maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/Layout/ms-x86-basic-layout.cpp

876 lines
30 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

__declspec is not a core Clang language extension. Instead, require -fms-extensions or -fborland to enable the language extension. Note: __declspec is also temporarily enabled when compiling for a CUDA target because there are implementation details relying on __declspec(property) support currently. When those details change, __declspec should be disabled for CUDA targets. llvm-svn: 238238
2015-05-27 03:44:52 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fno-rtti -emit-llvm-only -triple i686-pc-win32 -fms-extensions -fdump-record-layouts -fsyntax-only %s 2>/dev/null \
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
// RUN: | FileCheck %s
__declspec is not a core Clang language extension. Instead, require -fms-extensions or -fborland to enable the language extension. Note: __declspec is also temporarily enabled when compiling for a CUDA target because there are implementation details relying on __declspec(property) support currently. When those details change, __declspec should be disabled for CUDA targets. llvm-svn: 238238
2015-05-27 03:44:52 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fno-rtti -emit-llvm-only -triple x86_64-pc-win32 -fms-extensions -fdump-record-layouts -fsyntax-only %s 2>/dev/null \
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix CHECK-X64
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
extern "C" int printf(const char *fmt, ...);
struct A4 {
int a;
A4() : a(0xf00000a4) {}
};
struct B4 {
int a;
B4() : a(0xf00000b4) {}
};
struct C4 {
int a;
C4() : a(0xf00000c4) {}
virtual void f() {printf("C4");}
};
struct A16 {
__declspec(align(16)) int a;
A16() : a(0xf0000a16) {}
};
struct C16 {
__declspec(align(16)) int a;
C16() : a(0xf0000c16) {}
virtual void f() {printf("C16");}
};
struct TestF0 : A4, virtual B4 {
int a;
TestF0() : a(0xf00000F0) {}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF0
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | (TestF0 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | struct B4 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=16, align=4
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=12, nvalign=4]
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF0
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | (TestF0 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | struct B4 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=32, align=8
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=24, nvalign=8]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestF1 : A4, virtual A16 {
int a;
TestF1() : a(0xf00000f1) {}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF1
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | (TestF1 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=32, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=12, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF1
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | (TestF1 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct A16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=48, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=24, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestF2 : A4, virtual C4 {
int a;
TestF2() : a(0xf00000f2) {}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF2
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | (TestF2 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | struct C4 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | (C4 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=20, align=4
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=12, nvalign=4]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF2
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | (TestF2 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | struct C4 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | (C4 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=40, align=8
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=24, nvalign=8]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestF3 : A4, virtual C16 {
int a;
TestF3() : a(0xf00000f3) {}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF3
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | (TestF3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=48, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=12, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF3
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | (TestF3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=64, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=24, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestF4 : TestF3, A4 {
int a;
TestF4() : a(0xf00000f4) {}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF4
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF3 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | (TestF3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=64, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF4
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF3 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | (TestF3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 28 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=64, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestF5 : TestF3, A4 {
int a;
TestF5() : a(0xf00000f5) {}
virtual void g() {printf("F5");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF5
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (TestF5 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct TestF3 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 20 | (TestF3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 24 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 28 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 28 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=48, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF5
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (TestF5 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | struct TestF3 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | (TestF3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 40 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 40 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 44 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=48, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestF6 : TestF3, A4 {
int a;
TestF6() : a(0xf00000f6) {}
virtual void f() {printf("F6");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF6
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF3 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | (TestF3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 44 | (vtordisp for vbase C16)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF6
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF3 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | (TestF3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 28 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 44 | (vtordisp for vbase C16)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestF7 : A4, virtual C16 {
int a;
TestF7() : a(0xf00000f7) {}
virtual void f() {printf("F7");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF7
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | (TestF7 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 28 | (vtordisp for vbase C16)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=64, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=12, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF7
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | (TestF7 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 44 | (vtordisp for vbase C16)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=24, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestF8 : TestF7, A4 {
int a;
TestF8() : a(0xf00000f8) {}
virtual void f() {printf("F8");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF8
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF7 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | (TestF7 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 44 | (vtordisp for vbase C16)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF8
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF7 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | (TestF7 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 28 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 44 | (vtordisp for vbase C16)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestF9 : A4, virtual C16 {
int a;
TestF9() : a(0xf00000f9) {}
virtual void g() {printf("F9");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF9
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (TestF9 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | (TestF9 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=48, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=16, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF9
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (TestF9 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | (TestF9 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=64, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestFA : TestF9, A4 {
int a;
TestFA() : a(0xf00000fa) {}
virtual void g() {printf("FA");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestFA
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF9 (primary base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (TestF9 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | (TestF9 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 20 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=64, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestFA
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestF9 (primary base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (TestF9 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | (TestF9 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 36 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=48, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestFB : A16, virtual C16 {
int a;
TestFB() : a(0xf00000fb) {}
virtual void g() {printf("Fb");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestFB
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (TestFB vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A16 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | (TestFB vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 80 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=96, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=64, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestFB
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (TestFB vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | struct A16 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | (TestFB vbtable pointer)
[MS-ABI] Drop Special Layout in 64-bit mode. As of cl.exe version 18, the special layout rules for structs with alignment 16 or greater has been dropped. This patch drops the behavior from clang. This patch also updates the lit tests to reflect the change. llvm-svn: 204674
2014-03-25 05:37:27 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=96, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=64, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct TestFC : TestFB, A4 {
int a;
TestFC() : a(0xf00000fc) {}
virtual void g() {printf("FC");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestFC
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct TestFB (primary base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (TestFB vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A16 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | (TestFB vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 68 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 80 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 80 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 96 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=112, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=80, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestFC
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct TestFB (primary base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (TestFB vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | struct A16 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | (TestFB vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
[MS-ABI] Drop Special Layout in 64-bit mode. As of cl.exe version 18, the special layout rules for structs with alignment 16 or greater has been dropped. This patch drops the behavior from clang. This patch also updates the lit tests to reflect the change. llvm-svn: 204674
2014-03-25 05:37:27 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 68 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | struct C16 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | (C16 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 96 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=112, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=80, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct A16f {
__declspec(align(16)) int a;
A16f() : a(0xf0000a16) {}
virtual void f() {printf("A16f");}
};
struct Y { char y; Y() : y(0xaa) {} };
struct X : virtual A16f {};
struct B : A4, Y, X {
int a;
B() : a(0xf000000b) {}
};
struct F0 : A4, B {
int a;
F0() : a(0xf00000f0) {}
virtual void g() {printf("F0");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct F0
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (F0 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | struct B (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 36 | struct Y (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 36 | char y
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | struct X (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | (X vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 52 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 80 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 80 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 96 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=112, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=80, nvalign=16]
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct F0
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (F0 vftable pointer)
[MS-ABI] Drop Special Layout in 64-bit mode. As of cl.exe version 18, the special layout rules for structs with alignment 16 or greater has been dropped. This patch drops the behavior from clang. This patch also updates the lit tests to reflect the change. llvm-svn: 204674
2014-03-25 05:37:27 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct B (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 36 | struct Y (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 36 | char y
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | struct X (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | (X vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 56 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 96 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=112, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=80, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct F1 : B, A4 {
int a;
F1() : a(0xf00000f1) {}
virtual void g() {printf("F1");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct F1
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (F1 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct B (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 20 | struct Y (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 20 | char y
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | struct X (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | (X vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 36 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 52 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 80 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=96, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=64, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct F1
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (F1 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | struct B (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 20 | struct Y (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 20 | char y
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct X (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | (X vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 40 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 52 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=96, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=64, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct F2 : A4, virtual A16f {
int a;
F2() : a(0xf00000f2) {}
virtual void g() {printf("F2");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct F2
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (F2 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | (F2 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=48, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=16, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct F2
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (F2 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | (F2 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=64, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct F3 : A4, virtual A16f {
__declspec(align(16)) int a;
F3() : a(0xf00000f3) {}
virtual void g() {printf("F3");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct F3
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (F3 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 20 | (F3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 80 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=96, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=64, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct F3
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (F3 vftable pointer)
[MS-ABI] Drop Special Layout in 64-bit mode. As of cl.exe version 18, the special layout rules for structs with alignment 16 or greater has been dropped. This patch drops the behavior from clang. This patch also updates the lit tests to reflect the change. llvm-svn: 204674
2014-03-25 05:37:27 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | (F3 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=96, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=64, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct F4 : A4, B {
__declspec(align(16)) int a;
F4() : a(0xf00000f4) {}
virtual void g() {printf("F4");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct F4
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (F4 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | struct B (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 36 | struct Y (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 36 | char y
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | struct X (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | (X vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 52 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 80 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 80 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 96 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=112, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=80, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct F4
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (F4 vftable pointer)
[MS-ABI] Drop Special Layout in 64-bit mode. As of cl.exe version 18, the special layout rules for structs with alignment 16 or greater has been dropped. This patch drops the behavior from clang. This patch also updates the lit tests to reflect the change. llvm-svn: 204674
2014-03-25 05:37:27 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct B (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 36 | struct Y (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 36 | char y
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | struct X (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | (X vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 56 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 96 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=112, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=80, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct F5 : A16f, virtual A4 {
int a;
F5() : a(0xf00000f5) {}
virtual void g() {printf("F5");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct F5
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A16f (primary base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | (F5 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | struct A4 (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=64, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct F5
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A16f (primary base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | (F5 vbtable pointer)
[MS-ABI] Drop Special Layout in 64-bit mode. As of cl.exe version 18, the special layout rules for structs with alignment 16 or greater has been dropped. This patch drops the behavior from clang. This patch also updates the lit tests to reflect the change. llvm-svn: 204674
2014-03-25 05:37:27 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | struct A4 (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=64, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
struct F6 : virtual A16f, A4, virtual B {
int a;
F6() : a(0xf00000f6) {}
virtual void g() {printf("F6");}
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct F6
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | (F6 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | (F6 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 12 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 16 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 32 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | struct B (virtual base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: 52 | struct Y (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 52 | char y
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | struct X (base)
// CHECK-NEXT: 64 | (X vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-NEXT: 68 | int a
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=80, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=16, nvalign=16]
Implements 64 bit microsoft record layout and adds lit tests to cover it. Also removes all of the microsoft C++ ABI related code from the itanium layout builder. Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2003 llvm-svn: 193290
2013-10-24 07:53:07 +08:00
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
[ms-abi] Refactoring Non-virtual base layout in record layout This refactor addresses bugzilla bug 18167 and simplifies the code at the same time. Also I add a test case for the bug. Also I make a non-functional change to the basic layout lit tests to make them more reliable (using CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK). llvm-svn: 197183
2013-12-13 06:33:37 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct F6
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | (F6 vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 8 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 16 | (F6 vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 24 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | struct A16f (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 32 | (A16f vftable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 48 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | struct B (virtual base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | struct A4 (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 64 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 68 | struct Y (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 68 | char y
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | struct X (base)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 80 | (X vbtable pointer)
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 88 | int a
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=96, align=16
[ms-abi] Refactor Microsoft Record Layout This patch refactors microsoft record layout to be more "natural". The most dominant change is that vbptrs and vfptrs are injected after the fact. This simplifies the implementation and the math for the offest for the first base/field after the vbptr. llvm-svn: 198818
2014-01-09 08:30:56 +08:00
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=32, nvalign=16]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
[ms-abi] Quick fix layout of an array of records This fixes llvm::SmallVector, which fixes lots of TUs in the MS ABI self host. llvm-svn: 199129
2014-01-14 03:25:00 +08:00
struct ArrayFieldOfRecords {
A4 InlineElts[2];
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct ArrayFieldOfRecords
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 [2] InlineElts
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=8, align=4
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=8, nvalign=4]
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct ArrayFieldOfRecords
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 [2] InlineElts
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=8, align=4
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=8, nvalign=4]
[MS-ABI] Fix MSRecordLayout to handel MultiDimensionalArrays A recent change caused multi-dimensional arrays not to be handled correctly, this patch fixes that. Also, it adds a lit test for multi-dimensional arrays. llvm-svn: 201917
2014-02-22 08:40:37 +08:00
struct ArrayOfArrayFieldOfRecords {
A4 InlineElts[2][2];
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct ArrayOfArrayFieldOfRecords
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 [2][2] InlineElts
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=16, align=4
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=16, nvalign=4]
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct ArrayOfArrayFieldOfRecords
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct A4 [2][2] InlineElts
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=16, align=4
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=16, nvalign=4]
MS ABI: Just use getTypeInfoInChars to get the field size This was changed to use manual desugaring and multiplication in r201832 and fixed for multi-dimensional arrays in r201917. However, it breaks down in the presence of typedefs. Rather than attempting to handle all the desugaring, just go back to calling the generic type info code. This was discovered while compiling SIInstrWaits.cpp in the R600 backend. llvm-svn: 202175
2014-02-26 02:08:48 +08:00
struct RecordArrayTypedef {
typedef A4 ArrayTy[2];
ArrayTy InlineElts[2];
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct RecordArrayTypedef
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | ArrayTy [2] InlineElts
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=16, align=4
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=16, nvalign=4]
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct RecordArrayTypedef
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | ArrayTy [2] InlineElts
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=16, align=4
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=16, nvalign=4]
MS ABI: Correct layout for empty records Empty records do not always have size equivalent to their alignment. They only do so when their alignment is at least as large as the minimum empty struct size: 1 byte in C++ and 4 bytes in C. llvm-svn: 218661
2014-09-30 14:45:43 +08:00
struct EmptyIntMemb {
int FlexArrayMemb[0];
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct EmptyIntMemb
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int [0] FlexArrayMemb
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=1, align=4
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=0, nvalign=4]
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct EmptyIntMemb
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | int [0] FlexArrayMemb
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=4, align=4
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=0, nvalign=4]
struct EmptyLongLongMemb {
long long FlexArrayMemb[0];
};
// CHECK: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct EmptyLongLongMemb
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | long long [0] FlexArrayMemb
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=1, align=8
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=0, nvalign=8]
// CHECK-X64: *** Dumping AST Record Layout
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | struct EmptyLongLongMemb
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: 0 | long long [0] FlexArrayMemb
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | [sizeof=8, align=8
// CHECK-X64-NEXT: | nvsize=0, nvalign=8]
Lit tests for Microsoft C++ record layout. They weren't added with the rest of the microsoft record layout patch due me not doing svn add. llvm-svn: 192612
2013-10-15 03:08:58 +08:00
int a[
sizeof(TestF0)+
sizeof(TestF1)+
sizeof(TestF2)+
sizeof(TestF3)+
sizeof(TestF4)+
sizeof(TestF5)+
sizeof(TestF6)+
sizeof(TestF7)+
sizeof(TestF8)+
sizeof(TestF9)+
sizeof(TestFA)+
sizeof(TestFB)+
sizeof(TestFC)+
sizeof(F0)+
sizeof(F1)+
sizeof(F2)+
sizeof(F3)+
sizeof(F4)+
sizeof(F5)+
[ms-abi] Quick fix layout of an array of records This fixes llvm::SmallVector, which fixes lots of TUs in the MS ABI self host. llvm-svn: 199129
2014-01-14 03:25:00 +08:00
sizeof(F6)+
[MS-ABI] Fix MSRecordLayout to handel MultiDimensionalArrays A recent change caused multi-dimensional arrays not to be handled correctly, this patch fixes that. Also, it adds a lit test for multi-dimensional arrays. llvm-svn: 201917
2014-02-22 08:40:37 +08:00
sizeof(ArrayFieldOfRecords)+
sizeof(ArrayOfArrayFieldOfRecords)+
MS ABI: Just use getTypeInfoInChars to get the field size This was changed to use manual desugaring and multiplication in r201832 and fixed for multi-dimensional arrays in r201917. However, it breaks down in the presence of typedefs. Rather than attempting to handle all the desugaring, just go back to calling the generic type info code. This was discovered while compiling SIInstrWaits.cpp in the R600 backend. llvm-svn: 202175
2014-02-26 02:08:48 +08:00
sizeof(RecordArrayTypedef)+
MS ABI: Correct layout for empty records Empty records do not always have size equivalent to their alignment. They only do so when their alignment is at least as large as the minimum empty struct size: 1 byte in C++ and 4 bytes in C. llvm-svn: 218661
2014-09-30 14:45:43 +08:00
sizeof(EmptyIntMemb)+
sizeof(EmptyLongLongMemb)+
[MS-ABI] Fix MSRecordLayout to handel MultiDimensionalArrays A recent change caused multi-dimensional arrays not to be handled correctly, this patch fixes that. Also, it adds a lit test for multi-dimensional arrays. llvm-svn: 201917
2014-02-22 08:40:37 +08:00
0];