maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/unittests/Analysis/CFGTest.cpp

379 lines
10 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger. Adds unit tests for it too. Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG. llvm-svn: 187283
2013-07-27 09:24:00 +08:00
//===- CFGTest.cpp - CFG tests --------------------------------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/CFG.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/OwningPtr.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
Move the LLVM IR asm writer header files into the IR directory, as they are part of the core IR library in order to support dumping and other basic functionality. Rename the 'Assembly' include directory to 'AsmParser' to match the library name and the only functionality left their -- printing has been in the core IR library for quite some time. Update all of the #includes to match. All of this started because I wanted to have the layering in good shape before I started adding support for printing LLVM IR using the new pass infrastructure, and commandline support for the new pass infrastructure. llvm-svn: 198688
2014-01-07 20:34:26 +08:00
#include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h"
[cleanup] Move the Dominators.h and Verifier.h headers into the IR directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis. Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API. But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really confusing structure until that day arrives. llvm-svn: 199082
2014-01-13 17:26:24 +08:00
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger. Adds unit tests for it too. Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG. llvm-svn: 187283
2013-07-27 09:24:00 +08:00
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
Re-sort all of the includes with ./utils/sort_includes.py so that subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn. Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to match the usage in Memory.inc. llvm-svn: 198685
2014-01-07 19:48:04 +08:00
#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger. Adds unit tests for it too. Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG. llvm-svn: 187283
2013-07-27 09:24:00 +08:00
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
Re-sort all of the includes with ./utils/sort_includes.py so that subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn. Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to match the usage in Memory.inc. llvm-svn: 198685
2014-01-07 19:48:04 +08:00
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/PassManager.h"
Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger. Adds unit tests for it too. Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG. llvm-svn: 187283
2013-07-27 09:24:00 +08:00
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/InstIterator.h"
#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
using namespace llvm;
namespace {
// This fixture assists in running the isPotentiallyReachable utility four ways
// and ensuring it produces the correct answer each time.
class IsPotentiallyReachableTest : public testing::Test {
protected:
void ParseAssembly(const char *Assembly) {
M.reset(new Module("Module", getGlobalContext()));
SMDiagnostic Error;
bool Parsed = ParseAssemblyString(Assembly, M.get(),
Error, M->getContext()) == M.get();
std::string errMsg;
raw_string_ostream os(errMsg);
Error.print("", os);
if (!Parsed) {
// A failure here means that the test itself is buggy.
report_fatal_error(os.str().c_str());
}
Function *F = M->getFunction("test");
if (F == NULL)
report_fatal_error("Test must have a function named @test");
A = B = NULL;
for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I) {
if (I->hasName()) {
if (I->getName() == "A")
A = &*I;
else if (I->getName() == "B")
B = &*I;
}
}
if (A == NULL)
report_fatal_error("@test must have an instruction %A");
if (B == NULL)
report_fatal_error("@test must have an instruction %B");
}
void ExpectPath(bool ExpectedResult) {
static char ID;
class IsPotentiallyReachableTestPass : public FunctionPass {
public:
IsPotentiallyReachableTestPass(bool ExpectedResult,
Instruction *A, Instruction *B)
: FunctionPass(ID), ExpectedResult(ExpectedResult), A(A), B(B) {}
static int initialize() {
PassInfo *PI = new PassInfo("isPotentiallyReachable testing pass",
"", &ID, 0, true, true);
PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()->registerPass(*PI, false);
initializeLoopInfoPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
[PM] Split DominatorTree into a concrete analysis result object which can be used by both the new pass manager and the old. This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn, tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface. The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of this split should match the split between CallGraph and CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass manager significantly easier. Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to directly recomputing the domtree. llvm-svn: 199104
2014-01-13 21:07:17 +08:00
initializeDominatorTreeWrapperPassPass(
*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger. Adds unit tests for it too. Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG. llvm-svn: 187283
2013-07-27 09:24:00 +08:00
return 0;
}
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesAll();
AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>();
[PM] Split DominatorTree into a concrete analysis result object which can be used by both the new pass manager and the old. This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn, tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface. The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of this split should match the split between CallGraph and CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass manager significantly easier. Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to directly recomputing the domtree. llvm-svn: 199104
2014-01-13 21:07:17 +08:00
AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger. Adds unit tests for it too. Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG. llvm-svn: 187283
2013-07-27 09:24:00 +08:00
}
bool runOnFunction(Function &F) {
if (!F.hasName() || F.getName() != "test")
return false;
LoopInfo *LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfo>();
[PM] Split DominatorTree into a concrete analysis result object which can be used by both the new pass manager and the old. This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn, tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface. The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of this split should match the split between CallGraph and CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass manager significantly easier. Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to directly recomputing the domtree. llvm-svn: 199104
2014-01-13 21:07:17 +08:00
DominatorTree *DT =
&getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger. Adds unit tests for it too. Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG. llvm-svn: 187283
2013-07-27 09:24:00 +08:00
EXPECT_EQ(isPotentiallyReachable(A, B, 0, 0), ExpectedResult);
EXPECT_EQ(isPotentiallyReachable(A, B, DT, 0), ExpectedResult);
EXPECT_EQ(isPotentiallyReachable(A, B, 0, LI), ExpectedResult);
EXPECT_EQ(isPotentiallyReachable(A, B, DT, LI), ExpectedResult);
return false;
}
bool ExpectedResult;
Instruction *A, *B;
};
static int initialize = IsPotentiallyReachableTestPass::initialize();
(void)initialize;
IsPotentiallyReachableTestPass *P =
new IsPotentiallyReachableTestPass(ExpectedResult, A, B);
PassManager PM;
PM.add(P);
PM.run(*M);
}
private:
OwningPtr<Module> M;
Instruction *A, *B;
};
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, SameBlockNoPath) {
ParseAssembly(
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" ret void\n"
"}\n");
ExpectPath(false);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, SameBlockPath) {
ParseAssembly(
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" ret void\n"
"}\n");
ExpectPath(true);
}
Fix an oversight in isPotentiallyReachable where we wouldn't do any CFG-walking to find loops if the From and To instructions were in the same block. Refactor the code a little now that we need to fill to start the CFG-walking algorithm with more than one starting basic block sometimes. Special thanks to Andrew Trick for catching an error in my understanding of natural loops in code review. llvm-svn: 188236
2013-08-13 08:03:47 +08:00
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, SameBlockNoLoop) {
ParseAssembly(
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %middle\n"
"middle:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" br label %nextblock\n"
"nextblock:\n"
" ret void\n"
"}\n");
ExpectPath(false);
}
Reimplement isPotentiallyReachable to make nocapture deduction much stronger. Adds unit tests for it too. Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG. llvm-svn: 187283
2013-07-27 09:24:00 +08:00
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, StraightNoPath) {
ParseAssembly(
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" br label %exit\n"
"exit:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(false);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, StraightPath) {
ParseAssembly(
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" br label %exit\n"
"exit:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(true);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, DestUnreachable) {
ParseAssembly(
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %midblock\n"
"midblock:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" ret void\n"
"unreachable:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" br label %midblock\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(false);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, BranchToReturn) {
ParseAssembly(
"define void @test(i1 %x) {\n"
"entry:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" br i1 %x, label %block1, label %block2\n"
"block1:\n"
" ret void\n"
"block2:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(true);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, SimpleLoop1) {
ParseAssembly(
"declare i1 @switch()\n"
"\n"
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %loop\n"
"loop:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %x = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %loop, label %exit\n"
"exit:\n"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(true);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, SimpleLoop2) {
ParseAssembly(
"declare i1 @switch()\n"
"\n"
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" br label %loop\n"
"loop:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %x = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %loop, label %exit\n"
"exit:\n"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(false);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, SimpleLoop3) {
ParseAssembly(
"declare i1 @switch()\n"
"\n"
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %loop\n"
"loop:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %x = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %loop, label %exit\n"
"exit:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(false);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, OneLoopAfterTheOther1) {
ParseAssembly(
"declare i1 @switch()\n"
"\n"
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %loop1\n"
"loop1:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %x = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %loop1, label %loop1exit\n"
"loop1exit:\n"
" br label %loop2\n"
"loop2:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %y = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %loop2, label %loop2exit\n"
"loop2exit:"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(true);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, OneLoopAfterTheOther2) {
ParseAssembly(
"declare i1 @switch()\n"
"\n"
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %loop1\n"
"loop1:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %x = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %loop1, label %loop1exit\n"
"loop1exit:\n"
" br label %loop2\n"
"loop2:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %y = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %loop2, label %loop2exit\n"
"loop2exit:"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(false);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, OneLoopAfterTheOtherInsideAThirdLoop) {
ParseAssembly(
"declare i1 @switch()\n"
"\n"
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %outerloop3\n"
"outerloop3:\n"
" br label %innerloop1\n"
"innerloop1:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %x = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %innerloop1, label %innerloop1exit\n"
"innerloop1exit:\n"
" br label %innerloop2\n"
"innerloop2:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" %y = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %innerloop2, label %innerloop2exit\n"
"innerloop2exit:"
" ;; In outer loop3 now.\n"
" %z = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %z, label %outerloop3, label %exit\n"
"exit:\n"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(true);
}
TEST_F(IsPotentiallyReachableTest, BranchInsideLoop) {
ParseAssembly(
"declare i1 @switch()\n"
"\n"
"define void @test() {\n"
"entry:\n"
" br label %loop\n"
"loop:\n"
" %x = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %x, label %nextloopblock, label %exit\n"
"nextloopblock:\n"
" %y = call i1 @switch()\n"
" br i1 %y, label %left, label %right\n"
"left:\n"
" %A = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" br label %loop\n"
"right:\n"
" %B = bitcast i8 undef to i8\n"
" br label %loop\n"
"exit:\n"
" ret void\n"
"}");
ExpectPath(true);
}