maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/mips16_attr_allowed.c

28 lines
976 B
C
Raw Normal View History

First step in implementation of mips16 and nomips16 attributes. Waiting for new llvm attribute code for the next step. llvm-svn: 172626
2013-01-17 01:10:28 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple mipsel-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only -verify %s
void foo32();
void foo16();
Added the attribute name to the err_attribute_wrong_number_arguments diagnostic for clarity; updated almost all of the affected test cases. Thanks to Fariborz Jahanian for the suggestion! llvm-svn: 186980
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
void __attribute__((nomips16)) foo32();
void __attribute__((mips16)) foo16();
First step in implementation of mips16 and nomips16 attributes. Waiting for new llvm attribute code for the next step. llvm-svn: 172626
2013-01-17 01:10:28 +08:00
Added the attribute name to the err_attribute_wrong_number_arguments diagnostic for clarity; updated almost all of the affected test cases. Thanks to Fariborz Jahanian for the suggestion! llvm-svn: 186980
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
void __attribute__((nomips16)) foo32_();
void __attribute__((mips16)) foo16_();
First step in implementation of mips16 and nomips16 attributes. Waiting for new llvm attribute code for the next step. llvm-svn: 172626
2013-01-17 01:10:28 +08:00
void foo32_();
void foo16_();
Added the attribute name to the err_attribute_wrong_number_arguments diagnostic for clarity; updated almost all of the affected test cases. Thanks to Fariborz Jahanian for the suggestion! llvm-svn: 186980
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
void foo32__() __attribute__((nomips16));
void foo32__() __attribute__((mips16));
First step in implementation of mips16 and nomips16 attributes. Waiting for new llvm attribute code for the next step. llvm-svn: 172626
2013-01-17 01:10:28 +08:00
PR17666: Instead of allowing an initial identifier argument in any attribute which we don't think can't have one, only allow it in the tiny number of attributes which opts into this weird parse rule. I've manually checked that the handlers for all these attributes can in fact cope with an identifier as the argument. This is still somewhat terrible; we should move more fully towards picking the parsing rules based on the attribute, and make the Parse -> Sema interface more type-safe. llvm-svn: 193295
2013-10-24 09:07:54 +08:00
void foo32a() __attribute__((nomips16(0))) ; // expected-error {{'nomips16' attribute takes no arguments}}
void __attribute__((mips16(1))) foo16a(); // expected-error {{'mips16' attribute takes no arguments}}
First step in implementation of mips16 and nomips16 attributes. Waiting for new llvm attribute code for the next step. llvm-svn: 172626
2013-01-17 01:10:28 +08:00
Added the attribute name to the err_attribute_wrong_number_arguments diagnostic for clarity; updated almost all of the affected test cases. Thanks to Fariborz Jahanian for the suggestion! llvm-svn: 186980
2013-07-24 03:30:11 +08:00
void __attribute__((nomips16(1, 2))) foo32b(); // expected-error {{'nomips16' attribute takes no arguments}}
void __attribute__((mips16(1, 2))) foo16b(); // expected-error {{'mips16' attribute takes no arguments}}
First step in implementation of mips16 and nomips16 attributes. Waiting for new llvm attribute code for the next step. llvm-svn: 172626
2013-01-17 01:10:28 +08:00
__attribute((nomips16)) int a; // expected-error {{attribute only applies to functions}}
__attribute((mips16)) int b; // expected-error {{attribute only applies to functions}}