2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wthread-safety %s
2017-02-25 07:23:53 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wthread-safety -std=c++98 %s
2017-05-03 05:02:46 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wthread-safety -std=c++11 %s -D CPP11
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
2012-04-06 23:10:17 +08:00
# define LOCKABLE __attribute__ ((lockable))
# define SCOPED_LOCKABLE __attribute__ ((scoped_lockable))
# define GUARDED_BY(x) __attribute__ ((guarded_by(x)))
# define GUARDED_VAR __attribute__ ((guarded_var))
# define PT_GUARDED_BY(x) __attribute__ ((pt_guarded_by(x)))
# define PT_GUARDED_VAR __attribute__ ((pt_guarded_var))
# define ACQUIRED_AFTER(...) __attribute__ ((acquired_after(__VA_ARGS__)))
# define ACQUIRED_BEFORE(...) __attribute__ ((acquired_before(__VA_ARGS__)))
2013-05-18 07:02:59 +08:00
# define EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(...) __attribute__ ((exclusive_lock_function(__VA_ARGS__)))
# define SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION(...) __attribute__ ((shared_lock_function(__VA_ARGS__)))
# define ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK(...) __attribute__ ((assert_exclusive_lock(__VA_ARGS__)))
# define ASSERT_SHARED_LOCK(...) __attribute__ ((assert_shared_lock(__VA_ARGS__)))
2012-04-06 23:10:17 +08:00
# define EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION(...) __attribute__ ((exclusive_trylock_function(__VA_ARGS__)))
# define SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION(...) __attribute__ ((shared_trylock_function(__VA_ARGS__)))
# define UNLOCK_FUNCTION(...) __attribute__ ((unlock_function(__VA_ARGS__)))
# define LOCK_RETURNED(x) __attribute__ ((lock_returned(x)))
# define LOCKS_EXCLUDED(...) __attribute__ ((locks_excluded(__VA_ARGS__)))
# define EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(...) \
__attribute__ ( ( exclusive_locks_required ( __VA_ARGS__ ) ) )
# define SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED(...) \
__attribute__ ( ( shared_locks_required ( __VA_ARGS__ ) ) )
# define NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS __attribute__ ((no_thread_safety_analysis))
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class LOCKABLE Mutex {
2011-09-09 01:42:22 +08:00
public :
2013-05-18 07:02:59 +08:00
void Lock ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ;
void ReaderLock ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ;
void Unlock ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ;
bool TryLock ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( true ) ;
bool ReaderTryLock ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( true ) ;
void AssertHeld ( ) ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK ( ) ;
void AssertReaderHeld ( ) ASSERT_SHARED_LOCK ( ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
class UnlockableMu {
} ;
class MuWrapper {
public :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu ;
Mutex getMu ( ) {
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
return mu ;
}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex * getMuPointer ( ) {
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
return & mu ;
}
} ;
class MuDoubleWrapper {
public :
MuWrapper * muWrapper ;
MuWrapper * getWrapper ( ) {
return muWrapper ;
}
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu1 ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
UnlockableMu umu ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu2 ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
MuWrapper muWrapper ;
MuDoubleWrapper muDoubleWrapper ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex * muPointer ;
Mutex * * muDoublePointer = & muPointer ;
Mutex & muRef = mu1 ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2011-09-09 01:42:22 +08:00
//---------------------------------------//
// Scoping tests
//--------------------------------------//
class Foo {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex foomu ;
void needLock ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( foomu ) ;
2011-09-09 01:42:22 +08:00
} ;
class Foo2 {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void needLock ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( foomu ) ;
Mutex foomu ;
2011-09-09 01:42:22 +08:00
} ;
class Bar {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex barmu ;
Mutex barmu2 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( barmu ) ;
2011-09-09 01:42:22 +08:00
} ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// No Thread Safety Analysis (noanal) //
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
// FIXME: Right now we cannot parse attributes put on function definitions
// We would like to patch this at some point.
# if !__has_attribute(no_thread_safety_analysis)
# error "Should support no_thread_safety_analysis attribute"
# endif
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void noanal_fun ( ) NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS ;
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
2011-08-24 02:46:34 +08:00
void noanal_fun_args ( ) __attribute__ ( ( no_thread_safety_analysis ( 1 ) ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'no_thread_safety_analysis' attribute takes no arguments}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int noanal_testfn ( int y ) NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS ;
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
int noanal_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'no_thread_safety_analysis' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int noanal_test_var NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'no_thread_safety_analysis' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
class NoanalFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'no_thread_safety_analysis' attribute only applies to functions}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void test_method ( ) NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS ;
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS NoanalTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'no_thread_safety_analysis' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void noanal_fun_params ( int lvar NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'no_thread_safety_analysis' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Guarded Var Attribute (gv)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(guarded_var)
# error "Should support guarded_var attribute"
# endif
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int gv_var_noargs GUARDED_VAR ;
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
int gv_var_args __attribute__ ( ( guarded_var ( 1 ) ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'guarded_var' attribute takes no arguments}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
class GVFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int gv_field_noargs GUARDED_VAR ;
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
int gv_field_args __attribute__ ( ( guarded_var ( 1 ) ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'guarded_var' attribute takes no arguments}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class GUARDED_VAR GV { / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_var' attribute only applies to non-static data members and global variables}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void gv_function ( ) GUARDED_VAR ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_var' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void gv_function_params ( int gv_lvar GUARDED_VAR ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_var' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
int gv_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x GUARDED_VAR = y ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_var' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
return x ;
}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Pt Guarded Var Attribute (pgv)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
//FIXME: add support for boost::scoped_ptr<int> fancyptr and references
# if !__has_attribute(pt_guarded_var)
# error "Should support pt_guarded_var attribute"
# endif
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pgv_pt_var_noargs PT_GUARDED_VAR ;
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int pgv_var_noargs PT_GUARDED_VAR ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_var' only applies to pointer types; type here is 'int'}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
class PGVFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pt_field_noargs PT_GUARDED_VAR ;
int field_noargs PT_GUARDED_VAR ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_var' only applies to pointer types; type here is 'int'}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
int * gv_field_args __attribute__ ( ( pt_guarded_var ( 1 ) ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'pt_guarded_var' attribute takes no arguments}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class PT_GUARDED_VAR PGV { / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_var' attribute only applies to non-static data members and global variables}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
int * pgv_var_args __attribute__ ( ( pt_guarded_var ( 1 ) ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'pt_guarded_var' attribute takes no arguments}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void pgv_function ( ) PT_GUARDED_VAR ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_var' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void pgv_function_params ( int * gv_lvar PT_GUARDED_VAR ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_var' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
void pgv_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * x PT_GUARDED_VAR = new int ( 0 ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_var' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
delete x ;
}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Lockable Attribute (l)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
//FIXME: In future we may want to add support for structs, ObjC classes, etc.
# if !__has_attribute(lockable)
# error "Should support lockable attribute"
# endif
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class LOCKABLE LTestClass {
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
class __attribute__ ( ( lockable ( 1 ) ) ) LTestClass_args { / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'lockable' attribute takes no arguments}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void l_test_function ( ) LOCKABLE ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lockable' attribute only applies to structs, unions, and classes}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
int l_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x LOCKABLE = y ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
return x ;
}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int l_test_var LOCKABLE ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
class LFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field LOCKABLE ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void test_method ( ) LOCKABLE ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void l_function_params ( int lvar LOCKABLE ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Scoped Lockable Attribute (sl)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(scoped_lockable)
# error "Should support scoped_lockable attribute"
# endif
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class SCOPED_LOCKABLE SLTestClass {
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
class __attribute__ ( ( scoped_lockable ( 1 ) ) ) SLTestClass_args { / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'scoped_lockable' attribute takes no arguments}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void sl_test_function ( ) SCOPED_LOCKABLE ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'scoped_lockable' attribute only applies to structs, unions, and classes}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
int sl_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x SCOPED_LOCKABLE = y ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'scoped_lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
return x ;
}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int sl_test_var SCOPED_LOCKABLE ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'scoped_lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
class SLFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field SCOPED_LOCKABLE ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'scoped_lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void test_method ( ) SCOPED_LOCKABLE ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'scoped_lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 01:21:07 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void sl_function_params ( int lvar SCOPED_LOCKABLE ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'scoped_lockable' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Guarded By Attribute (gb)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// FIXME: Eventually, would we like this attribute to take more than 1 arg?
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(guarded_by)
# error "Should support guarded_by attribute"
# endif
//1. Check applied to the right types & argument number
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int gb_var_arg GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2013-09-14 00:30:12 +08:00
int gb_non_ascii GUARDED_BY ( L " wide " ) ; // expected-warning {{ignoring 'guarded_by' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int gb_var_args __attribute__ ( ( guarded_by ( mu1 , mu2 ) ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'guarded_by' attribute takes one argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int gb_var_noargs __attribute__ ( ( guarded_by ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'guarded_by' attribute takes one argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class GBFoo {
private :
int gb_field_noargs __attribute__ ( ( guarded_by ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'guarded_by' attribute takes one argument}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int gb_field_args GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) GB { / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_by' attribute only applies to non-static data members and global variables}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void gb_function ( ) GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_by' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void gb_function_params ( int gv_lvar GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_by' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int gb_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) = y ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_by' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//2. Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int gb_var_arg_1 GUARDED_BY ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
int gb_var_arg_2 GUARDED_BY ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int gb_var_arg_3 GUARDED_BY ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int gb_var_arg_4 GUARDED_BY ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int gb_var_arg_5 GUARDED_BY ( & mu1 ) ;
int gb_var_arg_6 GUARDED_BY ( muRef ) ;
int gb_var_arg_7 GUARDED_BY ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int gb_var_arg_8 GUARDED_BY ( muPointer ) ;
2017-12-15 06:24:45 +08:00
int gb_var_arg_9 GUARDED_BY ( ! & mu1 ) ;
int gb_var_arg_10 GUARDED_BY ( ! & * & mu1 ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int gb_var_arg_bad_1 GUARDED_BY ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_by' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'int'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int gb_var_arg_bad_2 GUARDED_BY ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'guarded_by' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int gb_var_arg_bad_3 GUARDED_BY ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_by' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int gb_var_arg_bad_4 GUARDED_BY ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_by' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'UnlockableMu'}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
//3.
// Thread Safety analysis tests
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Pt Guarded By Attribute (pgb)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(pt_guarded_by)
# error "Should support pt_guarded_by attribute"
# endif
//1. Check applied to the right types & argument number
int * pgb_var_noargs __attribute__ ( ( pt_guarded_by ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute takes one argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pgb_ptr_var_arg PT_GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pgb_ptr_var_args __attribute__ ( ( pt_guarded_by ( mu1 , mu2 ) ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute takes one argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int pgb_var_args PT_GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_by' only applies to pointer types; type here is 'int'}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class PGBFoo {
private :
int * pgb_field_noargs __attribute__ ( ( pt_guarded_by ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute takes one argument}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pgb_field_args PT_GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class PT_GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) PGB { / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute only applies to non-static data members and global variables}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void pgb_function ( ) PT_GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void pgb_function_params ( int gv_lvar PT_GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
void pgb_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * x PT_GUARDED_BY ( mu1 ) = new int ( 0 ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
delete x ;
}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//2. Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pgb_var_arg_1 PT_GUARDED_BY ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
int * pgb_var_arg_2 PT_GUARDED_BY ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int * pgb_var_arg_3 PT_GUARDED_BY ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int * pgb_var_arg_4 PT_GUARDED_BY ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int * pgb_var_arg_5 PT_GUARDED_BY ( & mu1 ) ;
int * pgb_var_arg_6 PT_GUARDED_BY ( muRef ) ;
int * pgb_var_arg_7 PT_GUARDED_BY ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int * pgb_var_arg_8 PT_GUARDED_BY ( muPointer ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pgb_var_arg_bad_1 PT_GUARDED_BY ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'int'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pgb_var_arg_bad_2 PT_GUARDED_BY ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'pt_guarded_by' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pgb_var_arg_bad_3 PT_GUARDED_BY ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int * pgb_var_arg_bad_4 PT_GUARDED_BY ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'pt_guarded_by' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Acquired After (aa)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
// FIXME: Would we like this attribute to take more than 1 arg?
# if !__has_attribute(acquired_after)
# error "Should support acquired_after attribute"
# endif
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu_aa ACQUIRED_AFTER ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex aa_var_noargs __attribute__ ( ( acquired_after ) ) ; / / \
2014-01-03 05:26:14 +08:00
// expected-error {{'acquired_after' attribute takes at least 1 argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class AAFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex aa_field_noargs __attribute__ ( ( acquired_after ) ) ; / / \
2014-01-03 05:26:14 +08:00
// expected-error {{'acquired_after' attribute takes at least 1 argument}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex aa_field_args ACQUIRED_AFTER ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class ACQUIRED_AFTER ( mu1 ) AA { / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_after' attribute only applies to non-static data members and global variables}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void aa_function ( ) ACQUIRED_AFTER ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_after' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void aa_function_params ( int gv_lvar ACQUIRED_AFTER ( mu1 ) ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_after' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
void aa_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex x ACQUIRED_AFTER ( mu1 ) = Mutex ( ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_after' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex aa_var_arg_1 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
Mutex aa_var_arg_2 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
Mutex aa_var_arg_3 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
Mutex aa_var_arg_4 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
Mutex aa_var_arg_5 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( & mu1 ) ;
Mutex aa_var_arg_6 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( muRef ) ;
Mutex aa_var_arg_7 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
Mutex aa_var_arg_8 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( muPointer ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex aa_var_arg_bad_1 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_after' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'int'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex aa_var_arg_bad_2 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'acquired_after' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex aa_var_arg_bad_3 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_after' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex aa_var_arg_bad_4 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_after' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
UnlockableMu aa_var_arg_bad_5 ACQUIRED_AFTER ( mu_aa ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_after' attribute can only be applied in a context annotated with 'capability("mutex")' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Acquired Before (ab)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(acquired_before)
# error "Should support acquired_before attribute"
# endif
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu_ab ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex ab_var_noargs __attribute__ ( ( acquired_before ) ) ; / / \
2014-01-03 05:26:14 +08:00
// expected-error {{'acquired_before' attribute takes at least 1 argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class ABFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex ab_field_noargs __attribute__ ( ( acquired_before ) ) ; / / \
2014-01-03 05:26:14 +08:00
// expected-error {{'acquired_before' attribute takes at least 1 argument}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex ab_field_args ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( mu1 ) AB { / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_before' attribute only applies to non-static data members and global variables}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void ab_function ( ) ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_before' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void ab_function_params ( int gv_lvar ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( mu1 ) ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_before' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
void ab_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex x ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( mu1 ) = Mutex ( ) ; / / \
2017-11-27 04:01:12 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_before' attribute only applies to}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
// Note: illegal int ab_int ACQUIRED_BEFORE(mu1) will
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
// be taken care of by warnings that ab__int is not lockable.
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex ab_var_arg_1 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
Mutex ab_var_arg_2 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
Mutex ab_var_arg_3 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
Mutex ab_var_arg_4 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
Mutex ab_var_arg_5 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( & mu1 ) ;
Mutex ab_var_arg_6 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( muRef ) ;
Mutex ab_var_arg_7 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
Mutex ab_var_arg_8 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( muPointer ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex ab_var_arg_bad_1 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_before' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'int'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex ab_var_arg_bad_2 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'acquired_before' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex ab_var_arg_bad_3 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_before' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex ab_var_arg_bad_4 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_before' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
UnlockableMu ab_var_arg_bad_5 ACQUIRED_BEFORE ( mu_ab ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'acquired_before' attribute can only be applied in a context annotated with 'capability("mutex")' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Exclusive Lock Function (elf)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(exclusive_lock_function)
# error "Should support exclusive_lock_function attribute"
# endif
// takes zero or more arguments, all locks (vars/fields)
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void elf_function ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; // expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void elf_function_args ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( mu1 , mu2 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
int elf_testfn ( int y ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; // expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int elf_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elf_test_var EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class ElfFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void test_method ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute without capability arguments refers to 'this', but 'ElfFoo' isn't annotated with 'capability' or 'scoped_lockable' attribute}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ElfTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void elf_fun_params ( int lvar EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elf_function_1 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
int elf_function_2 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int elf_function_3 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int elf_function_4 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int elf_function_5 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( & mu1 ) ;
int elf_function_6 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muRef ) ;
int elf_function_7 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int elf_function_8 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muPointer ) ;
int elf_function_9 ( Mutex x ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ;
int elf_function_9 ( Mutex x , Mutex y ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , 2 ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elf_function_bad_2 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'exclusive_lock_function' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elf_function_bad_3 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elf_function_bad_4 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elf_function_bad_1 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: no parameters to index into}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elf_function_bad_5 ( Mutex x ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 0 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: can only be 1, since there is one parameter}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elf_function_bad_6 ( Mutex x , Mutex y ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 0 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: must be between 1 and 2}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elf_function_bad_7 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 0 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'exclusive_lock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: no parameters to index into}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Shared Lock Function (slf)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(shared_lock_function)
# error "Should support shared_lock_function attribute"
# endif
// takes zero or more arguments, all locks (vars/fields)
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void slf_function ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; // expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void slf_function_args ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( mu1 , mu2 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
int slf_testfn ( int y ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; // expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int slf_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slf_test_var SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void slf_fun_params ( int lvar SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class SlfFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void test_method ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute without capability arguments refers to 'this', but 'SlfFoo' isn't annotated with 'capability' or 'scoped_lockable' attribute}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) SlfTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slf_function_1 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
int slf_function_2 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int slf_function_3 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int slf_function_4 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int slf_function_5 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( & mu1 ) ;
int slf_function_6 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muRef ) ;
int slf_function_7 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int slf_function_8 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muPointer ) ;
int slf_function_9 ( Mutex x ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ;
int slf_function_9 ( Mutex x , Mutex y ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , 2 ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slf_function_bad_2 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'shared_lock_function' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slf_function_bad_3 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slf_function_bad_4 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_lock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slf_function_bad_1 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'shared_lock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: no parameters to index into}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slf_function_bad_5 ( Mutex x ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 0 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'shared_lock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: can only be 1, since there is one parameter}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slf_function_bad_6 ( Mutex x , Mutex y ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 0 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'shared_lock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: must be between 1 and 2}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slf_function_bad_7 ( ) SHARED_LOCK_FUNCTION ( 0 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'shared_lock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: no parameters to index into}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Exclusive TryLock Function (etf)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(exclusive_trylock_function)
# error "Should support exclusive_trylock_function attribute"
# endif
// takes a mandatory boolean or integer argument specifying the retval
// plus an optional list of locks (vars/fields)
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void etf_function ( ) __attribute__ ( ( exclusive_trylock_function ) ) ; / / \
2017-08-11 15:54:35 +08:00
// expected-error {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute takes at least 1 argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void etf_function_args ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , mu2 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void etf_function_arg ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
int etf_testfn ( int y ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int etf_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int etf_test_var EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
2017-08-11 15:54:35 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class EtfFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void test_method ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute without capability arguments refers to 'this', but 'EtfFoo' isn't annotated with 'capability' or 'scoped_lockable' attribute}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) EtfTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void etf_fun_params ( int lvar EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int etf_function_1 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muWrapper . mu ) ;
int etf_function_2 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int etf_function_3 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int etf_function_4 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int etf_function_5 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , & mu1 ) ;
int etf_function_6 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muRef ) ;
int etf_function_7 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int etf_functetfn_8 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muPointer ) ;
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
int etf_function_9 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( true ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int etf_function_bad_1 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2013-07-23 22:03:57 +08:00
// expected-error {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute requires parameter 1 to be int or bool}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int etf_function_bad_2 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2013-07-23 22:03:57 +08:00
// expected-error {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute requires parameter 1 to be int or bool}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int etf_function_bad_3 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2013-07-23 22:03:57 +08:00
// expected-error {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute requires parameter 1 to be int or bool}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int etf_function_bad_4 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int etf_function_bad_5 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int etf_function_bad_6 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_trylock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Shared TryLock Function (stf)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(shared_trylock_function)
# error "Should support shared_trylock_function attribute"
# endif
// takes a mandatory boolean or integer argument specifying the retval
// plus an optional list of locks (vars/fields)
void stf_function ( ) __attribute__ ( ( shared_trylock_function ) ) ; / / \
2014-01-03 05:26:14 +08:00
// expected-error {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute takes at least 1 argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void stf_function_args ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , mu2 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void stf_function_arg ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
int stf_testfn ( int y ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int stf_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int stf_test_var SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void stf_fun_params ( int lvar SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class StfFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void test_method ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute without capability arguments refers to 'this', but 'StfFoo' isn't annotated with 'capability' or 'scoped_lockable' attribute}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) StfTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int stf_function_1 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muWrapper . mu ) ;
int stf_function_2 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int stf_function_3 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int stf_function_4 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int stf_function_5 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , & mu1 ) ;
int stf_function_6 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muRef ) ;
int stf_function_7 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int stf_function_8 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muPointer ) ;
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
int stf_function_9 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( true ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int stf_function_bad_1 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2013-07-23 22:03:57 +08:00
// expected-error {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute requires parameter 1 to be int or bool}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int stf_function_bad_2 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2013-07-23 22:03:57 +08:00
// expected-error {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute requires parameter 1 to be int or bool}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int stf_function_bad_3 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2013-07-23 22:03:57 +08:00
// expected-error {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute requires parameter 1 to be int or bool}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int stf_function_bad_4 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'shared_trylock_function' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int stf_function_bad_5 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int stf_function_bad_6 ( ) SHARED_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_trylock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Unlock Function (uf)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(unlock_function)
# error "Should support unlock_function attribute"
# endif
// takes zero or more arguments, all locks (vars/fields)
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void uf_function ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'unlock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void uf_function_args ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( mu1 , mu2 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
int uf_testfn ( int y ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'unlock_function' attribute without capability arguments can only be applied to non-static methods of a class}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int uf_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'unlock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int uf_test_var UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'unlock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class UfFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'unlock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
void test_method ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
// expected-warning {{'unlock_function' attribute without capability arguments refers to 'this', but 'UfFoo' isn't annotated with 'capability' or 'scoped_lockable' attribute}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS UfTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'no_thread_safety_analysis' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void uf_fun_params ( int lvar UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'unlock_function' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int uf_function_1 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
int uf_function_2 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int uf_function_3 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int uf_function_4 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int uf_function_5 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( & mu1 ) ;
int uf_function_6 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( muRef ) ;
int uf_function_7 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int uf_function_8 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( muPointer ) ;
int uf_function_9 ( Mutex x ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ;
int uf_function_9 ( Mutex x , Mutex y ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 , 2 ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int uf_function_bad_2 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'unlock_function' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int uf_function_bad_3 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'unlock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int uf_function_bad_4 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'unlock_function' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int uf_function_bad_1 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( 1 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'unlock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: no parameters to index into}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int uf_function_bad_5 ( Mutex x ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( 0 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'unlock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: can only be 1, since there is one parameter}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int uf_function_bad_6 ( Mutex x , Mutex y ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( 0 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'unlock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: must be between 1 and 2}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int uf_function_bad_7 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( 0 ) ; / / \
2011-09-09 02:07:26 +08:00
// expected-error {{'unlock_function' attribute parameter 1 is out of bounds: no parameters to index into}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Lock Returned (lr)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(lock_returned)
# error "Should support lock_returned attribute"
# endif
// Takes exactly one argument, a var/field
void lr_function ( ) __attribute__ ( ( lock_returned ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'lock_returned' attribute takes one argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void lr_function_arg ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
void lr_function_args ( ) __attribute__ ( ( lock_returned ( mu1 , mu2 ) ) ) ; / / \
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
// expected-error {{'lock_returned' attribute takes one argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int lr_testfn ( int y ) LOCK_RETURNED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int lr_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x LOCK_RETURNED ( mu1 ) = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lock_returned' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int lr_test_var LOCK_RETURNED ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lock_returned' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void lr_fun_params ( int lvar LOCK_RETURNED ( mu1 ) ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lock_returned' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class LrFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field LOCK_RETURNED ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lock_returned' attribute only applies to functions}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void test_method ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class LOCK_RETURNED ( mu1 ) LrTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lock_returned' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int lr_function_1 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
int lr_function_2 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int lr_function_3 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int lr_function_4 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int lr_function_5 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( & mu1 ) ;
int lr_function_6 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( muRef ) ;
int lr_function_7 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int lr_function_8 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( muPointer ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int lr_function_bad_1 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lock_returned' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'int'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int lr_function_bad_2 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-05-03 01:38:37 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'lock_returned' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int lr_function_bad_3 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lock_returned' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int lr_function_bad_4 ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'lock_returned' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Locks Excluded (le)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(locks_excluded)
# error "Should support locks_excluded attribute"
# endif
// takes one or more arguments, all locks (vars/fields)
void le_function ( ) __attribute__ ( ( locks_excluded ) ) ; / / \
2014-01-03 05:26:14 +08:00
// expected-error {{'locks_excluded' attribute takes at least 1 argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void le_function_arg ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void le_function_args ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu1 , mu2 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int le_testfn ( int y ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int le_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu1 ) = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'locks_excluded' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int le_test_var LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'locks_excluded' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void le_fun_params ( int lvar LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu1 ) ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'locks_excluded' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class LeFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'locks_excluded' attribute only applies to functions}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void test_method ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu1 ) LeTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'locks_excluded' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int le_function_1 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
int le_function_2 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int le_function_3 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int le_function_4 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int le_function_5 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( & mu1 ) ;
int le_function_6 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( muRef ) ;
int le_function_7 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int le_function_8 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( muPointer ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int le_function_bad_1 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'locks_excluded' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'int'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int le_function_bad_2 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'locks_excluded' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int le_function_bad_3 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'locks_excluded' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int le_function_bad_4 ( ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'locks_excluded' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Exclusive Locks Required (elr)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(exclusive_locks_required)
# error "Should support exclusive_locks_required attribute"
# endif
// takes one or more arguments, all locks (vars/fields)
void elr_function ( ) __attribute__ ( ( exclusive_locks_required ) ) ; / / \
2014-01-03 05:26:14 +08:00
// expected-error {{'exclusive_locks_required' attribute takes at least 1 argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void elr_function_arg ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void elr_function_args ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 , mu2 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elr_testfn ( int y ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int elr_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elr_test_var EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void elr_fun_params ( int lvar EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class ElrFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void test_method ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ElrTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elr_function_1 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
int elr_function_2 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int elr_function_3 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int elr_function_4 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int elr_function_5 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( & mu1 ) ;
int elr_function_6 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muRef ) ;
int elr_function_7 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int elr_function_8 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muPointer ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elr_function_bad_1 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_locks_required' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'int'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elr_function_bad_2 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'exclusive_locks_required' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elr_function_bad_3 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_locks_required' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int elr_function_bad_4 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'exclusive_locks_required' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Shared Locks Required (slr)
//-----------------------------------------//
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
# if !__has_attribute(shared_locks_required)
# error "Should support shared_locks_required attribute"
# endif
// takes one or more arguments, all locks (vars/fields)
void slr_function ( ) __attribute__ ( ( shared_locks_required ) ) ; / / \
2014-01-03 05:26:14 +08:00
// expected-error {{'shared_locks_required' attribute takes at least 1 argument}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void slr_function_arg ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void slr_function_args ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 , mu2 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slr_testfn ( int y ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
int slr_testfn ( int y ) {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int x SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) = y ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
return x ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slr_test_var SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void slr_fun_params ( int lvar SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
class SlrFoo {
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int test_field SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ; / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void test_method ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) ;
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1 ) SlrTestClass { / / \
2014-05-20 22:10:53 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_locks_required' attribute only applies to functions}}
2011-07-29 04:12:35 +08:00
} ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// Check argument parsing.
// legal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slr_function_1 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muWrapper . mu ) ;
int slr_function_2 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muDoubleWrapper . muWrapper - > mu ) ;
int slr_function_3 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muWrapper . getMu ( ) ) ;
int slr_function_4 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( * muWrapper . getMuPointer ( ) ) ;
int slr_function_5 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( & mu1 ) ;
int slr_function_6 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muRef ) ;
int slr_function_7 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muDoubleWrapper . getWrapper ( ) - > getMu ( ) ) ;
int slr_function_8 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muPointer ) ;
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
// illegal attribute arguments
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slr_function_bad_1 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( 1 ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_locks_required' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'int'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slr_function_bad_2 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( " mu " ) ; / / \
2012-04-20 00:10:44 +08:00
// expected-warning {{ignoring 'shared_locks_required' attribute because its argument is invalid}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slr_function_bad_3 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( muDoublePointer ) ; / / \
2014-03-25 03:29:19 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_locks_required' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'Mutex **'}}
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int slr_function_bad_4 ( ) SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( umu ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'shared_locks_required' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute}}
2011-08-10 01:59:31 +08:00
2011-08-30 01:12:27 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------//
// Regression tests for unusual cases.
//-----------------------------------------//
int trivially_false_edges ( bool b ) {
// Create NULL (never taken) edges in CFG
if ( false ) return 1 ;
else return 2 ;
}
// Possible Clang bug -- method pointer in template parameter
class UnFoo {
public :
void foo ( ) ;
} ;
template < void ( UnFoo : : * methptr ) ( ) >
class MCaller {
public :
static void call_method_ptr ( UnFoo * f ) {
// FIXME: Possible Clang bug:
// getCalleeDecl() returns NULL in the following case:
( f - > * methptr ) ( ) ;
}
} ;
void call_method_ptr_inst ( UnFoo * f ) {
MCaller < & UnFoo : : foo > : : call_method_ptr ( f ) ;
}
int temp ;
void empty_back_edge ( ) {
// Create a back edge to a block with with no statements
for ( ; ; ) {
+ + temp ;
if ( temp > 10 ) break ;
}
}
struct Foomger {
void operator + + ( ) ;
} ;
struct Foomgoper {
Foomger f ;
bool done ( ) ;
void invalid_back_edge ( ) {
do {
// FIXME: Possible Clang bug:
// The first statement in this basic block has no source location
+ + f ;
} while ( ! done ( ) ) ;
}
} ;
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
template < typename Mutex >
struct SCOPED_LOCKABLE SLTemplateClass {
~ SLTemplateClass ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ;
} ;
template < typename Mutex >
struct NonSLTemplateClass {
~ NonSLTemplateClass ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
// expected-warning{{'unlock_function' attribute without capability arguments refers to 'this', but 'NonSLTemplateClass' isn't annotated with 'capability' or 'scoped_lockable' attribute}}
} ;
template < >
struct SLTemplateClass < int > { } ;
template < typename Mutex >
struct SLTemplateDerived : public SLTemplateClass < Mutex > {
~ SLTemplateDerived ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ;
} ;
// FIXME: warn on template instantiation.
template struct SLTemplateDerived < int > ;
struct SLDerived1 : public SLTemplateClass < double > {
~ SLDerived1 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ;
} ;
struct SLDerived2 : public SLTemplateClass < int > {
~ SLDerived2 ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ; / / \
// expected-warning{{'unlock_function' attribute without capability arguments refers to 'this', but 'SLDerived2' isn't annotated with 'capability' or 'scoped_lockable' attribute}}
} ;
2011-08-30 01:12:27 +08:00
2011-09-09 01:42:31 +08:00
//-----------------------------------------------------
// Parsing of member variables and function parameters
//------------------------------------------------------
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex gmu ;
2011-09-09 01:42:31 +08:00
class StaticMu {
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
static Mutex statmu ;
2011-09-09 01:42:31 +08:00
} ;
class FooLate {
public :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void foo1 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( gmu ) { }
void foo2 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu ) { }
void foo3 ( Mutex * m ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( m ) { }
void foo3 ( FooLate * f ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( f - > mu ) { }
void foo4 ( FooLate * f ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( f - > mu ) ;
2011-09-09 01:42:31 +08:00
2017-02-25 07:23:53 +08:00
static void foo5 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu ) ;
//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
# if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-error@-3 {{invalid use of member 'mu' in static member function}}
# endif
2011-09-09 01:42:31 +08:00
template < class T >
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void foo6 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( T : : statmu ) { }
2011-09-09 01:42:31 +08:00
template < class T >
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void foo7 ( T * f ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( f - > mu ) { }
2011-09-09 01:42:31 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int a GUARDED_BY ( gmu ) ;
int b GUARDED_BY ( mu ) ;
int c GUARDED_BY ( this - > mu ) ;
2011-09-09 01:42:31 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu ;
2011-09-09 01:42:31 +08:00
} ;
2011-12-15 03:36:06 +08:00
//-------------------------
// Empty argument lists
//-------------------------
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
class LOCKABLE EmptyArgListsTest {
void lock ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) { }
void unlock ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) { }
2011-12-15 03:36:06 +08:00
} ;
2012-02-17 00:50:43 +08:00
namespace FunctionDefinitionParseTest {
// Test parsing of attributes on function definitions.
class Foo {
public :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu_ ;
2012-02-17 00:50:43 +08:00
void foo1 ( ) ;
void foo2 ( Foo * f ) ;
} ;
template < class T >
class Bar {
public :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu_ ;
2012-02-17 00:50:43 +08:00
void bar ( ) ;
} ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void Foo : : foo1 ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu_ ) { }
void Foo : : foo2 ( Foo * f ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( f - > mu_ ) { }
2012-02-17 00:50:43 +08:00
template < class T >
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void Bar < T > : : bar ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu_ ) { }
2012-02-17 00:50:43 +08:00
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
void baz ( Foo * f ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( f - > mu_ ) { }
2012-03-03 06:12:59 +08:00
} // end namespace
namespace TestMultiDecl {
class Foo {
public :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
int GUARDED_BY ( mu_ ) a ;
int GUARDED_BY ( mu_ ) b , c ;
2012-03-03 06:12:59 +08:00
private :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu_ ;
2012-02-17 00:50:43 +08:00
} ;
2012-05-05 00:28:38 +08:00
} // end namespace TestMultiDecl
2012-03-03 06:12:59 +08:00
2012-04-06 23:10:17 +08:00
namespace NestedClassLateDecl {
class Foo {
class Bar {
int a GUARDED_BY ( mu ) ;
int b GUARDED_BY ( fooMuStatic ) ;
void bar ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu ) { a = 0 ; }
void bar2 ( Bar * b ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( b - > mu ) { b - > a = 0 ; }
void bar3 ( Foo * f ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( f - > fooMu ) { f - > a = 0 ; }
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu ;
2012-04-06 23:10:17 +08:00
} ;
int a GUARDED_BY ( fooMu ) ;
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex fooMu ;
static Mutex fooMuStatic ;
2012-04-06 23:10:17 +08:00
} ;
}
2012-04-24 00:45:01 +08:00
namespace PointerToMemberTest {
2012-04-24 02:39:55 +08:00
// Empty string should be ignored.
int testEmptyAttribute GUARDED_BY ( " " ) ;
void testEmptyAttributeFunction ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( " " ) ;
2012-04-24 00:45:01 +08:00
class Graph {
public :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu_ ;
2012-05-03 01:38:37 +08:00
static Mutex * get_static_mu ( ) LOCK_RETURNED ( & Graph : : mu_ ) ;
2012-04-24 00:45:01 +08:00
} ;
class Node {
public :
void foo ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( & Graph : : mu_ ) ;
int a GUARDED_BY ( & Graph : : mu_ ) ;
} ;
}
2012-04-24 02:39:55 +08:00
namespace SmartPointerTest {
template < class T >
class smart_ptr {
public :
T * operator - > ( ) { return ptr_ ; }
T & operator * ( ) { return ptr_ ; }
private :
T * ptr_ ;
} ;
2012-05-03 06:18:42 +08:00
Mutex gmu ;
smart_ptr < int > gdat PT_GUARDED_BY ( gmu ) ;
2012-04-24 02:39:55 +08:00
class MyClass {
public :
2012-04-24 04:41:57 +08:00
Mutex mu_ ;
2012-05-03 06:18:42 +08:00
smart_ptr < Mutex > smu_ ;
2012-04-24 02:39:55 +08:00
smart_ptr < int > a PT_GUARDED_BY ( mu_ ) ;
2012-05-03 06:18:42 +08:00
int b GUARDED_BY ( smu_ ) ;
2012-04-24 02:39:55 +08:00
} ;
}
2012-05-05 00:28:38 +08:00
namespace InheritanceTest {
class LOCKABLE Base {
public :
void lock ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ;
void unlock ( ) UNLOCK_FUNCTION ( ) ;
} ;
class Base2 { } ;
class Derived1 : public Base { } ;
class Derived2 : public Base2 , public Derived1 { } ;
class Derived3 : public Base2 { } ;
class Foo {
Derived1 mu1_ ;
Derived2 mu2_ ;
Derived3 mu3_ ;
int a GUARDED_BY ( mu1_ ) ;
int b GUARDED_BY ( mu2_ ) ;
int c GUARDED_BY ( mu3_ ) ; / / \
2014-02-19 01:36:50 +08:00
// expected-warning {{'guarded_by' attribute requires arguments whose type is annotated with 'capability' attribute; type here is 'InheritanceTest::Derived3'}}
2012-05-05 00:28:38 +08:00
void foo ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu1_ , mu2_ ) {
a = 0 ;
b = 0 ;
}
} ;
}
2012-08-16 06:41:04 +08:00
namespace InvalidDeclTest {
class Foo { } ;
namespace {
void Foo : : bar ( Mutex * mu ) LOCKS_EXCLUDED ( mu ) { } / / \
/ / expected - error { { cannot define or redeclare ' bar ' here because namespace ' ' does not enclose namespace ' Foo ' } } \
// expected-warning {{attribute locks_excluded ignored, because it is not attached to a declaration}}
}
} // end namespace InvalidDeclTest
2012-03-03 06:12:59 +08:00
2012-08-21 05:32:18 +08:00
namespace StaticScopeTest {
class FooStream ;
class Foo {
mutable Mutex mu ;
int a GUARDED_BY ( mu ) ;
2017-02-25 07:23:53 +08:00
static int si GUARDED_BY ( mu ) ;
//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
# if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-error@-3 {{invalid use of non-static data member 'mu'}}
# endif
2012-08-21 05:32:18 +08:00
2017-02-25 07:23:53 +08:00
static void foo ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu ) ;
//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
# if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-error@-3 {{invalid use of member 'mu' in static member function}}
# endif
2012-08-21 05:32:18 +08:00
friend FooStream & operator < < ( FooStream & s , const Foo & f )
2017-02-25 07:23:53 +08:00
EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu ) ;
//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
# if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-error@-3 {{invalid use of non-static data member 'mu'}}
# endif
2012-08-21 05:32:18 +08:00
} ;
} // end namespace StaticScopeTest
2012-11-03 05:44:32 +08:00
namespace FunctionAttributesInsideClass_ICE_Test {
class Foo {
public :
/* Originally found when parsing foo() as an ordinary method after the
* the following :
template < class T >
void syntaxErrorMethod ( int i ) {
if ( i ) {
foo (
}
}
*/
void method ( ) {
void foo ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu ) ; / / \
// expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'mu'}}
}
} ;
} // end namespace FunctionAttributesInsideClass_ICE_Test
2012-08-21 05:32:18 +08:00
2017-05-03 05:02:46 +08:00
# ifdef CPP11
namespace CRASH_POST_R301735 {
class SomeClass {
public :
void foo ( ) {
auto l = [ this ] { auto l = [ ] ( ) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED ( mu_ ) { } ; } ;
}
Mutex mu_ ;
} ;
}
Thread Safety Analysis: warnings for attributes without arguments
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
2018-09-20 08:39:27 +08:00
# endif