intended' patch. It removes one FIXME, but adds several more. Motivation: the FeatureFastUAMem attribute may be too general. It is used to determine if any sized misaligned memory access under 32-bytes is 'fast'. From the added FIXME comments, however, you can see that we're not consistent about this. Changing the name of the attribute makes it clearer to see the logic holes. Changing this to a 'slow' attribute also means we don't have to add an explicit 'fast' attribute to new chips; fast unaligned accesses have been standard for several generations of CPUs now. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12154 llvm-svn: 245729
2015-08-22 04:17:26 +08:00
"IsUAMem32Slow", "true",
"Slow unaligned 32-byte memory access">;
Update CPU capabilities for AMD machines - added processors k8-sse3, opteron-sse3, athlon64-sse3, amdfam10, and barcelona with appropriate sse3/4a levels - added FeatureSSE4A for amdfam10 processors in X86Subtarget: - added hasSSE4A - updated AutoDetectSubtargetFeatures to detect SSE4A - updated GetCurrentX86CPU to detect family 15 with sse3 as k8-sse3 and family 10h as amdfam10 New processor names match those used by gcc. Patch by Paul Redmond! llvm-svn: 72434
2009-05-27 05:04:35 +08:00
def FeatureSSE4A : SubtargetFeature<"sse4a", "HasSSE4A", "true",
Make FMA4 imply AVX so that YMM registers would be available. Necessitates removing from Bulldozer CPU types since it would enable AVX code generation implicitly. Also make SSE4A imply SSE3. Without some level of SSE implied, XMM registers wouldn't be legal. llvm-svn: 147369
2011-12-30 15:16:00 +08:00
"Support SSE 4a instructions",
[FeatureSSE3]>;
Still need to support -mcpu=<> or cross compilation will fail. Doh. llvm-svn: 30764
2006-10-06 17:17:41 +08:00
Remove AVX hack in X86Subtarget. AVX/AVX2 are now treated as an SSE level. Predicate functions have been altered to maintain previous names and behavior. llvm-svn: 147770
2012-01-09 17:02:13 +08:00
def FeatureAVX : SubtargetFeature<"avx", "X86SSELevel", "AVX",
"Enable AVX instructions",
[FeatureSSE42]>;
def FeatureAVX2 : SubtargetFeature<"avx2", "X86SSELevel", "AVX2",
Add intrinsics and feature flag for read/write FS/GS base instructions. Also add AVX2 feature flag. llvm-svn: 143319
2011-10-31 03:57:21 +08:00
"Enable AVX2 instructions",
[FeatureAVX]>;
[X86] Make FeatureAVX512 imply FeatureFMA. Previously our VEX patterns were checking Subtarget.hasFMA() which checked FMA || AVX512. So we were behaving as if AVX512 implied it anyway. Which means we'd allow VEX encoded 128/256 FMA when AVX512F was enabled but AVX512VL is off. Regardless of the FMA flag. EVEX to VEX also transforms scalar EVEX FMA instructions to their VEX versions even without the FMA flag. Similarly for 128/256 under AVX512VL. So this makes AVX512 imply FeatureFMA to make our current behavior explicit. All known CPUs that support AVX512 have VEX FMA instructions. llvm-svn: 317520
2017-11-07 06:49:01 +08:00
def FeatureFMA : SubtargetFeature<"fma", "HasFMA", "true",
"Enable three-operand fused multiple-add",
[FeatureAVX]>;
[X86] Make FeatureAVX512 imply FeatureF16C. The EVEX to VEX pass is already assuming this is true under AVX512VL. We had special patterns to use zmm instructions if VLX and F16C weren't available. Instead just make AVX512 imply F16C to make the EVEX to VEX behavior explicitly legal and remove the extra patterns. All known CPUs with AVX512 have F16C so this should safe for now. llvm-svn: 317521
2017-11-07 06:49:04 +08:00
def FeatureF16C : SubtargetFeature<"f16c", "HasF16C", "true",
"Support 16-bit floating point conversion instructions",
[FeatureAVX]>;
Rename mattr names for AVX-512 to from avx-512 -> avx512f, avx-512-pfi -> av512pf, avx-512-cdi -> avx512cd, avx-512-eri->avx512er. This matches better with official docs and what gcc patches appearto be using. I didn't touch the has* functions or the feature flag names to avoid change the td and lowering file while commits are still happening. llvm-svn: 188859
2013-08-21 11:57:57 +08:00
def FeatureAVX512 : SubtargetFeature<"avx512f", "X86SSELevel", "AVX512F",
I'm starting to commit KNL backend. I'll push patches one-by-one. This patch includes support for the extended register set XMM16-31, YMM16-31, ZMM0-31. The full ISA you can see here: http://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-isa-extensions llvm-svn: 187030
2013-07-24 19:02:47 +08:00
"Enable AVX-512 instructions",
[X86] Make FeatureAVX512 imply FeatureF16C. The EVEX to VEX pass is already assuming this is true under AVX512VL. We had special patterns to use zmm instructions if VLX and F16C weren't available. Instead just make AVX512 imply F16C to make the EVEX to VEX behavior explicitly legal and remove the extra patterns. All known CPUs with AVX512 have F16C so this should safe for now. llvm-svn: 317521
2017-11-07 06:49:04 +08:00
[FeatureAVX2, FeatureFMA, FeatureF16C]>;
Rename mattr names for AVX-512 to from avx-512 -> avx512f, avx-512-pfi -> av512pf, avx-512-cdi -> avx512cd, avx-512-eri->avx512er. This matches better with official docs and what gcc patches appearto be using. I didn't touch the has* functions or the feature flag names to avoid change the td and lowering file while commits are still happening. llvm-svn: 188859
2013-08-21 11:57:57 +08:00
def FeatureERI : SubtargetFeature<"avx512er", "HasERI", "true",
Added encoding prefixes for KNL instructions (EVEX). Added 512-bit operands printing. Added instruction formats for KNL instructions. llvm-svn: 187324
2013-07-28 16:28:38 +08:00
"Enable AVX-512 Exponential and Reciprocal Instructions",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
Rename mattr names for AVX-512 to from avx-512 -> avx512f, avx-512-pfi -> av512pf, avx-512-cdi -> avx512cd, avx-512-eri->avx512er. This matches better with official docs and what gcc patches appearto be using. I didn't touch the has* functions or the feature flag names to avoid change the td and lowering file while commits are still happening. llvm-svn: 188859
2013-08-21 11:57:57 +08:00
def FeatureCDI : SubtargetFeature<"avx512cd", "HasCDI", "true",
Added encoding prefixes for KNL instructions (EVEX). Added 512-bit operands printing. Added instruction formats for KNL instructions. llvm-svn: 187324
2013-07-28 16:28:38 +08:00
"Enable AVX-512 Conflict Detection Instructions",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
[X86] Adding vpopcntd and vpopcntq instructions AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ is a new feature set that was published by Intel. The patch represents the LLVM side of the addition of two new intrinsic based instructions (vpopcntd and vpopcntq). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33169 llvm-svn: 303858
2017-05-25 21:45:23 +08:00
def FeatureVPOPCNTDQ : SubtargetFeature<"avx512vpopcntdq", "HasVPOPCNTDQ",
"true", "Enable AVX-512 Population Count Instructions",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
Rename mattr names for AVX-512 to from avx-512 -> avx512f, avx-512-pfi -> av512pf, avx-512-cdi -> avx512cd, avx-512-eri->avx512er. This matches better with official docs and what gcc patches appearto be using. I didn't touch the has* functions or the feature flag names to avoid change the td and lowering file while commits are still happening. llvm-svn: 188859
2013-08-21 11:57:57 +08:00
def FeaturePFI : SubtargetFeature<"avx512pf", "HasPFI", "true",
Added encoding prefixes for KNL instructions (EVEX). Added 512-bit operands printing. Added instruction formats for KNL instructions. llvm-svn: 187324
2013-07-28 16:28:38 +08:00
"Enable AVX-512 PreFetch Instructions",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
[X86] Add prefetchwt1 instruction and overhaul priorities and isel enabling for prefetch instructions. Previously prefetch was only considered legal if sse was enabled, but it should be supported with 3dnow as well. The prfchw flag now imply at least some form of prefetch without the write hint is available, either the sse or 3dnow version. This is true even if 3dnow and sse are explicitly disabled. Similarly prefetchwt1 feature implies availability of prefetchw and the the prefetcht0/1/2/nta instructions. This way we can support _MM_HINT_ET0 using prefetchw and _MM_HINT_ET1 with prefetchwt1. And its assumed that if we have levels for the write hint we would have levels for the non-write hint, thus why we enable the sse prefetch instructions. I believe this behavior is consistent with gcc. I've updated the prefetch.ll to test all of these combinations. llvm-svn: 321335
2017-12-22 10:30:30 +08:00
def FeaturePREFETCHWT1 : SubtargetFeature<"prefetchwt1", "HasPREFETCHWT1",
Added Skylake client to X86 targets and features Changes in X86.td: I set features of Intel processors in incremental form: IVB = SNB + X HSW = IVB + X .. I added Skylake client processor and defined it's features FeatureADX was missing on KNL Added some new features to appropriate processors SMAP, IFMA, PREFETCHWT1, VMFUNC and others Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16357 llvm-svn: 258659
2016-01-24 18:41:28 +08:00
"true",
"Prefetch with Intent to Write and T1 Hint">;
[SKX] Enabling SKX target and AVX512BW, AVX512DQ, AVX512VL features. Enabling HasAVX512{DQ,BW,VL} predicates. Adding VK2, VK4, VK32, VK64 masked register classes. Adding new types (v64i8, v32i16) to VR512. Extending calling conventions for new types (v64i8, v32i16) Patch by Zinovy Nis <zinovy.y.nis@intel.com> Reviewed by Elena Demikhovsky <elena.demikhovsky@intel.com> llvm-svn: 213545
2014-07-21 22:54:21 +08:00
def FeatureDQI : SubtargetFeature<"avx512dq", "HasDQI", "true",
"Enable AVX-512 Doubleword and Quadword Instructions",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
def FeatureBWI : SubtargetFeature<"avx512bw", "HasBWI", "true",
"Enable AVX-512 Byte and Word Instructions",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
def FeatureVLX : SubtargetFeature<"avx512vl", "HasVLX", "true",
"Enable AVX-512 Vector Length eXtensions",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
[AVX512] adding AVXVBMI feature flag The feature flag is for VPERMB,VPERMI2B,VPERMT2B and VPMULTISHIFTQB instructions. More about the instruction can be found in: hattps://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/07/b7/319433-023.pdf Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16190 llvm-svn: 258012
2016-01-17 21:42:12 +08:00
def FeatureVBMI : SubtargetFeature<"avx512vbmi", "HasVBMI", "true",
[AVX-512] Make VBMI instruction set enabling imply that the BWI instruction set is also enabled. Summary: This is needed to make the v64i8 and v32i16 types legal for the 512-bit VBMI instructions. Fixes PR30912. Reviewers: delena, zvi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26322 llvm-svn: 286339
2016-11-09 12:50:48 +08:00
"Enable AVX-512 Vector Byte Manipulation Instructions",
[FeatureBWI]>;
[x86][icelake]vbmi2 introducing vbmi2, consisting of vpcompress{b,w} vpexpand{b,w} vpsh{l,r}d{w,d,q} vpsh{l,r}dv{w,d,q} Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40206 llvm-svn: 318745
2017-11-21 17:48:44 +08:00
def FeatureVBMI2 : SubtargetFeature<"avx512vbmi2", "HasVBMI2", "true",
"Enable AVX-512 further Vector Byte Manipulation Instructions",
[FeatureBWI]>;
[X86] Change FeatureIFMA string to 'avx512ifma'. Matches gcc and fixes PR26461. llvm-svn: 260069
2016-02-08 09:23:15 +08:00
def FeatureIFMA : SubtargetFeature<"avx512ifma", "HasIFMA", "true",
Added Skylake client to X86 targets and features Changes in X86.td: I set features of Intel processors in incremental form: IVB = SNB + X HSW = IVB + X .. I added Skylake client processor and defined it's features FeatureADX was missing on KNL Added some new features to appropriate processors SMAP, IFMA, PREFETCHWT1, VMFUNC and others Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16357 llvm-svn: 258659
2016-01-24 18:41:28 +08:00
"Enable AVX-512 Integer Fused Multiple-Add",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
[x86] adding PKU feature flag the feature flag is essential for RDPKRU and WRPKRU instruction more about the instruction can be found in the SDM rev 56, vol 2 from http://www.intel.com/sdm Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15491 llvm-svn: 255644
2015-12-15 21:35:29 +08:00
def FeaturePKU : SubtargetFeature<"pku", "HasPKU", "true",
"Enable protection keys">;
[x86][icelake]VNNI Introducing Vector Neural Network Instructions, consisting of: vpdpbusd{s} vpdpwssd{s} Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40208 llvm-svn: 318746
2017-11-21 18:04:28 +08:00
def FeatureVNNI : SubtargetFeature<"avx512vnni", "HasVNNI", "true",
"Enable AVX-512 Vector Neural Network Instructions",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
[X86] Support Intel avxvnni This patch mainly made the following changes: 1. Support AVX-VNNI instructions; 2. Introduce ExplicitVEXPrefix flag so that vpdpbusd/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds instructions only use vex-encoding when user explicity add {vex} prefix. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89105
2020-10-30 12:58:05 +08:00
def FeatureAVXVNNI : SubtargetFeature<"avxvnni", "HasAVXVNNI", "true",
"Support AVX_VNNI encoding",
[FeatureAVX2]>;
Enable AVX512_BF16 instructions, which are supported for BFLOAT16 in Cooper Lake Summary: 1. Enable infrastructure of AVX512_BF16, which is supported for BFLOAT16 in Cooper Lake; 2. Enable VCVTNE2PS2BF16, VCVTNEPS2BF16 and DPBF16PS instructions, which are Vector Neural Network Instructions supporting BFLOAT16 inputs and conversion instructions from IEEE single precision. VCVTNE2PS2BF16: Convert Two Packed Single Data to One Packed BF16 Data. VCVTNEPS2BF16: Convert Packed Single Data to Packed BF16 Data. VDPBF16PS: Dot Product of BF16 Pairs Accumulated into Packed Single Precision. For more details about BF16 isa, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference Author: LiuTianle Reviewers: craig.topper, smaslov, LuoYuanke, wxiao3, annita.zhang, RKSimon, spatel Reviewed By: craig.topper Subscribers: kristina, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60550 llvm-svn: 360017
2019-05-06 16:22:37 +08:00
def FeatureBF16 : SubtargetFeature<"avx512bf16", "HasBF16", "true",
"Support bfloat16 floating point",
[FeatureBWI]>;
[x86][icelake]BITALG vpopcnt{b,w} Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40213 llvm-svn: 318748
2017-11-21 18:32:42 +08:00
def FeatureBITALG : SubtargetFeature<"avx512bitalg", "HasBITALG", "true",
"Enable AVX-512 Bit Algorithms",
[FeatureBWI]>;
[X86] Add VP2INTERSECT instructions Support Intel AVX512 VP2INTERSECT instructions in llvm Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62366 llvm-svn: 362188
2019-05-31 10:50:41 +08:00
def FeatureVP2INTERSECT : SubtargetFeature<"avx512vp2intersect",
"HasVP2INTERSECT", "true",
"Enable AVX-512 vp2intersect",
[FeatureAVX512]>;
X86: Rename the CLMUL target feature to PCLMUL. It was renamed in gcc/gas a while ago and causes all kinds of confusion because it was named differently in llvm and clang. llvm-svn: 157745
2012-05-31 22:34:17 +08:00
def FeaturePCLMUL : SubtargetFeature<"pclmul", "HasPCLMUL", "true",
"Enable packed carry-less multiplication instructions",
Make CLMUL and AES imply SSE2 since its needed to legalize the type. llvm-svn: 155888
2012-05-01 13:28:32 +08:00
[FeatureSSE2]>;
[x86][icelake]GFNI galois field arithmetic (GF(2^8)) insns: gf2p8affineinvqb gf2p8affineqb gf2p8mulb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40373 llvm-svn: 318993
2017-11-26 17:36:41 +08:00
def FeatureGFNI : SubtargetFeature<"gfni", "HasGFNI", "true",
"Enable Galois Field Arithmetic Instructions",
[FeatureSSE2]>;
[x86][icelake]vpclmulqdq introduction an icelake promotion of pclmulqdq Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40101 llvm-svn: 318741
2017-11-21 17:30:33 +08:00
def FeatureVPCLMULQDQ : SubtargetFeature<"vpclmulqdq", "HasVPCLMULQDQ", "true",
"Enable vpclmulqdq instructions",
[FeatureAVX, FeaturePCLMUL]>;
Add feature flags for AVX and FMA and fix some SSE4A feature flag initialization problems. llvm-svn: 74350
2009-06-27 06:46:54 +08:00
def FeatureFMA4 : SubtargetFeature<"fma4", "HasFMA4", "true",
Make FMA4 imply AVX so that YMM registers would be available. Necessitates removing from Bulldozer CPU types since it would enable AVX code generation implicitly. Also make SSE4A imply SSE3. Without some level of SSE implied, XMM registers wouldn't be legal. llvm-svn: 147369
2011-12-30 15:16:00 +08:00
"Enable four-operand fused multiple-add",
Make XOP and FMA4 require SSE4A to match GCC behavior. Use this to simplify Bulldozer feature list. llvm-svn: 155897
2012-05-01 14:54:48 +08:00
[FeatureAVX, FeatureSSE4A]>;
Make FMA4 imply AVX so that YMM registers would be available. Necessitates removing from Bulldozer CPU types since it would enable AVX code generation implicitly. Also make SSE4A imply SSE3. Without some level of SSE implied, XMM registers wouldn't be legal. llvm-svn: 147369
2011-12-30 15:16:00 +08:00
def FeatureXOP : SubtargetFeature<"xop", "HasXOP", "true",
Make XOP imply AVX as its needed to legalize the registers types. llvm-svn: 155891
2012-05-01 13:41:41 +08:00
"Enable XOP instructions",
Patch to enable FMA on bdver2 target. Make XOP feature enable FMA4 as well. llvm-svn: 162012
2012-08-16 12:04:02 +08:00
[FeatureFMA4]>;
Fix program crashes due to alignment exceptions generated for SSE memop instructions (PR22371). r224330 introduced a bug by misinterpreting the "FeatureVectorUAMem" bit. The commit log says that change did not affect anything, but that's not correct. That change allowed SSE instructions to have unaligned mem operands folded into math ops, and that's not allowed in the default specification for any SSE variant. The bug is exposed when compiling for an AVX-capable CPU that had this feature flag but without enabling AVX codegen. Another mistake in r224330 was not adding the feature flag to all AVX CPUs; the AMD chips were excluded. This is part of the fix for PR22371 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22371 ). This feature bit is SSE-specific, so I've renamed it to "FeatureSSEUnalignedMem". Changed the existing test case for the feature bit to reflect the new name and renamed the test file itself to better reflect the feature. Added runs to fold-vex.ll to check for the failing codegen. Note that the feature bit is not set by default on any CPU because it may require a configuration register setting to enable the enhanced unaligned behavior. llvm-svn: 227983
2015-02-04 01:13:04 +08:00
def FeatureSSEUnalignedMem : SubtargetFeature<"sse-unaligned-mem",
"HasSSEUnalignedMem", "true",
"Allow unaligned memory operands with SSE instructions">;
Separate out the AES-NI instructions from the SSE4.2 instructions. Add a new subtarget option for AES and check for the support. Add "westmere" line of processors and add AES-NI support to the core i7. Add a couple of TODOs for information I couldn't verify. llvm-svn: 100231
2010-04-03 05:54:27 +08:00
def FeatureAES : SubtargetFeature<"aes", "HasAES", "true",
Make CLMUL and AES imply SSE2 since its needed to legalize the type. llvm-svn: 155888
2012-05-01 13:28:32 +08:00
"Enable AES instructions",
[FeatureSSE2]>;
[x86][icelake]VAES introduction an icelake promotion of AES Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40078 llvm-svn: 318740
2017-11-21 17:11:41 +08:00
def FeatureVAES : SubtargetFeature<"vaes", "HasVAES", "true",
"Promote selected AES instructions to AVX512/AVX registers",
[FeatureAVX, FeatureAES]>;
Adding a feature flag to the llvm backend for x86 TBM instruction set. Adding TBM feature to bdver2 processor; piledriver supports this instruction set according to the following document: http://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/2012/10/New-Bulldozer-and-Piledriver-Instructions.pdf Phabricator code review is located here: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1692 llvm-svn: 191324
2013-09-25 02:21:52 +08:00
def FeatureTBM : SubtargetFeature<"tbm", "HasTBM", "true",
"Enable TBM instructions">;
[X86][LWP] Add llvm support for LWP instructions (reapplied). This patch adds support for the the LightWeight Profiling (LWP) instructions which are available on all AMD Bulldozer class CPUs (bdver1 to bdver4). Reapplied - this time without changing line endings of existing files. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32769 llvm-svn: 302041
2017-05-03 23:51:39 +08:00
def FeatureLWP : SubtargetFeature<"lwp", "HasLWP", "true",
"Enable LWP instructions">;
Add support for MOVBE and RDRAND instructions for the assembler and disassembler. Includes feature flag checking, but no instrinsic support. Fixes PR10832, PR11026 and PR11027. llvm-svn: 141007
2011-10-04 01:28:23 +08:00
def FeatureMOVBE : SubtargetFeature<"movbe", "HasMOVBE", "true",
"Support MOVBE instruction">;
Rename features to match what gcc and clang use. There is no advantage in being different and using the same names simplifies clang a bit. llvm-svn: 189141
2013-08-24 04:21:34 +08:00
def FeatureRDRAND : SubtargetFeature<"rdrnd", "HasRDRAND", "true",
Add support for MOVBE and RDRAND instructions for the assembler and disassembler. Includes feature flag checking, but no instrinsic support. Fixes PR10832, PR11026 and PR11027. llvm-svn: 141007
2011-10-04 01:28:23 +08:00
"Support RDRAND instruction">;
Add intrinsics and feature flag for read/write FS/GS base instructions. Also add AVX2 feature flag. llvm-svn: 143319
2011-10-31 03:57:21 +08:00
def FeatureFSGSBase : SubtargetFeature<"fsgsbase", "HasFSGSBase", "true",
"Support FS/GS Base instructions">;
Add X86 LZCNT instruction. Including instruction selection support. llvm-svn: 141651
2011-10-11 14:44:02 +08:00
def FeatureLZCNT : SubtargetFeature<"lzcnt", "HasLZCNT", "true",
"Support LZCNT instruction">;
Add X86 TZCNT instruction and patterns to select it. Also added core-avx2 processor which is gcc's name for Haswell. llvm-svn: 141939
2011-10-14 11:21:46 +08:00
def FeatureBMI : SubtargetFeature<"bmi", "HasBMI", "true",
"Support BMI instructions">;
Add X86 BZHI instruction as well as BMI2 feature detection. llvm-svn: 142122
2011-10-16 15:55:05 +08:00
def FeatureBMI2 : SubtargetFeature<"bmi2", "HasBMI2", "true",
"Support BMI2 instructions">;
Add support of RTM from TSX extension - Add RTM code generation support throught 3 X86 intrinsics: xbegin()/xend() to start/end a transaction region, and xabort() to abort a tranaction region llvm-svn: 167573
2012-11-08 15:28:54 +08:00
def FeatureRTM : SubtargetFeature<"rtm", "HasRTM", "true",
"Support RTM instructions">;
added basic support for Intel ADX instructions -feature flag, instructions definitions, test cases llvm-svn: 175196
2013-02-15 03:08:21 +08:00
def FeatureADX : SubtargetFeature<"adx", "HasADX", "true",
"Support ADX instructions">;
Partial support for Intel SHA Extensions (sha1rnds4) Add basic assembly/disassembly support for the first Intel SHA instruction 'sha1rnds4'. Also includes feature flag, and test cases. Support for the remaining instructions will follow in a separate patch. llvm-svn: 190611
2013-09-12 23:51:31 +08:00
def FeatureSHA : SubtargetFeature<"sha", "HasSHA", "true",
"Enable SHA instructions",
[FeatureSSE2]>;
Control-Flow Enforcement Technology - Shadow Stack support (LLVM side) Shadow stack solution introduces a new stack for return addresses only. The HW has a Shadow Stack Pointer (SSP) that points to the next return address. If we return to a different address, an exception is triggered. The shadow stack is managed using a series of intrinsics that are introduced in this patch as well as the new register (SSP). The intrinsics are mapped to new instruction set that implements CET mechanism. The patch also includes initial infrastructure support for IBT. For more information, please see the following: https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/4d/2a/control-flow-enforcement-technology-preview.pdf Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40223 Change-Id: I4daa1f27e88176be79a4ac3b4cd26a459e88fed4 llvm-svn: 318996
2017-11-26 21:02:45 +08:00
def FeatureSHSTK : SubtargetFeature<"shstk", "HasSHSTK", "true",
"Support CET Shadow-Stack instructions">;
Add PREFETCHW codegen support - Add 'PRFCHW' feature defined in AVX2 ISA extension llvm-svn: 178040
2013-03-27 01:47:11 +08:00
def FeaturePRFCHW : SubtargetFeature<"prfchw", "HasPRFCHW", "true",
"Support PRFCHW instructions">;
Add support of RDSEED defined in AVX2 extension llvm-svn: 178314
2013-03-29 07:41:26 +08:00
def FeatureRDSEED : SubtargetFeature<"rdseed", "HasRDSEED", "true",
"Support RDSEED instruction">;
[X86] Rework the "sahf" feature flag to only apply to 64-bit mode. SAHF/LAHF instructions are always available in 32-bit mode. Early 64-bit capable CPUs made the undefined opcodes in 64-bit mode. This was changed on later CPUs. We have a feature flag to control our usage of these instructions. This feature flag is hooked up to a clang command line option -msahf/-mno-sahf specifically to give control of the 64-bit mode behavior. In the backend X86Subtarget constructor we were explicitly forcing +sahf into the feature flag string if we were not compiling for 64-bit mode. This was intended to make the predicates always allow the instructions outside of 64-bit mode. Unfortunately, the way it was placed into the string allowed -mno-sahf from clang to disable SAHF instructions in 32-bit mode. This causes an assertion to fire if you compile a floating point comparison with something like "-march=pentium -mno-sahf" as our floating point comparison handling on CPUs that don't support FCOMI/FUCOMI instructions requires SAHF. To fix this, this commit restricts the feature flag to only apply to 64-bit mode by ignoring the flag outside 64-bit mode in X86Subtarget::hasLAHFSAHF(). This way we don't need to mess with the feature string at all.
2020-07-23 07:19:38 +08:00
def FeatureLAHFSAHF : SubtargetFeature<"sahf", "HasLAHFSAHF64", "true",
"Support LAHF and SAHF instructions in 64-bit mode">;
Add new flag and intrinsic support for MWAITX and MONITORX instructions Summary: MONITORX/MWAITX instructions provide similar capability to the MONITOR/MWAIT pair while adding a timer function, such that another termination of the MWAITX instruction occurs when the timer expires. The presence of the MONITORX and MWAITX instructions is indicated by CPUID 8000_0001, ECX, bit 29. The MONITORX and MWAITX instructions are intercepted by the same bits that intercept MONITOR and MWAIT. MONITORX instruction establishes a range to be monitored. MWAITX instruction causes the processor to stop instruction execution and enter an implementation-dependent optimized state until occurrence of a class of events. Opcode of MONITORX instruction is "0F 01 FA". Opcode of MWAITX instruction is "0F 01 FB". These opcode information is used in adding tests for the disassembler. These instructions are enabled for AMD's bdver4 architecture. Patch by Ganesh Gopalasubramanian! Reviewers: echristo, craig.topper, RKSimon Subscribers: RKSimon, joker.eph, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19795 llvm-svn: 269911
2016-05-18 19:59:12 +08:00
def FeatureMWAITX : SubtargetFeature<"mwaitx", "HasMWAITX", "true",
"Enable MONITORX/MWAITX timer functionality">;
[X86] Clzero intrinsic and its addition under znver1 This patch does the following. 1. Adds an Intrinsic int_x86_clzero which works with __builtin_ia32_clzero 2. Identifies clzero feature using cpuid info. (Function:8000_0008, Checks if EBX[0]=1) 3. Adds the clzero feature under znver1 architecture. 4. The custom inserter is added in Lowering. 5. A testcase is added to check the intrinsic. 6. The clzero instruction is added to assembler test. Patch by Ganesh Gopalasubramanian with a couple formatting tweaks, a disassembler test, and using update_llc_test.py from me. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29385 llvm-svn: 294558
2017-02-09 12:27:34 +08:00
def FeatureCLZERO : SubtargetFeature<"clzero", "HasCLZERO", "true",
"Enable Cache Line Zero">;
[X86] Introduce cldemote instruction Hint to hardware to move the cache line containing the address to a more distant level of the cache without writing back to memory. Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45256 llvm-svn: 329992
2018-04-13 15:35:08 +08:00
def FeatureCLDEMOTE : SubtargetFeature<"cldemote", "HasCLDEMOTE", "true",
"Enable Cache Demote">;
[X86] ptwrite intrinsic Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon Reviewed By: craig.topper, RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46539 llvm-svn: 331961
2018-05-10 15:26:05 +08:00
def FeaturePTWRITE : SubtargetFeature<"ptwrite", "HasPTWRITE", "true",
"Support ptwrite instruction">;
[X86-64] Support Intel AMX instructions Summary: INTEL ADVANCED MATRIX EXTENSIONS (AMX). AMX is a new programming paradigm, it has a set of 2-dimensional registers (TILES) representing sub-arrays from a larger 2-dimensional memory image and operate on TILES. Spec can be found in Chapter 3 here https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.html Reviewers: LuoYuanke, annita.zhang, pengfei, RKSimon, xiangzhangllvm Reviewed By: xiangzhangllvm Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82705
2020-07-02 08:36:45 +08:00
def FeatureAMXTILE : SubtargetFeature<"amx-tile", "HasAMXTILE", "true",
"Support AMX-TILE instructions">;
def FeatureAMXINT8 : SubtargetFeature<"amx-int8", "HasAMXINT8", "true",
"Support AMX-INT8 instructions",
[FeatureAMXTILE]>;
def FeatureAMXBF16 : SubtargetFeature<"amx-bf16", "HasAMXBF16", "true",
"Support AMX-BF16 instructions",
[FeatureAMXTILE]>;
fix capitalization; NFC llvm-svn: 250049
2015-10-12 23:24:01 +08:00
def FeatureLEAForSP : SubtargetFeature<"lea-sp", "UseLeaForSP", "true",
Use LEA to adjust stack ptr for Atom. Patch by Andy Zhang. llvm-svn: 150008
2012-02-08 06:50:41 +08:00
"Use LEA for adjusting the stack pointer">;
[X86] For Silvermont CPU use 16-bit division instead of 64-bit for small positive numbers Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5938 llvm-svn: 222521
2014-11-21 19:19:34 +08:00
def FeatureSlowDivide32 : SubtargetFeature<"idivl-to-divb",
"HasSlowDivide32", "true",
"Use 8-bit divide for positive values less than 256">;
[X86] Tune bypassing of slow division for Intel CPUs 64-bit integer division in Intel CPUs is extremely slow, much slower than 32-bit division. On the other hand, 8-bit and 16-bit divisions aren't any faster. The only important exception is Atom where DIV8 is fastest. Because of that, the patch 1) Enables bypassing of 64-bit division for Atom, Silvermont and all big cores. 2) Modifies 64-bit bypassing to use 32-bit division instead of 16-bit one. This doesn't make the shorter division slower but increases chances of taking it. Moreover, it's much more likely to prove at compile-time that a value fits 32 bits and doesn't require a run-time check (e.g. zext i32 to i64). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28196 llvm-svn: 291800
2017-01-13 03:34:15 +08:00
def FeatureSlowDivide64 : SubtargetFeature<"idivq-to-divl",
[X86] For Silvermont CPU use 16-bit division instead of 64-bit for small positive numbers Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5938 llvm-svn: 222521
2014-11-21 19:19:34 +08:00
"HasSlowDivide64", "true",
[X86] Tune bypassing of slow division for Intel CPUs 64-bit integer division in Intel CPUs is extremely slow, much slower than 32-bit division. On the other hand, 8-bit and 16-bit divisions aren't any faster. The only important exception is Atom where DIV8 is fastest. Because of that, the patch 1) Enables bypassing of 64-bit division for Atom, Silvermont and all big cores. 2) Modifies 64-bit bypassing to use 32-bit division instead of 16-bit one. This doesn't make the shorter division slower but increases chances of taking it. Moreover, it's much more likely to prove at compile-time that a value fits 32 bits and doesn't require a run-time check (e.g. zext i32 to i64). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28196 llvm-svn: 291800
2017-01-13 03:34:15 +08:00
"Use 32-bit divide for positive values less than 2^32">;
Pad Short Functions for Intel Atom The current Intel Atom microarchitecture has a feature whereby when a function returns early then it is slightly faster to execute a sequence of NOP instructions to wait until the return address is ready, as opposed to simply stalling on the ret instruction until the return address is ready. When compiling for X86 Atom only, this patch will run a pass, called "X86PadShortFunction" which will add NOP instructions where less than four cycles elapse between function entry and return. It includes tests. This patch has been updated to address Nadav's review comments - Optimize only at >= O1 and don't do optimization if -Os is set - Stores MachineBasicBlock* instead of BBNum - Uses DenseMap instead of std::map - Fixes placement of braces Patch by Andy Zhang. llvm-svn: 171879
2013-01-09 02:27:24 +08:00
def FeaturePadShortFunctions : SubtargetFeature<"pad-short-functions",
"PadShortFunctions", "true",
"Pad short functions">;
[x86] invpcid LLVM intrinsic Re-add the feature flag for invpcid, which was removed in r294561. Add an intrinsic, which always uses a 32 bit integer as first argument, while the instruction actually uses a 64 bit register in 64 bit mode for the INVPCID_TYPE argument. Reviewers: craig.topper Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47141 llvm-svn: 333255
2018-05-25 14:32:05 +08:00
def FeatureINVPCID : SubtargetFeature<"invpcid", "HasINVPCID", "true",
"Invalidate Process-Context Identifier">;
Added Skylake client to X86 targets and features Changes in X86.td: I set features of Intel processors in incremental form: IVB = SNB + X HSW = IVB + X .. I added Skylake client processor and defined it's features FeatureADX was missing on KNL Added some new features to appropriate processors SMAP, IFMA, PREFETCHWT1, VMFUNC and others Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16357 llvm-svn: 258659
2016-01-24 18:41:28 +08:00
def FeatureSGX : SubtargetFeature<"sgx", "HasSGX", "true",
"Enable Software Guard Extensions">;
def FeatureCLFLUSHOPT : SubtargetFeature<"clflushopt", "HasCLFLUSHOPT", "true",
"Flush A Cache Line Optimized">;
def FeatureCLWB : SubtargetFeature<"clwb", "HasCLWB", "true",
"Cache Line Write Back">;
[X86] Describe wbnoinvd instruction Similar to the wbinvd instruction, except this one does not invalidate caches. Ring 0 only. The encoding matches a wbinvd instruction with an F3 prefix. Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, ashlykov Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43816 llvm-svn: 329847
2018-04-12 04:01:57 +08:00
def FeatureWBNOINVD : SubtargetFeature<"wbnoinvd", "HasWBNOINVD", "true",
"Write Back No Invalidate">;
[X86] Add intrinsic support for the RDPID instruction This adds a new instrinsic to support the rdpid instruction. The implementation is a bit weird because the intrinsic is defined as always returning 32-bits, but the assembler support thinks the instruction produces a 64-bit register in 64-bit mode. But really it zeros the upper 32 bits. So I had to add separate patterns where 64-bit mode uses an extract_subreg. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42205 llvm-svn: 322910
2018-01-19 07:52:31 +08:00
def FeatureRDPID : SubtargetFeature<"rdpid", "HasRDPID", "true",
"Support RDPID instructions">;
[X86] WaitPKG instructions Three new instructions: umonitor - Sets up a linear address range to be monitored by hardware and activates the monitor. The address range should be a writeback memory caching type. umwait - A hint that allows the processor to stop instruction execution and enter an implementation-dependent optimized state until occurrence of a class of events. tpause - Directs the processor to enter an implementation-dependent optimized state until the TSC reaches the value in EDX:EAX. Also modifying the description of the mfence instruction, as the rep prefix (0xF3) was allowed before, which would conflict with umonitor during disassembly. Before: $ echo 0xf3,0x0f,0xae,0xf0 | llvm-mc -disassemble .text mfence After: $ echo 0xf3,0x0f,0xae,0xf0 | llvm-mc -disassemble .text umonitor %rax Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45253 llvm-svn: 330462
2018-04-21 02:42:47 +08:00
def FeatureWAITPKG : SubtargetFeature<"waitpkg", "HasWAITPKG", "true",
"Wait and pause enhancements">;
[X86] Add ENQCMD instructions For more details about these instructions, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference. Patch by Tianqing Wang (tianqing) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62281 llvm-svn: 362053
2019-05-30 11:59:16 +08:00
def FeatureENQCMD : SubtargetFeature<"enqcmd", "HasENQCMD", "true",
"Has ENQCMD instructions">;
[X86] Support Intel Key Locker Key Locker provides a mechanism to encrypt and decrypt data with an AES key without having access to the raw key value by converting AES keys into “handles”. These handles can be used to perform the same encryption and decryption operations as the original AES keys, but they only work on the current system and only until they are revoked. If software revokes Key Locker handles (e.g., on a reboot), then any previous handles can no longer be used. Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88398
2020-09-30 18:01:15 +08:00
def FeatureKL : SubtargetFeature<"kl", "HasKL", "true",
"Support Key Locker kl Instructions",
[FeatureSSE2]>;
def FeatureWIDEKL : SubtargetFeature<"widekl", "HasWIDEKL", "true",
"Support Key Locker wide Instructions",
[FeatureKL]>;
[X86] Add HRESET instruction. For more details about these instructions, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference. Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89102
2020-10-13 08:42:46 +08:00
def FeatureHRESET : SubtargetFeature<"hreset", "HasHRESET", "true",
"Has hreset instruction">;
[X86] Add SERIALIZE instruction. Summary: For more details about this instruction, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, LuoYuanke Reviewed By: craig.topper Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77193
2020-04-02 16:15:34 +08:00
def FeatureSERIALIZE : SubtargetFeature<"serialize", "HasSERIALIZE", "true",
"Has serialize instruction">;
[X86] Add TSXLDTRK instructions. Summary: For more details about these instructions, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, LuoYuanke Reviewed By: craig.topper Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77205
2020-04-09 13:15:42 +08:00
def FeatureTSXLDTRK : SubtargetFeature<"tsxldtrk", "HasTSXLDTRK", "true",
"Support TSXLDTRK instructions">;
[X86] Add User Interrupts(UINTR) instructions For more details about these instructions, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference. Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89301
2020-10-22 16:46:07 +08:00
def FeatureUINTR : SubtargetFeature<"uintr", "HasUINTR", "true",
"Has UINTR Instructions">;
Mark Knights Landing as having slow two memory operand instructions Summary: Knights Landing, because it is Atom derived, has slow two memory operand instructions. Mark the Knights Landing CPU model accordingly. Patch by David Zarzycki. Reviewers: craig.topper Reviewed By: craig.topper Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37224 llvm-svn: 311979
2017-08-29 13:14:27 +08:00
// On some processors, instructions that implicitly take two memory operands are
// slow. In practice, this means that CALL, PUSH, and POP with memory operands
// should be avoided in favor of a MOV + register CALL/PUSH/POP.
def FeatureSlowTwoMemOps : SubtargetFeature<"slow-two-mem-ops",
"SlowTwoMemOps", "true",
"Two memory operand instructions are slow">;
This patch adds the X86FixupLEAs pass, which will reduce instruction latency for certain models of the Intel Atom family, by converting instructions into their equivalent LEA instructions, when it is both useful and possible to do so. llvm-svn: 180573
2013-04-26 04:29:37 +08:00
def FeatureLEAUsesAG : SubtargetFeature<"lea-uses-ag", "LEAUsesAG", "true",
"LEA instruction needs inputs at AG stage">;
[X86] Tune LEA usage for Silvermont According to Intel Software Optimization Manual on Silvermont in some cases LEA is better to be replaced with ADD instructions: "The rule of thumb for ADDs and LEAs is that it is justified to use LEA with a valid index and/or displacement for non-destructive destination purposes (especially useful for stack offset cases), or to use a SCALE. Otherwise, ADD(s) are preferable." Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3826 llvm-svn: 209198
2014-05-20 16:55:50 +08:00
def FeatureSlowLEA : SubtargetFeature<"slow-lea", "SlowLEA", "true",
"LEA instruction with certain arguments is slow">;
[X86] Replace slow LEA instructions in X86 According to Intel's Optimization Reference Manual for SNB+: " For LEA instructions with three source operands and some specific situations, instruction latency has increased to 3 cycles, and must dispatch via port 1: - LEA that has all three source operands: base, index, and offset - LEA that uses base and index registers where the base is EBP, RBP,or R13 - LEA that uses RIP relative addressing mode - LEA that uses 16-bit addressing mode " This patch currently handles the first 2 cases only. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32277 llvm-svn: 303333
2017-05-18 16:11:50 +08:00
def FeatureSlow3OpsLEA : SubtargetFeature<"slow-3ops-lea", "Slow3OpsLEA", "true",
"LEA instruction with 3 ops or certain registers is slow">;
[X86] Use ADD/SUB instead of INC/DEC for Silvermont According to Intel Software Optimization Manual on Silvermont INC or DEC instructions require an additional uop to merge the flags. As a result, a branch instruction depending on an INC or a DEC instruction incurs a 1 cycle penalty. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3990 llvm-svn: 210466
2014-06-09 19:40:41 +08:00
def FeatureSlowIncDec : SubtargetFeature<"slow-incdec", "SlowIncDec", "true",
"INC and DEC instructions are slower than ADD and SUB">;
Migrate existing backends that care about software floating point to use the information in the module rather than TargetOptions. We've had and clang has used the use-soft-float attribute for some time now so have the backends set a subtarget feature based on a particular function now that subtargets are created based on functions and function attributes. For the one middle end soft float check go ahead and create an overloadable TargetLowering::useSoftFloat function that just checks the TargetSubtargetInfo in all cases. Also remove the command line option that hard codes whether or not soft-float is set by using the attribute for all of the target specific test cases - for the generic just go ahead and add the attribute in the one case that showed up. llvm-svn: 237079
2015-05-12 09:26:05 +08:00
def FeatureSoftFloat
: SubtargetFeature<"soft-float", "UseSoftFloat", "true",
[X86] Remove periods from the end of SubtargetFeature descriptions since the help printer adds a period. Most features don't have periods already, but some did. When there is a period it causes llc -mattr=+help to print 2 periods. llvm-svn: 355474
2019-03-06 10:36:48 +08:00
"Use software floating point features">;
Break false dependencies for POPCNT, LZCNT, TZCNT Add POPCNT, LZCNT, TZCNT to the list of instructions that have false dependency. Add a test to make sure BreakFalseDeps breaks the dependencies for these instructions. Update affected tests. This fixes bugzilla https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33869 This is the final of multiple patches that fix this bugzilla. Most of the patches are intended at refactoring the existent code. Reviews of the refactoring done to enable this change: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40330 https://reviews.llvm.org/D40331 https://reviews.llvm.org/D40332 https://reviews.llvm.org/D40333 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40334 Change-Id: If95cbf1a3f5c7dccff8f1b22ecb397542147303d llvm-svn: 323096
2018-01-22 18:07:01 +08:00
def FeaturePOPCNTFalseDeps : SubtargetFeature<"false-deps-popcnt",
"HasPOPCNTFalseDeps", "true",
"POPCNT has a false dependency on dest register">;
def FeatureLZCNTFalseDeps : SubtargetFeature<"false-deps-lzcnt-tzcnt",
"HasLZCNTFalseDeps", "true",
"LZCNT/TZCNT have a false dependency on dest register">;
[x86] Introduce the pconfig instruction Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46430 llvm-svn: 331739
2018-05-08 14:47:36 +08:00
def FeaturePCONFIG : SubtargetFeature<"pconfig", "HasPCONFIG", "true",
"platform configuration instruction">;
[X86][SSE] Add cpu feature for aggressive combining to variable shuffles As mentioned in D38318 and D40865, modern Intel processors prefer to combine multiple shuffles to a variable shuffle mask (PSHUFB/VPERMPS etc.) instead of having multiple stage 'fixed' shuffles which put more pressure on Port 5 (at the expense of extra shuffle mask loads). This patch provides a FeatureFastVariableShuffle target flag for Haswell+ CPUs that prefers combining 2 or more fixed shuffles to a single variable shuffle (default is 3 shuffles). The long term aim is to drive more of this from schedule data (probably via the MC) but we're not close to being ready for that yet. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41323 llvm-svn: 321074
2017-12-19 21:16:43 +08:00
// On recent X86 (port bound) processors, its preferable to combine to a single shuffle
// using a variable mask over multiple fixed shuffles.
def FeatureFastVariableShuffle
: SubtargetFeature<"fast-variable-shuffle",
"HasFastVariableShuffle",
"true", "Shuffles with variable masks are fast">;
[X86] Add support for -mvzeroupper and -mno-vzeroupper to match gcc -mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs where it normally runs. To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical behavior. Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
2019-11-05 02:20:00 +08:00
// On some X86 processors, a vzeroupper instruction should be inserted after
// using ymm/zmm registers before executing code that may use SSE instructions.
def FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER
: SubtargetFeature<"vzeroupper",
"InsertVZEROUPPER",
"true", "Should insert vzeroupper instructions">;
[X86] Heuristic to selectively build Newton-Raphson SQRT estimation On modern Intel processors hardware SQRT in many cases is faster than RSQRT followed by Newton-Raphson refinement. The patch introduces a simple heuristic to choose between hardware SQRT instruction and Newton-Raphson software estimation. The patch treats scalars and vectors differently. The heuristic is that for scalars the compiler should optimize for latency while for vectors it should optimize for throughput. It is based on the assumption that throughput bound code is likely to be vectorized. Basically, the patch disables scalar NR for big cores and disables NR completely for Skylake. Firstly, scalar SQRT has shorter latency than NR code in big cores. Secondly, vector SQRT has been greatly improved in Skylake and has better throughput compared to NR. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21379 llvm-svn: 277725
2016-08-04 20:47:28 +08:00
// FeatureFastScalarFSQRT should be enabled if scalar FSQRT has shorter latency
// than the corresponding NR code. FeatureFastVectorFSQRT should be enabled if
// vector FSQRT has higher throughput than the corresponding NR code.
// The idea is that throughput bound code is likely to be vectorized, so for
// vectorized code we should care about the throughput of SQRT operations.
// But if the code is scalar that probably means that the code has some kind of
// dependency and we should care more about reducing the latency.
def FeatureFastScalarFSQRT
: SubtargetFeature<"fast-scalar-fsqrt", "HasFastScalarFSQRT",
"true", "Scalar SQRT is fast (disable Newton-Raphson)">;
def FeatureFastVectorFSQRT
: SubtargetFeature<"fast-vector-fsqrt", "HasFastVectorFSQRT",
"true", "Vector SQRT is fast (disable Newton-Raphson)">;
[X86] Take advantage of the lzcnt instruction on btver2 architectures when ORing comparisons to zero. This change adds transformations such as: zext(or(setcc(eq, (cmp x, 0)), setcc(eq, (cmp y, 0)))) To: srl(or(ctlz(x), ctlz(y)), log2(bitsize(x)) This optimisation is beneficial on Jaguar architecture only, where lzcnt has a good reciprocal throughput. Other architectures such as Intel's Haswell/Broadwell or AMD's Bulldozer/PileDriver do not benefit from it. For this reason the change also adds a "HasFastLZCNT" feature which gets enabled for Jaguar. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23446 llvm-svn: 284248
2016-10-15 00:41:38 +08:00
// If lzcnt has equivalent latency/throughput to most simple integer ops, it can
// be used to replace test/set sequences.
def FeatureFastLZCNT
: SubtargetFeature<
"fast-lzcnt", "HasFastLZCNT", "true",
"LZCNT instructions are as fast as most simple integer ops">;
[X86] Add FeatureFast7ByteNOP flag Lets us remove another SLM proc family flag usage. This is NFC, but we should probably check whether atom/glm/knl? should be using this flag as well...
2020-03-12 21:06:12 +08:00
// If the target can efficiently decode NOPs upto 7-bytes in length.
def FeatureFast7ByteNOP
: SubtargetFeature<
"fast-7bytenop", "HasFast7ByteNOP", "true",
"Target can quickly decode up to 7 byte NOPs">;
[X86] Emit 11-byte or 15-byte NOPs on recent AMD targets, else default to 10-byte NOPs (PR22965) We currently emit up to 15-byte NOPs on all targets (apart from Silvermont), which stalls performance on some targets with decoders that struggle with 2 or 3 more '66' prefixes. This patch flags recent AMD targets (btver1/znver1) to still emit 15-byte NOPs and bdver* targets to emit 11-byte NOPs. All other targets now emit 10-byte NOPs apart from SilverMont CPUs which still emit 7-byte NOPS. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42616 llvm-svn: 323693
2018-01-30 05:24:31 +08:00
// If the target can efficiently decode NOPs upto 11-bytes in length.
def FeatureFast11ByteNOP
: SubtargetFeature<
"fast-11bytenop", "HasFast11ByteNOP", "true",
"Target can quickly decode up to 11 byte NOPs">;
// If the target can efficiently decode NOPs upto 15-bytes in length.
def FeatureFast15ByteNOP
: SubtargetFeature<
"fast-15bytenop", "HasFast15ByteNOP", "true",
"Target can quickly decode up to 15 byte NOPs">;
[X86] Use SHLD with both inputs from the same register to implement rotate on Sandy Bridge and later Intel CPUs Summary: Sandy Bridge and later CPUs have better throughput using a SHLD to implement rotate versus the normal rotate instructions. Additionally it saves one uop and avoids a partial flag update dependency. This patch implements this change on any Sandy Bridge or later processor without BMI2 instructions. With BMI2 we will use RORX as we currently do. Reviewers: zvi Reviewed By: zvi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30181 llvm-svn: 295697
2017-02-21 14:39:13 +08:00
// Sandy Bridge and newer processors can use SHLD with the same source on both
// inputs to implement rotate to avoid the partial flag update of the normal
// rotate instructions.
def FeatureFastSHLDRotate
: SubtargetFeature<
"fast-shld-rotate", "HasFastSHLDRotate", "true",
"SHLD can be used as a faster rotate">;
Rename FastString flag. llvm-svn: 300959
2017-04-21 17:20:50 +08:00
// Ivy Bridge and newer processors have enhanced REP MOVSB and STOSB (aka
// "string operations"). See "REP String Enhancement" in the Intel Software
typo llvm-svn: 300963
2017-04-21 17:21:05 +08:00
// Development Manual. This feature essentially means that REP MOVSB will copy
Rename FastString flag. llvm-svn: 300959
2017-04-21 17:20:50 +08:00
// using the largest available size instead of copying bytes one by one, making
// it at least as fast as REPMOVS{W,D,Q}.
def FeatureERMSB
X86 memcpy: use REPMOVSB instead of REPMOVS{Q,D,W} for inline copies when the subtarget has fast strings. This has two advantages: - Speed is improved. For example, on Haswell thoughput improvements increase linearly with size from 256 to 512 bytes, after which they plateau: (e.g. 1% for 260 bytes, 25% for 400 bytes, 40% for 508 bytes). - Code is much smaller (no need to handle boundaries). llvm-svn: 300957
2017-04-21 17:20:39 +08:00
: SubtargetFeature<
Rename FastString flag. llvm-svn: 300959
2017-04-21 17:20:50 +08:00
"ermsb", "HasERMSB", "true",
X86 memcpy: use REPMOVSB instead of REPMOVS{Q,D,W} for inline copies when the subtarget has fast strings. This has two advantages: - Speed is improved. For example, on Haswell thoughput improvements increase linearly with size from 256 to 512 bytes, after which they plateau: (e.g. 1% for 260 bytes, 25% for 400 bytes, 40% for 508 bytes). - Code is much smaller (no need to handle boundaries). llvm-svn: 300957
2017-04-21 17:20:39 +08:00
"REP MOVS/STOS are fast">;
[X86] Add feature for Fast Short REP MOV (FSRM) for Icelake or newer. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85989
2020-08-15 03:20:08 +08:00
// Icelake and newer processors have Fast Short REP MOV.
def FeatureFSRM
: SubtargetFeature<
"fsrm", "HasFSRM", "true",
"REP MOVSB of short lengths is faster">;
[X86MacroFusion] Handle branch fusion (AMD CPUs). Summary: This adds a BranchFusion feature to replace the usage of the MacroFusion for AMD CPUs. See D59688 for context. Reviewers: andreadb, lebedev.ri Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59872 llvm-svn: 357171
2019-03-28 22:12:46 +08:00
// Bulldozer and newer processors can merge CMP/TEST (but not other
// instructions) with conditional branches.
def FeatureBranchFusion
: SubtargetFeature<"branchfusion", "HasBranchFusion", "true",
"CMP/TEST can be fused with conditional branches">;
[X86] Provide a separate feature bit for macro fusion support instead of basing it on the AVX flag Summary: Currently we determine if macro fusion is supported based on the AVX flag as a proxy for the processor being Sandy Bridge". This is really strange as now AMD supports AVX. It also means if user explicitly disables AVX we disable macro fusion. This patch adds an explicit macro fusion feature. I've also enabled for the generic 64-bit CPU (which doesn't have AVX) This is probably another candidate for being in the MI layer, but for now I at least wanted to correct the overloading of the AVX feature. Reviewers: spatel, chandlerc, RKSimon, zvi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37280 llvm-svn: 312097
2017-08-30 12:34:48 +08:00
// Sandy Bridge and newer processors have many instructions that can be
// fused with conditional branches and pass through the CPU as a single
// operation.
def FeatureMacroFusion
: SubtargetFeature<"macrofusion", "HasMacroFusion", "true",
"Various instructions can be fused with conditional branches">;
[X86] Don't report gather is legal on Skylake CPUs when AVX2/AVX512 is disabled. Allow gather on SKX/CNL/ICL when AVX512 is disabled by using AVX2 instructions. Summary: This adds a new fast gather feature bit to cover all CPUs that support fast gather that we can use independent of whether the AVX512 feature is enabled. I'm only using this new bit to qualify AVX2 codegen. AVX512 is still implicitly assuming fast gather to keep tests working and to match the scatter behavior. Test command lines have been added for these two cases. Reviewers: magabari, delena, RKSimon, zvi Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40282 llvm-svn: 318983
2017-11-26 02:09:37 +08:00
// Gather is available since Haswell (AVX2 set). So technically, we can
// generate Gathers on all AVX2 processors. But the overhead on HSW is high.
// Skylake Client processor has faster Gathers than HSW and performance is
// similar to Skylake Server (AVX-512).
def FeatureHasFastGather
: SubtargetFeature<"fast-gather", "HasFastGather", "true",
[X86] Remove periods from the end of SubtargetFeature descriptions since the help printer adds a period. Most features don't have periods already, but some did. When there is a period it causes llc -mattr=+help to print 2 periods. llvm-svn: 355474
2019-03-06 10:36:48 +08:00
"Indicates if gather is reasonably fast">;
[X86] Don't report gather is legal on Skylake CPUs when AVX2/AVX512 is disabled. Allow gather on SKX/CNL/ICL when AVX512 is disabled by using AVX2 instructions. Summary: This adds a new fast gather feature bit to cover all CPUs that support fast gather that we can use independent of whether the AVX512 feature is enabled. I'm only using this new bit to qualify AVX2 codegen. AVX512 is still implicitly assuming fast gather to keep tests working and to match the scatter behavior. Test command lines have been added for these two cases. Reviewers: magabari, delena, RKSimon, zvi Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40282 llvm-svn: 318983
2017-11-26 02:09:37 +08:00
[X86] Add prefer-128-bit subtarget feature. Summary: Similar to the previous prefer-256-bit flag. We might want to enable this by default some CPUs. This just starts the initial work to implement and prove that it effects TTI's vector width. Reviewers: RKSimon, echristo, spatel, atdt Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: lebedev.ri, hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67311 llvm-svn: 371319
2019-09-08 03:54:22 +08:00
def FeaturePrefer128Bit
: SubtargetFeature<"prefer-128-bit", "Prefer128Bit", "true",
"Prefer 128-bit AVX instructions">;
[X86] Add support for passing 'prefer-vector-width' function attribute into X86Subtarget and exposing via X86's getRegisterWidth TTI interface. This will cause the vectorizers to do some limiting of the vector widths they create. This is not a strict limit. There are reasons I know of that the loop vectorizer will generate larger vectors for. I've written this in such a way that the interface will only return a properly supported width(0/128/256/512) even if the attribute says something funny like 384 or 10. This has been split from D41895 with the remainder in a follow up commit. llvm-svn: 323015
2018-01-20 08:26:08 +08:00
def FeaturePrefer256Bit
: SubtargetFeature<"prefer-256-bit", "Prefer256Bit", "true",
"Prefer 256-bit AVX instructions">;
[X86] Prefer KORTEST on Knights Landing or later for memcmp() PTEST and especially the MOVMSK instructions are slow on Knights Landing or later. As a bonus, this patch increases instruction parallelism by emitting: KORTEST(PCMPNEQ(a, b), PCMPNEQ(c, d)) == 0 Instead of: KORTEST(AND(PCMPEQ(a, b), PCMPEQ(c, d))) == ~0 https://reviews.llvm.org/D69157
2019-10-17 17:38:15 +08:00
def FeaturePreferMaskRegisters
: SubtargetFeature<"prefer-mask-registers", "PreferMaskRegisters", "true",
"Prefer AVX512 mask registers over PTEST/MOVMSK">;
[x86/retpoline] Split the LLVM concept of retpolines into separate subtarget features for indirect calls and indirect branches. This is in preparation for enabling *only* the call retpolines when using speculative load hardening. I've continued to use subtarget features for now as they continue to seem the best fit given the lack of other retpoline like constructs so far. The LLVM side is pretty simple. I'd like to eventually get rid of the old feature, but not sure what backwards compatibility issues that will cause. This does remove the "implies" from requesting an external thunk. This always seemed somewhat questionable and is now clearly not desirable -- you specify a thunk the same way no matter which set of things are getting retpolines. I really want to keep this nicely isolated from end users and just an LLVM implementation detail, so I've moved the `-mretpoline` flag in Clang to no longer rely on a specific subtarget feature by that name and instead to be directly handled. In some ways this is simpler, but in order to preserve existing behavior I've had to add some fallback code so that users who relied on merely passing -mretpoline-external-thunk continue to get the same behavior. We should eventually remove this I suspect (we have never tested that it works!) but I've not done that in this patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51150 llvm-svn: 340515
2018-08-23 14:06:38 +08:00
// Lower indirect calls using a special construct called a `retpoline` to
// mitigate potential Spectre v2 attacks against them.
def FeatureRetpolineIndirectCalls
: SubtargetFeature<
"retpoline-indirect-calls", "UseRetpolineIndirectCalls", "true",
[X86] Remove periods from the end of SubtargetFeature descriptions since the help printer adds a period. Most features don't have periods already, but some did. When there is a period it causes llc -mattr=+help to print 2 periods. llvm-svn: 355474
2019-03-06 10:36:48 +08:00
"Remove speculation of indirect calls from the generated code">;
[x86/retpoline] Split the LLVM concept of retpolines into separate subtarget features for indirect calls and indirect branches. This is in preparation for enabling *only* the call retpolines when using speculative load hardening. I've continued to use subtarget features for now as they continue to seem the best fit given the lack of other retpoline like constructs so far. The LLVM side is pretty simple. I'd like to eventually get rid of the old feature, but not sure what backwards compatibility issues that will cause. This does remove the "implies" from requesting an external thunk. This always seemed somewhat questionable and is now clearly not desirable -- you specify a thunk the same way no matter which set of things are getting retpolines. I really want to keep this nicely isolated from end users and just an LLVM implementation detail, so I've moved the `-mretpoline` flag in Clang to no longer rely on a specific subtarget feature by that name and instead to be directly handled. In some ways this is simpler, but in order to preserve existing behavior I've had to add some fallback code so that users who relied on merely passing -mretpoline-external-thunk continue to get the same behavior. We should eventually remove this I suspect (we have never tested that it works!) but I've not done that in this patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51150 llvm-svn: 340515
2018-08-23 14:06:38 +08:00
// Lower indirect branches and switches either using conditional branch trees
// or using a special construct called a `retpoline` to mitigate potential
// Spectre v2 attacks against them.
def FeatureRetpolineIndirectBranches
: SubtargetFeature<
"retpoline-indirect-branches", "UseRetpolineIndirectBranches", "true",
[X86] Remove periods from the end of SubtargetFeature descriptions since the help printer adds a period. Most features don't have periods already, but some did. When there is a period it causes llc -mattr=+help to print 2 periods. llvm-svn: 355474
2019-03-06 10:36:48 +08:00
"Remove speculation of indirect branches from the generated code">;
[x86/retpoline] Split the LLVM concept of retpolines into separate subtarget features for indirect calls and indirect branches. This is in preparation for enabling *only* the call retpolines when using speculative load hardening. I've continued to use subtarget features for now as they continue to seem the best fit given the lack of other retpoline like constructs so far. The LLVM side is pretty simple. I'd like to eventually get rid of the old feature, but not sure what backwards compatibility issues that will cause. This does remove the "implies" from requesting an external thunk. This always seemed somewhat questionable and is now clearly not desirable -- you specify a thunk the same way no matter which set of things are getting retpolines. I really want to keep this nicely isolated from end users and just an LLVM implementation detail, so I've moved the `-mretpoline` flag in Clang to no longer rely on a specific subtarget feature by that name and instead to be directly handled. In some ways this is simpler, but in order to preserve existing behavior I've had to add some fallback code so that users who relied on merely passing -mretpoline-external-thunk continue to get the same behavior. We should eventually remove this I suspect (we have never tested that it works!) but I've not done that in this patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51150 llvm-svn: 340515
2018-08-23 14:06:38 +08:00
// Deprecated umbrella feature for enabling both `retpoline-indirect-calls` and
// `retpoline-indirect-branches` above.
Introduce the "retpoline" x86 mitigation technique for variant #2 of the speculative execution vulnerabilities disclosed today, specifically identified by CVE-2017-5715, "Branch Target Injection", and is one of the two halves to Spectre.. Summary: First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that this is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero blog post for details: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative execution of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by poisoning the prediction of indirect branches with the address of that gadget. The gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a side channel for reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a load of secret data followed by a branch on the loaded value and then a load of some predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing of the processors cache to determine which direction the branch took *in the speculative execution*, and in turn what one bit of the loaded value was. Due to the nature of these timing side channels and the branch predictor on Intel processors, this allows an attacker to leak data only accessible to a privileged domain (like the kernel) back into an unprivileged domain. The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In many cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches and a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering switches in this way and the first step of this patch is to disable jump-table lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite explicit indirectbr sequences into a switch over integers. However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as a trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86. Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures the processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known location. The retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto the stack by the call with the desired target of the original indirect call. The result is a predicted return to the next instruction after a call (which can be used to trap speculative execution within an infinite loop) and an actual indirect branch to an arbitrary address. On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this device. For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register and so several different retpoline variants are introduced to use a scratch register if one is available in the calling convention and to otherwise use direct stack push/pop sequences to pass the target address. This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886 We also support a target feature that disables emission of the retpoline thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users want them. These are particularly useful in environments like kernels that routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch their thunk to different code sequences. They can write this custom thunk and use `-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to `-mretpoline`. In this case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be: ``` __llvm_external_retpoline_r11 ``` or on 32-bit: ``` __llvm_external_retpoline_eax __llvm_external_retpoline_ecx __llvm_external_retpoline_edx __llvm_external_retpoline_push ``` And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl` instruction. There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection. The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are from precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we have found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on them here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for retpoline-ed configurations for completeness. For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all* libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z retpolineplt` (or use similar functionality from some other linker). We strongly recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows the retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller. When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications running typical workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately 2%) even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely due to the small number of indirect branches that occur in performance sensitive paths of the kernel. When using these patches on statically linked applications, especially C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more dramatic performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch, indirect-, or virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from 10% to 50%. However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically reduce the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting them to direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to lower switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++ applications, we *strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call targets are statically linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both PGO and ThinLTO. Well tuned servers using all of these techniques saw 5% - 10% overhead from the use of retpoline. We will add detailed documentation covering these components in subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality available as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd really like to get these patches landed and backported ASAP for obvious reasons. We're planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0 release streams and get a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked ASAP for distros and vendors. This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month: Eric, Reid, Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit due to the time sensitive nature of landing this and the need to backport it. Huge thanks to everyone who helped out here, and everyone at Intel who helped out in discussions about how to craft this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at Google, but not an LLVM contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline design. Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723 llvm-svn: 323155
2018-01-23 06:05:25 +08:00
def FeatureRetpoline
[x86/retpoline] Split the LLVM concept of retpolines into separate subtarget features for indirect calls and indirect branches. This is in preparation for enabling *only* the call retpolines when using speculative load hardening. I've continued to use subtarget features for now as they continue to seem the best fit given the lack of other retpoline like constructs so far. The LLVM side is pretty simple. I'd like to eventually get rid of the old feature, but not sure what backwards compatibility issues that will cause. This does remove the "implies" from requesting an external thunk. This always seemed somewhat questionable and is now clearly not desirable -- you specify a thunk the same way no matter which set of things are getting retpolines. I really want to keep this nicely isolated from end users and just an LLVM implementation detail, so I've moved the `-mretpoline` flag in Clang to no longer rely on a specific subtarget feature by that name and instead to be directly handled. In some ways this is simpler, but in order to preserve existing behavior I've had to add some fallback code so that users who relied on merely passing -mretpoline-external-thunk continue to get the same behavior. We should eventually remove this I suspect (we have never tested that it works!) but I've not done that in this patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51150 llvm-svn: 340515
2018-08-23 14:06:38 +08:00
: SubtargetFeature<"retpoline", "DeprecatedUseRetpoline", "true",
Introduce the "retpoline" x86 mitigation technique for variant #2 of the speculative execution vulnerabilities disclosed today, specifically identified by CVE-2017-5715, "Branch Target Injection", and is one of the two halves to Spectre.. Summary: First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that this is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero blog post for details: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative execution of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by poisoning the prediction of indirect branches with the address of that gadget. The gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a side channel for reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a load of secret data followed by a branch on the loaded value and then a load of some predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing of the processors cache to determine which direction the branch took *in the speculative execution*, and in turn what one bit of the loaded value was. Due to the nature of these timing side channels and the branch predictor on Intel processors, this allows an attacker to leak data only accessible to a privileged domain (like the kernel) back into an unprivileged domain. The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In many cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches and a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering switches in this way and the first step of this patch is to disable jump-table lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite explicit indirectbr sequences into a switch over integers. However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as a trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86. Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures the processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known location. The retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto the stack by the call with the desired target of the original indirect call. The result is a predicted return to the next instruction after a call (which can be used to trap speculative execution within an infinite loop) and an actual indirect branch to an arbitrary address. On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this device. For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register and so several different retpoline variants are introduced to use a scratch register if one is available in the calling convention and to otherwise use direct stack push/pop sequences to pass the target address. This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886 We also support a target feature that disables emission of the retpoline thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users want them. These are particularly useful in environments like kernels that routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch their thunk to different code sequences. They can write this custom thunk and use `-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to `-mretpoline`. In this case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be: ``` __llvm_external_retpoline_r11 ``` or on 32-bit: ``` __llvm_external_retpoline_eax __llvm_external_retpoline_ecx __llvm_external_retpoline_edx __llvm_external_retpoline_push ``` And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl` instruction. There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection. The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are from precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we have found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on them here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for retpoline-ed configurations for completeness. For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all* libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z retpolineplt` (or use similar functionality from some other linker). We strongly recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows the retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller. When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications running typical workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately 2%) even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely due to the small number of indirect branches that occur in performance sensitive paths of the kernel. When using these patches on statically linked applications, especially C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more dramatic performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch, indirect-, or virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from 10% to 50%. However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically reduce the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting them to direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to lower switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++ applications, we *strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call targets are statically linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both PGO and ThinLTO. Well tuned servers using all of these techniques saw 5% - 10% overhead from the use of retpoline. We will add detailed documentation covering these components in subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality available as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd really like to get these patches landed and backported ASAP for obvious reasons. We're planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0 release streams and get a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked ASAP for distros and vendors. This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month: Eric, Reid, Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit due to the time sensitive nature of landing this and the need to backport it. Huge thanks to everyone who helped out here, and everyone at Intel who helped out in discussions about how to craft this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at Google, but not an LLVM contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline design. Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723 llvm-svn: 323155
2018-01-23 06:05:25 +08:00
"Remove speculation of indirect branches from the "
"generated code, either by avoiding them entirely or "
[X86] Remove periods from the end of SubtargetFeature descriptions since the help printer adds a period. Most features don't have periods already, but some did. When there is a period it causes llc -mattr=+help to print 2 periods. llvm-svn: 355474
2019-03-06 10:36:48 +08:00
"lowering them with a speculation blocking construct",
[x86/retpoline] Split the LLVM concept of retpolines into separate subtarget features for indirect calls and indirect branches. This is in preparation for enabling *only* the call retpolines when using speculative load hardening. I've continued to use subtarget features for now as they continue to seem the best fit given the lack of other retpoline like constructs so far. The LLVM side is pretty simple. I'd like to eventually get rid of the old feature, but not sure what backwards compatibility issues that will cause. This does remove the "implies" from requesting an external thunk. This always seemed somewhat questionable and is now clearly not desirable -- you specify a thunk the same way no matter which set of things are getting retpolines. I really want to keep this nicely isolated from end users and just an LLVM implementation detail, so I've moved the `-mretpoline` flag in Clang to no longer rely on a specific subtarget feature by that name and instead to be directly handled. In some ways this is simpler, but in order to preserve existing behavior I've had to add some fallback code so that users who relied on merely passing -mretpoline-external-thunk continue to get the same behavior. We should eventually remove this I suspect (we have never tested that it works!) but I've not done that in this patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51150 llvm-svn: 340515
2018-08-23 14:06:38 +08:00
[FeatureRetpolineIndirectCalls,
FeatureRetpolineIndirectBranches]>;
Introduce the "retpoline" x86 mitigation technique for variant #2 of the speculative execution vulnerabilities disclosed today, specifically identified by CVE-2017-5715, "Branch Target Injection", and is one of the two halves to Spectre.. Summary: First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that this is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero blog post for details: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative execution of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by poisoning the prediction of indirect branches with the address of that gadget. The gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a side channel for reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a load of secret data followed by a branch on the loaded value and then a load of some predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing of the processors cache to determine which direction the branch took *in the speculative execution*, and in turn what one bit of the loaded value was. Due to the nature of these timing side channels and the branch predictor on Intel processors, this allows an attacker to leak data only accessible to a privileged domain (like the kernel) back into an unprivileged domain. The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In many cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches and a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering switches in this way and the first step of this patch is to disable jump-table lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite explicit indirectbr sequences into a switch over integers. However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as a trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86. Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures the processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known location. The retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto the stack by the call with the desired target of the original indirect call. The result is a predicted return to the next instruction after a call (which can be used to trap speculative execution within an infinite loop) and an actual indirect branch to an arbitrary address. On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this device. For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register and so several different retpoline variants are introduced to use a scratch register if one is available in the calling convention and to otherwise use direct stack push/pop sequences to pass the target address. This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886 We also support a target feature that disables emission of the retpoline thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users want them. These are particularly useful in environments like kernels that routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch their thunk to different code sequences. They can write this custom thunk and use `-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to `-mretpoline`. In this case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be: ``` __llvm_external_retpoline_r11 ``` or on 32-bit: ``` __llvm_external_retpoline_eax __llvm_external_retpoline_ecx __llvm_external_retpoline_edx __llvm_external_retpoline_push ``` And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl` instruction. There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection. The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are from precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we have found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on them here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for retpoline-ed configurations for completeness. For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all* libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z retpolineplt` (or use similar functionality from some other linker). We strongly recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows the retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller. When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications running typical workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately 2%) even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely due to the small number of indirect branches that occur in performance sensitive paths of the kernel. When using these patches on statically linked applications, especially C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more dramatic performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch, indirect-, or virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from 10% to 50%. However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically reduce the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting them to direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to lower switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++ applications, we *strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call targets are statically linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both PGO and ThinLTO. Well tuned servers using all of these techniques saw 5% - 10% overhead from the use of retpoline. We will add detailed documentation covering these components in subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality available as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd really like to get these patches landed and backported ASAP for obvious reasons. We're planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0 release streams and get a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked ASAP for distros and vendors. This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month: Eric, Reid, Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit due to the time sensitive nature of landing this and the need to backport it. Huge thanks to everyone who helped out here, and everyone at Intel who helped out in discussions about how to craft this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at Google, but not an LLVM contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline design. Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723 llvm-svn: 323155
2018-01-23 06:05:25 +08:00
// Rely on external thunks for the emitted retpoline calls. This allows users
// to provide their own custom thunk definitions in highly specialized
// environments such as a kernel that does boot-time hot patching.
def FeatureRetpolineExternalThunk
: SubtargetFeature<
"retpoline-external-thunk", "UseRetpolineExternalThunk", "true",
[x86/retpoline] Split the LLVM concept of retpolines into separate subtarget features for indirect calls and indirect branches. This is in preparation for enabling *only* the call retpolines when using speculative load hardening. I've continued to use subtarget features for now as they continue to seem the best fit given the lack of other retpoline like constructs so far. The LLVM side is pretty simple. I'd like to eventually get rid of the old feature, but not sure what backwards compatibility issues that will cause. This does remove the "implies" from requesting an external thunk. This always seemed somewhat questionable and is now clearly not desirable -- you specify a thunk the same way no matter which set of things are getting retpolines. I really want to keep this nicely isolated from end users and just an LLVM implementation detail, so I've moved the `-mretpoline` flag in Clang to no longer rely on a specific subtarget feature by that name and instead to be directly handled. In some ways this is simpler, but in order to preserve existing behavior I've had to add some fallback code so that users who relied on merely passing -mretpoline-external-thunk continue to get the same behavior. We should eventually remove this I suspect (we have never tested that it works!) but I've not done that in this patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51150 llvm-svn: 340515
2018-08-23 14:06:38 +08:00
"When lowering an indirect call or branch using a `retpoline`, rely "
"on the specified user provided thunk rather than emitting one "
"ourselves. Only has effect when combined with some other retpoline "
[X86] Remove periods from the end of SubtargetFeature descriptions since the help printer adds a period. Most features don't have periods already, but some did. When there is a period it causes llc -mattr=+help to print 2 periods. llvm-svn: 355474
2019-03-06 10:36:48 +08:00
"feature", [FeatureRetpolineIndirectCalls]>;
Introduce the "retpoline" x86 mitigation technique for variant #2 of the speculative execution vulnerabilities disclosed today, specifically identified by CVE-2017-5715, "Branch Target Injection", and is one of the two halves to Spectre.. Summary: First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that this is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero blog post for details: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative execution of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by poisoning the prediction of indirect branches with the address of that gadget. The gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a side channel for reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a load of secret data followed by a branch on the loaded value and then a load of some predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing of the processors cache to determine which direction the branch took *in the speculative execution*, and in turn what one bit of the loaded value was. Due to the nature of these timing side channels and the branch predictor on Intel processors, this allows an attacker to leak data only accessible to a privileged domain (like the kernel) back into an unprivileged domain. The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In many cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches and a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering switches in this way and the first step of this patch is to disable jump-table lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite explicit indirectbr sequences into a switch over integers. However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as a trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86. Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures the processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known location. The retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto the stack by the call with the desired target of the original indirect call. The result is a predicted return to the next instruction after a call (which can be used to trap speculative execution within an infinite loop) and an actual indirect branch to an arbitrary address. On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this device. For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register and so several different retpoline variants are introduced to use a scratch register if one is available in the calling convention and to otherwise use direct stack push/pop sequences to pass the target address. This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886 We also support a target feature that disables emission of the retpoline thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users want them. These are particularly useful in environments like kernels that routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch their thunk to different code sequences. They can write this custom thunk and use `-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to `-mretpoline`. In this case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be: ``` __llvm_external_retpoline_r11 ``` or on 32-bit: ``` __llvm_external_retpoline_eax __llvm_external_retpoline_ecx __llvm_external_retpoline_edx __llvm_external_retpoline_push ``` And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl` instruction. There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection. The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are from precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we have found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on them here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for retpoline-ed configurations for completeness. For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all* libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z retpolineplt` (or use similar functionality from some other linker). We strongly recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows the retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller. When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications running typical workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately 2%) even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely due to the small number of indirect branches that occur in performance sensitive paths of the kernel. When using these patches on statically linked applications, especially C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more dramatic performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch, indirect-, or virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from 10% to 50%. However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically reduce the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting them to direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to lower switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++ applications, we *strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call targets are statically linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both PGO and ThinLTO. Well tuned servers using all of these techniques saw 5% - 10% overhead from the use of retpoline. We will add detailed documentation covering these components in subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality available as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd really like to get these patches landed and backported ASAP for obvious reasons. We're planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0 release streams and get a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked ASAP for distros and vendors. This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month: Eric, Reid, Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit due to the time sensitive nature of landing this and the need to backport it. Huge thanks to everyone who helped out here, and everyone at Intel who helped out in discussions about how to craft this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at Google, but not an LLVM contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline design. Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723 llvm-svn: 323155
2018-01-23 06:05:25 +08:00
[X86] Add Indirect Thunk Support to X86 to mitigate Load Value Injection (LVI) This pass replaces each indirect call/jump with a direct call to a thunk that looks like: lfence jmpq *%r11 This ensures that if the value in register %r11 was loaded from memory, then the value in %r11 is (architecturally) correct prior to the jump. Also adds a new target feature to X86: +lvi-cfi ("cfi" meaning control-flow integrity) The feature can be added via clang CLI using -mlvi-cfi. This is an alternate implementation to https://reviews.llvm.org/D75934 That merges the thunk insertion functionality with the existing X86 retpoline code. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76812
2020-04-03 12:59:47 +08:00
// Mitigate LVI attacks against indirect calls/branches and call returns
def FeatureLVIControlFlowIntegrity
: SubtargetFeature<
"lvi-cfi", "UseLVIControlFlowIntegrity", "true",
"Prevent indirect calls/branches from using a memory operand, and "
"precede all indirect calls/branches from a register with an "
"LFENCE instruction to serialize control flow. Also decompose RET "
"instructions into a POP+LFENCE+JMP sequence.">;
[x86][seses] Add clang flag; Use lvi-cfi with seses This patch creates a clang flag to enable SESES. This flag also ensures that lvi-cfi is on when using seses via clang. SESES should use lvi-cfi to mitigate returns and indirect branches. The flag to enable the SESES functionality only without lvi-cfi is now -x86-seses-enable-without-lvi-cfi to warn users part of the mitigation is not enabled if they use this flag. This is useful in case folks want to see the cost of SESES separate from the LVI-CFI. Reviewed By: sconstab Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79910
2020-05-14 02:25:08 +08:00
// Enable SESES to mitigate speculative execution attacks
def FeatureSpeculativeExecutionSideEffectSuppression
: SubtargetFeature<
"seses", "UseSpeculativeExecutionSideEffectSuppression", "true",
"Prevent speculative execution side channel timing attacks by "
"inserting a speculation barrier before memory reads, memory writes, "
"and conditional branches. Implies LVI Control Flow integrity.",
[FeatureLVIControlFlowIntegrity]>;
[X86] Add a Pass that builds a Condensed CFG for Load Value Injection (LVI) Gadgets Adds a new data structure, ImmutableGraph, and uses RDF to find LVI gadgets and add them to a MachineGadgetGraph. More specifically, a new X86 machine pass finds Load Value Injection (LVI) gadgets consisting of a load from memory (i.e., SOURCE), and any operation that may transmit the value loaded from memory over a covert channel, or use the value loaded from memory to determine a branch/call target (i.e., SINK). Also adds a new target feature to X86: +lvi-load-hardening The feature can be added via the clang CLI using -mlvi-hardening. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75936
2020-05-12 01:25:35 +08:00
// Mitigate LVI attacks against data loads
def FeatureLVILoadHardening
: SubtargetFeature<
"lvi-load-hardening", "UseLVILoadHardening", "true",
"Insert LFENCE instructions to prevent data speculatively injected "
"into loads from being used maliciously.">;
[X86] movdiri and movdir64b instructions Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon Reviewed By: craig.topper, RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45983 llvm-svn: 331248
2018-05-01 18:01:16 +08:00
// Direct Move instructions.
def FeatureMOVDIRI : SubtargetFeature<"movdiri", "HasMOVDIRI", "true",
"Support movdiri instruction">;
def FeatureMOVDIR64B : SubtargetFeature<"movdir64b", "HasMOVDIR64B", "true",
"Support movdir64b instruction">;
[X86] Disable BMI BEXTR in X86DAGToDAGISel::matchBEXTRFromAnd unless we're on compiling for a CPU with single uop BEXTR Summary: This function turns (X >> C1) & C2 into a BMI BEXTR or TBM BEXTRI instruction. For BMI BEXTR we have to materialize an immediate into a register to feed to the BEXTR instruction. The BMI BEXTR instruction is 2 uops on Intel CPUs. It looks like on SKL its one port 0/6 uop and one port 1/5 uop. Despite what Agner's tables say. I know one of the uops is a regular shift uop so it would have to go through the port 0/6 shifter unit. So that's the same or worse execution wise than the shift+and which is one 0/6 uop and one 0/1/5/6 uop. The move immediate into register is an additional 0/1/5/6 uop. For now I've limited this transform to AMD CPUs which have a single uop BEXTR. If may also might make sense if we can fold a load or if the and immediate is larger than 32-bits and can't be encoded as a sign extended 32-bit value or if LICM or CSE can hoist the move immediate and share it. But we'd need to look more carefully at that. In the regression I looked at it doesn't look load folding or large immediates were occurring so the regression isn't caused by the loss of those. So we could try to be smarter here if we find a compelling case. Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri, andreadb Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: llvm-commits, andreadb, RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52570 llvm-svn: 343399
2018-09-30 11:01:46 +08:00
def FeatureFastBEXTR : SubtargetFeature<"fast-bextr", "HasFastBEXTR", "true",
"Indicates that the BEXTR instruction is implemented as a single uop "
[X86] Remove periods from the end of SubtargetFeature descriptions since the help printer adds a period. Most features don't have periods already, but some did. When there is a period it causes llc -mattr=+help to print 2 periods. llvm-svn: 355474
2019-03-06 10:36:48 +08:00
"with good throughput">;
[X86] Disable BMI BEXTR in X86DAGToDAGISel::matchBEXTRFromAnd unless we're on compiling for a CPU with single uop BEXTR Summary: This function turns (X >> C1) & C2 into a BMI BEXTR or TBM BEXTRI instruction. For BMI BEXTR we have to materialize an immediate into a register to feed to the BEXTR instruction. The BMI BEXTR instruction is 2 uops on Intel CPUs. It looks like on SKL its one port 0/6 uop and one port 1/5 uop. Despite what Agner's tables say. I know one of the uops is a regular shift uop so it would have to go through the port 0/6 shifter unit. So that's the same or worse execution wise than the shift+and which is one 0/6 uop and one 0/1/5/6 uop. The move immediate into register is an additional 0/1/5/6 uop. For now I've limited this transform to AMD CPUs which have a single uop BEXTR. If may also might make sense if we can fold a load or if the and immediate is larger than 32-bits and can't be encoded as a sign extended 32-bit value or if LICM or CSE can hoist the move immediate and share it. But we'd need to look more carefully at that. In the regression I looked at it doesn't look load folding or large immediates were occurring so the regression isn't caused by the loss of those. So we could try to be smarter here if we find a compelling case. Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri, andreadb Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: llvm-commits, andreadb, RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52570 llvm-svn: 343399
2018-09-30 11:01:46 +08:00
[x86] add and use fast horizontal vector math subtarget feature This is the planned follow-up to D52997. Here we are reducing horizontal vector math codegen by default. AMD Jaguar (btver2) should have no difference with this patch because it has fast-hops. (If we want to set that bit for other CPUs, let me know.) The code changes are small, but there are many test diffs. For files that are specifically testing for hops, I added RUNs to distinguish fast/slow, so we can see the consequences side-by-side. For files that are primarily concerned with codegen other than hops, I just updated the CHECK lines to reflect the new default codegen. To recap the recent horizontal op story: 1. Before rL343727, we were producing hops for all subtargets for a variety of patterns. Hops were likely not optimal for all targets though. 2. The IR improvement in r343727 exposed a hole in the backend hop pattern matching, so we reduced hop codegen for all subtargets. That was bad for Jaguar (PR39195). 3. We restored the hop codegen for all targets with rL344141. Good for Jaguar, but probably bad for other CPUs. 4. This patch allows us to distinguish when we want to produce hops, so everyone can be happy. I'm not sure if we have the best predicate here, but the intent is to undo the extra hop-iness that was enabled by r344141. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53095 llvm-svn: 344361
2018-10-13 00:41:02 +08:00
// Combine vector math operations with shuffles into horizontal math
// instructions if a CPU implements horizontal operations (introduced with
// SSE3) with better latency/throughput than the alternative sequence.
def FeatureFastHorizontalOps
: SubtargetFeature<
"fast-hops", "HasFastHorizontalOps", "true",
"Prefer horizontal vector math instructions (haddp, phsub, etc.) over "
[X86] Remove FeatureSSE3 from the implies list of HasFastHorizontalOps. HasFastHorizontalOps is a tuning flag. It shouldn't imply an ISA flag.
2019-11-02 14:17:23 +08:00
"normal vector instructions with shuffles">;
[x86] add and use fast horizontal vector math subtarget feature This is the planned follow-up to D52997. Here we are reducing horizontal vector math codegen by default. AMD Jaguar (btver2) should have no difference with this patch because it has fast-hops. (If we want to set that bit for other CPUs, let me know.) The code changes are small, but there are many test diffs. For files that are specifically testing for hops, I added RUNs to distinguish fast/slow, so we can see the consequences side-by-side. For files that are primarily concerned with codegen other than hops, I just updated the CHECK lines to reflect the new default codegen. To recap the recent horizontal op story: 1. Before rL343727, we were producing hops for all subtargets for a variety of patterns. Hops were likely not optimal for all targets though. 2. The IR improvement in r343727 exposed a hole in the backend hop pattern matching, so we reduced hop codegen for all subtargets. That was bad for Jaguar (PR39195). 3. We restored the hop codegen for all targets with rL344141. Good for Jaguar, but probably bad for other CPUs. 4. This patch allows us to distinguish when we want to produce hops, so everyone can be happy. I'm not sure if we have the best predicate here, but the intent is to undo the extra hop-iness that was enabled by r344141. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53095 llvm-svn: 344361
2018-10-13 00:41:02 +08:00
[X86] Disable shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask for scalar shifts on AMD targets (PR40758) D61068 handled vector shifts, this patch does the same for scalars where there are similar number of pipes for shifts as bit ops - this is true almost entirely for AMD targets where the scalar ALUs are well balanced. This combine avoids AND immediate mask which usually means we reduce encoding size. Some tests show use of (slow, scaled) LEA instead of SHL in some cases, but thats due to particular shift immediates - shift+mask generate these just as easily. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61830 llvm-svn: 360684
2019-05-14 23:21:28 +08:00
def FeatureFastScalarShiftMasks
: SubtargetFeature<
"fast-scalar-shift-masks", "HasFastScalarShiftMasks", "true",
"Prefer a left/right scalar logical shift pair over a shift+and pair">;
[X86][SSE] Disable shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask for btver1/btver2 targets (PR40758) As detailed on PR40758, Bobcat/Jaguar can perform vector immediate shifts on the same pipes as vector ANDs with the same latency - so it doesn't make sense to replace a shl+lshr with a shift+and pair as it requires an additional mask (with the extra constant pool, loading and register pressure costs). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61068 llvm-svn: 359293
2019-04-26 18:49:13 +08:00
def FeatureFastVectorShiftMasks
: SubtargetFeature<
"fast-vector-shift-masks", "HasFastVectorShiftMasks", "true",
"Prefer a left/right vector logical shift pair over a shift+and pair">;
[X86] Remove ProcIntelGLM/ProcIntelGLP/ProcIntelTRM and replace them with a single feature flag covers the two places they were used. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71048
2019-12-06 02:24:10 +08:00
def FeatureUseGLMDivSqrtCosts
: SubtargetFeature<"use-glm-div-sqrt-costs", "UseGLMDivSqrtCosts", "true",
"Use Goldmont specific floating point div/sqrt costs">;
[X86][NFC] Add a `use-aa` feature. Summary: This allows enabling useaa on the command-line and will allow enabling the feature on a per-CPU basis where benchmarking shows improvements. This is modelled after the ARM/AArch64 target. Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, craig.topper Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, ychen, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67266 llvm-svn: 371989
2019-09-16 22:05:28 +08:00
// Enable use of alias analysis during code generation.
def FeatureUseAA : SubtargetFeature<"use-aa", "UseAA", "true",
"Use alias analysis during codegen">;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Bonnell
def ProcIntelAtom : SubtargetFeature<"", "X86ProcFamily", "IntelAtom", "">;
// Silvermont
def ProcIntelSLM : SubtargetFeature<"", "X86ProcFamily", "IntelSLM", "">;
Still need to support -mcpu=<> or cross compilation will fail. Doh. llvm-svn: 30764
2006-10-06 17:17:41 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
[X86] Adjust tablegen includes so we can use Instructions in scheduler models instead of just instregexs. This separates the CPU specific scheduler model includes to occur after the instructions. Moves the instruction includes between the basic scheduler information and the CPU specific scheduler models. llvm-svn: 320313
2017-12-11 01:42:36 +08:00
// Register File Description
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
include "X86RegisterInfo.td"
include "X86RegisterBanks.td"
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Instruction Descriptions
Still need to support -mcpu=<> or cross compilation will fail. Doh. llvm-svn: 30764
2006-10-06 17:17:41 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Instruction scheduling itinerary for Intel Atom. Adds an instruction itinerary to all x86 instructions, giving each a default latency of 1, using the InstrItinClass IIC_DEFAULT. Sets specific latencies for Atom for the instructions in files X86InstrCMovSetCC.td, X86InstrArithmetic.td, X86InstrControl.td, and X86InstrShiftRotate.td. The Atom latencies for the remainder of the x86 instructions will be set in subsequent patches. Adds a test to verify that the scheduler is working. Also changes the scheduling preference to "Hybrid" for i386 Atom, while leaving x86_64 as ILP. Patch by Preston Gurd! llvm-svn: 149558
2012-02-02 07:20:51 +08:00
include "X86Schedule.td"
[X86] Adjust tablegen includes so we can use Instructions in scheduler models instead of just instregexs. This separates the CPU specific scheduler model includes to occur after the instructions. Moves the instruction includes between the basic scheduler information and the CPU specific scheduler models. llvm-svn: 320313
2017-12-11 01:42:36 +08:00
include "X86InstrInfo.td"
[X86][BtVer2] correctly model the latency/throughput of LEA instructions. This patch fixes the latency/throughput of LEA instructions in the BtVer2 scheduling model. On Jaguar, A 3-operands LEA has a latency of 2cy, and a reciprocal throughput of 1. That is because it uses one cycle of SAGU followed by 1cy of ALU1. An LEA with a "Scale" operand is also slow, and it has the same latency profile as the 3-operands LEA. An LEA16r has a latency of 3cy, and a throughput of 0.5 (i.e. RThrouhgput of 2.0). This patch adds a new TIIPredicate named IsThreeOperandsLEAFn to X86Schedule.td. The tablegen backend (for instruction-info) expands that definition into this (file X86GenInstrInfo.inc): ``` static bool isThreeOperandsLEA(const MachineInstr &MI) { return ( ( MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA32r || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64r || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA64_32r || MI.getOpcode() == X86::LEA16r ) && MI.getOperand(1).isReg() && MI.getOperand(1).getReg() != 0 && MI.getOperand(3).isReg() && MI.getOperand(3).getReg() != 0 && ( ( MI.getOperand(4).isImm() && MI.getOperand(4).getImm() != 0 ) || (MI.getOperand(4).isGlobal()) ) ); } ``` A similar method is generated in the X86_MC namespace, and included into X86MCTargetDesc.cpp (the declaration lives in X86MCTargetDesc.h). Back to the BtVer2 scheduling model: A new scheduling predicate named JSlowLEAPredicate now checks if either the instruction is a three-operands LEA, or it is an LEA with a Scale value different than 1. A variant scheduling class uses that new predicate to correctly select the appropriate latency profile. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49436 llvm-svn: 337469
2018-07-20 00:42:15 +08:00
include "X86SchedPredicates.td"
[X86] Adjust tablegen includes so we can use Instructions in scheduler models instead of just instregexs. This separates the CPU specific scheduler model includes to occur after the instructions. Moves the instruction includes between the basic scheduler information and the CPU specific scheduler models. llvm-svn: 320313
2017-12-11 01:42:36 +08:00
def X86InstrInfo : InstrInfo;
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// X86 Scheduler Models
[X86] Adjust tablegen includes so we can use Instructions in scheduler models instead of just instregexs. This separates the CPU specific scheduler model includes to occur after the instructions. Moves the instruction includes between the basic scheduler information and the CPU specific scheduler models. llvm-svn: 320313
2017-12-11 01:42:36 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
include "X86ScheduleAtom.td"
include "X86SchedSandyBridge.td"
include "X86SchedHaswell.td"
include "X86SchedBroadwell.td"
include "X86ScheduleSLM.td"
include "X86ScheduleZnver1.td"
[X86] AMD Znver2 (Rome) Scheduler enablement The patch gives out the details of the znver2 scheduler model. There are few improvements with respect to execution units, latencies and throughput when compared with znver1. The tests that were present for znver1 for llvm-mca tool were replicated. The latencies, execution units, timeline and throughput information are updated for znver2. Reviewers: craig.topper, Simon Pilgrim Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66088
2020-01-09 22:41:32 +08:00
include "X86ScheduleZnver2.td"
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model Summary: # Overview This is somewhat partial. * Latencies are good {F7371125} * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky. * NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158} * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes * Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there. They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2` * Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left... To be noted: I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis! # Benchmark I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]]. Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch): ``` Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219 Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219 Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2 Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133 Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133 Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312 Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1 Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141 Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141 Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0 Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60 Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60 Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0 Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275 Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275 Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2 Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67 Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67 Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0 Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25 Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25 Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0 Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12 Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12 Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0 GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88 GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88 GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1 Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175 Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174 Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2 Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463 Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461 Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5 Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373 Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374 Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3 Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10 Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10 Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0 Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11 Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11 Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0 Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6 Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6 Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0 Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394 Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393 Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1 Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28 Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28 Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0 Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414 Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414 Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1 Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145 Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145 Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0 Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217 Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217 Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3 Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193 Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193 Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0 Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25 Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19 Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19 Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0 ``` {F7443905} If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`), and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`); Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%` Looks good so far i'd say. llvm-exegesis details: {F7371117} {F7371125} {F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158} Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh Reviewed By: andreadb Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779 llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
include "X86ScheduleBdVer2.td"
[X86] Adjust tablegen includes so we can use Instructions in scheduler models instead of just instregexs. This separates the CPU specific scheduler model includes to occur after the instructions. Moves the instruction includes between the basic scheduler information and the CPU specific scheduler models. llvm-svn: 320313
2017-12-11 01:42:36 +08:00
include "X86ScheduleBtVer2.td"
include "X86SchedSkylakeClient.td"
include "X86SchedSkylakeServer.td"
Instruction scheduling itinerary for Intel Atom. Adds an instruction itinerary to all x86 instructions, giving each a default latency of 1, using the InstrItinClass IIC_DEFAULT. Sets specific latencies for Atom for the instructions in files X86InstrCMovSetCC.td, X86InstrArithmetic.td, X86InstrControl.td, and X86InstrShiftRotate.td. The Atom latencies for the remainder of the x86 instructions will be set in subsequent patches. Adds a test to verify that the scheduler is working. Also changes the scheduling preference to "Hybrid" for i386 Atom, while leaving x86_64 as ILP. Patch by Preston Gurd! llvm-svn: 149558
2012-02-02 07:20:51 +08:00
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// X86 Processor Feature Lists
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
def ProcessorFeatures {
[X86] Support -march=x86-64-v[234] PR47686. These micro-architecture levels are defined in the x86-64 psABI: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb7e9 GCC 11 will support these levels. Note, -mtune=x86-64-v[234] are invalid and __builtin_cpu_is cannot be used on them. Reviewed By: craig.topper, RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89197
2020-10-13 00:35:22 +08:00
// x86-64 and x86-64-v[234]
list<SubtargetFeature> X86_64V1Features = [
FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureCMOV, FeatureMMX, FeatureSSE2,
FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL, Feature64Bit
];
list<SubtargetFeature> X86_64V2Features = !listconcat(
X86_64V1Features,
[FeatureCMPXCHG16B, FeatureLAHFSAHF, FeaturePOPCNT, FeatureSSE42]);
list<SubtargetFeature> X86_64V3Features = !listconcat(X86_64V2Features, [
FeatureAVX2, FeatureBMI, FeatureBMI2, FeatureF16C, FeatureFMA, FeatureLZCNT,
FeatureMOVBE, FeatureXSAVE
]);
list<SubtargetFeature> X86_64V4Features = !listconcat(X86_64V3Features, [
FeatureBWI,
FeatureCDI,
FeatureDQI,
FeatureVLX,
]);
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Nehalem
[X86] Support -march=x86-64-v[234] PR47686. These micro-architecture levels are defined in the x86-64 psABI: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb7e9 GCC 11 will support these levels. Note, -mtune=x86-64-v[234] are invalid and __builtin_cpu_is cannot be used on them. Reviewed By: craig.topper, RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89197
2020-10-13 00:35:22 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> NHMFeatures = X86_64V2Features;
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> NHMTuning = [FeatureMacroFusion,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Westmere
list<SubtargetFeature> WSMAdditionalFeatures = [FeaturePCLMUL];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> WSMTuning = NHMTuning;
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> WSMFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(NHMFeatures, WSMAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Sandybridge
list<SubtargetFeature> SNBAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAVX,
FeatureXSAVE,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
FeatureXSAVEOPT];
list<SubtargetFeature> SNBTuning = [FeatureMacroFusion,
FeatureSlow3OpsLEA,
FeatureSlowDivide64,
FeatureSlowUAMem32,
FeatureFastScalarFSQRT,
FeatureFastSHLDRotate,
FeatureFast15ByteNOP,
FeaturePOPCNTFalseDeps,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> SNBFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(WSMFeatures, SNBAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Ivybridge
list<SubtargetFeature> IVBAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureRDRAND,
FeatureF16C,
FeatureFSGSBase];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> IVBTuning = SNBTuning;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> IVBFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(SNBFeatures, IVBAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Haswell
list<SubtargetFeature> HSWAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAVX2,
FeatureBMI,
FeatureBMI2,
FeatureERMSB,
FeatureFMA,
FeatureINVPCID,
FeatureLZCNT,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
FeatureMOVBE];
list<SubtargetFeature> HSWTuning = [FeatureMacroFusion,
FeatureSlow3OpsLEA,
FeatureSlowDivide64,
FeatureFastScalarFSQRT,
FeatureFastSHLDRotate,
FeatureFast15ByteNOP,
FeatureFastVariableShuffle,
FeaturePOPCNTFalseDeps,
FeatureLZCNTFalseDeps,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> HSWFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(IVBFeatures, HSWAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Broadwell
list<SubtargetFeature> BDWAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureADX,
FeatureRDSEED,
FeaturePRFCHW];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BDWTuning = HSWTuning;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BDWFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(HSWFeatures, BDWAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Skylake
list<SubtargetFeature> SKLAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAES,
FeatureXSAVEC,
FeatureXSAVES,
FeatureCLFLUSHOPT,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
FeatureSGX];
list<SubtargetFeature> SKLTuning = [FeatureHasFastGather,
FeatureMacroFusion,
FeatureSlow3OpsLEA,
FeatureSlowDivide64,
FeatureFastScalarFSQRT,
FeatureFastVectorFSQRT,
FeatureFastSHLDRotate,
FeatureFast15ByteNOP,
FeatureFastVariableShuffle,
FeaturePOPCNTFalseDeps,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> SKLFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(BDWFeatures, SKLAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Skylake-AVX512
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> SKXAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAES,
FeatureXSAVEC,
FeatureXSAVES,
FeatureCLFLUSHOPT,
FeatureAVX512,
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
FeatureCDI,
FeatureDQI,
FeatureBWI,
FeatureVLX,
FeaturePKU,
FeatureCLWB];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> SKXTuning = [FeatureHasFastGather,
FeatureMacroFusion,
FeatureSlow3OpsLEA,
FeatureSlowDivide64,
FeatureFastScalarFSQRT,
FeatureFastVectorFSQRT,
FeatureFastSHLDRotate,
FeatureFast15ByteNOP,
FeatureFastVariableShuffle,
FeaturePrefer256Bit,
FeaturePOPCNTFalseDeps,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> SKXFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(BDWFeatures, SKXAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Cascadelake
list<SubtargetFeature> CLXAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureVNNI];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> CLXTuning = SKXTuning;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> CLXFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(SKXFeatures, CLXAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
[X86] -march=cooperlake (llvm) Support intel -march=cooperlake in llvm Patch by Shengchen Kan (skan) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62836 llvm-svn: 362776
2019-06-07 16:31:35 +08:00
// Cooperlake
list<SubtargetFeature> CPXAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureBF16];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> CPXTuning = SKXTuning;
[X86] -march=cooperlake (llvm) Support intel -march=cooperlake in llvm Patch by Shengchen Kan (skan) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62836 llvm-svn: 362776
2019-06-07 16:31:35 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> CPXFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(CLXFeatures, CPXAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] -march=cooperlake (llvm) Support intel -march=cooperlake in llvm Patch by Shengchen Kan (skan) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62836 llvm-svn: 362776
2019-06-07 16:31:35 +08:00
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Cannonlake
list<SubtargetFeature> CNLAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAVX512,
FeatureCDI,
FeatureDQI,
FeatureBWI,
FeatureVLX,
FeaturePKU,
FeatureVBMI,
FeatureIFMA,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
FeatureSHA];
list<SubtargetFeature> CNLTuning = [FeatureHasFastGather,
FeatureMacroFusion,
FeatureSlow3OpsLEA,
FeatureSlowDivide64,
FeatureFastScalarFSQRT,
FeatureFastVectorFSQRT,
FeatureFastSHLDRotate,
FeatureFast15ByteNOP,
FeatureFastVariableShuffle,
FeaturePrefer256Bit,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> CNLFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(SKLFeatures, CNLAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Icelake
list<SubtargetFeature> ICLAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureBITALG,
FeatureVAES,
FeatureVBMI2,
FeatureVNNI,
FeatureVPCLMULQDQ,
FeatureVPOPCNTDQ,
FeatureGFNI,
FeatureCLWB,
[X86] Add feature for Fast Short REP MOV (FSRM) for Icelake or newer. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85989
2020-08-15 03:20:08 +08:00
FeatureRDPID,
FeatureFSRM];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ICLTuning = CNLTuning;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ICLFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(CNLFeatures, ICLAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Icelake Server
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ICXAdditionalFeatures = [FeaturePCONFIG,
FeatureWBNOINVD];
list<SubtargetFeature> ICXTuning = CNLTuning;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ICXFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(ICLFeatures, ICXAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
[X86] Support -march=tigerlake Support -march=tigerlake for x86. Compare with Icelake Client, It include 4 more new features ,they are avx512vp2intersect, movdiri, movdir64b, shstk. Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65840 llvm-svn: 368543
2019-08-12 09:29:46 +08:00
//Tigerlake
list<SubtargetFeature> TGLAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureVP2INTERSECT,
FeatureMOVDIRI,
FeatureMOVDIR64B,
FeatureSHSTK];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> TGLTuning = CNLTuning;
[X86] Support -march=tigerlake Support -march=tigerlake for x86. Compare with Icelake Client, It include 4 more new features ,they are avx512vp2intersect, movdiri, movdir64b, shstk. Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65840 llvm-svn: 368543
2019-08-12 09:29:46 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> TGLFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(ICLFeatures, TGLAdditionalFeatures );
[X86] Support -march=tigerlake Support -march=tigerlake for x86. Compare with Icelake Client, It include 4 more new features ,they are avx512vp2intersect, movdiri, movdir64b, shstk. Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65840 llvm-svn: 368543
2019-08-12 09:29:46 +08:00
[X86] Support -march=sapphirerapids Support -march=sapphirerapids for x86. Compare with Icelake Server, it includes 14 more new features. They are amxtile, amxint8, amxbf16, avx512bf16, avx512vp2intersect, cldemote, enqcmd, movdir64b, movdiri, ptwrite, serialize, shstk, tsxldtrk, waitpkg. Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86503
2020-08-25 12:27:02 +08:00
//Sapphirerapids
list<SubtargetFeature> SPRAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAMXTILE,
FeatureAMXINT8,
FeatureAMXBF16,
FeatureBF16,
FeatureSERIALIZE,
FeatureCLDEMOTE,
FeatureWAITPKG,
FeaturePTWRITE,
[X86] Support Intel avxvnni This patch mainly made the following changes: 1. Support AVX-VNNI instructions; 2. Introduce ExplicitVEXPrefix flag so that vpdpbusd/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds instructions only use vex-encoding when user explicity add {vex} prefix. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89105
2020-10-30 12:58:05 +08:00
FeatureAVXVNNI,
[X86] Support -march=sapphirerapids Support -march=sapphirerapids for x86. Compare with Icelake Server, it includes 14 more new features. They are amxtile, amxint8, amxbf16, avx512bf16, avx512vp2intersect, cldemote, enqcmd, movdir64b, movdiri, ptwrite, serialize, shstk, tsxldtrk, waitpkg. Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86503
2020-08-25 12:27:02 +08:00
FeatureTSXLDTRK,
FeatureENQCMD,
FeatureSHSTK,
FeatureVP2INTERSECT,
FeatureMOVDIRI,
[X86] Add User Interrupts(UINTR) instructions For more details about these instructions, please refer to the latest ISE document: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference. Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89301
2020-10-22 16:46:07 +08:00
FeatureMOVDIR64B,
FeatureUINTR];
[X86] Support -march=sapphirerapids Support -march=sapphirerapids for x86. Compare with Icelake Server, it includes 14 more new features. They are amxtile, amxint8, amxbf16, avx512bf16, avx512vp2intersect, cldemote, enqcmd, movdir64b, movdiri, ptwrite, serialize, shstk, tsxldtrk, waitpkg. Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86503
2020-08-25 12:27:02 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> SPRTuning = ICXTuning;
list<SubtargetFeature> SPRFeatures =
!listconcat(ICXFeatures, SPRAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Add a stub for Intel's alderlake. No scheduling, no autodetection.
2020-10-25 00:00:33 +08:00
// Alderlake
[X86] Support Intel avxvnni This patch mainly made the following changes: 1. Support AVX-VNNI instructions; 2. Introduce ExplicitVEXPrefix flag so that vpdpbusd/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds/vpdpbusds instructions only use vex-encoding when user explicity add {vex} prefix. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89105
2020-10-30 12:58:05 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ADLAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAVXVNNI,
FeatureCLDEMOTE,
[X86] Add a stub for Intel's alderlake. No scheduling, no autodetection.
2020-10-25 00:00:33 +08:00
FeatureHRESET,
FeaturePTWRITE,
FeatureSERIALIZE,
FeatureWAITPKG];
list<SubtargetFeature> ADLTuning = SKLTuning;
list<SubtargetFeature> ADLFeatures =
!listconcat(SKLFeatures, ADLAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Atom
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> AtomFeatures = [FeatureX87,
FeatureCMPXCHG8B,
FeatureCMOV,
FeatureMMX,
FeatureSSSE3,
FeatureFXSR,
FeatureNOPL,
Feature64Bit,
FeatureCMPXCHG16B,
FeatureMOVBE,
FeatureLAHFSAHF];
list<SubtargetFeature> AtomTuning = [ProcIntelAtom,
FeatureSlowUAMem16,
FeatureLEAForSP,
FeatureSlowDivide32,
FeatureSlowDivide64,
FeatureSlowTwoMemOps,
FeatureLEAUsesAG,
FeaturePadShortFunctions,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Silvermont
list<SubtargetFeature> SLMAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureSSE42,
FeaturePOPCNT,
FeaturePCLMUL,
FeaturePRFCHW,
FeatureRDRAND];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> SLMTuning = [ProcIntelSLM,
FeatureSlowTwoMemOps,
FeatureSlowLEA,
FeatureSlowIncDec,
FeatureSlowDivide64,
FeatureSlowPMULLD,
FeatureFast7ByteNOP,
FeaturePOPCNTFalseDeps,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> SLMFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(AtomFeatures, SLMAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Goldmont
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> GLMAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAES,
FeatureSHA,
FeatureRDSEED,
FeatureXSAVE,
FeatureXSAVEOPT,
FeatureXSAVEC,
FeatureXSAVES,
FeatureCLFLUSHOPT,
FeatureFSGSBase];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> GLMTuning = [FeatureUseGLMDivSqrtCosts,
FeatureSlowTwoMemOps,
FeatureSlowLEA,
FeatureSlowIncDec,
FeaturePOPCNTFalseDeps,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> GLMFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(SLMFeatures, GLMAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Goldmont Plus
list<SubtargetFeature> GLPAdditionalFeatures = [FeaturePTWRITE,
FeatureRDPID,
FeatureSGX];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> GLPTuning = [FeatureUseGLMDivSqrtCosts,
FeatureSlowTwoMemOps,
FeatureSlowLEA,
FeatureSlowIncDec,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> GLPFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(GLMFeatures, GLPAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Tremont
[X86] Add CLWB to Tremont CPU. Remove CLDEMOTE, MOVDIRI, MOVDIR64B, and WAITPKG to match gcc.
2020-06-03 13:21:12 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> TRMAdditionalFeatures = [FeatureCLWB,
FeatureGFNI];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> TRMTuning = GLPTuning;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> TRMFeatures =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(GLPFeatures, TRMAdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// Knights Landing
list<SubtargetFeature> KNLFeatures = [FeatureX87,
[X86] Add CMPXCHG8B feature flag. Set it for all CPUs except i386/i486 including 'generic'. Disable use of CMPXCHG8B when this flag isn't set. CMPXCHG8B was introduced on i586/pentium generation. If its not enabled, limit the atomic width to 32 bits so the AtomicExpandPass will expand to lib calls. Unclear if we should be using a different limit for other configs. The default is 1024 and experimentation shows that using an i256 atomic will cause a crash in SelectionDAG. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59576 llvm-svn: 356631
2019-03-21 07:35:49 +08:00
FeatureCMPXCHG8B,
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
FeatureCMOV,
FeatureMMX,
FeatureFXSR,
FeatureNOPL,
Feature64Bit,
FeatureCMPXCHG16B,
FeaturePOPCNT,
FeaturePCLMUL,
FeatureXSAVE,
FeatureXSAVEOPT,
FeatureLAHFSAHF,
FeatureAES,
FeatureRDRAND,
FeatureF16C,
FeatureFSGSBase,
FeatureAVX512,
FeatureERI,
FeatureCDI,
FeaturePFI,
FeaturePREFETCHWT1,
FeatureADX,
FeatureRDSEED,
FeatureMOVBE,
FeatureLZCNT,
FeatureBMI,
FeatureBMI2,
FeatureFMA,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
FeaturePRFCHW];
list<SubtargetFeature> KNLTuning = [FeatureSlowDivide64,
FeatureSlow3OpsLEA,
FeatureSlowIncDec,
FeatureSlowTwoMemOps,
FeaturePreferMaskRegisters,
FeatureHasFastGather,
FeatureSlowPMADDWD];
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// TODO Add AVX5124FMAPS/AVX5124VNNIW features
list<SubtargetFeature> KNMFeatures =
!listconcat(KNLFeatures, [FeatureVPOPCNTDQ]);
[X86] Move CPU features for Barcelona/K10 out of line Summary: Cleans X86.td's Barcelona entry to be more like the others, by moving the features out of the `Proc<>`, thus potentially making it possible to inherit from them. Split off from D63628 Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon Reviewed By: craig.topper Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65791 llvm-svn: 368061
2019-08-07 01:04:02 +08:00
// Barcelona
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BarcelonaFeatures = [FeatureX87,
FeatureCMPXCHG8B,
FeatureSSE4A,
Feature3DNowA,
FeatureFXSR,
FeatureNOPL,
FeatureCMPXCHG16B,
FeaturePRFCHW,
FeatureLZCNT,
FeaturePOPCNT,
FeatureLAHFSAHF,
FeatureCMOV,
Feature64Bit];
list<SubtargetFeature> BarcelonaTuning = [FeatureFastScalarShiftMasks,
FeatureSlowSHLD,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Bobcat
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BtVer1Features = [FeatureX87,
FeatureCMPXCHG8B,
FeatureCMOV,
FeatureMMX,
FeatureSSSE3,
FeatureSSE4A,
FeatureFXSR,
FeatureNOPL,
Feature64Bit,
FeatureCMPXCHG16B,
FeaturePRFCHW,
FeatureLZCNT,
FeaturePOPCNT,
FeatureLAHFSAHF];
list<SubtargetFeature> BtVer1Tuning = [FeatureFast15ByteNOP,
FeatureFastScalarShiftMasks,
FeatureFastVectorShiftMasks,
FeatureSlowSHLD,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Jaguar
list<SubtargetFeature> BtVer2AdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAVX,
FeatureAES,
FeaturePCLMUL,
FeatureBMI,
FeatureF16C,
FeatureMOVBE,
FeatureXSAVE,
FeatureXSAVEOPT];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BtVer2Tuning = [FeatureFastLZCNT,
FeatureFastBEXTR,
FeatureFastHorizontalOps,
FeatureFast15ByteNOP,
FeatureFastScalarShiftMasks,
FeatureFastVectorShiftMasks,
FeatureSlowSHLD];
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BtVer2Features =
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
!listconcat(BtVer1Features, BtVer2AdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Bulldozer
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer1Features = [FeatureX87,
FeatureCMPXCHG8B,
FeatureCMOV,
FeatureXOP,
Feature64Bit,
FeatureCMPXCHG16B,
FeatureAES,
FeaturePRFCHW,
FeaturePCLMUL,
FeatureMMX,
FeatureFXSR,
FeatureNOPL,
FeatureLZCNT,
FeaturePOPCNT,
FeatureXSAVE,
FeatureLWP,
FeatureLAHFSAHF];
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer1Tuning = [FeatureSlowSHLD,
FeatureFast11ByteNOP,
FeatureFastScalarShiftMasks,
FeatureBranchFusion,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// PileDriver
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer2AdditionalFeatures = [FeatureF16C,
FeatureBMI,
FeatureTBM,
FeatureFMA,
FeatureFastBEXTR];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer2Tuning = BdVer1Tuning;
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer2Features =
!listconcat(BdVer1Features, BdVer2AdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Steamroller
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer3AdditionalFeatures = [FeatureXSAVEOPT,
FeatureFSGSBase];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer3Tuning = BdVer2Tuning;
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer3Features =
!listconcat(BdVer2Features, BdVer3AdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
// Excavator
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer4AdditionalFeatures = [FeatureAVX2,
FeatureBMI2,
[X86] Add MOVBE and RDRND features to BDVER4. Only 6 years behind gcc. https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg00231.html Found while working on improving how we define CPU features for clang and auditing for correctness.
2020-06-27 14:32:17 +08:00
FeatureMOVBE,
FeatureRDRAND,
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
FeatureMWAITX];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer4Tuning = BdVer3Tuning;
list<SubtargetFeature> BdVer4Features =
!listconcat(BdVer3Features, BdVer4AdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Arrange more CPU features to inherit from earlier CPUs. NFCI This makes SandyBridge inherit back to Westmere/Nehalem. Make bdver1-4 inherit from each other and btver2 inherit from btver1. llvm-svn: 355935
2019-03-13 00:35:30 +08:00
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// AMD Zen Processors common ISAs
list<SubtargetFeature> ZNFeatures = [FeatureADX,
FeatureAES,
FeatureAVX2,
FeatureBMI,
FeatureBMI2,
FeatureCLFLUSHOPT,
FeatureCLZERO,
FeatureCMOV,
Feature64Bit,
FeatureCMPXCHG16B,
FeatureF16C,
FeatureFMA,
FeatureFSGSBase,
FeatureFXSR,
FeatureNOPL,
FeatureLAHFSAHF,
FeatureLZCNT,
FeatureMMX,
FeatureMOVBE,
FeatureMWAITX,
FeaturePCLMUL,
FeaturePOPCNT,
FeaturePRFCHW,
FeatureRDRAND,
FeatureRDSEED,
FeatureSHA,
FeatureSSE4A,
FeatureX87,
FeatureXSAVE,
FeatureXSAVEC,
FeatureXSAVEOPT,
FeatureXSAVES];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ZNTuning = [FeatureFastLZCNT,
FeatureFastBEXTR,
FeatureFast15ByteNOP,
FeatureBranchFusion,
FeatureFastScalarShiftMasks,
FeatureSlowSHLD,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER];
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ZN2AdditionalFeatures = [FeatureCLWB,
FeatureRDPID,
FeatureWBNOINVD];
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ZN2Tuning = ZNTuning;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ZN2Features =
!listconcat(ZNFeatures, ZN2AdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Add a stub for znver3 based on the little public information there is in AMD's manuals No scheduling, no autodetection. Just enough so -march=znver3 works.
2020-10-25 00:00:20 +08:00
list<SubtargetFeature> ZN3AdditionalFeatures = [FeatureINVPCID,
FeaturePKU,
FeatureVAES,
FeatureVPCLMULQDQ];
list<SubtargetFeature> ZN3Tuning = ZNTuning;
list<SubtargetFeature> ZN3Features =
!listconcat(ZN2Features, ZN3AdditionalFeatures);
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// X86 processors supported.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Instruction scheduling itinerary for Intel Atom. Adds an instruction itinerary to all x86 instructions, giving each a default latency of 1, using the InstrItinClass IIC_DEFAULT. Sets specific latencies for Atom for the instructions in files X86InstrCMovSetCC.td, X86InstrArithmetic.td, X86InstrControl.td, and X86InstrShiftRotate.td. The Atom latencies for the remainder of the x86 instructions will be set in subsequent patches. Adds a test to verify that the scheduler is working. Also changes the scheduling preference to "Hybrid" for i386 Atom, while leaving x86_64 as ILP. Patch by Preston Gurd! llvm-svn: 149558
2012-02-02 07:20:51 +08:00
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
class Proc<string Name, list<SubtargetFeature> Features,
list<SubtargetFeature> TuneFeatures>
[X86][MC][Target] Initial backend support a tune CPU to support -mtune This patch implements initial backend support for a -mtune CPU controlled by a "tune-cpu" function attribute. If the attribute is not present X86 will use the resolved CPU from target-cpu attribute or command line. This patch adds MC layer support a tune CPU. Each CPU now has two sets of features stored in their GenSubtargetInfo.inc tables . These features lists are passed separately to the Processor and ProcessorModel classes in tablegen. The tune list defaults to an empty list to avoid changes to non-X86. This annoyingly increases the size of static tables on all target as we now store 24 more bytes per CPU. I haven't quantified the overall impact, but I can if we're concerned. One new test is added to X86 to show a few tuning features with mismatched tune-cpu and target-cpu/target-feature attributes to demonstrate independent control. Another new test is added to demonstrate that the scheduler model follows the tune CPU. I have not added a -mtune to llc/opt or MC layer command line yet. With no attributes we'll just use the -mcpu for both. MC layer tools will always follow the normal CPU for tuning. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
2020-08-15 05:56:54 +08:00
: ProcessorModel<Name, GenericModel, Features, TuneFeatures>;
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
class ProcModel<string Name, SchedMachineModel Model,
list<SubtargetFeature> Features,
list<SubtargetFeature> TuneFeatures>
[X86][MC][Target] Initial backend support a tune CPU to support -mtune This patch implements initial backend support for a -mtune CPU controlled by a "tune-cpu" function attribute. If the attribute is not present X86 will use the resolved CPU from target-cpu attribute or command line. This patch adds MC layer support a tune CPU. Each CPU now has two sets of features stored in their GenSubtargetInfo.inc tables . These features lists are passed separately to the Processor and ProcessorModel classes in tablegen. The tune list defaults to an empty list to avoid changes to non-X86. This annoyingly increases the size of static tables on all target as we now store 24 more bytes per CPU. I haven't quantified the overall impact, but I can if we're concerned. One new test is added to X86 to show a few tuning features with mismatched tune-cpu and target-cpu/target-feature attributes to demonstrate independent control. Another new test is added to demonstrate that the scheduler model follows the tune CPU. I have not added a -mtune to llc/opt or MC layer command line yet. With no attributes we'll just use the -mcpu for both. MC layer tools will always follow the normal CPU for tuning. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
2020-08-15 05:56:54 +08:00
: ProcessorModel<Name, Model, Features, TuneFeatures>;
Instruction scheduling itinerary for Intel Atom. Adds an instruction itinerary to all x86 instructions, giving each a default latency of 1, using the InstrItinClass IIC_DEFAULT. Sets specific latencies for Atom for the instructions in files X86InstrCMovSetCC.td, X86InstrArithmetic.td, X86InstrControl.td, and X86InstrShiftRotate.td. The Atom latencies for the remainder of the x86 instructions will be set in subsequent patches. Adds a test to verify that the scheduler is working. Also changes the scheduling preference to "Hybrid" for i386 Atom, while leaving x86_64 as ILP. Patch by Preston Gurd! llvm-svn: 149558
2012-02-02 07:20:51 +08:00
[llvm] NFC: Fix trivial typo in rst and td files Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77469
2020-04-23 13:26:07 +08:00
// NOTE: CMPXCHG8B is here for legacy compatibility so that it is only disabled
[X86] Add CMPXCHG8B feature flag. Set it for all CPUs except i386/i486 including 'generic'. Disable use of CMPXCHG8B when this flag isn't set. CMPXCHG8B was introduced on i586/pentium generation. If its not enabled, limit the atomic width to 32 bits so the AtomicExpandPass will expand to lib calls. Unclear if we should be using a different limit for other configs. The default is 1024 and experimentation shows that using an i256 atomic will cause a crash in SelectionDAG. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59576 llvm-svn: 356631
2019-03-21 07:35:49 +08:00
// if i386/i486 is specifically requested.
[X86] Add Feature64Bit to the 'generic' CPU and remove feature string hacking in X86Subtarget constructor Feature64Bit is only used by a check in the X86Subtarget constructor to ensure that the CPU selected supports 64-bit mode when the triple is for 64-bit mode. 'generic' is the default CPU in llc and so needs to be able to pass this check. Previously we did this by detecting the name and adding the feature to the feature string. But there doesn't seem to be any reason we can't just add the feature to the CPU directly.
2020-07-23 23:52:06 +08:00
// NOTE: 64Bit is here as "generic" is the default llc CPU. The X86Subtarget
// constructor checks that any CPU used in 64-bit mode has Feature64Bit enabled.
// It has no effect on code generation.
[X86] Copy the tuning features and scheduler model from pentium4/x86-64 to generic This is preparation for making clang default to -mtune=generic when no -march is specified. This will allow the default tuning to be "generic" even though our default march is "pentium4" or "x86-64". To avoid llc lit test regressions, if no mcpu is specified, I've defaulted tune to use i586 to match the old tuning settings of no CPU. Some tests explicitly used -mcpu=generic which I've removed so they instead get this default of architecture features from generic and tune from i586. I updated one llvm-mca test to check a different CPU since generic has a scheduler model now Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86312
2020-08-25 01:51:56 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"generic", SandyBridgeModel,
[FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, Feature64Bit],
[FeatureSlow3OpsLEA,
FeatureSlowDivide64,
FeatureSlowIncDec,
FeatureMacroFusion,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<"i386", [FeatureX87],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"i486", [FeatureX87],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"i586", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"pentium", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"pentium-mmx", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureMMX],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"i686", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureCMOV],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"pentiumpro", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureCMOV,
FeatureNOPL],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"pentium2", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureMMX, FeatureCMOV,
FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
foreach P = ["pentium3", "pentium3m"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<P, [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureMMX,
FeatureSSE1, FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL, FeatureCMOV],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
}
[X86] Enable the post-RA-scheduler for clang's default 32-bit cpu. For compilations with no explicit cpu specified, this exhibits nice gains on Silvermont, with neutral performance on big cores. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19138 llvm-svn: 267809
2016-04-28 06:52:35 +08:00
// Enable the PostRAScheduler for SSE2 and SSE3 class cpus.
// The intent is to enable it for pentium4 which is the current default
// processor in a vanilla 32-bit clang compilation when no specific
// architecture is specified. This generally gives a nice performance
// increase on silvermont, with largely neutral behavior on other
// contemporary large core processors.
// pentium-m, pentium4m, prescott and nocona are included as a preventative
// measure to avoid performance surprises, in case clang's default cpu
// changes slightly.
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"pentium-m", GenericPostRAModel,
[FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureMMX, FeatureSSE2,
FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL, FeatureCMOV],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Enable the post-RA-scheduler for clang's default 32-bit cpu. For compilations with no explicit cpu specified, this exhibits nice gains on Silvermont, with neutral performance on big cores. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19138 llvm-svn: 267809
2016-04-28 06:52:35 +08:00
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
foreach P = ["pentium4", "pentium4m"] in {
[X86] Change pentium4 tuning settings and scheduler model back to their values before D83913. Clang now defaults to -march=pentium4 -mtune=generic so we don't need modern tune settings on pentium4.
2020-08-27 06:21:55 +08:00
def : ProcModel<P, GenericPostRAModel,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
[FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureMMX, FeatureSSE2,
FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL, FeatureCMOV],
[X86] Change pentium4 tuning settings and scheduler model back to their values before D83913. Clang now defaults to -march=pentium4 -mtune=generic so we don't need modern tune settings on pentium4.
2020-08-27 06:21:55 +08:00
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
}
[x86] Make the 'x86-64' cpu, what I see as and many use as the generic default architecture for reasonable modern x86 processors, actually be modern. This processor model should essentially be "tuned" for modern x86 chips as much as possible without undue penalties on any specific architecture. Previously we weren't even using the nice scheduling models. There are a few other tweaks needed here, but this change at least I have benchmarked across a decent swatch of chips (intel's clovertown, westmere, and sandybridge; amd's istanbul) and seen no significant regressions. If anyone has suggested ways to test this, just let me know. Somewhat alarmingly, no existing tests failed. llvm-svn: 208230
2014-05-08 01:37:03 +08:00
[X86] Introduce Lakemont CPU. Add a new Intel MCU CPU Lakemont, which doesn't support X87. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18650 llvm-svn: 265128
2016-04-01 18:16:15 +08:00
// Intel Quark.
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<"lakemont", [FeatureCMPXCHG8B],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Introduce Lakemont CPU. Add a new Intel MCU CPU Lakemont, which doesn't support X87. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18650 llvm-svn: 265128
2016-04-01 18:16:15 +08:00
Enable SandyBridgeModel for all modern Intel P6 descendants. All Intel CPUs since Yonah look a lot alike, at least at the granularity of the scheduling models. We can add more accurate models for processors that aren't Sandy Bridge if required. Haswell will probably need its own. The Atom processor and anything based on NetBurst is completely different. So are the non-Intel chips. llvm-svn: 178080
2013-03-27 06:19:12 +08:00
// Intel Core Duo.
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"yonah", SandyBridgeModel,
[FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureMMX, FeatureSSE3,
FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL, FeatureCMOV],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
Enable SandyBridgeModel for all modern Intel P6 descendants. All Intel CPUs since Yonah look a lot alike, at least at the granularity of the scheduling models. We can add more accurate models for processors that aren't Sandy Bridge if required. Haswell will probably need its own. The Atom processor and anything based on NetBurst is completely different. So are the non-Intel chips. llvm-svn: 178080
2013-03-27 06:19:12 +08:00
// NetBurst.
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"prescott", GenericPostRAModel,
[FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureMMX, FeatureSSE3,
FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL, FeatureCMOV],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : ProcModel<"nocona", GenericPostRAModel, [
[X86] Introduction of FeatureX87. Add FeatureX87 in X86 backend to be able to define CPUs which doesn't have x87. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13979 llvm-svn: 264148
2016-03-23 19:13:54 +08:00
FeatureX87,
[X86] Add CMPXCHG8B feature flag. Set it for all CPUs except i386/i486 including 'generic'. Disable use of CMPXCHG8B when this flag isn't set. CMPXCHG8B was introduced on i586/pentium generation. If its not enabled, limit the atomic width to 32 bits so the AtomicExpandPass will expand to lib calls. Unclear if we should be using a different limit for other configs. The default is 1024 and experimentation shows that using an i256 atomic will cause a crash in SelectionDAG. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59576 llvm-svn: 356631
2019-03-21 07:35:49 +08:00
FeatureCMPXCHG8B,
[X86] Add FeatureCMOV explicitly to all CPUs that support it. Remove FeatureCMOV implication from Feature64Bit and FeatureSSE1 Summary: Previously most CPUs inherited cmov support through Feature64Bit(or FeatureCMPXCHG16HB implying Feature64Bit) or FeatureSSE1. This has the surprising side effect that -mattr=-cmov causes an assert to fire in 64-bit mode because it clears the Feature64Bit. Or in 32-bit mode, -mattr=-cmov disables any sse/avx features which seems surprising. This patch removes the implication and instead updates hasCMOV in X86Subtarget to check SSE1 or is64Bit in addition to the regular cmov flag. This should keep most things working the way they did before. I don't believe there is a way to specific "-cmov" directly from clang so this should only effect our lower level tools. This does stop -mattr=cx16(cmpxchg16b) from implying cmov is enabled via the 64bit flag as you can see from one of the changed tests. But that was a 32-bit test so I don't know why it enabled cx16 anyway. For the other test I had to add -sse to override the new sse check in hasCMOV. Reviewers: RKSimon, DavidKreitzer, spatel Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51228 llvm-svn: 340707
2018-08-27 02:29:33 +08:00
FeatureCMOV,
Move the MMX subtarget feature out of the SSE set of features and into its own variable. This is needed so that we can explicitly turn off MMX without turning off SSE and also so that we can diagnose feature set incompatibilities that involve MMX without SSE. Rationale: // sse3 __m128d test_mm_addsub_pd(__m128d A, __m128d B) { return _mm_addsub_pd(A, B); } // mmx void shift(__m64 a, __m64 b, int c) { _mm_slli_pi16(a, c); _mm_slli_pi32(a, c); _mm_slli_si64(a, c); _mm_srli_pi16(a, c); _mm_srli_pi32(a, c); _mm_srli_si64(a, c); _mm_srai_pi16(a, c); _mm_srai_pi32(a, c); } clang -msse3 -mno-mmx file.c -c For this code we should be able to explicitly turn off MMX without affecting the compilation of the SSE3 function and then diagnose and error on compiling the MMX function. This matches the existing gcc behavior and follows the spirit of the SSE/MMX separation in llvm where we can (and do) turn off MMX code generation except in the presence of intrinsics. Updated a couple of tests, but primarily tested with a couple of tests for turning on only mmx and only sse. This is paired with a patch to clang to take advantage of this behavior. llvm-svn: 249731
2015-10-09 04:10:06 +08:00
FeatureMMX,
FeatureSSE3,
[X86] Add fxsr feature flag for fxsave/fxrestore instructions. llvm-svn: 250497
2015-10-16 14:03:09 +08:00
FeatureFXSR,
[X86] Move HasNOPL to a subtarget feature bit. Plumb MCSubtargetInfo through the MCAsmBackend constructor After D41349, we can no get a MCSubtargetInfo into the MCAsmBackend constructor. This allows us to get NOPL from a subtarget feature rather than a CPU name blacklist. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41721 llvm-svn: 322227
2018-01-11 06:07:16 +08:00
FeatureNOPL,
[X86] Make Feature64Bit useful We now only add +64bit to the CPU string for "generic" CPU. All other CPU names are assumed to have the feature flag already set if they support 64-bit. I've remove the implies from CMPXCHG8 so that Feature64Bit only comes in via CPUs or user passing -mattr=+64bit. I've changed the assert to a report_fatal_error so it's not lost in Release builds. The test updates are to fix things that tripped the new error. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51231 llvm-svn: 341022
2018-08-30 14:01:05 +08:00
Feature64Bit,
[X86] Add support for -mvzeroupper and -mno-vzeroupper to match gcc -mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs where it normally runs. To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical behavior. Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
2019-11-05 02:20:00 +08:00
FeatureCMPXCHG16B,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
],
[
FeatureSlowUAMem16,
[X86] Add support for -mvzeroupper and -mno-vzeroupper to match gcc -mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs where it normally runs. To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical behavior. Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
2019-11-05 02:20:00 +08:00
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER
Move the MMX subtarget feature out of the SSE set of features and into its own variable. This is needed so that we can explicitly turn off MMX without turning off SSE and also so that we can diagnose feature set incompatibilities that involve MMX without SSE. Rationale: // sse3 __m128d test_mm_addsub_pd(__m128d A, __m128d B) { return _mm_addsub_pd(A, B); } // mmx void shift(__m64 a, __m64 b, int c) { _mm_slli_pi16(a, c); _mm_slli_pi32(a, c); _mm_slli_si64(a, c); _mm_srli_pi16(a, c); _mm_srli_pi32(a, c); _mm_srli_si64(a, c); _mm_srai_pi16(a, c); _mm_srai_pi32(a, c); } clang -msse3 -mno-mmx file.c -c For this code we should be able to explicitly turn off MMX without affecting the compilation of the SSE3 function and then diagnose and error on compiling the MMX function. This matches the existing gcc behavior and follows the spirit of the SSE/MMX separation in llvm where we can (and do) turn off MMX code generation except in the presence of intrinsics. Updated a couple of tests, but primarily tested with a couple of tests for turning on only mmx and only sse. This is paired with a patch to clang to take advantage of this behavior. llvm-svn: 249731
2015-10-09 04:10:06 +08:00
]>;
Enable SandyBridgeModel for all modern Intel P6 descendants. All Intel CPUs since Yonah look a lot alike, at least at the granularity of the scheduling models. We can add more accurate models for processors that aren't Sandy Bridge if required. Haswell will probably need its own. The Atom processor and anything based on NetBurst is completely different. So are the non-Intel chips. llvm-svn: 178080
2013-03-27 06:19:12 +08:00
// Intel Core 2 Solo/Duo.
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"core2", SandyBridgeModel, [
[X86] Introduction of FeatureX87. Add FeatureX87 in X86 backend to be able to define CPUs which doesn't have x87. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13979 llvm-svn: 264148
2016-03-23 19:13:54 +08:00
FeatureX87,
[X86] Add CMPXCHG8B feature flag. Set it for all CPUs except i386/i486 including 'generic'. Disable use of CMPXCHG8B when this flag isn't set. CMPXCHG8B was introduced on i586/pentium generation. If its not enabled, limit the atomic width to 32 bits so the AtomicExpandPass will expand to lib calls. Unclear if we should be using a different limit for other configs. The default is 1024 and experimentation shows that using an i256 atomic will cause a crash in SelectionDAG. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59576 llvm-svn: 356631
2019-03-21 07:35:49 +08:00
FeatureCMPXCHG8B,
[X86] Add FeatureCMOV explicitly to all CPUs that support it. Remove FeatureCMOV implication from Feature64Bit and FeatureSSE1 Summary: Previously most CPUs inherited cmov support through Feature64Bit(or FeatureCMPXCHG16HB implying Feature64Bit) or FeatureSSE1. This has the surprising side effect that -mattr=-cmov causes an assert to fire in 64-bit mode because it clears the Feature64Bit. Or in 32-bit mode, -mattr=-cmov disables any sse/avx features which seems surprising. This patch removes the implication and instead updates hasCMOV in X86Subtarget to check SSE1 or is64Bit in addition to the regular cmov flag. This should keep most things working the way they did before. I don't believe there is a way to specific "-cmov" directly from clang so this should only effect our lower level tools. This does stop -mattr=cx16(cmpxchg16b) from implying cmov is enabled via the 64bit flag as you can see from one of the changed tests. But that was a 32-bit test so I don't know why it enabled cx16 anyway. For the other test I had to add -sse to override the new sse check in hasCMOV. Reviewers: RKSimon, DavidKreitzer, spatel Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51228 llvm-svn: 340707
2018-08-27 02:29:33 +08:00
FeatureCMOV,
Move the MMX subtarget feature out of the SSE set of features and into its own variable. This is needed so that we can explicitly turn off MMX without turning off SSE and also so that we can diagnose feature set incompatibilities that involve MMX without SSE. Rationale: // sse3 __m128d test_mm_addsub_pd(__m128d A, __m128d B) { return _mm_addsub_pd(A, B); } // mmx void shift(__m64 a, __m64 b, int c) { _mm_slli_pi16(a, c); _mm_slli_pi32(a, c); _mm_slli_si64(a, c); _mm_srli_pi16(a, c); _mm_srli_pi32(a, c); _mm_srli_si64(a, c); _mm_srai_pi16(a, c); _mm_srai_pi32(a, c); } clang -msse3 -mno-mmx file.c -c For this code we should be able to explicitly turn off MMX without affecting the compilation of the SSE3 function and then diagnose and error on compiling the MMX function. This matches the existing gcc behavior and follows the spirit of the SSE/MMX separation in llvm where we can (and do) turn off MMX code generation except in the presence of intrinsics. Updated a couple of tests, but primarily tested with a couple of tests for turning on only mmx and only sse. This is paired with a patch to clang to take advantage of this behavior. llvm-svn: 249731
2015-10-09 04:10:06 +08:00
FeatureMMX,
FeatureSSSE3,
[X86] Add fxsr feature flag for fxsave/fxrestore instructions. llvm-svn: 250497
2015-10-16 14:03:09 +08:00
FeatureFXSR,
[X86] Move HasNOPL to a subtarget feature bit. Plumb MCSubtargetInfo through the MCAsmBackend constructor After D41349, we can no get a MCSubtargetInfo into the MCAsmBackend constructor. This allows us to get NOPL from a subtarget feature rather than a CPU name blacklist. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41721 llvm-svn: 322227
2018-01-11 06:07:16 +08:00
FeatureNOPL,
[X86] Make Feature64Bit useful We now only add +64bit to the CPU string for "generic" CPU. All other CPU names are assumed to have the feature flag already set if they support 64-bit. I've remove the implies from CMPXCHG8 so that Feature64Bit only comes in via CPUs or user passing -mattr=+64bit. I've changed the assert to a report_fatal_error so it's not lost in Release builds. The test updates are to fix things that tripped the new error. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51231 llvm-svn: 341022
2018-08-30 14:01:05 +08:00
Feature64Bit,
Move the MMX subtarget feature out of the SSE set of features and into its own variable. This is needed so that we can explicitly turn off MMX without turning off SSE and also so that we can diagnose feature set incompatibilities that involve MMX without SSE. Rationale: // sse3 __m128d test_mm_addsub_pd(__m128d A, __m128d B) { return _mm_addsub_pd(A, B); } // mmx void shift(__m64 a, __m64 b, int c) { _mm_slli_pi16(a, c); _mm_slli_pi32(a, c); _mm_slli_si64(a, c); _mm_srli_pi16(a, c); _mm_srli_pi32(a, c); _mm_srli_si64(a, c); _mm_srai_pi16(a, c); _mm_srai_pi32(a, c); } clang -msse3 -mno-mmx file.c -c For this code we should be able to explicitly turn off MMX without affecting the compilation of the SSE3 function and then diagnose and error on compiling the MMX function. This matches the existing gcc behavior and follows the spirit of the SSE/MMX separation in llvm where we can (and do) turn off MMX code generation except in the presence of intrinsics. Updated a couple of tests, but primarily tested with a couple of tests for turning on only mmx and only sse. This is paired with a patch to clang to take advantage of this behavior. llvm-svn: 249731
2015-10-09 04:10:06 +08:00
FeatureCMPXCHG16B,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
FeatureLAHFSAHF
],
[
[X86] Add support for -mvzeroupper and -mno-vzeroupper to match gcc -mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs where it normally runs. To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical behavior. Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
2019-11-05 02:20:00 +08:00
FeatureMacroFusion,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
FeatureSlowUAMem16,
[X86] Add support for -mvzeroupper and -mno-vzeroupper to match gcc -mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs where it normally runs. To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical behavior. Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
2019-11-05 02:20:00 +08:00
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER
Move the MMX subtarget feature out of the SSE set of features and into its own variable. This is needed so that we can explicitly turn off MMX without turning off SSE and also so that we can diagnose feature set incompatibilities that involve MMX without SSE. Rationale: // sse3 __m128d test_mm_addsub_pd(__m128d A, __m128d B) { return _mm_addsub_pd(A, B); } // mmx void shift(__m64 a, __m64 b, int c) { _mm_slli_pi16(a, c); _mm_slli_pi32(a, c); _mm_slli_si64(a, c); _mm_srli_pi16(a, c); _mm_srli_pi32(a, c); _mm_srli_si64(a, c); _mm_srai_pi16(a, c); _mm_srai_pi32(a, c); } clang -msse3 -mno-mmx file.c -c For this code we should be able to explicitly turn off MMX without affecting the compilation of the SSE3 function and then diagnose and error on compiling the MMX function. This matches the existing gcc behavior and follows the spirit of the SSE/MMX separation in llvm where we can (and do) turn off MMX code generation except in the presence of intrinsics. Updated a couple of tests, but primarily tested with a couple of tests for turning on only mmx and only sse. This is paired with a patch to clang to take advantage of this behavior. llvm-svn: 249731
2015-10-09 04:10:06 +08:00
]>;
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"penryn", SandyBridgeModel, [
[X86] Introduction of FeatureX87. Add FeatureX87 in X86 backend to be able to define CPUs which doesn't have x87. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13979 llvm-svn: 264148
2016-03-23 19:13:54 +08:00
FeatureX87,
[X86] Add CMPXCHG8B feature flag. Set it for all CPUs except i386/i486 including 'generic'. Disable use of CMPXCHG8B when this flag isn't set. CMPXCHG8B was introduced on i586/pentium generation. If its not enabled, limit the atomic width to 32 bits so the AtomicExpandPass will expand to lib calls. Unclear if we should be using a different limit for other configs. The default is 1024 and experimentation shows that using an i256 atomic will cause a crash in SelectionDAG. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59576 llvm-svn: 356631
2019-03-21 07:35:49 +08:00
FeatureCMPXCHG8B,
[X86] Add FeatureCMOV explicitly to all CPUs that support it. Remove FeatureCMOV implication from Feature64Bit and FeatureSSE1 Summary: Previously most CPUs inherited cmov support through Feature64Bit(or FeatureCMPXCHG16HB implying Feature64Bit) or FeatureSSE1. This has the surprising side effect that -mattr=-cmov causes an assert to fire in 64-bit mode because it clears the Feature64Bit. Or in 32-bit mode, -mattr=-cmov disables any sse/avx features which seems surprising. This patch removes the implication and instead updates hasCMOV in X86Subtarget to check SSE1 or is64Bit in addition to the regular cmov flag. This should keep most things working the way they did before. I don't believe there is a way to specific "-cmov" directly from clang so this should only effect our lower level tools. This does stop -mattr=cx16(cmpxchg16b) from implying cmov is enabled via the 64bit flag as you can see from one of the changed tests. But that was a 32-bit test so I don't know why it enabled cx16 anyway. For the other test I had to add -sse to override the new sse check in hasCMOV. Reviewers: RKSimon, DavidKreitzer, spatel Reviewed By: RKSimon Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51228 llvm-svn: 340707
2018-08-27 02:29:33 +08:00
FeatureCMOV,
Move the MMX subtarget feature out of the SSE set of features and into its own variable. This is needed so that we can explicitly turn off MMX without turning off SSE and also so that we can diagnose feature set incompatibilities that involve MMX without SSE. Rationale: // sse3 __m128d test_mm_addsub_pd(__m128d A, __m128d B) { return _mm_addsub_pd(A, B); } // mmx void shift(__m64 a, __m64 b, int c) { _mm_slli_pi16(a, c); _mm_slli_pi32(a, c); _mm_slli_si64(a, c); _mm_srli_pi16(a, c); _mm_srli_pi32(a, c); _mm_srli_si64(a, c); _mm_srai_pi16(a, c); _mm_srai_pi32(a, c); } clang -msse3 -mno-mmx file.c -c For this code we should be able to explicitly turn off MMX without affecting the compilation of the SSE3 function and then diagnose and error on compiling the MMX function. This matches the existing gcc behavior and follows the spirit of the SSE/MMX separation in llvm where we can (and do) turn off MMX code generation except in the presence of intrinsics. Updated a couple of tests, but primarily tested with a couple of tests for turning on only mmx and only sse. This is paired with a patch to clang to take advantage of this behavior. llvm-svn: 249731
2015-10-09 04:10:06 +08:00
FeatureMMX,
FeatureSSE41,
[X86] Add fxsr feature flag for fxsave/fxrestore instructions. llvm-svn: 250497
2015-10-16 14:03:09 +08:00
FeatureFXSR,
[X86] Move HasNOPL to a subtarget feature bit. Plumb MCSubtargetInfo through the MCAsmBackend constructor After D41349, we can no get a MCSubtargetInfo into the MCAsmBackend constructor. This allows us to get NOPL from a subtarget feature rather than a CPU name blacklist. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41721 llvm-svn: 322227
2018-01-11 06:07:16 +08:00
FeatureNOPL,
[X86] Make Feature64Bit useful We now only add +64bit to the CPU string for "generic" CPU. All other CPU names are assumed to have the feature flag already set if they support 64-bit. I've remove the implies from CMPXCHG8 so that Feature64Bit only comes in via CPUs or user passing -mattr=+64bit. I've changed the assert to a report_fatal_error so it's not lost in Release builds. The test updates are to fix things that tripped the new error. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51231 llvm-svn: 341022
2018-08-30 14:01:05 +08:00
Feature64Bit,
Move the MMX subtarget feature out of the SSE set of features and into its own variable. This is needed so that we can explicitly turn off MMX without turning off SSE and also so that we can diagnose feature set incompatibilities that involve MMX without SSE. Rationale: // sse3 __m128d test_mm_addsub_pd(__m128d A, __m128d B) { return _mm_addsub_pd(A, B); } // mmx void shift(__m64 a, __m64 b, int c) { _mm_slli_pi16(a, c); _mm_slli_pi32(a, c); _mm_slli_si64(a, c); _mm_srli_pi16(a, c); _mm_srli_pi32(a, c); _mm_srli_si64(a, c); _mm_srai_pi16(a, c); _mm_srai_pi32(a, c); } clang -msse3 -mno-mmx file.c -c For this code we should be able to explicitly turn off MMX without affecting the compilation of the SSE3 function and then diagnose and error on compiling the MMX function. This matches the existing gcc behavior and follows the spirit of the SSE/MMX separation in llvm where we can (and do) turn off MMX code generation except in the presence of intrinsics. Updated a couple of tests, but primarily tested with a couple of tests for turning on only mmx and only sse. This is paired with a patch to clang to take advantage of this behavior. llvm-svn: 249731
2015-10-09 04:10:06 +08:00
FeatureCMPXCHG16B,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
FeatureLAHFSAHF
],
[
[X86] Add support for -mvzeroupper and -mno-vzeroupper to match gcc -mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs where it normally runs. To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical behavior. Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
2019-11-05 02:20:00 +08:00
FeatureMacroFusion,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
FeatureSlowUAMem16,
[X86] Add support for -mvzeroupper and -mno-vzeroupper to match gcc -mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs where it normally runs. To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical behavior. Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
2019-11-05 02:20:00 +08:00
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER
Move the MMX subtarget feature out of the SSE set of features and into its own variable. This is needed so that we can explicitly turn off MMX without turning off SSE and also so that we can diagnose feature set incompatibilities that involve MMX without SSE. Rationale: // sse3 __m128d test_mm_addsub_pd(__m128d A, __m128d B) { return _mm_addsub_pd(A, B); } // mmx void shift(__m64 a, __m64 b, int c) { _mm_slli_pi16(a, c); _mm_slli_pi32(a, c); _mm_slli_si64(a, c); _mm_srli_pi16(a, c); _mm_srli_pi32(a, c); _mm_srli_si64(a, c); _mm_srai_pi16(a, c); _mm_srai_pi32(a, c); } clang -msse3 -mno-mmx file.c -c For this code we should be able to explicitly turn off MMX without affecting the compilation of the SSE3 function and then diagnose and error on compiling the MMX function. This matches the existing gcc behavior and follows the spirit of the SSE/MMX separation in llvm where we can (and do) turn off MMX code generation except in the presence of intrinsics. Updated a couple of tests, but primarily tested with a couple of tests for turning on only mmx and only sse. This is paired with a patch to clang to take advantage of this behavior. llvm-svn: 249731
2015-10-09 04:10:06 +08:00
]>;
Enable SandyBridgeModel for all modern Intel P6 descendants. All Intel CPUs since Yonah look a lot alike, at least at the granularity of the scheduling models. We can add more accurate models for processors that aren't Sandy Bridge if required. Haswell will probably need its own. The Atom processor and anything based on NetBurst is completely different. So are the non-Intel chips. llvm-svn: 178080
2013-03-27 06:19:12 +08:00
[x86] Bring some sanity to the x86 CPU processor definitions. Notably, this adds simple micro-architecture names for the Intel CPU variants, and defines the old 'core'-based names as aliases. GCC has started to simplify their documented interface to use these names as well, so it seems like we can start to converge on a consistent pattern. I'd appreciate Intel double checking the entries that aren't yet documented widely, especially Atom (Bonnell and Silvermont), Knights Landing, and Skylake. But this change shouldn't break any existing users. Also, ran clang-format to re-format this code and it actually worked (modulo a tiny bug) so hopefully we can start to stop thinking about formatting this stuff. llvm-svn: 223769
2014-12-09 18:58:36 +08:00
// Atom CPUs.
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
foreach P = ["bonnell", "atom"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<P, AtomModel, ProcessorFeatures.AtomFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.AtomTuning>;
[X86] Introduce archs: goldmont-plus & tremont Using Goldmont's cost tables for these two upcoming atom archs. Reviewers: craig.topper Reviewed By: craig.topper Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45612 llvm-svn: 330109
2018-04-16 15:47:35 +08:00
}
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
foreach P = ["silvermont", "slm"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<P, SLMModel, ProcessorFeatures.SLMFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.SLMTuning>;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
}
[X86] ptwrite intrinsic Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon Reviewed By: craig.topper, RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46539 llvm-svn: 331961
2018-05-10 15:26:05 +08:00
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"goldmont", SLMModel, ProcessorFeatures.GLMFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.GLMTuning>;
def : ProcModel<"goldmont-plus", SLMModel, ProcessorFeatures.GLPFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.GLPTuning>;
def : ProcModel<"tremont", SLMModel, ProcessorFeatures.TRMFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.TRMTuning>;
[X86] Introduce archs: goldmont-plus & tremont Using Goldmont's cost tables for these two upcoming atom archs. Reviewers: craig.topper Reviewed By: craig.topper Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45612 llvm-svn: 330109
2018-04-16 15:47:35 +08:00
Separate out the AES-NI instructions from the SSE4.2 instructions. Add a new subtarget option for AES and check for the support. Add "westmere" line of processors and add AES-NI support to the core i7. Add a couple of TODOs for information I couldn't verify. llvm-svn: 100231
2010-04-03 05:54:27 +08:00
// "Arrandale" along with corei3 and corei5
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
foreach P = ["nehalem", "corei7"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<P, SandyBridgeModel, ProcessorFeatures.NHMFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.NHMTuning>;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
}
Enable SandyBridgeModel for all modern Intel P6 descendants. All Intel CPUs since Yonah look a lot alike, at least at the granularity of the scheduling models. We can add more accurate models for processors that aren't Sandy Bridge if required. Haswell will probably need its own. The Atom processor and anything based on NetBurst is completely different. So are the non-Intel chips. llvm-svn: 178080
2013-03-27 06:19:12 +08:00
Separate out the AES-NI instructions from the SSE4.2 instructions. Add a new subtarget option for AES and check for the support. Add "westmere" line of processors and add AES-NI support to the core i7. Add a couple of TODOs for information I couldn't verify. llvm-svn: 100231
2010-04-03 05:54:27 +08:00
// Westmere is the corei3/i5/i7 path from nehalem to sandybridge
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"westmere", SandyBridgeModel, ProcessorFeatures.WSMFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.WSMTuning>;
[x86] Bring some sanity to the x86 CPU processor definitions. Notably, this adds simple micro-architecture names for the Intel CPU variants, and defines the old 'core'-based names as aliases. GCC has started to simplify their documented interface to use these names as well, so it seems like we can start to converge on a consistent pattern. I'd appreciate Intel double checking the entries that aren't yet documented widely, especially Atom (Bonnell and Silvermont), Knights Landing, and Skylake. But this change shouldn't break any existing users. Also, ran clang-format to re-format this code and it actually worked (modulo a tiny bug) so hopefully we can start to stop thinking about formatting this stuff. llvm-svn: 223769
2014-12-09 18:58:36 +08:00
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
foreach P = ["sandybridge", "corei7-avx"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<P, SandyBridgeModel, ProcessorFeatures.SNBFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.SNBTuning>;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
}
I'm starting to commit KNL backend. I'll push patches one-by-one. This patch includes support for the extended register set XMM16-31, YMM16-31, ZMM0-31. The full ISA you can see here: http://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-isa-extensions llvm-svn: 187030
2013-07-24 19:02:47 +08:00
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
foreach P = ["ivybridge", "core-avx-i"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<P, SandyBridgeModel, ProcessorFeatures.IVBFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.IVBTuning>;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
}
[x86] Bring some sanity to the x86 CPU processor definitions. Notably, this adds simple micro-architecture names for the Intel CPU variants, and defines the old 'core'-based names as aliases. GCC has started to simplify their documented interface to use these names as well, so it seems like we can start to converge on a consistent pattern. I'd appreciate Intel double checking the entries that aren't yet documented widely, especially Atom (Bonnell and Silvermont), Knights Landing, and Skylake. But this change shouldn't break any existing users. Also, ran clang-format to re-format this code and it actually worked (modulo a tiny bug) so hopefully we can start to stop thinking about formatting this stuff. llvm-svn: 223769
2014-12-09 18:58:36 +08:00
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
foreach P = ["haswell", "core-avx2"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<P, HaswellModel, ProcessorFeatures.HSWFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.HSWTuning>;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
}
Added Skylake client to X86 targets and features Changes in X86.td: I set features of Intel processors in incremental form: IVB = SNB + X HSW = IVB + X .. I added Skylake client processor and defined it's features FeatureADX was missing on KNL Added some new features to appropriate processors SMAP, IFMA, PREFETCHWT1, VMFUNC and others Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16357 llvm-svn: 258659
2016-01-24 18:41:28 +08:00
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"broadwell", BroadwellModel, ProcessorFeatures.BDWFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.BDWTuning>;
[X86] Add cascade lake arch in X86 target. This is skylake-avx512 with the addition of avx512vnni ISA. Patch by Jianping Chen Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54785 llvm-svn: 347681
2018-11-28 02:05:00 +08:00
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"skylake", SkylakeClientModel, ProcessorFeatures.SKLFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.SKLTuning>;
Added Skylake client to X86 targets and features Changes in X86.td: I set features of Intel processors in incremental form: IVB = SNB + X HSW = IVB + X .. I added Skylake client processor and defined it's features FeatureADX was missing on KNL Added some new features to appropriate processors SMAP, IFMA, PREFETCHWT1, VMFUNC and others Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16357 llvm-svn: 258659
2016-01-24 18:41:28 +08:00
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
// FIXME: define KNL scheduler model
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"knl", HaswellModel, ProcessorFeatures.KNLFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.KNLTuning>;
def : ProcModel<"knm", HaswellModel, ProcessorFeatures.KNMFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.KNLTuning>;
[X86] Add skeleton support for icelake CPU. There are several patches out for review right now to implement Icelake features. This adds a CPU to collect them under. llvm-svn: 318612
2017-11-19 09:12:00 +08:00
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
foreach P = ["skylake-avx512", "skx"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<P, SkylakeServerModel, ProcessorFeatures.SKXFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.SKXTuning>;
[X86] Remove ProcModel and ProcFeatures tablegen classes. Move all feature lists into a ProcessorFeatures class. ProcFeatures was a class that just concatenated two feature lists together and gave it a name. We used it to inherit features between CPUs. ProcModel took a two CPU feature lists and concatenated them before deferring to ProcessorModel. This was to allow inherited features and specific features to be passed to each CPU. Both of these allowed for only very rigid CPU inheritance rules. With this patch we now store all of the lists we were using for inheritance in one object and do any list oncatenation we want there. Then we just pass whatever list we want from this class into the ProcessorModel class for each CPU. Hopefully this gives us more flexibility to build up feature lists in whatever ways we think make sense. Perhaps untangling ISA flags and tuning flags. I've only touched the CPUs that were directly affected by the removal of the ProcModel and ProcFeatures classes. We should move more of the feature lists into ProcessorFeatures. llvm-svn: 355872
2019-03-12 06:29:00 +08:00
}
[X86] Split up -march=icelake to -client & -server Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, echristo Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45055 llvm-svn: 329742
2018-04-11 02:59:13 +08:00
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"cascadelake", SkylakeServerModel,
ProcessorFeatures.CLXFeatures, ProcessorFeatures.CLXTuning>;
def : ProcModel<"cooperlake", SkylakeServerModel,
ProcessorFeatures.CPXFeatures, ProcessorFeatures.CPXTuning>;
def : ProcModel<"cannonlake", SkylakeServerModel,
ProcessorFeatures.CNLFeatures, ProcessorFeatures.CNLTuning>;
def : ProcModel<"icelake-client", SkylakeServerModel,
ProcessorFeatures.ICLFeatures, ProcessorFeatures.ICLTuning>;
def : ProcModel<"icelake-server", SkylakeServerModel,
ProcessorFeatures.ICXFeatures, ProcessorFeatures.ICXTuning>;
def : ProcModel<"tigerlake", SkylakeServerModel,
ProcessorFeatures.TGLFeatures, ProcessorFeatures.TGLTuning>;
[X86] Support -march=sapphirerapids Support -march=sapphirerapids for x86. Compare with Icelake Server, it includes 14 more new features. They are amxtile, amxint8, amxbf16, avx512bf16, avx512vp2intersect, cldemote, enqcmd, movdir64b, movdiri, ptwrite, serialize, shstk, tsxldtrk, waitpkg. Reviewed By: craig.topper Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86503
2020-08-25 12:27:02 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"sapphirerapids", SkylakeServerModel,
ProcessorFeatures.SPRFeatures, ProcessorFeatures.SPRTuning>;
[X86] Add a stub for Intel's alderlake. No scheduling, no autodetection.
2020-10-25 00:00:33 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"alderlake", SkylakeClientModel,
ProcessorFeatures.ADLFeatures, ProcessorFeatures.ADLTuning>;
[X86] Add skeleton support for icelake CPU. There are several patches out for review right now to implement Icelake features. This adds a CPU to collect them under. llvm-svn: 318612
2017-11-19 09:12:00 +08:00
[x86] Bring some sanity to the x86 CPU processor definitions. Notably, this adds simple micro-architecture names for the Intel CPU variants, and defines the old 'core'-based names as aliases. GCC has started to simplify their documented interface to use these names as well, so it seems like we can start to converge on a consistent pattern. I'd appreciate Intel double checking the entries that aren't yet documented widely, especially Atom (Bonnell and Silvermont), Knights Landing, and Skylake. But this change shouldn't break any existing users. Also, ran clang-format to re-format this code and it actually worked (modulo a tiny bug) so hopefully we can start to stop thinking about formatting this stuff. llvm-svn: 223769
2014-12-09 18:58:36 +08:00
// AMD CPUs.
[SKX] Enabling SKX target and AVX512BW, AVX512DQ, AVX512VL features. Enabling HasAVX512{DQ,BW,VL} predicates. Adding VK2, VK4, VK32, VK64 masked register classes. Adding new types (v64i8, v32i16) to VR512. Extending calling conventions for new types (v64i8, v32i16) Patch by Zinovy Nis <zinovy.y.nis@intel.com> Reviewed by Elena Demikhovsky <elena.demikhovsky@intel.com> llvm-svn: 213545
2014-07-21 22:54:21 +08:00
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<"k6", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureMMX],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"k6-2", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, Feature3DNow],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"k6-3", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, Feature3DNow],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
foreach P = ["athlon", "athlon-tbird"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<P, [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureCMOV, Feature3DNowA,
FeatureNOPL],
[FeatureSlowSHLD, FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
}
foreach P = ["athlon-4", "athlon-xp", "athlon-mp"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<P, [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureCMOV,
FeatureSSE1, Feature3DNowA, FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL],
[FeatureSlowSHLD, FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
}
foreach P = ["k8", "opteron", "athlon64", "athlon-fx"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<P, [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureSSE2, Feature3DNowA,
FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL, Feature64Bit, FeatureCMOV],
[FeatureFastScalarShiftMasks, FeatureSlowSHLD, FeatureSlowUAMem16,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
}
foreach P = ["k8-sse3", "opteron-sse3", "athlon64-sse3"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<P, [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureSSE3, Feature3DNowA,
FeatureFXSR, FeatureNOPL, FeatureCMPXCHG16B, FeatureCMOV,
Feature64Bit],
[FeatureFastScalarShiftMasks, FeatureSlowSHLD, FeatureSlowUAMem16,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
}
foreach P = ["amdfam10", "barcelona"] in {
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<P, ProcessorFeatures.BarcelonaFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.BarcelonaTuning>;
[X86] Use foreach in X86.td to combine some of the CPU names that are obviously aliases. NFC llvm-svn: 317134
2017-11-02 06:15:49 +08:00
}
[x86] invert logic for attribute 'FeatureFastUAMem' This is a 'no functional change intended' patch. It removes one FIXME, but adds several more. Motivation: the FeatureFastUAMem attribute may be too general. It is used to determine if any sized misaligned memory access under 32-bytes is 'fast'. From the added FIXME comments, however, you can see that we're not consistent about this. Changing the name of the attribute makes it clearer to see the logic holes. Changing this to a 'slow' attribute also means we don't have to add an explicit 'fast' attribute to new chips; fast unaligned accesses have been standard for several generations of CPUs now. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12154 llvm-svn: 245729
2015-08-22 04:17:26 +08:00
Add definitions for AMD's bobcat (aka btver1) llvm-svn: 147846
2012-01-10 19:50:02 +08:00
// Bobcat
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<"btver1", ProcessorFeatures.BtVer1Features,
ProcessorFeatures.BtVer1Tuning>;
X86: Add target description for btver2; make autodetection logic aware of AVX. llvm-svn: 181005
2013-05-03 18:20:08 +08:00
// Jaguar
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"btver2", BtVer2Model, ProcessorFeatures.BtVer2Features,
ProcessorFeatures.BtVer2Tuning>;
Enable FeatureFastUAMem for btver2 Allow unaligned 16-byte memop codegen for btver2. No functional changes for any other subtargets. Replace the existing supposed small memcpy test with an actual test of a small memcpy. The previous test wasn't using FileCheck either. This patch should allow us to close PR21541 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21541 ). Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6360 llvm-svn: 222925
2014-11-29 02:40:18 +08:00
Add definitions for AMD's bobcat (aka btver1) llvm-svn: 147846
2012-01-10 19:50:02 +08:00
// Bulldozer
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"bdver1", BdVer2Model, ProcessorFeatures.BdVer1Features,
ProcessorFeatures.BdVer1Tuning>;
X86: Add target description for btver2; make autodetection logic aware of AVX. llvm-svn: 181005
2013-05-03 18:20:08 +08:00
// Piledriver
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"bdver2", BdVer2Model, ProcessorFeatures.BdVer2Features,
ProcessorFeatures.BdVer2Tuning>;
X86: Add a description for AMD bdver3 aka Steamroller. This is just bdver2 + FSGSBase. llvm-svn: 193984
2013-11-04 18:29:20 +08:00
// Steamroller
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<"bdver3", ProcessorFeatures.BdVer3Features,
ProcessorFeatures.BdVer3Tuning>;
Add a description for AMD's bdver4 (aka Excavator). This is just bdver3 + AVX2 + BMI2. llvm-svn: 207847
2014-05-02 23:47:07 +08:00
// Excavator
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<"bdver4", ProcessorFeatures.BdVer4Features,
ProcessorFeatures.BdVer4Tuning>;
def : ProcModel<"znver1", Znver1Model, ProcessorFeatures.ZNFeatures,
ProcessorFeatures.ZNTuning>;
def : ProcModel<"znver2", Znver2Model, ProcessorFeatures.ZN2Features,
ProcessorFeatures.ZN2Tuning>;
[X86] Add a stub for znver3 based on the little public information there is in AMD's manuals No scheduling, no autodetection. Just enough so -march=znver3 works.
2020-10-25 00:00:20 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"znver3", Znver2Model, ProcessorFeatures.ZN3Features,
ProcessorFeatures.ZN3Tuning>;
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
def : Proc<"geode", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, Feature3DNowA],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"winchip-c6", [FeatureX87, FeatureMMX],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"winchip2", [FeatureX87, Feature3DNow],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"c3", [FeatureX87, Feature3DNow],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
def : Proc<"c3-2", [FeatureX87, FeatureCMPXCHG8B, FeatureMMX,
FeatureSSE1, FeatureFXSR, FeatureCMOV],
[FeatureSlowUAMem16, FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER]>;
Still need to support -mcpu=<> or cross compilation will fail. Doh. llvm-svn: 30764
2006-10-06 17:17:41 +08:00
[x86] Make the 'x86-64' cpu, what I see as and many use as the generic default architecture for reasonable modern x86 processors, actually be modern. This processor model should essentially be "tuned" for modern x86 chips as much as possible without undue penalties on any specific architecture. Previously we weren't even using the nice scheduling models. There are a few other tweaks needed here, but this change at least I have benchmarked across a decent swatch of chips (intel's clovertown, westmere, and sandybridge; amd's istanbul) and seen no significant regressions. If anyone has suggested ways to test this, just let me know. Somewhat alarmingly, no existing tests failed. llvm-svn: 208230
2014-05-08 01:37:03 +08:00
// We also provide a generic 64-bit specific x86 processor model which tries to
// be good for modern chips without enabling instruction set encodings past the
// basic SSE2 and 64-bit ones. It disables slow things from any mainstream and
// modern 64-bit x86 chip, and enables features that are generally beneficial.
[X86] Clean up whitespace as well as minor coding style llvm-svn: 223339
2014-12-04 13:20:33 +08:00
//
[x86] Make the 'x86-64' cpu, what I see as and many use as the generic default architecture for reasonable modern x86 processors, actually be modern. This processor model should essentially be "tuned" for modern x86 chips as much as possible without undue penalties on any specific architecture. Previously we weren't even using the nice scheduling models. There are a few other tweaks needed here, but this change at least I have benchmarked across a decent swatch of chips (intel's clovertown, westmere, and sandybridge; amd's istanbul) and seen no significant regressions. If anyone has suggested ways to test this, just let me know. Somewhat alarmingly, no existing tests failed. llvm-svn: 208230
2014-05-08 01:37:03 +08:00
// We currently use the Sandy Bridge model as the default scheduling model as
// we use it across Nehalem, Westmere, Sandy Bridge, and Ivy Bridge which
// covers a huge swath of x86 processors. If there are specific scheduling
// knobs which need to be tuned differently for AMD chips, we might consider
// forming a common base for them.
[X86] Support -march=x86-64-v[234] PR47686. These micro-architecture levels are defined in the x86-64 psABI: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb7e9 GCC 11 will support these levels. Note, -mtune=x86-64-v[234] are invalid and __builtin_cpu_is cannot be used on them. Reviewed By: craig.topper, RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89197
2020-10-13 00:35:22 +08:00
def : ProcModel<"x86-64", SandyBridgeModel, ProcessorFeatures.X86_64V1Features,
[X86] Separate CPU Feature lists in X86.td between architecture features and tuning features After the recent change to the tuning settings for pentium4 to improve our default 32-bit behavior, I've decided to see about implementing -mtune support. This way we could have a default architecture CPU of "pentium4" or "x86-64" and a default tuning cpu of "generic". And we could change our "pentium4" tuning settings back to what they were before. As a step to supporting this, this patch separates all of the features lists for the CPUs into 2 lists. I'm using the Proc class and a new ProcModel class to concat the 2 lists before passing to the target independent ProcessorModel. Future work to truly support mtune would change ProcessorModel to take 2 lists separately. I've diffed the X86GenSubtargetInfo.inc file before and after this patch to ensure that the final feature list for the CPUs isn't changed. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84879
2020-07-31 08:05:06 +08:00
[
[x86] Teach the "generic" x86 CPU to avoid patterns that are slow on widely used processors. This occured to me when I saw that we were generating 'inc' and 'dec' when for Haswell and newer we shouldn't. However, there were a few "X is slow" things that we should probably just set. I've avoided any of the "X is fast" features because most of those would be pretty serious regressions on processors where X isn't actually fast. The slow things are likely to be negligible costs on processors where these aren't slow and a significant win when they are slow. In retrospect this seems somewhat obvious. Not sure why we didn't do this a long time ago. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36947 llvm-svn: 311318
2017-08-21 16:45:22 +08:00
FeatureSlow3OpsLEA,
[x86] Enable bypassing 64-bit division on generic x86-64 This is currently enabled for Intel big cores from Sandy Bridge onward, as well as Atom, Silvermont, and KNL, due to 64-bit division being so slow on these cores. AMD cores can do this in hardware (use 32-bit division based on input operand width), so it's not a win there. But since the majority of x86 CPUs benefit from this optimization, and since the potential upside is significantly greater than the downside, we should enable this for the generic x86-64 target. Patch By: @atdt Reviewed By: @craig.topper, @RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75567
2020-04-29 23:47:10 +08:00
FeatureSlowDivide64,
[X86] Provide a separate feature bit for macro fusion support instead of basing it on the AVX flag Summary: Currently we determine if macro fusion is supported based on the AVX flag as a proxy for the processor being Sandy Bridge". This is really strange as now AMD supports AVX. It also means if user explicitly disables AVX we disable macro fusion. This patch adds an explicit macro fusion feature. I've also enabled for the generic 64-bit CPU (which doesn't have AVX) This is probably another candidate for being in the MI layer, but for now I at least wanted to correct the overloading of the AVX feature. Reviewers: spatel, chandlerc, RKSimon, zvi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37280 llvm-svn: 312097
2017-08-30 12:34:48 +08:00
FeatureSlowIncDec,
[X86] Add support for -mvzeroupper and -mno-vzeroupper to match gcc -mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs where it normally runs. To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical behavior. Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
2019-11-05 02:20:00 +08:00
FeatureMacroFusion,
FeatureInsertVZEROUPPER
[x86] Teach the "generic" x86 CPU to avoid patterns that are slow on widely used processors. This occured to me when I saw that we were generating 'inc' and 'dec' when for Haswell and newer we shouldn't. However, there were a few "X is slow" things that we should probably just set. I've avoided any of the "X is fast" features because most of those would be pretty serious regressions on processors where X isn't actually fast. The slow things are likely to be negligible costs on processors where these aren't slow and a significant win when they are slow. In retrospect this seems somewhat obvious. Not sure why we didn't do this a long time ago. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36947 llvm-svn: 311318
2017-08-21 16:45:22 +08:00
]>;
[x86] Make the 'x86-64' cpu, what I see as and many use as the generic default architecture for reasonable modern x86 processors, actually be modern. This processor model should essentially be "tuned" for modern x86 chips as much as possible without undue penalties on any specific architecture. Previously we weren't even using the nice scheduling models. There are a few other tweaks needed here, but this change at least I have benchmarked across a decent swatch of chips (intel's clovertown, westmere, and sandybridge; amd's istanbul) and seen no significant regressions. If anyone has suggested ways to test this, just let me know. Somewhat alarmingly, no existing tests failed. llvm-svn: 208230
2014-05-08 01:37:03 +08:00
[X86] Support -march=x86-64-v[234] PR47686. These micro-architecture levels are defined in the x86-64 psABI: https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/commit/77566eb03bc6a326811cb7e9 GCC 11 will support these levels. Note, -mtune=x86-64-v[234] are invalid and __builtin_cpu_is cannot be used on them. Reviewed By: craig.topper, RKSimon Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89197
2020-10-13 00:35:22 +08:00
// x86-64 micro-architecture levels.
def : ProcModel<"x86-64-v2", SandyBridgeModel, ProcessorFeatures.X86_64V2Features,
ProcessorFeatures.SNBTuning>;
// Close to Haswell.
def : ProcModel<"x86-64-v3", HaswellModel, ProcessorFeatures.X86_64V3Features,
ProcessorFeatures.HSWTuning>;
// Close to the AVX-512 level implemented by Xeon Scalable Processors.
def : ProcModel<"x86-64-v4", HaswellModel, ProcessorFeatures.X86_64V4Features,
ProcessorFeatures.SKXTuning>;
Add a description of the X86-64 calling convention and the return conventions. This doesn't do anything yet, but may in the future. llvm-svn: 34636
2007-02-27 02:17:14 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Calling Conventions
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
include "X86CallingConv.td"
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Clean up comments. llvm-svn: 117785
2010-10-30 21:48:28 +08:00
// Assembly Parser
Add a description of the X86-64 calling convention and the return conventions. This doesn't do anything yet, but may in the future. llvm-svn: 34636
2007-02-27 02:17:14 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Split AsmParser into two components - AsmParser and AsmParserVariant AsmParser holds info specific to target parser. AsmParserVariant holds info specific to asm variants supported by the target. llvm-svn: 147787
2012-01-10 03:13:28 +08:00
def ATTAsmParserVariant : AsmParserVariant {
Match X86 register names to number. llvm-svn: 77404
2009-07-29 08:02:19 +08:00
int Variant = 0;
llvm-mc/AsmParser: Allow target to specific a comment delimiter, which will be used to strip hard coded comments out of .td assembly strings. llvm-svn: 78716
2009-08-12 04:59:47 +08:00
[asm parser] Add support for predicating MnemonicAlias based on the assembler variant/dialect. Addresses a FIXME in the emitMnemonicAliases function. Use and test case to come shortly. rdar://13688439 and part of PR13340. llvm-svn: 179804
2013-04-19 06:35:36 +08:00
// Variant name.
string Name = "att";
llvm-mc/AsmParser: Allow target to specific a comment delimiter, which will be used to strip hard coded comments out of .td assembly strings. llvm-svn: 78716
2009-08-12 04:59:47 +08:00
// Discard comments in assembly strings.
string CommentDelimiter = "#";
// Recognize hard coded registers.
string RegisterPrefix = "%";
Match X86 register names to number. llvm-svn: 77404
2009-07-29 08:02:19 +08:00
}
Add definition for intel asm variant. Right now, this just adds additional entries in match table. The parser does not use them yet. llvm-svn: 147859
2012-01-11 01:51:54 +08:00
def IntelAsmParserVariant : AsmParserVariant {
int Variant = 1;
[asm parser] Add support for predicating MnemonicAlias based on the assembler variant/dialect. Addresses a FIXME in the emitMnemonicAliases function. Use and test case to come shortly. rdar://13688439 and part of PR13340. llvm-svn: 179804
2013-04-19 06:35:36 +08:00
// Variant name.
string Name = "intel";
Add definition for intel asm variant. Right now, this just adds additional entries in match table. The parser does not use them yet. llvm-svn: 147859
2012-01-11 01:51:54 +08:00
// Discard comments in assembly strings.
string CommentDelimiter = ";";
// Recognize hard coded registers.
string RegisterPrefix = "";
}
Clean up comments. llvm-svn: 117785
2010-10-30 21:48:28 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Assembly Printers
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Add support for the -x86-asm-syntax flag, which can be used to choose between Intel and AT&T style assembly language. The ultimate goal of this is to eliminate the GasBugWorkaroundEmitter class, but for now AT&T style emission is not fully operational. llvm-svn: 16639
2004-10-04 04:36:57 +08:00
// The X86 target supports two different syntaxes for emitting machine code.
// This is controlled by the -x86-asm-syntax={att|intel}
def ATTAsmWriter : AsmWriter {
split MCInst printing out of the X86ATTInstPrinter class into its own X86ATTInstPrinter class. The inst printer now has just one dependence on the code generator (TRI). llvm-svn: 81703
2009-09-14 03:30:11 +08:00
string AsmWriterClassName = "ATTInstPrinter";
Add support for the -x86-asm-syntax flag, which can be used to choose between Intel and AT&T style assembly language. The ultimate goal of this is to eliminate the GasBugWorkaroundEmitter class, but for now AT&T style emission is not fully operational. llvm-svn: 16639
2004-10-04 04:36:57 +08:00
int Variant = 0;
}
def IntelAsmWriter : AsmWriter {
remove a temporary hack. llvm-svn: 82395
2009-09-20 15:47:59 +08:00
string AsmWriterClassName = "IntelInstPrinter";
Add support for the -x86-asm-syntax flag, which can be used to choose between Intel and AT&T style assembly language. The ultimate goal of this is to eliminate the GasBugWorkaroundEmitter class, but for now AT&T style emission is not fully operational. llvm-svn: 16639
2004-10-04 04:36:57 +08:00
int Variant = 1;
}
Add Target class for X86 target llvm-svn: 7523
2003-08-04 02:19:37 +08:00
def X86 : Target {
// Information about the instructions...
transition to using let instead of set llvm-svn: 7564
2003-08-04 12:59:56 +08:00
let InstructionSet = X86InstrInfo;
Add definition for intel asm variant. Right now, this just adds additional entries in match table. The parser does not use them yet. llvm-svn: 147859
2012-01-11 01:51:54 +08:00
let AssemblyParserVariants = [ATTAsmParserVariant, IntelAsmParserVariant];
Add support for the -x86-asm-syntax flag, which can be used to choose between Intel and AT&T style assembly language. The ultimate goal of this is to eliminate the GasBugWorkaroundEmitter class, but for now AT&T style emission is not fully operational. llvm-svn: 16639
2004-10-04 04:36:57 +08:00
let AssemblyWriters = [ATTAsmWriter, IntelAsmWriter];
[MachineOperand][Target] MachineOperand::isRenamable semantics changes Summary: Add a target option AllowRegisterRenaming that is used to opt in to post-register-allocation renaming of registers. This is set to 0 by default, which causes the hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq/hasExtraDstRegAllocReq fields of all opcodes to be set to 1, causing MachineOperand::isRenamable to always return false. Set the AllowRegisterRenaming flag to 1 for all in-tree targets that have lit tests that were effected by enabling COPY forwarding in MachineCopyPropagation (AArch64, AMDGPU, ARM, Hexagon, Mips, PowerPC, RISCV, Sparc, SystemZ and X86). Add some more comments describing the semantics of the MachineOperand::isRenamable function and how it is set and maintained. Change isRenamable to check the operand's opcode hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq/hasExtraDstRegAllocReq bit directly instead of relying on it being consistently reflected in the IsRenamable bit setting. Clear the IsRenamable bit when changing an operand's register value. Remove target code that was clearing the IsRenamable bit when changing registers/opcodes now that this is done conservatively by default. Change setting of hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq in AMDGPU target to be done in one place covering all opcodes that have constant pipe read limit restrictions. Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB Subscribers: aemerson, arsenm, jyknight, mcrosier, sdardis, nhaehnle, javed.absar, tpr, arichardson, kristof.beyls, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, jordy.potman.lists, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, escha, nemanjai, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43042 llvm-svn: 325931
2018-02-24 02:25:08 +08:00
let AllowRegisterRenaming = 1;
Add Target class for X86 target llvm-svn: 7523
2003-08-04 02:19:37 +08:00
}
[MC][TableGen] Add optional libpfm counter names for ProcResUnits. Summary: Subtargets can define the libpfm counter names that can be used to measure cycles and uops issued on ProcResUnits. This allows making llvm-exegesis available on more targets. Fixes PR36984. Reviewers: gchatelet, RKSimon, andreadb, craig.topper Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45360 llvm-svn: 329675
2018-04-10 16:16:37 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Pfm Counters
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
include "X86PfmCounters.td"