llvm-project/llvm/test/Instrumentation/SanitizerCoverage/coverage.ll

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

106 lines
4.1 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

; RUN: opt < %s -sancov -sanitizer-coverage-level=4 -sanitizer-coverage-trace-pc -S -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK_TRACE_PC
; RUN: opt < %s -sancov -sanitizer-coverage-level=3 -sanitizer-coverage-prune-blocks=1 -S -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECKPRUNE
[NewPM][Sancov] Make Sancov a Module Pass instead of 2 Passes This patch merges the sancov module and funciton passes into one module pass. The reason for this is because we ran into an out of memory error when attempting to run asan fuzzer on some protobufs (pc.cc files). I traced the OOM error to the destructor of SanitizerCoverage where we only call appendTo[Compiler]Used which calls appendToUsedList. I'm not sure where precisely in appendToUsedList causes the OOM, but I am able to confirm that it's calling this function *repeatedly* that causes the OOM. (I hacked sancov a bit such that I can still create and destroy a new sancov on every function run, but only call appendToUsedList after all functions in the module have finished. This passes, but when I make it such that appendToUsedList is called on every sancov destruction, we hit OOM.) I don't think the OOM is from just adding to the SmallSet and SmallVector inside appendToUsedList since in either case for a given module, they'll have the same max size. I suspect that when the existing llvm.compiler.used global is erased, the memory behind it isn't freed. I could be wrong on this though. This patch works around the OOM issue by just calling appendToUsedList at the end of every module run instead of function run. The same amount of constants still get added to llvm.compiler.used, abd we make the pass usage and logic simpler by not having any inter-pass dependencies. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66988 llvm-svn: 370971
2019-09-05 04:30:29 +08:00
; RUN: opt < %s -passes='module(sancov-module)' -sanitizer-coverage-level=4 -sanitizer-coverage-trace-pc -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK_TRACE_PC
; RUN: opt < %s -passes='module(sancov-module)' -sanitizer-coverage-level=3 -sanitizer-coverage-prune-blocks=1 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECKPRUNE
target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
[asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). - add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2). So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented), the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%. - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom, which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn. Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006 (train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}): asan+cov0 asan+cov1 diff 0-1 asan+cov2 diff 0-2 diff 1-2 400.perlbench, 65.60, 65.80, 1.00, 76.20, 1.16, 1.16 401.bzip2, 65.10, 65.50, 1.01, 75.90, 1.17, 1.16 403.gcc, 1.64, 1.69, 1.03, 2.04, 1.24, 1.21 429.mcf, 21.90, 22.60, 1.03, 23.20, 1.06, 1.03 445.gobmk, 166.00, 169.00, 1.02, 205.00, 1.23, 1.21 456.hmmer, 88.30, 87.90, 1.00, 91.00, 1.03, 1.04 458.sjeng, 210.00, 222.00, 1.06, 258.00, 1.23, 1.16 462.libquantum, 1.73, 1.75, 1.01, 2.11, 1.22, 1.21 464.h264ref, 147.00, 152.00, 1.03, 160.00, 1.09, 1.05 471.omnetpp, 115.00, 116.00, 1.01, 140.00, 1.22, 1.21 473.astar, 133.00, 131.00, 0.98, 142.00, 1.07, 1.08 483.xalancbmk, 118.00, 120.00, 1.02, 154.00, 1.31, 1.28 433.milc, 19.80, 20.00, 1.01, 20.10, 1.02, 1.01 444.namd, 16.20, 16.20, 1.00, 17.60, 1.09, 1.09 447.dealII, 41.80, 42.20, 1.01, 43.50, 1.04, 1.03 450.soplex, 7.51, 7.82, 1.04, 8.25, 1.10, 1.05 453.povray, 14.00, 14.40, 1.03, 15.80, 1.13, 1.10 470.lbm, 33.30, 34.10, 1.02, 34.10, 1.02, 1.00 482.sphinx3, 12.40, 12.30, 0.99, 13.00, 1.05, 1.06 llvm-svn: 199488
2014-01-17 19:00:30 +08:00
define void @foo(i32* %a) sanitize_address {
entry:
[asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). - add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2). So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented), the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%. - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom, which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn. Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006 (train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}): asan+cov0 asan+cov1 diff 0-1 asan+cov2 diff 0-2 diff 1-2 400.perlbench, 65.60, 65.80, 1.00, 76.20, 1.16, 1.16 401.bzip2, 65.10, 65.50, 1.01, 75.90, 1.17, 1.16 403.gcc, 1.64, 1.69, 1.03, 2.04, 1.24, 1.21 429.mcf, 21.90, 22.60, 1.03, 23.20, 1.06, 1.03 445.gobmk, 166.00, 169.00, 1.02, 205.00, 1.23, 1.21 456.hmmer, 88.30, 87.90, 1.00, 91.00, 1.03, 1.04 458.sjeng, 210.00, 222.00, 1.06, 258.00, 1.23, 1.16 462.libquantum, 1.73, 1.75, 1.01, 2.11, 1.22, 1.21 464.h264ref, 147.00, 152.00, 1.03, 160.00, 1.09, 1.05 471.omnetpp, 115.00, 116.00, 1.01, 140.00, 1.22, 1.21 473.astar, 133.00, 131.00, 0.98, 142.00, 1.07, 1.08 483.xalancbmk, 118.00, 120.00, 1.02, 154.00, 1.31, 1.28 433.milc, 19.80, 20.00, 1.01, 20.10, 1.02, 1.01 444.namd, 16.20, 16.20, 1.00, 17.60, 1.09, 1.09 447.dealII, 41.80, 42.20, 1.01, 43.50, 1.04, 1.03 450.soplex, 7.51, 7.82, 1.04, 8.25, 1.10, 1.05 453.povray, 14.00, 14.40, 1.03, 15.80, 1.13, 1.10 470.lbm, 33.30, 34.10, 1.02, 34.10, 1.02, 1.00 482.sphinx3, 12.40, 12.30, 0.99, 13.00, 1.05, 1.06 llvm-svn: 199488
2014-01-17 19:00:30 +08:00
%tobool = icmp eq i32* %a, null
br i1 %tobool, label %if.end, label %if.then
if.then: ; preds = %entry
store i32 0, i32* %a, align 4
br label %if.end
if.end: ; preds = %entry, %if.then
ret void
}
; CHECK0-NOT: @llvm.global_ctors = {{.*}}{ i32 2, void ()* @sancov.module_ctor }
; CHECK1: @llvm.global_ctors = {{.*}}{ i32 2, void ()* @sancov.module_ctor, i8* null }
; CHECK2: @llvm.global_ctors = {{.*}}{ i32 2, void ()* @sancov.module_ctor, i8* null }
; CHECK0-NOT: call void @__sanitizer_cov(
; CHECK0-NOT: call void @__sanitizer_cov_module_init(
[asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). - add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2). So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented), the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%. - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom, which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn. Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006 (train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}): asan+cov0 asan+cov1 diff 0-1 asan+cov2 diff 0-2 diff 1-2 400.perlbench, 65.60, 65.80, 1.00, 76.20, 1.16, 1.16 401.bzip2, 65.10, 65.50, 1.01, 75.90, 1.17, 1.16 403.gcc, 1.64, 1.69, 1.03, 2.04, 1.24, 1.21 429.mcf, 21.90, 22.60, 1.03, 23.20, 1.06, 1.03 445.gobmk, 166.00, 169.00, 1.02, 205.00, 1.23, 1.21 456.hmmer, 88.30, 87.90, 1.00, 91.00, 1.03, 1.04 458.sjeng, 210.00, 222.00, 1.06, 258.00, 1.23, 1.16 462.libquantum, 1.73, 1.75, 1.01, 2.11, 1.22, 1.21 464.h264ref, 147.00, 152.00, 1.03, 160.00, 1.09, 1.05 471.omnetpp, 115.00, 116.00, 1.01, 140.00, 1.22, 1.21 473.astar, 133.00, 131.00, 0.98, 142.00, 1.07, 1.08 483.xalancbmk, 118.00, 120.00, 1.02, 154.00, 1.31, 1.28 433.milc, 19.80, 20.00, 1.01, 20.10, 1.02, 1.01 444.namd, 16.20, 16.20, 1.00, 17.60, 1.09, 1.09 447.dealII, 41.80, 42.20, 1.01, 43.50, 1.04, 1.03 450.soplex, 7.51, 7.82, 1.04, 8.25, 1.10, 1.05 453.povray, 14.00, 14.40, 1.03, 15.80, 1.13, 1.10 470.lbm, 33.30, 34.10, 1.02, 34.10, 1.02, 1.00 482.sphinx3, 12.40, 12.30, 0.99, 13.00, 1.05, 1.06 llvm-svn: 199488
2014-01-17 19:00:30 +08:00
; CHECK1-LABEL: define void @foo
; CHECK1: %0 = load atomic i32, i32* {{.*}} monotonic, align 4, !nosanitize
; CHECK1: %1 = icmp sge i32 0, %0
[asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). - add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2). So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented), the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%. - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom, which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn. Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006 (train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}): asan+cov0 asan+cov1 diff 0-1 asan+cov2 diff 0-2 diff 1-2 400.perlbench, 65.60, 65.80, 1.00, 76.20, 1.16, 1.16 401.bzip2, 65.10, 65.50, 1.01, 75.90, 1.17, 1.16 403.gcc, 1.64, 1.69, 1.03, 2.04, 1.24, 1.21 429.mcf, 21.90, 22.60, 1.03, 23.20, 1.06, 1.03 445.gobmk, 166.00, 169.00, 1.02, 205.00, 1.23, 1.21 456.hmmer, 88.30, 87.90, 1.00, 91.00, 1.03, 1.04 458.sjeng, 210.00, 222.00, 1.06, 258.00, 1.23, 1.16 462.libquantum, 1.73, 1.75, 1.01, 2.11, 1.22, 1.21 464.h264ref, 147.00, 152.00, 1.03, 160.00, 1.09, 1.05 471.omnetpp, 115.00, 116.00, 1.01, 140.00, 1.22, 1.21 473.astar, 133.00, 131.00, 0.98, 142.00, 1.07, 1.08 483.xalancbmk, 118.00, 120.00, 1.02, 154.00, 1.31, 1.28 433.milc, 19.80, 20.00, 1.01, 20.10, 1.02, 1.01 444.namd, 16.20, 16.20, 1.00, 17.60, 1.09, 1.09 447.dealII, 41.80, 42.20, 1.01, 43.50, 1.04, 1.03 450.soplex, 7.51, 7.82, 1.04, 8.25, 1.10, 1.05 453.povray, 14.00, 14.40, 1.03, 15.80, 1.13, 1.10 470.lbm, 33.30, 34.10, 1.02, 34.10, 1.02, 1.00 482.sphinx3, 12.40, 12.30, 0.99, 13.00, 1.05, 1.06 llvm-svn: 199488
2014-01-17 19:00:30 +08:00
; CHECK1: br i1 %1, label %2, label %3
; CHECK1: call void @__sanitizer_cov(i32*{{.*}})
; CHECK1: call void asm sideeffect "", ""()
[asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). - add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2). So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented), the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%. - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom, which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn. Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006 (train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}): asan+cov0 asan+cov1 diff 0-1 asan+cov2 diff 0-2 diff 1-2 400.perlbench, 65.60, 65.80, 1.00, 76.20, 1.16, 1.16 401.bzip2, 65.10, 65.50, 1.01, 75.90, 1.17, 1.16 403.gcc, 1.64, 1.69, 1.03, 2.04, 1.24, 1.21 429.mcf, 21.90, 22.60, 1.03, 23.20, 1.06, 1.03 445.gobmk, 166.00, 169.00, 1.02, 205.00, 1.23, 1.21 456.hmmer, 88.30, 87.90, 1.00, 91.00, 1.03, 1.04 458.sjeng, 210.00, 222.00, 1.06, 258.00, 1.23, 1.16 462.libquantum, 1.73, 1.75, 1.01, 2.11, 1.22, 1.21 464.h264ref, 147.00, 152.00, 1.03, 160.00, 1.09, 1.05 471.omnetpp, 115.00, 116.00, 1.01, 140.00, 1.22, 1.21 473.astar, 133.00, 131.00, 0.98, 142.00, 1.07, 1.08 483.xalancbmk, 118.00, 120.00, 1.02, 154.00, 1.31, 1.28 433.milc, 19.80, 20.00, 1.01, 20.10, 1.02, 1.01 444.namd, 16.20, 16.20, 1.00, 17.60, 1.09, 1.09 447.dealII, 41.80, 42.20, 1.01, 43.50, 1.04, 1.03 450.soplex, 7.51, 7.82, 1.04, 8.25, 1.10, 1.05 453.povray, 14.00, 14.40, 1.03, 15.80, 1.13, 1.10 470.lbm, 33.30, 34.10, 1.02, 34.10, 1.02, 1.00 482.sphinx3, 12.40, 12.30, 0.99, 13.00, 1.05, 1.06 llvm-svn: 199488
2014-01-17 19:00:30 +08:00
; CHECK1-NOT: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECK1: ret void
[asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). - add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2). So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented), the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%. - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom, which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn. Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006 (train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}): asan+cov0 asan+cov1 diff 0-1 asan+cov2 diff 0-2 diff 1-2 400.perlbench, 65.60, 65.80, 1.00, 76.20, 1.16, 1.16 401.bzip2, 65.10, 65.50, 1.01, 75.90, 1.17, 1.16 403.gcc, 1.64, 1.69, 1.03, 2.04, 1.24, 1.21 429.mcf, 21.90, 22.60, 1.03, 23.20, 1.06, 1.03 445.gobmk, 166.00, 169.00, 1.02, 205.00, 1.23, 1.21 456.hmmer, 88.30, 87.90, 1.00, 91.00, 1.03, 1.04 458.sjeng, 210.00, 222.00, 1.06, 258.00, 1.23, 1.16 462.libquantum, 1.73, 1.75, 1.01, 2.11, 1.22, 1.21 464.h264ref, 147.00, 152.00, 1.03, 160.00, 1.09, 1.05 471.omnetpp, 115.00, 116.00, 1.01, 140.00, 1.22, 1.21 473.astar, 133.00, 131.00, 0.98, 142.00, 1.07, 1.08 483.xalancbmk, 118.00, 120.00, 1.02, 154.00, 1.31, 1.28 433.milc, 19.80, 20.00, 1.01, 20.10, 1.02, 1.01 444.namd, 16.20, 16.20, 1.00, 17.60, 1.09, 1.09 447.dealII, 41.80, 42.20, 1.01, 43.50, 1.04, 1.03 450.soplex, 7.51, 7.82, 1.04, 8.25, 1.10, 1.05 453.povray, 14.00, 14.40, 1.03, 15.80, 1.13, 1.10 470.lbm, 33.30, 34.10, 1.02, 34.10, 1.02, 1.00 482.sphinx3, 12.40, 12.30, 0.99, 13.00, 1.05, 1.06 llvm-svn: 199488
2014-01-17 19:00:30 +08:00
; CHECK1-LABEL: define internal void @sancov.module_ctor
; CHECK1-NOT: ret
; CHECK1: call void @__sanitizer_cov_module_init({{.*}}, i64 2, {{.*}}@__sancov_gen_modname
; CHECK1: ret
; CHECK_WITH_CHECK-LABEL: define void @foo
; CHECK_WITH_CHECK: __sanitizer_cov_with_check
; CHECK_WITH_CHECK: ret void
; CHECK_WITH_CHECK-LABEL: define internal void @sancov.module_ctor
; CHECK_WITH_CHECK-NOT: ret
; CHECK_WITH_CHECK: call void @__sanitizer_cov_module_init({{.*}}, i64 3,
; CHECK_WITH_CHECK: ret
[asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). - add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2). So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented), the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%. - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom, which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn. Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006 (train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}): asan+cov0 asan+cov1 diff 0-1 asan+cov2 diff 0-2 diff 1-2 400.perlbench, 65.60, 65.80, 1.00, 76.20, 1.16, 1.16 401.bzip2, 65.10, 65.50, 1.01, 75.90, 1.17, 1.16 403.gcc, 1.64, 1.69, 1.03, 2.04, 1.24, 1.21 429.mcf, 21.90, 22.60, 1.03, 23.20, 1.06, 1.03 445.gobmk, 166.00, 169.00, 1.02, 205.00, 1.23, 1.21 456.hmmer, 88.30, 87.90, 1.00, 91.00, 1.03, 1.04 458.sjeng, 210.00, 222.00, 1.06, 258.00, 1.23, 1.16 462.libquantum, 1.73, 1.75, 1.01, 2.11, 1.22, 1.21 464.h264ref, 147.00, 152.00, 1.03, 160.00, 1.09, 1.05 471.omnetpp, 115.00, 116.00, 1.01, 140.00, 1.22, 1.21 473.astar, 133.00, 131.00, 0.98, 142.00, 1.07, 1.08 483.xalancbmk, 118.00, 120.00, 1.02, 154.00, 1.31, 1.28 433.milc, 19.80, 20.00, 1.01, 20.10, 1.02, 1.01 444.namd, 16.20, 16.20, 1.00, 17.60, 1.09, 1.09 447.dealII, 41.80, 42.20, 1.01, 43.50, 1.04, 1.03 450.soplex, 7.51, 7.82, 1.04, 8.25, 1.10, 1.05 453.povray, 14.00, 14.40, 1.03, 15.80, 1.13, 1.10 470.lbm, 33.30, 34.10, 1.02, 34.10, 1.02, 1.00 482.sphinx3, 12.40, 12.30, 0.99, 13.00, 1.05, 1.06 llvm-svn: 199488
2014-01-17 19:00:30 +08:00
; CHECK2-LABEL: define void @foo
; CHECK2: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECK2: call void asm sideeffect "", ""()
[asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). - add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2). So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented), the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%. - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom, which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn. Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006 (train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}): asan+cov0 asan+cov1 diff 0-1 asan+cov2 diff 0-2 diff 1-2 400.perlbench, 65.60, 65.80, 1.00, 76.20, 1.16, 1.16 401.bzip2, 65.10, 65.50, 1.01, 75.90, 1.17, 1.16 403.gcc, 1.64, 1.69, 1.03, 2.04, 1.24, 1.21 429.mcf, 21.90, 22.60, 1.03, 23.20, 1.06, 1.03 445.gobmk, 166.00, 169.00, 1.02, 205.00, 1.23, 1.21 456.hmmer, 88.30, 87.90, 1.00, 91.00, 1.03, 1.04 458.sjeng, 210.00, 222.00, 1.06, 258.00, 1.23, 1.16 462.libquantum, 1.73, 1.75, 1.01, 2.11, 1.22, 1.21 464.h264ref, 147.00, 152.00, 1.03, 160.00, 1.09, 1.05 471.omnetpp, 115.00, 116.00, 1.01, 140.00, 1.22, 1.21 473.astar, 133.00, 131.00, 0.98, 142.00, 1.07, 1.08 483.xalancbmk, 118.00, 120.00, 1.02, 154.00, 1.31, 1.28 433.milc, 19.80, 20.00, 1.01, 20.10, 1.02, 1.01 444.namd, 16.20, 16.20, 1.00, 17.60, 1.09, 1.09 447.dealII, 41.80, 42.20, 1.01, 43.50, 1.04, 1.03 450.soplex, 7.51, 7.82, 1.04, 8.25, 1.10, 1.05 453.povray, 14.00, 14.40, 1.03, 15.80, 1.13, 1.10 470.lbm, 33.30, 34.10, 1.02, 34.10, 1.02, 1.00 482.sphinx3, 12.40, 12.30, 0.99, 13.00, 1.05, 1.06 llvm-svn: 199488
2014-01-17 19:00:30 +08:00
; CHECK2: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECK2: call void asm sideeffect "", ""()
; CHECK2: call void asm sideeffect "", ""()
[asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). - add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2). So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented), the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%. - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom, which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn. Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006 (train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}): asan+cov0 asan+cov1 diff 0-1 asan+cov2 diff 0-2 diff 1-2 400.perlbench, 65.60, 65.80, 1.00, 76.20, 1.16, 1.16 401.bzip2, 65.10, 65.50, 1.01, 75.90, 1.17, 1.16 403.gcc, 1.64, 1.69, 1.03, 2.04, 1.24, 1.21 429.mcf, 21.90, 22.60, 1.03, 23.20, 1.06, 1.03 445.gobmk, 166.00, 169.00, 1.02, 205.00, 1.23, 1.21 456.hmmer, 88.30, 87.90, 1.00, 91.00, 1.03, 1.04 458.sjeng, 210.00, 222.00, 1.06, 258.00, 1.23, 1.16 462.libquantum, 1.73, 1.75, 1.01, 2.11, 1.22, 1.21 464.h264ref, 147.00, 152.00, 1.03, 160.00, 1.09, 1.05 471.omnetpp, 115.00, 116.00, 1.01, 140.00, 1.22, 1.21 473.astar, 133.00, 131.00, 0.98, 142.00, 1.07, 1.08 483.xalancbmk, 118.00, 120.00, 1.02, 154.00, 1.31, 1.28 433.milc, 19.80, 20.00, 1.01, 20.10, 1.02, 1.01 444.namd, 16.20, 16.20, 1.00, 17.60, 1.09, 1.09 447.dealII, 41.80, 42.20, 1.01, 43.50, 1.04, 1.03 450.soplex, 7.51, 7.82, 1.04, 8.25, 1.10, 1.05 453.povray, 14.00, 14.40, 1.03, 15.80, 1.13, 1.10 470.lbm, 33.30, 34.10, 1.02, 34.10, 1.02, 1.00 482.sphinx3, 12.40, 12.30, 0.99, 13.00, 1.05, 1.06 llvm-svn: 199488
2014-01-17 19:00:30 +08:00
; CHECK2-NOT: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECK2: ret void
; CHECK2-LABEL: define internal void @sancov.module_ctor
; CHECK2-NOT: ret
; CHECK2: call void @__sanitizer_cov_module_init({{.*}}, i64 3,
; CHECK2: ret
; CHECK3-LABEL: define void @foo
; CHECK3: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECK3: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECK3-NOT: ret void
; CHECK3: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECK3-NOT: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECK3: ret void
%struct.StructWithVptr = type { i32 (...)** }
define void @CallViaVptr(%struct.StructWithVptr* %foo) uwtable sanitize_address {
entry:
%0 = bitcast %struct.StructWithVptr* %foo to void (%struct.StructWithVptr*)***
%vtable = load void (%struct.StructWithVptr*)**, void (%struct.StructWithVptr*)*** %0, align 8
%1 = load void (%struct.StructWithVptr*)*, void (%struct.StructWithVptr*)** %vtable, align 8
tail call void %1(%struct.StructWithVptr* %foo)
tail call void %1(%struct.StructWithVptr* %foo)
tail call void asm sideeffect "", ""()
ret void
}
; CHECK_TRACE_PC-LABEL: define void @foo
; CHECK_TRACE_PC: call void @__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc
; CHECK_TRACE_PC: ret void
; CHECK_TRACE_PC-LABEL: define void @CallViaVptr
; CHECK_TRACE_PC: call void @__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_indir
; CHECK_TRACE_PC: call void @__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_indir
; CHECK_TRACE_PC: ret void
define void @call_unreachable() uwtable sanitize_address {
entry:
unreachable
}
; CHECKPRUNE-LABEL: define void @foo
; CHECKPRUNE: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECKPRUNE: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECKPRUNE: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECKPRUNE-NOT: call void @__sanitizer_cov
; CHECKPRUNE: ret void