llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerExpectIntrinsic/basic.ll

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

295 lines
8.7 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

; RUN: opt -lower-expect -strip-dead-prototypes -S -o - < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -S -passes='function(lower-expect),strip-dead-prototypes' < %s | FileCheck %s
; CHECK-LABEL: @test1(
define i32 @test1(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%x.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%cmp = icmp sgt i32 %tmp, 1
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i32
%conv1 = sext i32 %conv to i64
%expval = call i64 @llvm.expect.i64(i64 %conv1, i64 1)
%tobool = icmp ne i64 %expval, 0
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: !prof !0, !misexpect !1
; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.expect
br i1 %tobool, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = call i32 (...) @f()
store i32 %call, i32* %retval
br label %return
if.end: ; preds = %entry
store i32 1, i32* %retval
br label %return
return: ; preds = %if.end, %if.then
%0 = load i32, i32* %retval
ret i32 %0
}
declare i64 @llvm.expect.i64(i64, i64) nounwind readnone
declare i32 @f(...)
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2(
define i32 @test2(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%x.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%conv = sext i32 %tmp to i64
%expval = call i64 @llvm.expect.i64(i64 %conv, i64 1)
%tobool = icmp ne i64 %expval, 0
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: !prof !0, !misexpect !1
; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.expect
br i1 %tobool, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = call i32 (...) @f()
store i32 %call, i32* %retval
br label %return
if.end: ; preds = %entry
store i32 1, i32* %retval
br label %return
return: ; preds = %if.end, %if.then
%0 = load i32, i32* %retval
ret i32 %0
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @test3(
define i32 @test3(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%x.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tobool = icmp ne i32 %tmp, 0
%lnot = xor i1 %tobool, true
%lnot.ext = zext i1 %lnot to i32
%conv = sext i32 %lnot.ext to i64
%expval = call i64 @llvm.expect.i64(i64 %conv, i64 1)
%tobool1 = icmp ne i64 %expval, 0
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: !prof !0, !misexpect !1
; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.expect
br i1 %tobool1, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = call i32 (...) @f()
store i32 %call, i32* %retval
br label %return
if.end: ; preds = %entry
store i32 1, i32* %retval
br label %return
return: ; preds = %if.end, %if.then
%0 = load i32, i32* %retval
ret i32 %0
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @test4(
define i32 @test4(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%x.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tobool = icmp ne i32 %tmp, 0
%lnot = xor i1 %tobool, true
%lnot1 = xor i1 %lnot, true
%lnot.ext = zext i1 %lnot1 to i32
%conv = sext i32 %lnot.ext to i64
%expval = call i64 @llvm.expect.i64(i64 %conv, i64 1)
%tobool2 = icmp ne i64 %expval, 0
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: !prof !0, !misexpect !1
; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.expect
br i1 %tobool2, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = call i32 (...) @f()
store i32 %call, i32* %retval
br label %return
if.end: ; preds = %entry
store i32 1, i32* %retval
br label %return
return: ; preds = %if.end, %if.then
%0 = load i32, i32* %retval
ret i32 %0
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @test5(
define i32 @test5(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%x.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%cmp = icmp slt i32 %tmp, 0
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i32
%conv1 = sext i32 %conv to i64
%expval = call i64 @llvm.expect.i64(i64 %conv1, i64 0)
%tobool = icmp ne i64 %expval, 0
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: !prof !2, !misexpect !3
; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.expect
br i1 %tobool, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = call i32 (...) @f()
store i32 %call, i32* %retval
br label %return
if.end: ; preds = %entry
store i32 1, i32* %retval
br label %return
return: ; preds = %if.end, %if.then
%0 = load i32, i32* %retval
ret i32 %0
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @test6(
define i32 @test6(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%x.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%conv = sext i32 %tmp to i64
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
%expval = call i64 @llvm.expect.i64(i64 %conv, i64 2)
; CHECK: !prof !4, !misexpect !5
; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.expect
switch i64 %expval, label %sw.epilog [
i64 1, label %sw.bb
i64 2, label %sw.bb
]
sw.bb: ; preds = %entry, %entry
store i32 0, i32* %retval
br label %return
sw.epilog: ; preds = %entry
store i32 1, i32* %retval
br label %return
return: ; preds = %sw.epilog, %sw.bb
%0 = load i32, i32* %retval
ret i32 %0
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @test7(
define i32 @test7(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%x.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%conv = sext i32 %tmp to i64
%expval = call i64 @llvm.expect.i64(i64 %conv, i64 1)
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: !prof !6, !misexpect !1
; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.expect
switch i64 %expval, label %sw.epilog [
i64 2, label %sw.bb
i64 3, label %sw.bb
]
sw.bb: ; preds = %entry, %entry
%tmp1 = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
store i32 %tmp1, i32* %retval
br label %return
sw.epilog: ; preds = %entry
store i32 0, i32* %retval
br label %return
return: ; preds = %sw.epilog, %sw.bb
%0 = load i32, i32* %retval
ret i32 %0
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @test8(
define i32 @test8(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%x.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%cmp = icmp sgt i32 %tmp, 1
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i32
%expval = call i32 @llvm.expect.i32(i32 %conv, i32 1)
%tobool = icmp ne i32 %expval, 0
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: !prof !0, !misexpect !1
; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.expect
br i1 %tobool, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = call i32 (...) @f()
store i32 %call, i32* %retval
br label %return
if.end: ; preds = %entry
store i32 1, i32* %retval
br label %return
return: ; preds = %if.end, %if.then
%0 = load i32, i32* %retval
ret i32 %0
}
declare i32 @llvm.expect.i32(i32, i32) nounwind readnone
; CHECK-LABEL: @test9(
define i32 @test9(i32 %x) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%x.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32, i32* %x.addr, align 4
%cmp = icmp sgt i32 %tmp, 1
%expval = call i1 @llvm.expect.i1(i1 %cmp, i1 1)
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: !prof !0, !misexpect !1
; CHECK-NOT: @llvm.expect
br i1 %expval, label %if.then, label %if.end
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = call i32 (...) @f()
store i32 %call, i32* %retval
br label %return
if.end: ; preds = %entry
store i32 1, i32* %retval
br label %return
return: ; preds = %if.end, %if.then
%0 = load i32, i32* %retval
ret i32 %0
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @test10(
define i32 @test10(i64 %t6) {
%t7 = call i64 @llvm.expect.i64(i64 %t6, i64 0)
%t8 = icmp ne i64 %t7, 0
%t9 = select i1 %t8, i32 1, i32 2
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: select{{.*}}, !prof !2, !misexpect !3
ret i32 %t9
}
declare i1 @llvm.expect.i1(i1, i1) nounwind readnone
; CHECK: !0 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 2000, i32 1}
Reland "clang-misexpect: Profile Guided Validation of Performance Annotations in LLVM" This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300 We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in addition to frontend instrumentation. We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select) when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight. We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the diagnostic to the user. A future patch should address the comment at the top of LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller. In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions are influenced by the use of llvm.expect Patch By: paulkirth Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324 llvm-svn: 371635
2019-09-12 00:19:50 +08:00
; CHECK: !1 = !{!"misexpect", i64 0, i64 2000, i64 1}
; CHECK: !2 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 2000}
; CHECK: !3 = !{!"misexpect", i64 1, i64 2000, i64 1}
; CHECK: !4 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 1, i32 2000}
; CHECK: !5 = !{!"misexpect", i64 2, i64 2000, i64 1}
; CHECK: !6 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 2000, i32 1, i32 1}