forked from OSchip/llvm-project
83 lines
2.7 KiB
C++
83 lines
2.7 KiB
C++
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-windows-msvc %s -emit-llvm -fexceptions -o - | FileCheck %s
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
// PR41065: As background, when constructing a complete object, virtual bases
|
||
|
|
// are constructed first. If an exception is thrown while constructing a
|
||
|
|
// subobject later, those virtual bases are destroyed, so sema references the
|
||
|
|
// relevant constructors and destructors of every base class in case they are
|
||
|
|
// needed.
|
||
|
|
//
|
||
|
|
// However, an abstract class can never be used to construct a complete object.
|
||
|
|
// In the Itanium C++ ABI, this works out nicely, because we never end up
|
||
|
|
// emitting the "complete" constructor variant, only the "base" constructor
|
||
|
|
// variant, which can be called by constructors of derived classes. For various
|
||
|
|
// reasons, Sema does not mark ctors and dtors of virtual bases referenced when
|
||
|
|
// the constructor of an abstract class is emitted.
|
||
|
|
//
|
||
|
|
// In the Microsoft ABI, there are no complete/base variants, so before PR41065
|
||
|
|
// was fixed, the constructor of an abstract class could reference special
|
||
|
|
// members of a virtual base without marking them referenced. This could lead to
|
||
|
|
// unresolved symbol errors at link time.
|
||
|
|
//
|
||
|
|
// The fix is to implement the same optimization as Sema: If the class is
|
||
|
|
// abstract, don't bother initializing its virtual bases. The "is this class the
|
||
|
|
// most derived class" check in the constructor will never pass, and the virtual
|
||
|
|
// base constructor calls are always dead. Skip them.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
struct A {
|
||
|
|
A();
|
||
|
|
virtual void f() = 0;
|
||
|
|
virtual ~A();
|
||
|
|
};
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
// B has an implicit inline dtor, but is still abstract.
|
||
|
|
struct B : A {
|
||
|
|
B(int n);
|
||
|
|
int n;
|
||
|
|
};
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
// Still abstract
|
||
|
|
struct C : virtual B {
|
||
|
|
C(int n);
|
||
|
|
//void f() override;
|
||
|
|
};
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
// Not abstract, D::D calls C::C and B::B.
|
||
|
|
struct D : C {
|
||
|
|
D(int n);
|
||
|
|
void f() override;
|
||
|
|
};
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
void may_throw();
|
||
|
|
C::C(int n) : B(n) { may_throw(); }
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
// No branches, no constructor calls before may_throw();
|
||
|
|
//
|
||
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define dso_local %struct.C* @"??0C@@QEAA@H@Z"(%struct.C* returned %this, i32 %n, i32 %is_most_derived)
|
||
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: br i1
|
||
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: {{call.*@"\?0}}
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: call void @"?may_throw@@YAXXZ"()
|
||
|
|
// no cleanups
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
D::D(int n) : C(n), B(n) { may_throw(); }
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
// Conditionally construct (and destroy) vbase B, unconditionally C.
|
||
|
|
//
|
||
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define dso_local %struct.D* @"??0D@@QEAA@H@Z"(%struct.D* returned %this, i32 %n, i32 %is_most_derived)
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: icmp ne i32 {{.*}}, 0
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: br i1
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: call %struct.B* @"??0B@@QEAA@H@Z"
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: br label
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: invoke %struct.C* @"??0C@@QEAA@H@Z"
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: invoke void @"?may_throw@@YAXXZ"()
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: cleanuppad
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: call void @"??1C@@UEAA@XZ"
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: cleanupret
|
||
|
|
//
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: cleanuppad
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: icmp ne i32 {{.*}}, 0
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: br i1
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: call void @"??1B@@UEAA@XZ"
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: br label
|
||
|
|
// CHECK: cleanupret
|