llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CodeMetrics.cpp

200 lines
7.0 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- CodeMetrics.cpp - Code cost measurements ---------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements code cost measurement utilities.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/CodeMetrics.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionCache.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
#include "llvm/IR/CallSite.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#define DEBUG_TYPE "code-metrics"
using namespace llvm;
static void
appendSpeculatableOperands(const Value *V,
SmallPtrSetImpl<const Value *> &Visited,
SmallVectorImpl<const Value *> &Worklist) {
const User *U = dyn_cast<User>(V);
if (!U)
return;
for (const Value *Operand : U->operands())
if (Visited.insert(Operand).second)
if (isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(Operand))
Worklist.push_back(Operand);
}
static void completeEphemeralValues(SmallPtrSetImpl<const Value *> &Visited,
SmallVectorImpl<const Value *> &Worklist,
SmallPtrSetImpl<const Value *> &EphValues) {
// Note: We don't speculate PHIs here, so we'll miss instruction chains kept
// alive only by ephemeral values.
// Walk the worklist using an index but without caching the size so we can
// append more entries as we process the worklist. This forms a queue without
// quadratic behavior by just leaving processed nodes at the head of the
// worklist forever.
for (int i = 0; i < (int)Worklist.size(); ++i) {
const Value *V = Worklist[i];
assert(Visited.count(V) &&
"Failed to add a worklist entry to our visited set!");
// If all uses of this value are ephemeral, then so is this value.
if (!all_of(V->users(), [&](const User *U) { return EphValues.count(U); }))
continue;
EphValues.insert(V);
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Ephemeral Value: " << *V << "\n");
// Append any more operands to consider.
appendSpeculatableOperands(V, Visited, Worklist);
}
}
// Find all ephemeral values.
void CodeMetrics::collectEphemeralValues(
const Loop *L, AssumptionCache *AC,
SmallPtrSetImpl<const Value *> &EphValues) {
SmallPtrSet<const Value *, 32> Visited;
SmallVector<const Value *, 16> Worklist;
for (auto &AssumeVH : AC->assumptions()) {
if (!AssumeVH)
continue;
Instruction *I = cast<Instruction>(AssumeVH);
// Filter out call sites outside of the loop so we don't do a function's
// worth of work for each of its loops (and, in the common case, ephemeral
// values in the loop are likely due to @llvm.assume calls in the loop).
if (!L->contains(I->getParent()))
continue;
if (EphValues.insert(I).second)
appendSpeculatableOperands(I, Visited, Worklist);
}
completeEphemeralValues(Visited, Worklist, EphValues);
}
void CodeMetrics::collectEphemeralValues(
const Function *F, AssumptionCache *AC,
SmallPtrSetImpl<const Value *> &EphValues) {
SmallPtrSet<const Value *, 32> Visited;
SmallVector<const Value *, 16> Worklist;
for (auto &AssumeVH : AC->assumptions()) {
if (!AssumeVH)
continue;
Instruction *I = cast<Instruction>(AssumeVH);
assert(I->getParent()->getParent() == F &&
"Found assumption for the wrong function!");
if (EphValues.insert(I).second)
appendSpeculatableOperands(I, Visited, Worklist);
}
completeEphemeralValues(Visited, Worklist, EphValues);
}
/// Fill in the current structure with information gleaned from the specified
/// block.
void CodeMetrics::analyzeBasicBlock(const BasicBlock *BB,
const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
const SmallPtrSetImpl<const Value*> &EphValues) {
++NumBlocks;
unsigned NumInstsBeforeThisBB = NumInsts;
for (const Instruction &I : *BB) {
// Skip ephemeral values.
if (EphValues.count(&I))
continue;
// Special handling for calls.
if (isa<CallInst>(I) || isa<InvokeInst>(I)) {
ImmutableCallSite CS(&I);
if (const Function *F = CS.getCalledFunction()) {
// If a function is both internal and has a single use, then it is
// extremely likely to get inlined in the future (it was probably
// exposed by an interleaved devirtualization pass).
if (!CS.isNoInline() && F->hasInternalLinkage() && F->hasOneUse())
++NumInlineCandidates;
// If this call is to function itself, then the function is recursive.
// Inlining it into other functions is a bad idea, because this is
// basically just a form of loop peeling, and our metrics aren't useful
// for that case.
if (F == BB->getParent())
isRecursive = true;
if (TTI.isLoweredToCall(F))
++NumCalls;
} else {
// We don't want inline asm to count as a call - that would prevent loop
// unrolling. The argument setup cost is still real, though.
if (!isa<InlineAsm>(CS.getCalledValue()))
++NumCalls;
}
}
if (const AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(&I)) {
if (!AI->isStaticAlloca())
this->usesDynamicAlloca = true;
}
if (isa<ExtractElementInst>(I) || I.getType()->isVectorTy())
++NumVectorInsts;
if (I.getType()->isTokenTy() && I.isUsedOutsideOfBlock(BB))
[IR] Add token types This introduces the basic functionality to support "token types". The motivation stems from the need to perform operations on a Value whose provenance cannot be obscured. There are several applications for such a type but my immediate motivation stems from WinEH. Our personality routine enforces a single-entry - single-exit regime for cleanups. After several rounds of optimizations, we may be left with a terminator whose "cleanup-entry block" is not entirely clear because control flow has merged two cleanups together. We have experimented with using labels as operands inside of instructions which are not terminators to indicate where we came from but found that LLVM does not expect such exotic uses of BasicBlocks. Instead, we can use this new type to clearly associate the "entry point" and "exit point" of our cleanup. This is done by having the cleanuppad yield a Token and consuming it at the cleanupret. The token type makes it impossible to obscure or otherwise hide the Value, making it trivial to track the relationship between the two points. What is the burden to the optimizer? Well, it turns out we have already paid down this cost by accepting that there are certain calls that we are not permitted to duplicate, optimizations have to watch out for such instructions anyway. There are additional places in the optimizer that we will probably have to update but early examination has given me the impression that this will not be heroic. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11861 llvm-svn: 245029
2015-08-14 13:09:07 +08:00
notDuplicatable = true;
if (const CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(&I)) {
if (CI->cannotDuplicate())
notDuplicatable = true;
if (CI->isConvergent())
convergent = true;
}
if (const InvokeInst *InvI = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(&I))
if (InvI->cannotDuplicate())
notDuplicatable = true;
NumInsts += TTI.getUserCost(&I);
}
if (isa<ReturnInst>(BB->getTerminator()))
++NumRets;
// We never want to inline functions that contain an indirectbr. This is
// incorrect because all the blockaddress's (in static global initializers
// for example) would be referring to the original function, and this indirect
// jump would jump from the inlined copy of the function into the original
// function which is extremely undefined behavior.
// FIXME: This logic isn't really right; we can safely inline functions
// with indirectbr's as long as no other function or global references the
// blockaddress of a block within the current function. And as a QOI issue,
// if someone is using a blockaddress without an indirectbr, and that
// reference somehow ends up in another function or global, we probably
// don't want to inline this function.
notDuplicatable |= isa<IndirectBrInst>(BB->getTerminator());
// Remember NumInsts for this BB.
NumBBInsts[BB] = NumInsts - NumInstsBeforeThisBB;
}