llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/i-c-e.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

99 lines
3.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -ffreestanding -Wno-int-to-pointer-cast -fsyntax-only -verify -pedantic -fpascal-strings -std=c99
#include <stdint.h>
#include <limits.h>
int a() {int p; *(1 ? &p : (void*)(0 && (a(),1))) = 10;} // expected-error {{incomplete type 'void' is not assignable}}
// rdar://6091492 - ?: with __builtin_constant_p as the operand is an i-c-e.
int expr;
char w[__builtin_constant_p(expr) ? expr : 1];
char v[sizeof(__builtin_constant_p(0)) == sizeof(int) ? 1 : -1];
int implicitConversion = 1.0;
char floatArith[(int)(1.0+2.0)]; // expected-warning {{variable length array folded to constant array as an extension}}
// __builtin_constant_p as the condition of ?: allows arbitrary foldable
// constants to be transmogrified into i-c-e's.
char b[__builtin_constant_p((int)(1.0+2.0)) ? (int)(1.0+2.0) : -1];
struct c {
int a : (
__builtin_constant_p((int)(1.0+2.0)) ? (int)(1.0+
expr // expected-error {{expression is not an integer constant expression}}
) : -1);
};
// Check that we can evaluate statement-expressions properly when
// constant-folding inside an ICE.
void PR49239() {
goto check_not_vla;
char not_vla[__builtin_constant_p(1) ? ({ 42; }) : -1]; // expected-warning {{statement expression}}
check_not_vla:;
_Static_assert(sizeof(not_vla) == 42, ""); // expected-warning {{C11 extension}}
// It's not clear that this should be valid: __builtin_expect(expr1, expr2)
// should probably be an ICE if and only if expr1 is an ICE, but we roughly
// follow GCC in treating it as an ICE if and only if we can evaluate expr1
// regardless of whether it's an ICE.
goto check_also_not_vla;
char also_not_vla[__builtin_expect(({ 76; }), 0)]; // expected-warning {{statement expression}}
check_also_not_vla:;
_Static_assert(sizeof(also_not_vla) == 76, ""); // expected-warning {{C11 extension}}
}
void test1(int n, int* p) { *(n ? p : (void *)(7-7)) = 1; }
void test2(int n, int* p) { *(n ? p : (void *)0) = 1; }
char array[1024/(sizeof (long))];
int x['\xBb' == (char) 187 ? 1: -1];
// PR1992
void func(int x)
{
switch (x) {
case sizeof("abc"): break;
case sizeof("loooong"): func(4);
case sizeof("\ploooong"): func(4);
}
}
// rdar://4213768
int expr;
char y[__builtin_constant_p(expr) ? -1 : 1];
char z[__builtin_constant_p(4) ? 1 : -1];
// Comma tests
int comma1[0?1,2:3]; // expected-warning {{left operand of comma operator has no effect}}
int comma2[1 || (1, 2)]; // expected-warning {{use of logical '||' with constant operand}} \
// expected-note {{use '|' for a bitwise operation}} \
// expected-warning {{left operand of comma operator has no effect}}
int comma3[(1, 2)]; // expected-warning {{variable length array folded to constant array as an extension}} \
// expected-warning {{left operand of comma operator has no effect}}
// Pointer + __builtin_constant_p
char pbcp[__builtin_constant_p(4) ? (intptr_t)&expr : 0]; // expected-error {{variable length array declaration not allowed at file scope}}
int illegaldiv1a[1 || 1/0];
int illegaldiv1b[1 && 1/0]; //expected-error{{variable length array declaration not allowed at file scope}}
int illegaldiv2[1/0]; // expected-error {{variable length array declaration not allowed at file scope}}
int illegaldiv3[INT_MIN / -1]; // expected-error {{variable length array declaration not allowed at file scope}}
// PR9262
int illegaldiv4[0 / (1 / 0)]; // expected-error {{variable length array declaration not allowed at file scope}}
Simplify the scheme used for keywords, and change the classification scheme to be more useful. The new scheme introduces a set of categories that should be more readable, and also reflects what we want to consider as an extension more accurately. Specifically, it makes the "what is a keyword" determination accurately reflect whether the keyword is a GNU or Microsoft extension. I also introduced separate flags for keyword aliases; this is useful because the classification of the aliases is mostly unrelated to the classification of the original keyword. This patch treats anything that's in the implementation namespace (prefixed with "__", or "_X" where "X" is any upper-case letter) as a keyword without marking it as an extension. This is consistent with the standards in that an implementation is allowed to define arbitrary extensions in the implementation namespace without violating the standard. This gets rid of all the nasty "extension used" warnings for stuff like __attribute__ in -pedantic mode. We still warn for extensions outside of the the implementation namespace, like typeof. If someone wants to implement -Wextensions or something like that, we could add additional information to the keyword table. This also removes processing for the unused "Boolean" language option; such an extension isn't supported on any other C implementation, so I don't see any point to adding it. The changes to test/CodeGen/inline.c are required because previously, we weren't actually disabling the "inline" keyword in -std=c89 mode. I'll remove Boolean and NoExtensions from LangOptions in a follow-up commit. llvm-svn: 70281
2009-04-28 11:13:54 +08:00
int chooseexpr[__builtin_choose_expr(1, 1, expr)];
int realop[(__real__ 4) == 4 ? 1 : -1];
int imagop[(__imag__ 4) == 0 ? 1 : -1];
int *PR14729 = 0 ?: 1/0; // expected-error {{not a compile-time constant}} expected-warning 3{{}}
int bcp_call_v;
int bcp_call_a[] = {__builtin_constant_p(bcp_call_v && 0) ? bcp_call_v && 0 : -1};