maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/UserExpression.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

406 lines
15 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// ``` However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this is done in the same way in other files). This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators, all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line). Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
2020-01-24 15:23:27 +08:00
//===-- UserExpression.cpp ------------------------------------------------===//
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
//
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 16:50:56 +08:00
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
[lldb][NFC] Use C++ versions of the deprecated C standard library headers The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivalent. Reviewed By: shafik Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103084
2021-05-26 18:19:37 +08:00
#include <cstdio>
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <map>
#include <string>
#include "lldb/Core/Module.h"
#include "lldb/Core/StreamFile.h"
#include "lldb/Core/ValueObjectConstResult.h"
Add a DiagnosticManager replace error streams in the expression parser. We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave all of them. To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors to the user. This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead pass the Severity flag. The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase. <rdar://problem/22864976> llvm-svn: 263859
2016-03-19 08:03:59 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/DiagnosticManager.h"
[Expression] Remove unused dependency lldbExpression was linking against lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, and lldbPluginExpressionParserClang was linking against lldbExpression. There's no reason lldbExpression should need anything from lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, so let's remove that dependency. llvm-svn: 360208
2019-05-08 07:11:05 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/ExpressionVariable.h"
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/IRExecutionUnit.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/IRInterpreter.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/Materializer.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/UserExpression.h"
#include "lldb/Host/HostInfo.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/Block.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/Function.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/ObjectFile.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/SymbolVendor.h"
#include "lldb/Symbol/Type.h"
Now persistent expression data no longer lives with the Target, but rather with the corresponding TypeSystem. This makes sense because what kind of data there is -- and how it can be looked up -- depends on the language. Functionality that is common to all type systems is factored out into PersistentExpressionState. llvm-svn: 248934
2015-10-01 03:57:57 +08:00
#include "lldb/Symbol/TypeSystem.h"
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Symbol/VariableList.h"
#include "lldb/Target/ExecutionContext.h"
#include "lldb/Target/Process.h"
#include "lldb/Target/StackFrame.h"
#include "lldb/Target/Target.h"
#include "lldb/Target/ThreadPlan.h"
#include "lldb/Target/ThreadPlanCallUserExpression.h"
Move classes from Core -> Utility. This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility. ConstString Error RegularExpression Stream StreamString The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies. These are all low level and very widely used classes, and previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes sense from both the short term and long term perspective in solving this problem. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427 llvm-svn: 293941
2017-02-03 05:39:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Utility/ConstString.h"
[lldb] Rename Logging.h to LLDBLog.h and clean up includes Most of our code was including Log.h even though that is not where the "lldb" log channel is defined (Log.h defines the generic logging infrastructure). This worked because Log.h included Logging.h, even though it should. After the recent refactor, it became impossible the two files include each other in this direction (the opposite inclusion is needed), so this patch removes the workaround that was put in place and cleans up all files to include the right thing. It also renames the file to LLDBLog to better reflect its purpose.
2022-02-03 20:26:10 +08:00
#include "lldb/Utility/LLDBLog.h"
Move Log from Core -> Utility. All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this class can now safely be lowered into Utility. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559 llvm-svn: 296909
2017-03-04 04:56:28 +08:00
#include "lldb/Utility/Log.h"
Move classes from Core -> Utility. This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility. ConstString Error RegularExpression Stream StreamString The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies. These are all low level and very widely used classes, and previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes sense from both the short term and long term perspective in solving this problem. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427 llvm-svn: 293941
2017-02-03 05:39:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Utility/StreamString.h"
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
using namespace lldb_private;
[lldb][NFC] Move LLVM RTTI implementation from enum to static ID variable Summary: swift-lldb currently has to patch the ExpressionKind enum to add support for Swift expressions. If we implement LLVM's RTTI with a static ID variable instead of a centralised enum we can drop that patch. Reviewers: labath, davide Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits Tags: #upstreaming_lldb_s_downstream_patches, #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70070
2019-11-12 17:04:32 +08:00
char UserExpression::ID;
Add the ability to pass an EvaluateExpressionOptions when you make a UserExpression. This isn't used in this commit but will be in a future commit. llvm-svn: 251887
2015-11-03 10:11:24 +08:00
UserExpression::UserExpression(ExecutionContextScope &exe_scope,
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
llvm::StringRef expr, llvm::StringRef prefix,
Add the ability to pass an EvaluateExpressionOptions when you make a UserExpression. This isn't used in this commit but will be in a future commit. llvm-svn: 251887
2015-11-03 10:11:24 +08:00
lldb::LanguageType language,
ResultType desired_type,
[lldb][NFC] Move LLVM RTTI implementation from enum to static ID variable Summary: swift-lldb currently has to patch the ExpressionKind enum to add support for Swift expressions. If we implement LLVM's RTTI with a static ID variable instead of a centralised enum we can drop that patch. Reviewers: labath, davide Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits Tags: #upstreaming_lldb_s_downstream_patches, #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70070
2019-11-12 17:04:32 +08:00
const EvaluateExpressionOptions &options)
Make llvm::StringRef to std::string conversions explicit. This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with std::string_view. There should be no functional change here. This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies. This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
2020-01-29 03:23:46 +08:00
: Expression(exe_scope), m_expr_text(std::string(expr)),
m_expr_prefix(std::string(prefix)), m_language(language),
m_desired_type(desired_type), m_options(options) {}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default; Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default; $ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,modernize-use-equals-default' -fix , https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-equals-default.html Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104041
2021-07-03 02:27:37 +08:00
UserExpression::~UserExpression() = default;
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
void UserExpression::InstallContext(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx) {
m_jit_process_wp = exe_ctx.GetProcessSP();
lldb::StackFrameSP frame_sp = exe_ctx.GetFrameSP();
if (frame_sp)
m_address = frame_sp->GetFrameCodeAddress();
}
bool UserExpression::LockAndCheckContext(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx,
lldb::TargetSP &target_sp,
lldb::ProcessSP &process_sp,
lldb::StackFrameSP &frame_sp) {
lldb::ProcessSP expected_process_sp = m_jit_process_wp.lock();
process_sp = exe_ctx.GetProcessSP();
if (process_sp != expected_process_sp)
return false;
process_sp = exe_ctx.GetProcessSP();
target_sp = exe_ctx.GetTargetSP();
frame_sp = exe_ctx.GetFrameSP();
if (m_address.IsValid()) {
if (!frame_sp)
return false;
[UserExpression] Clean up `return` after `else`.
2020-01-04 08:49:51 +08:00
return (Address::CompareLoadAddress(m_address,
frame_sp->GetFrameCodeAddress(),
target_sp.get()) == 0);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
return true;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
bool UserExpression::MatchesContext(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx) {
lldb::TargetSP target_sp;
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp;
lldb::StackFrameSP frame_sp;
return LockAndCheckContext(exe_ctx, target_sp, process_sp, frame_sp);
}
lldb::addr_t UserExpression::GetObjectPointer(lldb::StackFrameSP frame_sp,
ConstString &object_name,
Rename Error -> Status. This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed on the lldb-dev mailing list. A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error" appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too serious. llvm-svn: 302872
2017-05-12 12:51:55 +08:00
Status &err) {
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
err.Clear();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (!frame_sp) {
err.SetErrorStringWithFormat(
"Couldn't load '%s' because the context is incomplete",
object_name.AsCString());
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
lldb::VariableSP var_sp;
lldb::ValueObjectSP valobj_sp;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
valobj_sp = frame_sp->GetValueForVariableExpressionPath(
[lldb][NFC] Remove several inefficient ConstString -> const char * -> StringRef conversions StringRef will call strlen on the C string which is inefficient (as ConstString already knows the string lenght and so does StringRef). This patch replaces all those calls with GetStringRef() which doesn't recompute the length.
2020-02-11 16:05:37 +08:00
object_name.GetStringRef(), lldb::eNoDynamicValues,
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionCheckPtrVsMember |
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionsNoFragileObjcIvar |
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionsNoSyntheticChildren |
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionsNoSyntheticArrayRange,
Add a DiagnosticManager replace error streams in the expression parser. We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave all of them. To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors to the user. This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead pass the Severity flag. The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase. <rdar://problem/22864976> llvm-svn: 263859
2016-03-19 08:03:59 +08:00
var_sp, err);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (!err.Success() || !valobj_sp.get())
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
lldb::addr_t ret = valobj_sp->GetValueAsUnsigned(LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (ret == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
err.SetErrorStringWithFormat(
"Couldn't load '%s' because its value couldn't be evaluated",
object_name.AsCString());
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
return ret;
}
[lldb][NFCI] Remove UserExpression::GetJITModule UserExpression::GetJITModule was used to support an option in UserExpression::Evaluate that let you hold onto the JIT Module used during the expression evaluation. This was only actually used in one spot -- REPL::IOHandlerInputComplete. That method didn't actually take use the JIT module it got back, so this feature was not used in practice. This means that we can delete the support in UserExpression::Evaluate and delete the UserExpression::GetJITModule method entirely.
2020-01-31 15:16:12 +08:00
lldb::ExpressionResults
UserExpression::Evaluate(ExecutionContext &exe_ctx,
const EvaluateExpressionOptions &options,
llvm::StringRef expr, llvm::StringRef prefix,
lldb::ValueObjectSP &result_valobj_sp, Status &error,
std::string *fixed_expression, ValueObject *ctx_obj) {
[lldb] Convert "LLDB" log channel to the new API
2022-01-31 22:57:48 +08:00
Log *log(GetLog(LLDBLog::Expressions | LLDBLog::Step));
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
[Expressions] Add support of expressions evaluation in some object's context Summary: This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object. Consider the following example: ``` struct S { int a = 11; int b = 12; }; int main() { S s; int a = 1; int b = 2; // We have stopped here return 0; } ``` This patch allows to do something like that: ``` lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b") ``` and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be used (not locals `a` and `b`). This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad` type). Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318 llvm-svn: 353149
2019-02-05 17:14:36 +08:00
if (ctx_obj) {
static unsigned const ctx_type_mask =
lldb::TypeFlags::eTypeIsClass | lldb::TypeFlags::eTypeIsStructUnion;
if (!(ctx_obj->GetTypeInfo() & ctx_type_mask)) {
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Passed a context object of "
"an invalid type, can't run expressions.");
error.SetErrorString("a context object of an invalid type passed");
return lldb::eExpressionSetupError;
}
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
lldb_private::ExecutionPolicy execution_policy = options.GetExecutionPolicy();
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
lldb::LanguageType language = options.GetLanguage();
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
const ResultType desired_type = options.DoesCoerceToId()
? UserExpression::eResultTypeId
: UserExpression::eResultTypeAny;
lldb::ExpressionResults execution_results = lldb::eExpressionSetupError;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
Target *target = exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr();
if (!target) {
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Passed a NULL target, can't "
"run expressions.");
UserExpression::Evaluate only returns a non-empty ValueObjectSP if it returns eExpressionCompleted. Don't try to get the error from the ValueObjectSP if that's not true. I just have a report of this from the field, I don't know how to make it fail yet. <rdar://problem/29113004> llvm-svn: 286170
2016-11-08 06:47:01 +08:00
error.SetErrorString("expression passed a null target");
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
return lldb::eExpressionSetupError;
}
Process *process = exe_ctx.GetProcessPtr();
[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr Summary: NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]] This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using `nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html for more information. This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base: ``` run-clang-tidy.py \ -header-filter='.*' \ -checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \ -fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \ -format \ -style LLVM \ -p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc ``` NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in isolation somehow. NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most parts. Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits Tags: #lldb, #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847 llvm-svn: 361484
2019-05-23 19:14:47 +08:00
if (process == nullptr || process->GetState() != lldb::eStateStopped) {
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (execution_policy == eExecutionPolicyAlways) {
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Expression may not run, but "
"is not constant ==");
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
error.SetErrorString("expression needed to run but couldn't");
return execution_results;
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
[lldb] Fix that running a top level expression without a process fails with a cryptic error Right now when running `expr --top-level -- void foo() {}`, LLDB just prints a cryptic `error: Couldn't find $__lldb_expr() in the module` error. The reason for that is that if we don't have a running process, we try to set our execution policy to always use the IR interpreter (ExecutionPolicyNever) which works even without a process. However that code didn't consider the special ExecutionPolicyTopLevel which we use for top-level expressions. By changing the execution policy to ExecutionPolicyNever, LLDB thinks we're actually trying to interpret a normal expression inside our `$__lldb_expr` function and then fails when looking for it. This just adds an exception for top-level expressions to that code and a bunch of tests. Reviewed By: shafik Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91723
2021-02-12 00:00:17 +08:00
// Explicitly force the IR interpreter to evaluate the expression when the
// there is no process that supports running the expression for us. Don't
// change the execution policy if we have the special top-level policy that
// doesn't contain any expression and there is nothing to interpret.
if (execution_policy != eExecutionPolicyTopLevel &&
(process == nullptr || !process->CanJIT()))
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
execution_policy = eExecutionPolicyNever;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Compilation can end up calling functions (e.g. to resolve indirect functions) so I added a way for compilation to take a "thread to use for compilation". If it isn't set then the compilation will use the currently selected thread. This should help keep function execution to the one thread intended. llvm-svn: 263972
2016-03-22 03:21:13 +08:00
// We need to set the expression execution thread here, turns out parse can
Reflow paragraphs in comments. This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read. FYI, the script I used was: import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2) continue if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = "" out.write(line) os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1]) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144 llvm-svn: 331197
2018-05-01 00:49:04 +08:00
// call functions in the process of looking up symbols, which will escape the
// context set by exe_ctx passed to Execute.
Compilation can end up calling functions (e.g. to resolve indirect functions) so I added a way for compilation to take a "thread to use for compilation". If it isn't set then the compilation will use the currently selected thread. This should help keep function execution to the one thread intended. llvm-svn: 263972
2016-03-22 03:21:13 +08:00
lldb::ThreadSP thread_sp = exe_ctx.GetThreadSP();
ThreadList::ExpressionExecutionThreadPusher execution_thread_pusher(
thread_sp);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
llvm::StringRef full_prefix;
llvm::StringRef option_prefix(options.GetPrefix());
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
std::string full_prefix_storage;
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
if (!prefix.empty() && !option_prefix.empty()) {
Make llvm::StringRef to std::string conversions explicit. This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with std::string_view. There should be no functional change here. This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies. This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
2020-01-29 03:23:46 +08:00
full_prefix_storage = std::string(prefix);
full_prefix_storage.append(std::string(option_prefix));
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
full_prefix = full_prefix_storage;
} else if (!prefix.empty())
full_prefix = prefix;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
else
Breakpoint conditions were making result variables, which they should not do. The result variables aren't useful, and if you have a breakpoint on a common function you can generate a lot of these. So I changed the code that checks the condition to set ResultVariableIsInternal in the EvaluateExpressionOptions that we pass to the execution. Unfortunately, the check for this variable was done in the wrong place (the static UserExpression::Evaluate) which is not how breakpoint conditions execute expressions (UserExpression::Execute). So I moved the check to UserExpression::Execute (which Evaluate also calls) and made the overridden method DoExecute. llvm-svn: 266093
2016-04-13 01:17:35 +08:00
full_prefix = option_prefix;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Reflow paragraphs in comments. This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read. FYI, the script I used was: import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2) continue if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = "" out.write(line) os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1]) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144 llvm-svn: 331197
2018-05-01 00:49:04 +08:00
// If the language was not specified in the expression command, set it to the
// language in the target's properties if specified, else default to the
// langage for the frame.
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (language == lldb::eLanguageTypeUnknown) {
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
if (target->GetLanguage() != lldb::eLanguageTypeUnknown)
language = target->GetLanguage();
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
else if (StackFrame *frame = exe_ctx.GetFramePtr())
language = frame->GetLanguage();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
lldb::UserExpressionSP user_expression_sp(
Convert some Expression parser functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286208
2016-11-08 12:52:16 +08:00
target->GetUserExpressionForLanguage(expr, full_prefix, language,
[Expressions] Add support of expressions evaluation in some object's context Summary: This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object. Consider the following example: ``` struct S { int a = 11; int b = 12; }; int main() { S s; int a = 1; int b = 2; // We have stopped here return 0; } ``` This patch allows to do something like that: ``` lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b") ``` and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be used (not locals `a` and `b`). This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad` type). Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318 llvm-svn: 353149
2019-02-05 17:14:36 +08:00
desired_type, options, ctx_obj,
error));
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (error.Fail()) {
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Getting expression: {0} ==",
error.AsCString());
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
return lldb::eExpressionSetupError;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Parsing expression {0} ==",
expr.str());
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
const bool keep_expression_in_memory = true;
const bool generate_debug_info = options.GetGenerateDebugInfo();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
if (options.InvokeCancelCallback(lldb::eExpressionEvaluationParse)) {
error.SetErrorString("expression interrupted by callback before parse");
Add a DiagnosticManager replace error streams in the expression parser. We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave all of them. To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors to the user. This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead pass the Severity flag. The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase. <rdar://problem/22864976> llvm-svn: 263859
2016-03-19 08:03:59 +08:00
result_valobj_sp = ValueObjectConstResult::Create(
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
exe_ctx.GetBestExecutionContextScope(), error);
return lldb::eExpressionInterrupted;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
Add a DiagnosticManager replace error streams in the expression parser. We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave all of them. To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors to the user. This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead pass the Severity flag. The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase. <rdar://problem/22864976> llvm-svn: 263859
2016-03-19 08:03:59 +08:00
DiagnosticManager diagnostic_manager;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
bool parse_success =
user_expression_sp->Parse(diagnostic_manager, exe_ctx, execution_policy,
Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits. Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present. <rdar://problem/25351938> llvm-svn: 264793
2016-03-30 06:00:08 +08:00
keep_expression_in_memory, generate_debug_info);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
// Calculate the fixed expression always, since we need it for errors.
std::string tmp_fixed_expression;
if (fixed_expression == nullptr)
Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits. Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present. <rdar://problem/25351938> llvm-svn: 264793
2016-03-30 06:00:08 +08:00
fixed_expression = &tmp_fixed_expression;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Use StringRef instead of char* (NFC)
2021-12-16 06:48:30 +08:00
*fixed_expression = user_expression_sp->GetFixedText().str();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
// If there is a fixed expression, try to parse it:
Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits. Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present. <rdar://problem/25351938> llvm-svn: 264793
2016-03-30 06:00:08 +08:00
if (!parse_success) {
[lldb][NFC] Delete the original UserExpression before trying to reparse it with FixIts. Currently when an expression fails to parse and we have a FixIt, we keep the failed UserExpression around while trying to parse the expression with applied fixits. This means that we have this rather confusing control flow: 1. Original expression created and parsing attempted. 2. Expression with applied FixIts is created and parsing attempted. 3. Original expression is destroyed and parser deconstructed. 4. Expression with applied FixIts is destroyed and parser deconstructed. This patch just deletes the original expression so that step 2 and 3 are swapped and the whole process looks more like just sequentially parsing two expressions (which is what we actually do here). Doesn't fix anything just makes the code less fragile.
2020-03-20 00:40:53 +08:00
// Delete the expression that failed to parse before attempting to parse
// the next expression.
user_expression_sp.reset();
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
execution_results = lldb::eExpressionParseError;
Remove redundant check (NFC)
2021-12-16 06:54:03 +08:00
if (!fixed_expression->empty() && options.GetAutoApplyFixIts()) {
[lldb] Add option to retry Fix-Its multiple times to failed expressions Summary: Usually when Clang emits an error Fix-It it does two things. It emits the diagnostic and then it fixes the currently generated AST to reflect the applied Fix-It. While emitting the diagnostic is easy to implement, fixing the currently generated AST is often tricky. That causes that some Fix-Its just keep the AST as-is or abort the parsing process entirely. Once the parser stopped, any Fix-Its for the rest of the expression are not detected and when the user manually applies the Fix-It, the next expression will just produce a new Fix-It. This is often occurring with quickly made Fix-Its that are just used to bridge temporary API changes and that often are not worth implementing a proper API fixup in addition to the diagnostic. To still give some kind of reasonable user-experience for users that have these Fix-Its and rely on them to fix their expressions, this patch adds the ability to retry parsing with applied Fix-Its multiple time to give the normal Fix-It experience where things Clang knows how to fix are not causing actual expression error (at least when automatically applying Fix-Its is activated). The way this is implemented is just by having another setting in the expression options that specify how often we should try applying Fix-Its and then reparse the expression. The default setting is still 1 for everyone so this should not affect the speed in which we fail to parse expressions. Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, friss, shafik Reviewed By: shafik Subscribers: shafik, abidh Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77214
2020-04-06 17:08:12 +08:00
const uint64_t max_fix_retries = options.GetRetriesWithFixIts();
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < max_fix_retries; ++i) {
// Try parsing the fixed expression.
lldb::UserExpressionSP fixed_expression_sp(
target->GetUserExpressionForLanguage(
fixed_expression->c_str(), full_prefix, language, desired_type,
options, ctx_obj, error));
DiagnosticManager fixed_diagnostic_manager;
parse_success = fixed_expression_sp->Parse(
fixed_diagnostic_manager, exe_ctx, execution_policy,
keep_expression_in_memory, generate_debug_info);
if (parse_success) {
diagnostic_manager.Clear();
user_expression_sp = fixed_expression_sp;
break;
} else {
// The fixed expression also didn't parse. Let's check for any new
// Fix-Its we could try.
Use StringRef instead of char* (NFC)
2021-12-16 06:48:30 +08:00
if (!fixed_expression_sp->GetFixedText().empty()) {
*fixed_expression = fixed_expression_sp->GetFixedText().str();
[lldb] Add option to retry Fix-Its multiple times to failed expressions Summary: Usually when Clang emits an error Fix-It it does two things. It emits the diagnostic and then it fixes the currently generated AST to reflect the applied Fix-It. While emitting the diagnostic is easy to implement, fixing the currently generated AST is often tricky. That causes that some Fix-Its just keep the AST as-is or abort the parsing process entirely. Once the parser stopped, any Fix-Its for the rest of the expression are not detected and when the user manually applies the Fix-It, the next expression will just produce a new Fix-It. This is often occurring with quickly made Fix-Its that are just used to bridge temporary API changes and that often are not worth implementing a proper API fixup in addition to the diagnostic. To still give some kind of reasonable user-experience for users that have these Fix-Its and rely on them to fix their expressions, this patch adds the ability to retry parsing with applied Fix-Its multiple time to give the normal Fix-It experience where things Clang knows how to fix are not causing actual expression error (at least when automatically applying Fix-Its is activated). The way this is implemented is just by having another setting in the expression options that specify how often we should try applying Fix-Its and then reparse the expression. The default setting is still 1 for everyone so this should not affect the speed in which we fail to parse expressions. Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, friss, shafik Reviewed By: shafik Subscribers: shafik, abidh Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77214
2020-04-06 17:08:12 +08:00
} else {
// Fixed expression didn't compile without a fixit, don't retry and
// don't tell the user about it.
fixed_expression->clear();
break;
}
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
Decide on the expression language inside UserExpression When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes this. Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com Reviewed by: dawn Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267 llvm-svn: 249624
2015-10-08 06:01:12 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (!parse_success) {
Also display the underlying error message when displaying a fixit When the user running LLDB with default settings sees the fixit notification it means that the auto-applied fixit didn't work. This patch shows the underlying error message instead of just the fixit to make it easier to understand what the error in the expression was. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101333
2021-04-28 01:38:51 +08:00
std::string msg;
{
llvm::raw_string_ostream os(msg);
os << "expression failed to parse:\n";
if (!diagnostic_manager.Diagnostics().empty())
os << diagnostic_manager.GetString();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
else
Also display the underlying error message when displaying a fixit When the user running LLDB with default settings sees the fixit notification it means that the auto-applied fixit didn't work. This patch shows the underlying error message instead of just the fixit to make it easier to understand what the error in the expression was. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101333
2021-04-28 01:38:51 +08:00
os << "unknown error";
if (target->GetEnableNotifyAboutFixIts() && fixed_expression &&
!fixed_expression->empty())
os << "\nfixed expression suggested:\n " << *fixed_expression;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
Also display the underlying error message when displaying a fixit When the user running LLDB with default settings sees the fixit notification it means that the auto-applied fixit didn't work. This patch shows the underlying error message instead of just the fixit to make it easier to understand what the error in the expression was. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101333
2021-04-28 01:38:51 +08:00
error.SetExpressionError(execution_results, msg.c_str());
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits. Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present. <rdar://problem/25351938> llvm-svn: 264793
2016-03-30 06:00:08 +08:00
if (parse_success) {
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
lldb::ExpressionVariableSP expr_result;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (execution_policy == eExecutionPolicyNever &&
!user_expression_sp->CanInterpret()) {
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Expression may not run, but "
"is not constant ==");
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits. Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present. <rdar://problem/25351938> llvm-svn: 264793
2016-03-30 06:00:08 +08:00
if (!diagnostic_manager.Diagnostics().size())
Add a DiagnosticManager replace error streams in the expression parser. We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave all of them. To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors to the user. This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead pass the Severity flag. The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase. <rdar://problem/22864976> llvm-svn: 263859
2016-03-19 08:03:59 +08:00
error.SetExpressionError(lldb::eExpressionSetupError,
"expression needed to run but couldn't");
Don't try to actually run code when the expression is top-level. llvm-svn: 264660
2016-03-29 05:10:36 +08:00
} else if (execution_policy == eExecutionPolicyTopLevel) {
Revert "Return a named error in the result object of an expression with no result" This reverts commit r344647. This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in: lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350 lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529 (maybe there could be more) As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the author to resolve. llvm-svn: 344722
2018-10-18 11:10:43 +08:00
error.SetError(UserExpression::kNoResult, lldb::eErrorTypeGeneric);
Don't try to actually run code when the expression is top-level. llvm-svn: 264660
2016-03-29 05:10:36 +08:00
return lldb::eExpressionCompleted;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
} else {
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (options.InvokeCancelCallback(lldb::eExpressionEvaluationExecution)) {
Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits. Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present. <rdar://problem/25351938> llvm-svn: 264793
2016-03-30 06:00:08 +08:00
error.SetExpressionError(
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
lldb::eExpressionInterrupted,
"expression interrupted by callback before execution");
result_valobj_sp = ValueObjectConstResult::Create(
exe_ctx.GetBestExecutionContextScope(), error);
return lldb::eExpressionInterrupted;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
diagnostic_manager.Clear();
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Executing expression ==");
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
Add a DiagnosticManager replace error streams in the expression parser. We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave all of them. To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors to the user. This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead pass the Severity flag. The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase. <rdar://problem/22864976> llvm-svn: 263859
2016-03-19 08:03:59 +08:00
execution_results =
user_expression_sp->Execute(diagnostic_manager, exe_ctx, options,
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
user_expression_sp, expr_result);
Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits. Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present. <rdar://problem/25351938> llvm-svn: 264793
2016-03-30 06:00:08 +08:00
if (execution_results != lldb::eExpressionCompleted) {
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Execution completed "
"abnormally ==");
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Figure out what the fixed expression is, and print it. Added another target setting to quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits. Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present. <rdar://problem/25351938> llvm-svn: 264793
2016-03-30 06:00:08 +08:00
if (!diagnostic_manager.Diagnostics().size())
error.SetExpressionError(
Add a DiagnosticManager replace error streams in the expression parser. We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave all of them. To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors to the user. This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead pass the Severity flag. The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase. <rdar://problem/22864976> llvm-svn: 263859
2016-03-19 08:03:59 +08:00
execution_results, "expression failed to execute, unknown error");
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
else
error.SetExpressionError(execution_results,
diagnostic_manager.GetString().c_str());
} else {
if (expr_result) {
result_valobj_sp = expr_result->GetValueObject();
[lldb/DataFormatters] Display null C++ pointers as nullptr Display null pointer as `nullptr`, `nil` and `NULL` for C++, Objective-C/Objective-C++ and C respectively. The original motivation for this patch was to display a null std::string pointer as nullptr instead of "", but the fix seemed generic enough to be done for all summary providers. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77153
2020-11-13 04:11:47 +08:00
result_valobj_sp->SetPreferredDisplayLanguage(language);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
LLDB_LOG(log,
"== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Execution completed "
[lldb] Log the actual expression result in UserExpression::Evaluate This used to be a LLDB_LOGF call that used the printf %s syntax. 0ab109d43d9d8389fe686ee8df4a82634f246b55 changed it to LLDB_LOG but didn't update this format string to use formatv's syntax so this just printed '%s'.
2021-02-11 23:05:14 +08:00
"normally with result {0} ==",
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
result_valobj_sp->GetValueAsCString());
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
} else {
[lldb][NFC] Modernize logging UserExpression
2020-03-04 08:31:25 +08:00
LLDB_LOG(log, "== [UserExpression::Evaluate] Execution completed "
"normally with no result ==");
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Revert "Return a named error in the result object of an expression with no result" This reverts commit r344647. This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in: lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350 lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529 (maybe there could be more) As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the author to resolve. llvm-svn: 344722
2018-10-18 11:10:43 +08:00
error.SetError(UserExpression::kNoResult, lldb::eErrorTypeGeneric);
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
if (options.InvokeCancelCallback(lldb::eExpressionEvaluationComplete)) {
error.SetExpressionError(
lldb::eExpressionInterrupted,
"expression interrupted by callback after complete");
return lldb::eExpressionInterrupted;
}
[lldb] NFC modernize codebase with modernize-use-nullptr Summary: NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]] This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using `nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html for more information. This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base: ``` run-clang-tidy.py \ -header-filter='.*' \ -checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \ -fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \ -format \ -style LLVM \ -p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc ``` NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in isolation somehow. NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most parts. Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits Tags: #lldb, #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847 llvm-svn: 361484
2019-05-23 19:14:47 +08:00
if (result_valobj_sp.get() == nullptr) {
This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
2015-09-16 05:13:50 +08:00
result_valobj_sp = ValueObjectConstResult::Create(
exe_ctx.GetBestExecutionContextScope(), error);
}
return execution_results;
}
Breakpoint conditions were making result variables, which they should not do. The result variables aren't useful, and if you have a breakpoint on a common function you can generate a lot of these. So I changed the code that checks the condition to set ResultVariableIsInternal in the EvaluateExpressionOptions that we pass to the execution. Unfortunately, the check for this variable was done in the wrong place (the static UserExpression::Evaluate) which is not how breakpoint conditions execute expressions (UserExpression::Execute). So I moved the check to UserExpression::Execute (which Evaluate also calls) and made the overridden method DoExecute. llvm-svn: 266093
2016-04-13 01:17:35 +08:00
lldb::ExpressionResults
UserExpression::Execute(DiagnosticManager &diagnostic_manager,
ExecutionContext &exe_ctx,
const EvaluateExpressionOptions &options,
lldb::UserExpressionSP &shared_ptr_to_me,
lldb::ExpressionVariableSP &result_var) {
lldb::ExpressionResults expr_result = DoExecute(
diagnostic_manager, exe_ctx, options, shared_ptr_to_me, result_var);
Target *target = exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr();
if (options.GetResultIsInternal() && result_var && target) {
Add missing nullptr checks. GetPersistentExpressionStateForLanguage() can return a nullptr if it cannot construct a typesystem. This patch adds missing nullptr checks at all uses. Inspired by rdar://problem/58317195 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72413
2020-01-09 06:18:47 +08:00
if (auto *persistent_state =
target->GetPersistentExpressionStateForLanguage(m_language))
persistent_state->RemovePersistentVariable(result_var);
Breakpoint conditions were making result variables, which they should not do. The result variables aren't useful, and if you have a breakpoint on a common function you can generate a lot of these. So I changed the code that checks the condition to set ResultVariableIsInternal in the EvaluateExpressionOptions that we pass to the execution. Unfortunately, the check for this variable was done in the wrong place (the static UserExpression::Evaluate) which is not how breakpoint conditions execute expressions (UserExpression::Execute). So I moved the check to UserExpression::Execute (which Evaluate also calls) and made the overridden method DoExecute. llvm-svn: 266093
2016-04-13 01:17:35 +08:00
}
return expr_result;
}