2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -basicaa -da | FileCheck %s
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; ModuleID = 'StrongSIV.bc'
|
|
|
|
|
target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
|
|
|
|
|
target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.6.0"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[i + 2] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[i];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong0(i32* %A, i32* %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
%cmp1 = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp1, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent flow [2]!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body.preheader: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body.preheader ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.02 = phi i32* [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ], [ %B, %for.body.preheader ]
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 2
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %0
|
|
|
|
|
%1 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %1, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %indvars.iv
|
|
|
|
|
%2 = load i32* %arrayidx3, align 4
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.02, i64 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
store i32 %2, i32* %B.addr.02, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%indvars.iv.next = add i64 %indvars.iv, 1
|
|
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next, %n
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end.loopexit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.end.loopexit, %entry
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (long int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[i + 2] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[i];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong1(i32* %A, i32* %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
%cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp1, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent flow [2]!
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body.preheader: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = sext i32 %n to i64
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
%i.03 = phi i64 [ %inc, %for.body ], [ 0, %for.body.preheader ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.02 = phi i32* [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ], [ %B, %for.body.preheader ]
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%conv2 = trunc i64 %i.03 to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%add = add nsw i64 %i.03, 2
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %conv2, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %i.03
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%1 = load i32* %arrayidx3, align 4
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.02, i64 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
store i32 %1, i32* %B.addr.02, align 4
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%inc = add nsw i64 %i.03, 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, %0
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end.loopexit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.end.loopexit, %entry
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (long unsigned i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[i + 2] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[i];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong2(i32* %A, i32* %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
%cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp1, label %for.end, label %for.body.preheader
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent flow [2]!
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
for.body.preheader: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
%i.03 = phi i64 [ %inc, %for.body ], [ 0, %for.body.preheader ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.02 = phi i32* [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ], [ %B, %for.body.preheader ]
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%conv = trunc i64 %i.03 to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%add = add i64 %i.03, 2
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %conv, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx1 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %i.03
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* %arrayidx1, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.02, i64 1
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %0, i32* %B.addr.02, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%inc = add i64 %i.03, 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, %n
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end.loopexit
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
for.end.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.end.loopexit, %entry
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[i + 2] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[i];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong3(i32* %A, i32* %B, i32 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
%cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp1, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.end
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent flow [2]!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body.preheader: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body.preheader ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.02 = phi i32* [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ], [ %B, %for.body.preheader ]
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 2
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %0
|
|
|
|
|
%1 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %1, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %indvars.iv
|
|
|
|
|
%2 = load i32* %arrayidx2, align 4
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.02, i64 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
store i32 %2, i32* %B.addr.02, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%indvars.iv.next = add i64 %indvars.iv, 1
|
|
|
|
|
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i32 %lftr.wideiv, %n
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end.loopexit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.end.loopexit, %entry
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (long unsigned i = 0; i < 19; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[i + 19] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[i];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong4(i32* %A, i32* %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%i.02 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.01 = phi i32* [ %B, %entry ], [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%conv = trunc i64 %i.02 to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%add = add i64 %i.02, 19
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %conv, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx1 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %i.02
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* %arrayidx1, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.01, i64 1
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %0, i32* %B.addr.01, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%inc = add i64 %i.02, 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, 19
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (long unsigned i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[i + 19] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[i];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong5(i32* %A, i32* %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent flow [19]!
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%i.02 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.01 = phi i32* [ %B, %entry ], [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%conv = trunc i64 %i.02 to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%add = add i64 %i.02, 19
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %conv, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx1 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %i.02
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* %arrayidx1, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.01, i64 1
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %0, i32* %B.addr.01, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%inc = add i64 %i.02, 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, 20
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (long unsigned i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[2*i + 6] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[2*i];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong6(i32* %A, i32* %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent flow [3]!
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%i.02 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.01 = phi i32* [ %B, %entry ], [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%conv = trunc i64 %i.02 to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = shl i64 %i.02, 1
|
|
|
|
|
%add = add i64 %mul, 6
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %conv, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = shl i64 %i.02, 1
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %mul1
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* %arrayidx2, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.01, i64 1
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %0, i32* %B.addr.01, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%inc = add i64 %i.02, 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, 20
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (long unsigned i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[2*i + 7] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[2*i];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong7(i32* %A, i32* %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%i.02 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.01 = phi i32* [ %B, %entry ], [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%conv = trunc i64 %i.02 to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = shl i64 %i.02, 1
|
|
|
|
|
%add = add i64 %mul, 7
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %conv, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = shl i64 %i.02, 1
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %mul1
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* %arrayidx2, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.01, i64 1
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %0, i32* %B.addr.01, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%inc = add i64 %i.02, 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, 20
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (long unsigned i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[i + n] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[i];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong8(i32* %A, i32* %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent flow [%n|<]!
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%i.02 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.01 = phi i32* [ %B, %entry ], [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%conv = trunc i64 %i.02 to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%add = add i64 %i.02, %n
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %conv, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx1 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %i.02
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* %arrayidx1, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.01, i64 1
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %0, i32* %B.addr.01, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%inc = add i64 %i.02, 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, 20
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (long unsigned i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[i + n] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[i + 2*n];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong9(i32* %A, i32* %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
%cmp1 = icmp eq i64 %n, 0
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
br i1 %cmp1, label %for.end, label %for.body.preheader
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body.preheader: ; preds = %entry
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
%i.03 = phi i64 [ %inc, %for.body ], [ 0, %for.body.preheader ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.02 = phi i32* [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ], [ %B, %for.body.preheader ]
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%conv = trunc i64 %i.03 to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%add = add i64 %i.03, %n
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %conv, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = shl i64 %n, 1
|
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i64 %i.03, %mul
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add1
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* %arrayidx2, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.02, i64 1
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %0, i32* %B.addr.02, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%inc = add i64 %i.03, 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, %n
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end.loopexit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.end.loopexit, %entry
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
;; for (long unsigned i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
;; A[n*i + 5] = i;
|
|
|
|
|
;; *B++ = A[n*i + 5];
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define void @strong10(i32* %A, i32* %B, i64 %n) nounwind uwtable ssp {
|
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent flow [0|<]!
|
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - confused!
|
2012-11-28 03:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
%i.02 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%B.addr.01 = phi i32* [ %B, %entry ], [ %incdec.ptr, %for.body ]
|
|
|
|
|
%conv = trunc i64 %i.02 to i32
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = mul i64 %i.02, %n
|
|
|
|
|
%add = add i64 %mul, 5
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %conv, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul i64 %i.02, %n
|
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i64 %mul1, 5
|
|
|
|
|
%arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %A, i64 %add2
|
|
|
|
|
%0 = load i32* %arrayidx3, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%incdec.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32* %B.addr.01, i64 1
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %0, i32* %B.addr.01, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
%inc = add i64 %i.02, 1
|
2012-11-13 20:12:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %inc, 1000
|
|
|
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
dependence analysis
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
This is an updated version of the dependence-analysis patch, including an MIV
test based on Banerjee's inequalities.
It's a fairly complete implementation of the paper
Practical Dependence Testing
Gina Goff, Ken Kennedy, and Chau-Wen Tseng
PLDI 1991
It cannot yet propagate constraints between coupled RDIV subscripts (discussed
in Section 5.3.2 of the paper).
It's organized as a FunctionPass with a single entry point that supports testing
for dependence between two instructions in a function. If there's no dependence,
it returns null. If there's a dependence, it returns a pointer to a Dependence
which can be queried about details (what kind of dependence, is it loop
independent, direction and distance vector entries, etc). I haven't included
every imaginable feature, but there's a good selection that should be adequate
for supporting many loop transformations. Of course, it can be extended as
necessary.
Included in the patch file are many test cases, commented with C code showing
the loops and array references.
llvm-svn: 165708
2012-10-11 15:32:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
|
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
|
}
|