maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetTransformInfo.h

132 lines
5.5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
//===-- X86TargetTransformInfo.h - X86 specific TTI -------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// \file
/// This file a TargetTransformInfo::Concept conforming object specific to the
/// X86 target machine. It uses the target's detailed information to
/// provide more precise answers to certain TTI queries, while letting the
/// target independent and default TTI implementations handle the rest.
///
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#ifndef LLVM_LIB_TARGET_X86_X86TARGETTRANSFORMINFO_H
#define LLVM_LIB_TARGET_X86_X86TARGETTRANSFORMINFO_H
#include "X86.h"
#include "X86TargetMachine.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h"
namespace llvm {
class X86TTIImpl : public BasicTTIImplBase<X86TTIImpl> {
typedef BasicTTIImplBase<X86TTIImpl> BaseT;
typedef TargetTransformInfo TTI;
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
friend BaseT;
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
const X86Subtarget *ST;
const X86TargetLowering *TLI;
[multiversion] Switch the TTI queries from TargetMachine to Subtarget now that we have a correct and cached subtarget specific to the function. Also, finish providing a cached per-function subtarget in the core LLVMTargetMachine -- that layer hadn't switched over yet. The only use of the TargetMachine was to re-lookup a subtarget for a particular function to work around the fact that TTI was immutable. Now that it is per-function and we haved a cached subtarget, use it. This still leaves a few interfaces with real warts on them where we were passing Function objects through the TTI interface. I'll remove these and clean their usage up in subsequent commits now that this isn't necessary. llvm-svn: 227738
2015-02-01 22:22:17 +08:00
const X86Subtarget *getST() const { return ST; }
[multiversion] Remove the cached TargetMachine pointer from the intermediate TTI implementation template and instead query up to the derived class for both the TargetMachine and the TargetLowering. Most of the derived types had a TLI cached already and there is no need to store a less precisely typed target machine pointer. This will in turn make it much cleaner to look up the TLI via a per-function subtarget instead of the generic subtarget, and it will pave the way toward pulling the subtarget used for unroll preferences into the same form once we are *always* using the function to look up the correct subtarget. llvm-svn: 227737
2015-02-01 22:01:15 +08:00
const X86TargetLowering *getTLI() const { return TLI; }
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
public:
constify the Function parameter to the TTI creation callback and propagate to all callers/users/etc. llvm-svn: 247864
2015-09-17 07:38:13 +08:00
explicit X86TTIImpl(const X86TargetMachine *TM, const Function &F)
Make TargetTransformInfo keeping a reference to the Module DataLayout DataLayout is no longer optional. It was initialized with or without a DataLayout, and the DataLayout when supplied could have been the one from the TargetMachine. Summary: This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the module. Reviewers: echristo Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11021 From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> llvm-svn: 241774
2015-07-09 10:08:42 +08:00
: BaseT(TM, F.getParent()->getDataLayout()), ST(TM->getSubtargetImpl(F)),
TLI(ST->getTargetLowering()) {}
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
/// \name Scalar TTI Implementations
/// @{
TTI::PopcntSupportKind getPopcntSupport(unsigned TyWidth);
/// @}
/// \name Vector TTI Implementations
/// @{
unsigned getNumberOfRegisters(bool Vector);
[X86 TTI] Implement LSV hook Summary: LSV wants to know the maximum size that can be loaded to a vector register. On X86, this always matches the maximum register width. Implement this accordingly and add a test to make sure that LSV can vectorize up to the maximum permissible width on X86. Reviewers: delena, arsenm Reviewed By: arsenm Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31504 llvm-svn: 299589
2017-04-06 04:51:38 +08:00
unsigned getRegisterBitWidth(bool Vector) const;
unsigned getLoadStoreVecRegBitWidth(unsigned AS) const;
[X86] Disable loop unrolling in loop vectorization pass when VF is 1. The patch disabled unrolling in loop vectorization pass when VF==1 on x86 architecture, by setting MaxInterleaveFactor to 1. Unrolling in loop vectorization pass may introduce the cost of overflow check, memory boundary check and extra prologue/epilogue code when regular unroller will unroll the loop another time. Disable it when VF==1 remove the unnecessary cost on x86. The same can be done for other platforms after verifying interleaving/memory bound checking to be not perf critical on those platforms. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9515 llvm-svn: 236613
2015-05-07 01:12:25 +08:00
unsigned getMaxInterleaveFactor(unsigned VF);
[TTI] Make the cost APIs in TargetTransformInfo consistently use 'int' rather than 'unsigned' for their costs. For something like costs in particular there is a natural "negative" value, that of savings or saved cost. As a consequence, there is a lot of code that subtracts or creates negative values based on cost, all of which is prone to awkwardness or bugs when dealing with an unsigned type. Similarly, we *never* want these values to wrap, as that would cause Very Bad code generation (likely percieved as an infinite loop as we try to emit over 2^32 instructions or some such insanity). All around 'int' seems a much better fit for these basic metrics. I've added asserts to ensure that at least the TTI interface never returns negative numbers here. If we ever have a use case for negative numbers, we can remove this, but this way a bug where someone used '-1' to produce a 'very large' cost will be caught by the assert. This passes all tests, and is also UBSan clean. No functional change intended. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11741 llvm-svn: 244080
2015-08-06 02:08:10 +08:00
int getArithmeticInstrCost(
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
unsigned Opcode, Type *Ty,
TTI::OperandValueKind Opd1Info = TTI::OK_AnyValue,
TTI::OperandValueKind Opd2Info = TTI::OK_AnyValue,
TTI::OperandValueProperties Opd1PropInfo = TTI::OP_None,
[X86] updating TTI costs for arithmetic instructions on X86\SLM arch. updated instructions: pmulld, pmullw, pmulhw, mulsd, mulps, mulpd, divss, divps, divsd, divpd, addpd and subpd. special optimization case which replaces pmulld with pmullw\pmulhw\pshuf seq. In case if the real operands bitwidth <= 16. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28104 llvm-svn: 291657
2017-01-11 16:23:37 +08:00
TTI::OperandValueProperties Opd2PropInfo = TTI::OP_None,
ArrayRef<const Value *> Args = ArrayRef<const Value *>());
[TTI] Make the cost APIs in TargetTransformInfo consistently use 'int' rather than 'unsigned' for their costs. For something like costs in particular there is a natural "negative" value, that of savings or saved cost. As a consequence, there is a lot of code that subtracts or creates negative values based on cost, all of which is prone to awkwardness or bugs when dealing with an unsigned type. Similarly, we *never* want these values to wrap, as that would cause Very Bad code generation (likely percieved as an infinite loop as we try to emit over 2^32 instructions or some such insanity). All around 'int' seems a much better fit for these basic metrics. I've added asserts to ensure that at least the TTI interface never returns negative numbers here. If we ever have a use case for negative numbers, we can remove this, but this way a bug where someone used '-1' to produce a 'very large' cost will be caught by the assert. This passes all tests, and is also UBSan clean. No functional change intended. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11741 llvm-svn: 244080
2015-08-06 02:08:10 +08:00
int getShuffleCost(TTI::ShuffleKind Kind, Type *Tp, int Index, Type *SubTp);
[SystemZ] TargetTransformInfo cost functions implemented. getArithmeticInstrCost(), getShuffleCost(), getCastInstrCost(), getCmpSelInstrCost(), getVectorInstrCost(), getMemoryOpCost(), getInterleavedMemoryOpCost() implemented. Interleaved access vectorization enabled. BasicTTIImpl::getCastInstrCost() improved to check for legal extending loads, in which case the cost of the z/sext instruction becomes 0. Review: Ulrich Weigand, Renato Golin. https://reviews.llvm.org/D29631 llvm-svn: 300052
2017-04-12 19:49:08 +08:00
int getCastInstrCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Dst, Type *Src,
const Instruction *I = nullptr);
int getCmpSelInstrCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *ValTy, Type *CondTy,
const Instruction *I = nullptr);
[TTI] Make the cost APIs in TargetTransformInfo consistently use 'int' rather than 'unsigned' for their costs. For something like costs in particular there is a natural "negative" value, that of savings or saved cost. As a consequence, there is a lot of code that subtracts or creates negative values based on cost, all of which is prone to awkwardness or bugs when dealing with an unsigned type. Similarly, we *never* want these values to wrap, as that would cause Very Bad code generation (likely percieved as an infinite loop as we try to emit over 2^32 instructions or some such insanity). All around 'int' seems a much better fit for these basic metrics. I've added asserts to ensure that at least the TTI interface never returns negative numbers here. If we ever have a use case for negative numbers, we can remove this, but this way a bug where someone used '-1' to produce a 'very large' cost will be caught by the assert. This passes all tests, and is also UBSan clean. No functional change intended. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11741 llvm-svn: 244080
2015-08-06 02:08:10 +08:00
int getVectorInstrCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Val, unsigned Index);
int getMemoryOpCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Src, unsigned Alignment,
[SystemZ] TargetTransformInfo cost functions implemented. getArithmeticInstrCost(), getShuffleCost(), getCastInstrCost(), getCmpSelInstrCost(), getVectorInstrCost(), getMemoryOpCost(), getInterleavedMemoryOpCost() implemented. Interleaved access vectorization enabled. BasicTTIImpl::getCastInstrCost() improved to check for legal extending loads, in which case the cost of the z/sext instruction becomes 0. Review: Ulrich Weigand, Renato Golin. https://reviews.llvm.org/D29631 llvm-svn: 300052
2017-04-12 19:49:08 +08:00
unsigned AddressSpace, const Instruction *I = nullptr);
[TTI] Make the cost APIs in TargetTransformInfo consistently use 'int' rather than 'unsigned' for their costs. For something like costs in particular there is a natural "negative" value, that of savings or saved cost. As a consequence, there is a lot of code that subtracts or creates negative values based on cost, all of which is prone to awkwardness or bugs when dealing with an unsigned type. Similarly, we *never* want these values to wrap, as that would cause Very Bad code generation (likely percieved as an infinite loop as we try to emit over 2^32 instructions or some such insanity). All around 'int' seems a much better fit for these basic metrics. I've added asserts to ensure that at least the TTI interface never returns negative numbers here. If we ever have a use case for negative numbers, we can remove this, but this way a bug where someone used '-1' to produce a 'very large' cost will be caught by the assert. This passes all tests, and is also UBSan clean. No functional change intended. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11741 llvm-svn: 244080
2015-08-06 02:08:10 +08:00
int getMaskedMemoryOpCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Src, unsigned Alignment,
unsigned AddressSpace);
Implemented cost model for masked gather and scatter operations The cost is calculated for all X86 targets. When gather/scatter instruction is not supported we calculate the cost of scalar sequence. Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15677 llvm-svn: 256519
2015-12-29 04:10:59 +08:00
int getGatherScatterOpCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *DataTy, Value *Ptr,
bool VariableMask, unsigned Alignment);
Currently isLikelyComplexAddressComputation tries to figure out if the given stride seems to be 'complex' and need some extra cost for address computation handling. This code seems to be target dependent which may not be the same for all targets. Passed the decision whether the given stride is complex or not to the target by sending stride information via SCEV to getAddressComputationCost instead of 'IsComplex'. Specifically at X86 targets we dont see any significant address computation cost in case of the strided access in general. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27518 llvm-svn: 291106
2017-01-05 22:03:41 +08:00
int getAddressComputationCost(Type *PtrTy, ScalarEvolution *SE,
const SCEV *Ptr);
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
[Atomics][LoopIdiom] Recognize unordered atomic memcpy Summary: Expanding the loop idiom test for memcpy to also recognize unordered atomic memcpy. The only difference for recognizing an unordered atomic memcpy and instead of a normal memcpy is that the loads and/or stores involved are unordered atomic operations. Background: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112779.html Patch by Daniel Neilson! Reviewers: reames, anna, skatkov Reviewed By: reames, anna Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33243 llvm-svn: 304806
2017-06-07 00:45:25 +08:00
unsigned getAtomicMemIntrinsicMaxElementSize() const;
[CostModel][X86][XOP] Added XOP costmodel for BITREVERSE Now that we have a nice fast VPPERM solution. Added framework for future intrinsic costs as well. llvm-svn: 270537
2016-05-24 16:17:50 +08:00
int getIntrinsicInstrCost(Intrinsic::ID IID, Type *RetTy,
[TargetTransformInfo] getIntrinsicInstrCost() scalarization estimation improved getIntrinsicInstrCost() used to only compute scalarization cost based on types. This patch improves this so that the actual arguments are checked when they are available, in order to handle only unique non-constant operands. Tests updates: Analysis/CostModel/X86/arith-fp.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/interleaved_cost.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/ARM/interleaved_cost.ll The improvement in getOperandsScalarizationOverhead() to differentiate on constants made it necessary to update the interleaved_cost.ll tests even though they do not relate to intrinsics. Review: Hal Finkel https://reviews.llvm.org/D29540 llvm-svn: 297705
2017-03-14 14:35:36 +08:00
ArrayRef<Type *> Tys, FastMathFlags FMF,
unsigned ScalarizationCostPassed = UINT_MAX);
[CostModel][X86][XOP] Added XOP costmodel for BITREVERSE Now that we have a nice fast VPPERM solution. Added framework for future intrinsic costs as well. llvm-svn: 270537
2016-05-24 16:17:50 +08:00
int getIntrinsicInstrCost(Intrinsic::ID IID, Type *RetTy,
[TargetTransformInfo] getIntrinsicInstrCost() scalarization estimation improved getIntrinsicInstrCost() used to only compute scalarization cost based on types. This patch improves this so that the actual arguments are checked when they are available, in order to handle only unique non-constant operands. Tests updates: Analysis/CostModel/X86/arith-fp.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/interleaved_cost.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/ARM/interleaved_cost.ll The improvement in getOperandsScalarizationOverhead() to differentiate on constants made it necessary to update the interleaved_cost.ll tests even though they do not relate to intrinsics. Review: Hal Finkel https://reviews.llvm.org/D29540 llvm-svn: 297705
2017-03-14 14:35:36 +08:00
ArrayRef<Value *> Args, FastMathFlags FMF,
unsigned VF = 1);
[CostModel][X86][XOP] Added XOP costmodel for BITREVERSE Now that we have a nice fast VPPERM solution. Added framework for future intrinsic costs as well. llvm-svn: 270537
2016-05-24 16:17:50 +08:00
[Cost] Rename getReductionCost() to getArithmeticReductionCost(), NFC. llvm-svn: 309563
2017-07-31 22:19:32 +08:00
int getArithmeticReductionCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Ty,
bool IsPairwiseForm);
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
AVX-512 Loop Vectorizer: Cost calculation for interleave load/store patterns. X86 target does not provide any target specific cost calculation for interleave patterns.It uses the common target-independent calculation, which gives very high numbers. As a result, the scalar version is chosen in many cases. The situation on AVX-512 is even worse, since we have 3-src shuffles that significantly reduce the cost. In this patch I calculate the cost on AVX-512. It will allow to compare interleave pattern with gather/scatter and choose a better solution (PR31426). * Shiffle-broadcast cost will be changed in Simon's upcoming patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28118 llvm-svn: 290810
2017-01-02 18:37:52 +08:00
int getInterleavedMemoryOpCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *VecTy,
unsigned Factor, ArrayRef<unsigned> Indices,
unsigned Alignment, unsigned AddressSpace);
int getInterleavedMemoryOpCostAVX512(unsigned Opcode, Type *VecTy,
unsigned Factor, ArrayRef<unsigned> Indices,
unsigned Alignment, unsigned AddressSpace);
[AVX2] [TTI CostModel] Add cost of interleaved loads/stores for AVX2 The cost of an interleaved access was only implemented for AVX512. For other X86 targets an overly conservative Base cost was returned, resulting in avoiding vectorization where it is actually profitable to vectorize. This patch starts to add costs for AVX2 for most prominent cases of interleaved accesses (stride 3,4 chars, for now). Note1: Improvements of up to ~4x were observed in some of EEMBC's rgb workloads; There is also a known issue of 15-30% degradations on some of these workloads, associated with an interleaved access followed by type promotion/widening; the resulting shuffle sequence is currently inefficient and will be improved by a series of patches that extend the X86InterleavedAccess pass (such as D34601 and more to follow). Note 2: The costs in this patch do not reflect port pressure penalties which can be very dominant in the case of interleaved accesses since most of the shuffle operations are restricted to a single port. Further tuning, that may incorporate these considerations, will be done on top of the upcoming improved shuffle sequences (that is, along with the abovementioned work to extend X86InterleavedAccess pass). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34023 llvm-svn: 306238
2017-06-25 16:26:25 +08:00
int getInterleavedMemoryOpCostAVX2(unsigned Opcode, Type *VecTy,
unsigned Factor, ArrayRef<unsigned> Indices,
unsigned Alignment, unsigned AddressSpace);
AVX-512 Loop Vectorizer: Cost calculation for interleave load/store patterns. X86 target does not provide any target specific cost calculation for interleave patterns.It uses the common target-independent calculation, which gives very high numbers. As a result, the scalar version is chosen in many cases. The situation on AVX-512 is even worse, since we have 3-src shuffles that significantly reduce the cost. In this patch I calculate the cost on AVX-512. It will allow to compare interleave pattern with gather/scatter and choose a better solution (PR31426). * Shiffle-broadcast cost will be changed in Simon's upcoming patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28118 llvm-svn: 290810
2017-01-02 18:37:52 +08:00
[TTI] Make the cost APIs in TargetTransformInfo consistently use 'int' rather than 'unsigned' for their costs. For something like costs in particular there is a natural "negative" value, that of savings or saved cost. As a consequence, there is a lot of code that subtracts or creates negative values based on cost, all of which is prone to awkwardness or bugs when dealing with an unsigned type. Similarly, we *never* want these values to wrap, as that would cause Very Bad code generation (likely percieved as an infinite loop as we try to emit over 2^32 instructions or some such insanity). All around 'int' seems a much better fit for these basic metrics. I've added asserts to ensure that at least the TTI interface never returns negative numbers here. If we ever have a use case for negative numbers, we can remove this, but this way a bug where someone used '-1' to produce a 'very large' cost will be caught by the assert. This passes all tests, and is also UBSan clean. No functional change intended. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11741 llvm-svn: 244080
2015-08-06 02:08:10 +08:00
int getIntImmCost(int64_t);
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
[TTI] Make the cost APIs in TargetTransformInfo consistently use 'int' rather than 'unsigned' for their costs. For something like costs in particular there is a natural "negative" value, that of savings or saved cost. As a consequence, there is a lot of code that subtracts or creates negative values based on cost, all of which is prone to awkwardness or bugs when dealing with an unsigned type. Similarly, we *never* want these values to wrap, as that would cause Very Bad code generation (likely percieved as an infinite loop as we try to emit over 2^32 instructions or some such insanity). All around 'int' seems a much better fit for these basic metrics. I've added asserts to ensure that at least the TTI interface never returns negative numbers here. If we ever have a use case for negative numbers, we can remove this, but this way a bug where someone used '-1' to produce a 'very large' cost will be caught by the assert. This passes all tests, and is also UBSan clean. No functional change intended. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11741 llvm-svn: 244080
2015-08-06 02:08:10 +08:00
int getIntImmCost(const APInt &Imm, Type *Ty);
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
Changed basic cost of store operation on X86 Store operation takes 2 UOps on X86 processors. The exact cost calculation affects several optimization passes including loop unroling. This change compensates performance degradation caused by https://reviews.llvm.org/D34458 and shows improvements on some benchmarks. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35888 llvm-svn: 311285
2017-08-20 20:34:29 +08:00
unsigned getUserCost(const User *U, ArrayRef<const Value *> Operands);
[TTI] Make the cost APIs in TargetTransformInfo consistently use 'int' rather than 'unsigned' for their costs. For something like costs in particular there is a natural "negative" value, that of savings or saved cost. As a consequence, there is a lot of code that subtracts or creates negative values based on cost, all of which is prone to awkwardness or bugs when dealing with an unsigned type. Similarly, we *never* want these values to wrap, as that would cause Very Bad code generation (likely percieved as an infinite loop as we try to emit over 2^32 instructions or some such insanity). All around 'int' seems a much better fit for these basic metrics. I've added asserts to ensure that at least the TTI interface never returns negative numbers here. If we ever have a use case for negative numbers, we can remove this, but this way a bug where someone used '-1' to produce a 'very large' cost will be caught by the assert. This passes all tests, and is also UBSan clean. No functional change intended. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11741 llvm-svn: 244080
2015-08-06 02:08:10 +08:00
int getIntImmCost(unsigned Opcode, unsigned Idx, const APInt &Imm, Type *Ty);
int getIntImmCost(Intrinsic::ID IID, unsigned Idx, const APInt &Imm,
Type *Ty);
Reapply fix PR23384 (part 3 of 3) r304824 (was reverted in r305720). The root cause of reverting was fixed - PR33514. Summary: The patch makes instruction count the highest priority for LSR solution for X86 (previously registers had highest priority). Reviewers: qcolombet Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D30562 From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com> <evgeny.v.stupachenko@intel.com> llvm-svn: 310289
2017-08-08 03:56:34 +08:00
bool isLSRCostLess(TargetTransformInfo::LSRCost &C1,
TargetTransformInfo::LSRCost &C2);
Removed parameter "Consecutive" from isLegalMaskedLoad() / isLegalMaskedStore(). Originally I planned to use the same interface for masked gather/scatter and set isConsecutive to "false" in this case. Now I'm implementing masked gather/scatter and see that the interface is inconvenient. I want to add interfaces isLegalMaskedGather() / isLegalMaskedScatter() instead of using the "Consecutive" parameter in the existing interfaces. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13850 llvm-svn: 250686
2015-10-19 15:43:38 +08:00
bool isLegalMaskedLoad(Type *DataType);
bool isLegalMaskedStore(Type *DataType);
Scalarizer for masked.gather and masked.scatter intrinsics. When the target does not support these intrinsics they should be converted to a chain of scalar load or store operations. If the mask is not constant, the scalarizer will build a chain of conditional basic blocks. I added isLegalMaskedGather() isLegalMaskedScatter() APIs. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13722 llvm-svn: 251237
2015-10-25 23:37:55 +08:00
bool isLegalMaskedGather(Type *DataType);
bool isLegalMaskedScatter(Type *DataType);
Rename hasCompatibleFunctionAttributes->areInlineCompatible based on suggestions. Currently the function is only used for inline purposes and this is more descriptive for the use. llvm-svn: 243578
2015-07-30 06:09:48 +08:00
bool areInlineCompatible(const Function *Caller,
const Function *Callee) const;
[x86] enable CGP memcmp() expansion for 2/4/8 byte sizes There are a couple of potential improvements as seen in the IR and asm: 1. We're unnecessarily extending to a larger type to compare values. 2. The codegen for (select cond, 1, -1) could avoid a cmov. (or we could change the order of the compares, so we have a select with 0 operand) llvm-svn: 305802
2017-06-20 23:58:30 +08:00
bool expandMemCmp(Instruction *I, unsigned &MaxLoadSize);
[X86] Enable interleaved memory access by default This lets the loop vectorizer generate interleaved memory accesses on x86. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25350 llvm-svn: 284779
2016-10-21 05:04:31 +08:00
bool enableInterleavedAccessVectorization();
Implemented cost model for masked gather and scatter operations The cost is calculated for all X86 targets. When gather/scatter instruction is not supported we calculate the cost of scalar sequence. Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15677 llvm-svn: 256519
2015-12-29 04:10:59 +08:00
private:
int getGSScalarCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *DataTy, bool VariableMask,
unsigned Alignment, unsigned AddressSpace);
int getGSVectorCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *DataTy, Value *Ptr,
unsigned Alignment, unsigned AddressSpace);
[PM] Switch the TargetMachine interface from accepting a pass manager base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine. This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI *pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make types available in a header file for use in a different source file within each target. I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line with this move, but let me know if I missed anything. With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine. Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept a function argument as well. llvm-svn: 227685
2015-01-31 19:17:59 +08:00
/// @}
};
} // end namespace llvm
#endif