2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx700 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX7 %s
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx803 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX8 %s
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx900 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX9 %s
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx906 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX9-DL %s
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1011 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX10-DL %s
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1012 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX10-DL %s
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @idot8_acc32(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: idot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s20, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s4, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s5, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s7
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s20
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s19, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s18, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s5, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s18, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s4, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: idot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s2, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s3, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s5
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s4, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s3, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s3, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s3, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s3, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v1, v0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s2, s2, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s2, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: idot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s2, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s3, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s5
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s4, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s3, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s3, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s3, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s3, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v1, v0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s2, s2, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s2, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[0:1], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_dot8_i32_i4 v2, s4, v0, v1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[4:5], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_dot8_i32_i4 v2, s0, s1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv1e0 = sext i4 %v1e0 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv2e0 = sext i4 %v2e0 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e0, %cv2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv1e1 = sext i4 %v1e1 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv2e1 = sext i4 %v2e1 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e1, %cv2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv1e2 = sext i4 %v1e2 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv2e2 = sext i4 %v2e2 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e2, %cv2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv1e3 = sext i4 %v1e3 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv2e3 = sext i4 %v2e3 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e3, %cv2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv1e4 = sext i4 %v1e4 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv2e4 = sext i4 %v2e4 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e4, %cv2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv1e5 = sext i4 %v1e5 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv2e5 = sext i4 %v2e5 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e5, %cv2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv1e6 = sext i4 %v1e6 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv2e6 = sext i4 %v2e6 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e6, %cv2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv1e7 = sext i4 %v1e7 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv2e7 = sext i4 %v2e7 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e7, %cv2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i32 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i32 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i32 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i32 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i32 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i32 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i32 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i32 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %add8, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Once the unnecessary zero extentions of the elements are removed;
|
|
|
|
; pattern recognizer will kick in.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @idot8_acc16(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: idot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s8, 0xffff
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ushort v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s4, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s5, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s7, s7, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s10, s10, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s12, s12, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s9, s9, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s14, s14, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s11, s11, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s18, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s16, s16, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s13, s13, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s20, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s18, s18, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s15, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s19, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s5, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s20, s20, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s17, s17, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s4, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s19, s19, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s5, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, s8
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s13, v4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s15, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s17, v6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s19, v7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_short v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: idot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ushort v2, v[0:1]
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s0, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s1, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s5
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 12
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s1, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s7
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 12, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v3, s8, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s1, 0x40010
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v4, 12, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v5, 12, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s0, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s0, s0, 28
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s4, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s6, v7, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v3, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:WORD_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, v4, v5, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s10, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s12, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s14, v10, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_short v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: idot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s0, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s1, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s5
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 12
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s1, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s7
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 12, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v3, s8, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s1, 0x40010
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v4, 12, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v5, 12, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s0, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s0, s0, 28
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s4, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s6, v7, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:WORD_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, v4, v5, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s10, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s12, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s14, v10, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s0, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s1, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s5
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 12
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s1, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s7
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 12, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v3, s8, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s1, 0x40010
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v4, 12, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v5, 12, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s0, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s0, s0, 28
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s4, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s6, v7, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:WORD_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, v4, v5, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s10, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s12, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s14, v10, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 12
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s1, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s0, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s1, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s0, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v3, 12, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s1, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s2, s1, 0x40004
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v3, 12, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xffff
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v4, 12, v4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e64 v5, s7, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, s3, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s3, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s3, s1, 0x40010
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s4, s5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s6, s2, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s2, s0, 0x40010
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:WORD_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, v3, v4, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s2, s0, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s3, s1, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s0, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s4, s5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s0, s1, v2
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i16 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv1e0 = sext i4 %v1e0 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv2e0 = sext i4 %v2e0 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e0, %cv2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv1e1 = sext i4 %v1e1 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv2e1 = sext i4 %v2e1 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e1, %cv2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv1e2 = sext i4 %v1e2 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv2e2 = sext i4 %v2e2 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e2, %cv2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv1e3 = sext i4 %v1e3 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv2e3 = sext i4 %v2e3 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e3, %cv2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv1e4 = sext i4 %v1e4 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv2e4 = sext i4 %v2e4 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e4, %cv2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv1e5 = sext i4 %v1e5 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv2e5 = sext i4 %v2e5 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e5, %cv2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv1e6 = sext i4 %v1e6 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv2e6 = sext i4 %v2e6 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e6, %cv2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv1e7 = sext i4 %v1e7 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv2e7 = sext i4 %v2e7 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e7, %cv2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i16 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i16 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i16 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i16 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i16 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i16 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i16 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i16 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i16 %add8, i16 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Support this pattern.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @idot8_acc8(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: idot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s8, 0xff
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ubyte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s4, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s5, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s7, s7, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s10, s10, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s12, s12, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s9, s9, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s14, s14, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s11, s11, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s18, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s16, s16, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s13, s13, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s20, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s18, s18, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s15, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s19, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s5, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s20, s20, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s17, s17, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s4, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s19, s19, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s5, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, s8
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s13, v4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s15, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s17, v6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s19, v7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_byte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: idot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s2, 0xff
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s3, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s3, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s3, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s0, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s0, 0x40000
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s6
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 12, s4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s8
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v4, 12, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v5, 12, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v3, s9, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s3, 0x40010
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s2, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v5, s2, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s3, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s16
|
[DAGCombine] Prune unnused nodes.
Summary:
Nodes that have no uses are eventually pruned when they are selected
from the worklist. Record nodes newly added to the worklist or DAG and
perform pruning after every combine attempt.
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: jdoerfert, jyknight, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58070
llvm-svn: 357283
2019-03-30 01:35:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s0, s0, 28
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s5, v6, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s7, v7, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v3, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, v4, v5, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s11, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s13, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s15, v10, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_byte v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: idot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s2, 0xff
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s3, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s3, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s3, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s0, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s0, 0x40000
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s6
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 12, s4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s8
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v4, 12, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v5, 12, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v3, s9, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s3, 0x40010
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s2, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v5, s2, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s3, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s16
|
[DAGCombine] Prune unnused nodes.
Summary:
Nodes that have no uses are eventually pruned when they are selected
from the worklist. Record nodes newly added to the worklist or DAG and
perform pruning after every combine attempt.
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: jdoerfert, jyknight, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58070
llvm-svn: 357283
2019-03-30 01:35:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s0, s0, 28
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s5, v6, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s7, v7, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, v4, v5, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s11, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s13, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s15, v10, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s2, 0xff
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s3, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s3, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s3, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s0, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s0, 0x40000
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s6
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 12, s4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s8
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v4, 12, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v5, 12, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v3, s9, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s3, 0x40010
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s2, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v5, s2, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s3, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s16
|
[DAGCombine] Prune unnused nodes.
Summary:
Nodes that have no uses are eventually pruned when they are selected
from the worklist. Record nodes newly added to the worklist or DAG and
perform pruning after every combine attempt.
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: jdoerfert, jyknight, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58070
llvm-svn: 357283
2019-03-30 01:35:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s0, s0, 28
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s5, v6, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s7, v7, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, v4, v5, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s11, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s13, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s15, v10, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-07-11 18:37:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-07-11 18:37:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 12
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s1, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s0, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s1, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s0, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v3, 12, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s1, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s2, s1, 0x40004
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v3, 12, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s3, 0xff
|
2019-07-11 18:37:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v4, 12, v4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e64 v5, s7, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, s3, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s3, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s3, s1, 0x40010
|
2019-07-11 18:37:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s4, s5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s6, s2, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s2, s0, 0x40010
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, v3, v4, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s2, s0, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s3, s1, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s0, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s4, s5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s0, s1, v2
|
2019-07-11 18:37:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i8 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv1e0 = sext i4 %v1e0 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv2e0 = sext i4 %v2e0 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e0, %cv2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv1e1 = sext i4 %v1e1 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv2e1 = sext i4 %v2e1 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e1, %cv2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv1e2 = sext i4 %v1e2 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv2e2 = sext i4 %v2e2 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e2, %cv2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv1e3 = sext i4 %v1e3 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv2e3 = sext i4 %v2e3 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e3, %cv2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv1e4 = sext i4 %v1e4 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv2e4 = sext i4 %v2e4 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e4, %cv2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv1e5 = sext i4 %v1e5 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv2e5 = sext i4 %v2e5 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e5, %cv2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv1e6 = sext i4 %v1e6 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv2e6 = sext i4 %v2e6 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e6, %cv2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv1e7 = sext i4 %v1e7 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv2e7 = sext i4 %v2e7 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e7, %cv2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i8 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i8 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i8 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i8 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i8 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i8 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i8 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i8 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i8 %add8, i8 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; Make sure the pattern is not recognized if there are multiple uses of the
|
|
|
|
; intermediate multiplications.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @idot8_multiuses_mul1(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: idot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s20, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s4, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s5, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s6, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s19, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s18, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s5, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s18, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s4, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s4, v2, v0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: idot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s2, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s3, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s4, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s3, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s4, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s3, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s3, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s3, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v2, v0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s2, s2, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s2, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: idot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s2, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s3, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s4, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s3, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s4, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s3, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s3, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s3, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v2, v0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s2, s2, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s2, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: idot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s2, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s3, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s4, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s3, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s4, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s8, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s3, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s3, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s3, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v2, v0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s2, s2, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s2, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: idot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s2, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s3, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s5, s6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s5, s6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s3, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s4, s7, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s3, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s5, s6, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s3, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s4, s7, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s5, s6, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s5, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s3, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s2, s2, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s4, s7, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s5, s6, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v1, s2, s3, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv1e0 = sext i4 %v1e0 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv2e0 = sext i4 %v2e0 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e0, %cv2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv1e1 = sext i4 %v1e1 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv2e1 = sext i4 %v2e1 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e1, %cv2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv1e2 = sext i4 %v1e2 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv2e2 = sext i4 %v2e2 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e2, %cv2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv1e3 = sext i4 %v1e3 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv2e3 = sext i4 %v2e3 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e3, %cv2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv1e4 = sext i4 %v1e4 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv2e4 = sext i4 %v2e4 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e4, %cv2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv1e5 = sext i4 %v1e5 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv2e5 = sext i4 %v2e5 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e5, %cv2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv1e6 = sext i4 %v1e6 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv2e6 = sext i4 %v2e6 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e6, %cv2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv1e7 = sext i4 %v1e7 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv2e7 = sext i4 %v2e7 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e7, %cv2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add = add i32 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i32 %mul0, %add
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i32 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i32 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i32 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i32 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i32 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i32 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i32 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%res = add i32 %add, %add8
|
|
|
|
store i32 %res, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Support this pattern.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @idot8_acc32_vecMul(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: idot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s7, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s5, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[14:15], s[8:9], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s5, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[16:17], s[8:9], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s5, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s11, s5, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s13, s5, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[18:19], s[8:9], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s5, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[4:5], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s7, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[24:25], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s7, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[26:27], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s7, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[28:29], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s7, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[30:31], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s7, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[34:35], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s7, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[36:37], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s7, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[22:23], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[20:21], s[8:9], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[12:13], s[12:13], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[10:11], s[10:11], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s4, v0, v1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s36
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s20, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s34
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s18, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s30
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v1, v0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s26
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s24
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s22
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: idot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[14:15], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s3, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s11, s3, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s13, s3, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[16:17], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[2:3], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[22:23], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[24:25], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[26:27], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[28:29], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[30:31], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[34:35], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[20:21], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[4:5], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[18:19], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[12:13], s[12:13], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[10:11], s[10:11], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s18, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s30
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s26
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[8:9], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s24
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s22
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s6, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: idot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[14:15], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s3, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s11, s3, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s13, s3, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[16:17], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[2:3], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[22:23], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[24:25], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[26:27], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[28:29], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[30:31], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[34:35], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[20:21], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[4:5], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[18:19], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[12:13], s[12:13], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[10:11], s[10:11], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s18, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s30
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s26
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[8:9], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s24
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s22
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s6, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[14:15], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s3, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s11, s3, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s13, s3, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[16:17], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[2:3], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[22:23], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[24:25], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[26:27], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[28:29], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[30:31], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[34:35], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[20:21], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[4:5], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[18:19], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[12:13], s[12:13], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[10:11], s[10:11], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s18, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s30
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s16, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s26
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[8:9], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s24
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s22
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s14, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s6, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s5, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s11, s3, 24
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s13, s5, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[6:7], 60
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[8:9], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[10:11], s[10:11], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[12:13], s[12:13], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 20
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s5, 20
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, s8, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s11, s3, 16
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s13, s5, 16
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[6:7], 60
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[8:9], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, s12, v0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[10:11], s[10:11], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[12:13], s[12:13], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 12
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s5, 12
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, s8, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s11, s3, 8
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s13, s5, 8
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[6:7], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[8:9], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, s12, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s3, 4
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s5, 4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[10:11], s[10:11], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[12:13], s[12:13], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, s8, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[6:7], 60
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[8:9], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[2:3], s[2:3], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[4:5], s[4:5], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, s12, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s6, s8, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s2, s4, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%cvec1 = sext <8 x i4> %vec1 to <8 x i32>
|
|
|
|
%cvec2 = sext <8 x i4> %vec2 to <8 x i32>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = mul <8 x i32> %cvec1, %cvec2
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i32 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i32 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i32 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i32 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i32 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i32 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i32 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i32 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %add8, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Support this pattern.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @idot8_acc16_vecMul(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: idot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s8, 0xffff
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ushort v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s18, s6, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s19, s6, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s20, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s14, s6, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s5, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s9, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s4, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s4, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v1, s4, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v2, s13, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v3, s12, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v4, s11, v4
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v1, 16, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, s8, v2
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v3, 16, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s8, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v1, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v4, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_alignbit_b32 v3, v1, v2, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v4, 16, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s15
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v3, v0
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v1
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v4, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s10, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s9, v6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s7, v7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s5, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_short v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: idot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ushort v2, v[0:1]
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s27, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[16:17], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s19, s3, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s21, s3, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s15, s1, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s23, s3, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s25, s3, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s17, s3, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s3, 20
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[4:5], s[0:1], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[26:27], s[26:27], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s1, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s1, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s11, s1, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s13, s1, 24
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s1, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s1, s1, 20
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[24:25], s[24:25], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[2:3], s[2:3], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[14:15], s[14:15], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s26
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[12:13], s[12:13], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[0:1], s[0:1], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s24
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[22:23], s[22:23], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[20:21], s[20:21], 60
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[10:11], s[10:11], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s22
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[18:19], s[18:19], 60
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[8:9], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[30:31], s[16:17], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[28:29], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s30
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s14, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s12, v5, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v3, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:WORD_0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s10, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s8, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s6, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s28, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s16
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v2, s4, v3, v2
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_short v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: idot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s11, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s2, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s11, s2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v0, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s9, s10
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v1, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s5, s8
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v2, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s3, s4
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s6, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s12, s6, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s17, s6, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s6, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v3, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s17, s6
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v4, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s15, s16
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v5, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s13, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v0, 12, v0 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v4, 12, v4 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v1, 12, v1 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v5, 12, v5 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v6, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v5, v1, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v4, v0, v4
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v2, 12, v2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v6, 12, v6 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v2, v2, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ushort v6, v[0:1], off
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s7, s12
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v7, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v3, 12, v3 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v7, 12, v7 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v3, v3, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v6, v4, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v4, v6, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v4, v4, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:WORD_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v4, v4, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v4, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v4, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s11, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s2, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s11, s2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v0, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s9, s10
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v1, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s5, s8
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v2, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s3, s4
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s6, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s12, s6, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s17, s6, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s6, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v3, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s17, s6
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v4, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s15, s16
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v5, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s13, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v0, 12, v0 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v4, 12, v4 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v1, 12, v1 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v5, 12, v5 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v6, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v5, v1, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v4, v0, v4
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v2, 12, v2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v6, 12, v6 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v2, v2, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ushort v6, v[0:1], off
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s7, s12
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v7, 12, s2 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v3, 12, v3 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v7, 12, v7 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v3, v3, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v6, v4, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v4, v6, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v4, v4, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:WORD_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v4, v4, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v4, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v4, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s4, s4, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s6, s6, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v3, 12, s4 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v4, 12, s6 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s1, 0x4000c
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v3, 12, v3 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s0, s5, s0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v4, 12, v4 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s4, s7, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s1, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v5, 12, s0 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s1, 0x40014
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v3, v3, v4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v6, 12, s4 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s4, s8, s9
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v4, 12, v5 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s0, s5, s0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 28
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v5, 12, v6 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v6, 12, s4 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v7, 12, s0 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s0, s2, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v4, v4, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s1, s6, s1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v5, 12, v7 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v7, 12, s1 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v3, 12, v6 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_lshlrev_b16 v6, 12, s0 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:WORD_0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v3, v3, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v5, 12, v7 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_ashrrev_i16 v4, 12, v6 op_sel_hi:[0,1]
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v4, v4, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v4
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i16 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%cvec1 = sext <8 x i4> %vec1 to <8 x i16>
|
|
|
|
%cvec2 = sext <8 x i4> %vec2 to <8 x i16>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = mul <8 x i16> %cvec1, %cvec2
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i16 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i16 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i16 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i16 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i16 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i16 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i16 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i16 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i16 %add8, i16 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Support this pattern.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @idot8_acc8_vecMul(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: idot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_movk_i32 s8, 0xff
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s9, 0xffff
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ubyte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s6, s4, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s15, s5, 0x40000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s16, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s17, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s18, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s19, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s20, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s21, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s5, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s7, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s10, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s11, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s12, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s13, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_i32 s14, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s21
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_ashr_i32 s4, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v1, s4, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v2, s14, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v3, s13, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v9, s12, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v5, s11, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v6, s10, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v7, s7, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v8, s6, v8
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v1, 8, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, s8, v2
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v3, 8, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v9, s8, v9
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v5, 8, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v6, s8, v6
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v7, 8, v7
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v8, s8, v8
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v1, v2, v1
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v9, v3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v6, v5
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v5, v8, v7
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v1, 16, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, s9, v2
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v3, 16, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v5, s9, v5
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v1, v2, v1
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v5, v3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_alignbit_b32 v3, v1, v2, 8
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_alignbit_b32 v5, v1, v2, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v6, 24, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v7, 8, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v8, 16, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v1, 24, v1
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v6, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_i32_i24 v0, s12, v4, v0
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_byte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: idot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s33, 0xffff
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1]
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s11, s1, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s15, s1, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[20:21], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s23, s3, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s25, s3, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s27, s3, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[8:9], s[0:1], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s13, s1, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s17, s3, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s19, s3, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s21, s3, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s3, s3, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[10:11], s[10:11], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[14:15], s[14:15], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[22:23], s[22:23], 60
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[24:25], s[24:25], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[26:27], s[26:27], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s5, s1, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s7, s1, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s9, s1, 4
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshl_b32 s1, s1, 20
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[2:3], s[2:3], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[12:13], s[12:13], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s26
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s22
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s10
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_sdwa v6, v7, v6 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v7, s12, v8
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_sdwa v8, v10, v9 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[0:1], s[0:1], 60
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s2
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v5, s0, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v7, v7, v8 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[4:5], s[4:5], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[16:17], s[16:17], 60
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v5, v5, v6 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v6, s33, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[18:19], s[18:19], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[30:31], s[20:21], 60
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_sdwa v3, v4, v3 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v5, v6, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[6:7], s[6:7], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v12, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v13, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_ashr_i64 s[28:29], s[8:9], 60
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v11, s30
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v4, s6, v4
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_sdwa v10, v13, v12 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v7, 8, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v4, v4, v10 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_i32_i24_e32 v9, s28, v11
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v3, v9, v3 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s33, v4
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v4, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v8, 8, v3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v2, v6
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v7, v2
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v5, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_2 src1_sel:BYTE_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v5, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_3 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v2, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v8, v2
|
2020-02-20 23:49:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v3, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v3, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_3 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_byte v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: idot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, 0xffff
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s0, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s14, s1, 4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v3, 12, s0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v7, 12, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v14, 12, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s8, s0, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s0, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s15, s1, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s16, s1, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 12, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v6, 12, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v12, 12, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v13, 12, s15
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v3, 12, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v4, 12, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v7, 12, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v14, 12, v14
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v5, 12, v5
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v12, 12, v12
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v6, 12, v6
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v13, 12, v13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v3, v3, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v7, v7, v14 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v3, v3, v7 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s0, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s0, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s10, s1, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s11, s1, 16
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v6, v6, v13 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v5, v5, v12
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v10, 12, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v11, 12, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v17, 12, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v18, 12, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s5, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s0, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s12, s1, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s1, 24
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, s2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v5, v5, v6 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v8, 12, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v9, 12, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v15, 12, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v16, 12, s12
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v5, v3, v5
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v10, 12, v10
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v17, 12, v17
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v11, 12, v11
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v18, 12, v18
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v8, 12, v8
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v15, 12, v15
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v9, 12, v9
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v16, 12, v16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v4, v11, v18 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v10, v10, v17
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v7, 8, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v4, v10, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v9, v9, v16 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v8, v8, v15
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v8, v8, v9 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s2, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v6, v4, v8
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v3, 8, v6
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v6 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v6 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, 0xffff
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s0, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s14, s1, 4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v3, 12, s0
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v7, 12, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v14, 12, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s8, s0, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s0, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s15, s1, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s16, s1, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 12, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v6, 12, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v12, 12, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v13, 12, s15
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v3, 12, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v4, 12, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v7, 12, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v14, 12, v14
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v5, 12, v5
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v12, 12, v12
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v6, 12, v6
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v13, 12, v13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v3, v3, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v7, v7, v14 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v3, v3, v7 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s0, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s0, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s10, s1, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s11, s1, 16
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v6, v6, v13 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v5, v5, v12
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v10, 12, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v11, 12, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v17, 12, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v18, 12, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s5, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s0, 24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s12, s1, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s1, 24
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, s2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v5, v5, v6 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v8, 12, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v9, 12, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v15, 12, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v16, 12, s12
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v5, v3, v5
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v10, 12, v10
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v17, 12, v17
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v11, 12, v11
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v18, 12, v18
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v8, 12, v8
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v15, 12, v15
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v9, 12, v9
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e32 v16, 12, v16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v4, v11, v18 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v10, v10, v17
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v7, 8, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v4, v10, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v9, v9, v16 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v8, v8, v15
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v8, v8, v9 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s2, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v6, v4, v8
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v3, 8, v6
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v6 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v6 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: idot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, 0xffff
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s0, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s14, s1, 4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s8, s0, 12
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s15, s1, 12
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v3, 12, s0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v7, 12, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v12, 12, s14
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 12, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v14, 12, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s0, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s16, s1, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v6, 12, s8
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v7, 12, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v12, 12, v12
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 12, s9
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v3, 12, v3
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v4, 12, v4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v13, 12, s16
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v7, v7, v12
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v19, 12, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v14, 12, v14
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s0, 20
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s0, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s5, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s0, 24
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v3, v3, v4
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v4, v19, v14
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v6, 8, v7
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s10, s1, 20
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v12, 12, v13
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v5, 12, v5
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s11, s1, 16
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v3, v3, v6 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s12, s1, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v8, 12, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v9, 12, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v10, 12, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v11, 12, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v13, 12, s10
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v5, v5, v12
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v4, 8, v4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v7, 12, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s1, 24
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v6, 12, v8
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v8, 12, v9
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v9, 12, v10
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v4, v5, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, s2, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v16, 12, s12
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v5, 12, v11
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v10, 12, v13
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v15, 12, s13
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v7, 12, v7
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v11, 12, v16
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v4, v3, v4
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v5, v5, v10
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_ashrrev_i16_e64 v12, 12, v15
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v10, v9, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v8, v8, v11
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v9, 8, v4
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v3, 8, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v5, v6, v12
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v6, 8, v8
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v9
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v3, v10, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v5, v5, v6 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, s2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v4, v3, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v3, 8, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-02-09 09:02:28 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i8 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%cvec1 = sext <8 x i4> %vec1 to <8 x i8>
|
|
|
|
%cvec2 = sext <8 x i4> %vec2 to <8 x i8>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = mul <8 x i8> %cvec1, %cvec2
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i8 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i8 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i8 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i8 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i8 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i8 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i8 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i8 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i8 %add8, i8 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|