llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/default-assignment-operator...

172 lines
4.1 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
class Base { // expected-warning{{class 'Base' does not declare any constructor to initialize its non-modifiable members}}
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-error@-2 {{cannot define the implicit copy assignment operator for 'Base', because non-static reference member 'ref' cannot use copy assignment operator}}
#endif
int &ref; // expected-note{{reference member 'ref' will never be initialized}}
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 {{declared here}}
#else
// expected-note@-4 2 {{copy assignment operator of 'Base' is implicitly deleted because field 'ref' is of reference type 'int &'}}
#endif
};
class X : Base {
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 {{assignment operator for 'Base' first required here}}
// expected-error@-3 {{cannot define the implicit copy assignment operator for 'X', because non-static const member 'cint' cannot use copy assignment operator}}
#else
// expected-note@-5 2 {{copy assignment operator of 'X' is implicitly deleted because base class 'Base' has a deleted copy assignment operator}}
#endif
public:
X();
const int cint;
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 {{declared here}}
#endif
};
struct Y : X {
Y();
Y& operator=(const Y&);
Y& operator=(volatile Y&);
Y& operator=(const volatile Y&);
Y& operator=(Y&);
};
class Z : Y {};
Z z1;
Z z2;
// Test1
void f(X x, const X cx) {
x = cx;
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 2{{assignment operator for 'X' first required here}}
#else
// expected-error@-4 {{object of type 'X' cannot be assigned because its copy assignment operator is implicitly deleted}}
#endif
x = cx;
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
// expected-error@-2 {{object of type 'X' cannot be assigned because its copy assignment operator is implicitly deleted}}
#endif
z1 = z2;
}
// Test2
class T {};
T t1;
T t2;
void g() {
t1 = t2;
}
// Test3
class V {
public:
V();
V &operator = (V &b);
};
class W : V {};
W w1, w2;
void h() {
w1 = w2;
}
// Test4
class B1 {
public:
B1();
B1 &operator = (B1 b);
};
class D1 : B1 {};
D1 d1, d2;
void i() {
d1 = d2;
}
// Test5
class E1 {
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-error@-2 {{cannot define the implicit copy assignment operator for 'E1', because non-static const member 'a' cannot use copy assignment operator}}
#endif
Complete reimplementation of the synthesis for implicitly-defined copy assignment operators. Previously, Sema provided type-checking and template instantiation for copy assignment operators, then CodeGen would synthesize the actual body of the copy constructor. Unfortunately, the two were not in sync, and CodeGen might pick a copy-assignment operator that is different from what Sema chose, leading to strange failures, e.g., link-time failures when CodeGen called a copy-assignment operator that was not instantiation, run-time failures when copy-assignment operators were overloaded for const/non-const references and the wrong one was picked, and run-time failures when by-value copy-assignment operators did not have their arguments properly copy-initialized. This implementation synthesizes the implicitly-defined copy assignment operator bodies in Sema, so that the resulting ASTs encode exactly what CodeGen needs to do; there is no longer any special code in CodeGen to synthesize copy-assignment operators. The synthesis of the body is relatively simple, and we generate one of three different kinds of copy statements for each base or member: - For a class subobject, call the appropriate copy-assignment operator, after overload resolution has determined what that is. - For an array of scalar types or an array of class types that have trivial copy assignment operators, construct a call to __builtin_memcpy. - For an array of class types with non-trivial copy assignment operators, synthesize a (possibly nested!) for loop whose inner statement calls the copy constructor. - For a scalar type, use built-in assignment. This patch fixes at least a few tests cases in Boost.Spirit that were failing because CodeGen picked the wrong copy-assignment operator (leading to link-time failures), and I suspect a number of undiagnosed problems will also go away with this change. Some of the diagnostics we had previously have gotten worse with this change, since we're going through generic code for our type-checking. I will improve this in a subsequent patch. llvm-svn: 102853
2010-05-02 04:49:11 +08:00
public:
const int a;
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 {{declared here}}
#else
// expected-note@-4 {{copy assignment operator of 'E1' is implicitly deleted because field 'a' is of const-qualified type 'const int'}}
#endif
E1() : a(0) {}
};
E1 e1, e2;
void j() {
e1 = e2;
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 {{assignment operator for 'E1' first required here}}
#else
// expected-error@-4 {{object of type 'E1' cannot be assigned because its copy assignment operator is implicitly deleted}}
#endif
}
namespace ProtectedCheck {
struct X {
protected:
X &operator=(const X&);
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 {{declared protected here}}
#endif
};
struct Y : public X { };
void f(Y y) { y = y; }
struct Z {
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-error@-2 {{'operator=' is a protected member of 'ProtectedCheck::X'}}
#endif
X x;
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
// expected-note@-2 {{copy assignment operator of 'Z' is implicitly deleted because field 'x' has an inaccessible copy assignment operator}}
#endif
};
void f(Z z) { z = z; }
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 {{implicit copy assignment operator}}
#else
// expected-error@-4 {{object of type 'ProtectedCheck::Z' cannot be assigned because its copy assignment operator is implicitly deleted}}
#endif
}
namespace MultiplePaths {
struct X0 {
X0 &operator=(const X0&);
};
struct X1 : public virtual X0 { };
struct X2 : X0, X1 { }; // expected-warning{{direct base 'MultiplePaths::X0' is inaccessible due to ambiguity:\n struct MultiplePaths::X2 -> struct MultiplePaths::X0\n struct MultiplePaths::X2 -> struct MultiplePaths::X1 -> struct MultiplePaths::X0}}
void f(X2 x2) { x2 = x2; }
}