llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/build-attributes.ll

1720 lines
84 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

; This tests that MC/asm header conversion is smooth and that the
; build attributes are correct
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv5-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=xscale -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=XSCALE
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V6
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V6-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V6M
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V6M-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6sm-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V6M
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6sm-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V6M-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1156t2f-s -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ARM1156T2F-S
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1156t2f-s -mattr=+strict-align -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ARM1156T2F-S-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1156t2f-s -mattr=+strict-align -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V7M
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V7M-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V7
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V7-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V8
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V8-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=Vt8
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8-linux-gnueabi -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mattr=-neon,-crypto | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V8-FPARMv8
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mattr=-fp-armv8,-crypto | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V8-NEON
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mattr=-crypto | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V8-FPARMv8-NEON
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V8-FPARMv8-NEON-CRYPTO
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8m.base-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V8MBASELINE
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8m.main-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V8MMAINLINE
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8m.main-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+dsp | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V8MMAINLINE_DSP
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a5 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a5 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a5 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a5 -mattr=-neon,+d16 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A5-NONEON
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a5 -mattr=-vfp2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A5-NOFPU
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a5 -mattr=-vfp2 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A5-NOFPU-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a8 -float-abi=soft | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A8-SOFT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a8 -float-abi=soft -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A8-SOFT-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a8 -float-abi=hard | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A8-HARD
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a8 -float-abi=hard -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A8-HARD-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a8 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a8 -float-abi=soft | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A8-SOFT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 -float-abi=soft | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A9-SOFT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 -float-abi=soft -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A9-SOFT-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 -float-abi=hard | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A9-HARD
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 -float-abi=hard -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A9-HARD-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a12 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 -float-abi=soft | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A9-SOFT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a12 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a12 -mattr=-vfp2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A12-NOFPU
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a12 -mattr=-vfp2 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A12-NOFPU-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a12 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a15 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A15
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a15 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A15-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a15 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a17 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a17 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A17-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a17 -mattr=-vfp2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A17-NOFPU
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a17 -mattr=-vfp2 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A17-NOFPU-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a15 -enable-no-trapping-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-TRAPPING-MATH
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a15 -denormal-fp-math=ieee | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DENORMAL-IEEE
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a15 -denormal-fp-math=preserve-sign | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DENORMAL-PRESERVE-SIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a15 -denormal-fp-math=positive-zero | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DENORMAL-POSITIVE-ZERO
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mattr=-neon,+vfp3,+fp16 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=GENERIC-FPU-VFPV3-FP16
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mattr=-neon,+vfp3,+d16,+fp16 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=GENERIC-FPU-VFPV3-D16-FP16
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mattr=-neon,+vfp3,+fp-only-sp,+d16 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=GENERIC-FPU-VFPV3XD
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mattr=-neon,+vfp3,+fp-only-sp,+d16,+fp16 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=GENERIC-FPU-VFPV3XD-FP16
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+neon,+fp16 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=GENERIC-FPU-NEON-FP16
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a17 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m0 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M0
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m0 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M0-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m0 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m0plus | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M0PLUS
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m0plus -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M0PLUS-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m0plus -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M1
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m1 -mattr=+strict-align -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M1-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m1 -mattr=+strict-align -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=sc000 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SC000
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=sc000 -mattr=+strict-align -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SC000-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=sc000 -mattr=+strict-align -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m3 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M3
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m3 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M3-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m3 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=sc300 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SC300
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=sc300 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SC300-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=sc300 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m4 -float-abi=soft | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M4-SOFT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m4 -float-abi=soft -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M4-SOFT-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m4 -float-abi=hard | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M4-HARD
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m4 -float-abi=hard -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M4-HARD-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m4 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7em-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m7 -mattr=-vfp2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M7 --check-prefix=CORTEX-M7-SOFT
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7em-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m7 -mattr=-vfp2 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M7-NOFPU-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7em-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m7 -mattr=+fp-only-sp | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M7 --check-prefix=CORTEX-M7-SINGLE
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7em-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m7 -mattr=+fp-only-sp -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M7-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7em-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m7 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M7-DOUBLE
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7em-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m7 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m23 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M23
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m33 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M33
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m33 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-M33-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m33 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r4 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-R4
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r4f | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-R4F
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r5 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-R5
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r5 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-R5-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r5 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r7 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-R7
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r7 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-R7-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r7 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r8 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-R8
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r8 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-R8-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r8 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a32 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A32
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a32 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A32-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a32 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a35 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A35
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a35 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A35-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a35 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a53 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A53
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a53 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A53-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a53 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a57 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A57
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a57 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A57-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a57 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a72 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A72
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a72 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A72-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a72 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a73 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A73
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8.1a-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXYNOS-M1
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m1 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXYNOS-M1-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m1 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXYNOS-M2
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m2 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXYNOS-M1-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m2 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m3 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXYNOS-M3
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m3 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXYNOS-M1-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m3 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m4 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXYNOS-M4
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m4 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXYNOS-M1-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m4 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8.1a-linux-gnueabi -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8.1a-linux-gnueabi -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A7-CHECK
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A7-CHECK-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 -mattr=-vfp2,-vfp3,-vfp4,-neon,-fp16 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A7-NOFPU
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 -mattr=-vfp2,-vfp3,-vfp4,-neon,-fp16 -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A7-NOFPU-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 -mattr=+vfp4,-neon | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A7-FPUV4
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 -enable-sign-dependent-rounding-fp-math | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DYN-ROUNDING
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 -mattr=+vfp4,-neon -enable-unsafe-fp-math -disable-fp-elim -enable-no-infs-fp-math -enable-no-nans-fp-math -fp-contract=fast | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A7-FPUV4-FAST
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 -mattr=+vfp4,,+d16,-neon | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORTEX-A7-FPUV4
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -relocation-model=pic | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RELOC-PIC
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -relocation-model=static | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RELOC-OTHER
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -relocation-model=dynamic-no-pic | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RELOC-OTHER
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RELOC-OTHER
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PCS-R9-USE
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+reserve-r9,+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PCS-R9-RESERVE
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -relocation-model=ropi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RELOC-ROPI
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -relocation-model=rwpi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RELOC-RWPI
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -relocation-model=ropi-rwpi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RELOC-ROPI-RWPI
; ARMv8.1a (AArch32)
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8.1a-none-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8.1a-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8.1a-none-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv8a (AArch32)
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a32 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a32 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a35 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a35 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a57 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a57 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a72 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a72 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m1 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m2 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m3 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m3 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m4 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv8-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=exynos-m4 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv7a
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a7 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv7ve
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7ve-none-linux-gnueabi | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=V7VE
; ARMv7r
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r5 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv7r-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-r5 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv7em
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7em-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m4 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7em-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv7m
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m3 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7m-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m3 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv6
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6-none-netbsd-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1136j-s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1136j-s -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1136j-s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv6k
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6k-none-netbsd-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1176j-s 2> %t | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: FileCheck %s < %t --allow-empty --check-prefix=CPU-SUPPORTED
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6k-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1176j-s -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv6k-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1176j-s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv6m
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumb-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m0 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumb-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align -mcpu=cortex-m0 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m-none-linux-gnueabi -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumb-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m0 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv5
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv5-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1022e | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=armv5-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=arm1022e -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; ARMv8-R
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-r52 -mattr=-vfp2,-fp16 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ARMv8R --check-prefix=ARMv8R-NOFPU
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-r52 -mattr=-neon,+fp-only-sp,+d16 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ARMv8R --check-prefix=ARMv8R-SP
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm-none-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-r52 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ARMv8R --check-prefix=ARMv8R-NEON
; ARMv8-M
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8-none-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-m23 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8-none-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-m33 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRICT-ALIGN
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8-none-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-m33 -mattr=+strict-align | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRICT-ALIGN
; CPU-SUPPORTED-NOT: is not a recognized processor for this target
; XSCALE: .eabi_attribute 6, 5
; XSCALE: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; XSCALE: .eabi_attribute 9, 1
; DYN-ROUNDING: .eabi_attribute 19, 1
; V6: .eabi_attribute 6, 6
; V6: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
;; We assume round-to-nearest by default (matches GCC)
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; V6-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; V6-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; V6-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; V6-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; V6-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; V6-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The default choice made by llc is for a V6 CPU without an FPU.
;; This is not an interesting detail, but for such CPUs, the default intention is to use
;; software floating-point support. The choice is not important for targets without
;; FPU support!
; V6: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; V6: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; V6-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V6: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; V6: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; V6: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; V6-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; V6: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; V6-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite the V6 CPU having no FPU by default, we chose to flush to
;; positive zero here. There's no hardware support doing this, but the
;; fast maths software library might.
; V6-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 20
; V6-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; V6-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V6-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
;; We emit 6, 12 for both v6-M and v6S-M, technically this is incorrect for
;; V6-M, however we don't model the OS extension so this is fine.
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 6, 12
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 9, 1
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; V6M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; V6M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; V6M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; V6M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; V6M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; V6M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The default choice made by llc is for a V6M CPU without an FPU.
;; This is not an interesting detail, but for such CPUs, the default intention is to use
;; software floating-point support. The choice is not important for targets without
;; FPU support!
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; V6M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; V6M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; V6M: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; V6M-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite the V6M CPU having no FPU by default, we chose to flush to
;; positive zero here. There's no hardware support doing this, but the
;; fast maths software library might.
; V6M-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 20
; V6M-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; V6M-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V6M-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; ARM1156T2F-S: .cpu arm1156t2f-s
; ARM1156T2F-S: .eabi_attribute 6, 8
; ARM1156T2F-S: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; ARM1156T2F-S: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; ARM1156T2F-S: .fpu vfpv2
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; ARM1156T2F-S-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; ARM1156T2F-S-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; ARM1156T2F-S-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; ARM1156T2F-S-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; ARM1156T2F-S-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; ARM1156T2F-S-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; ARM1156T2F-S: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; ARM1156T2F-S: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; ARM1156T2F-S-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; ARM1156T2F-S: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; ARM1156T2F-S: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; ARM1156T2F-S: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; ARM1156T2F-S-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; ARM1156T2F-S: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; ARM1156T2F-S-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; V6 cores default to flush to positive zero (value 0). Note that value 2 is also equally
;; valid for this core, it's an implementation defined question as to which of 0 and 2 you
;; select. LLVM historically picks 0.
; ARM1156T2F-S-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 20
; ARM1156T2F-S-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; ARM1156T2F-S-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; ARM1156T2F-S-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; V7M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; V7M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; V7M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; V7M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; V7M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; V7M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The default choice made by llc is for a V7M CPU without an FPU.
;; This is not an interesting detail, but for such CPUs, the default intention is to use
;; software floating-point support. The choice is not important for targets without
;; FPU support!
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; V7M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; V7M-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; V7M: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; V7M-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite the V7M CPU having no FPU by default, we chose to flush
;; preserving sign. This matches what the hardware would do in the
;; architecture revision were to exist on the current target.
; V7M-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; V7M-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; V7M-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V7M-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; V7: .syntax unified
; V7: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; V7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; V7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; V7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; V7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; V7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; V7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; In safe-maths mode we default to an IEEE 754 compliant choice.
; V7: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; V7: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; V7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V7: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; V7: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; V7: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; V7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; V7: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; V7-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The default CPU does have an FPU and it must be VFPv3 or better, so it flushes
;; denormals to zero preserving the sign.
; V7-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; V7-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; V7-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V7-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; V7VE: .syntax unified
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 6, 10 @ Tag_CPU_arch
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 7, 65 @ Tag_CPU_arch_profile
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 8, 1 @ Tag_ARM_ISA_use
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 9, 2 @ Tag_THUMB_ISA_use
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 42, 1 @ Tag_MPextension_use
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 44, 2 @ Tag_DIV_use
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 68, 3 @ Tag_Virtualization_use
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 17, 1 @ Tag_ABI_PCS_GOT_use
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 20, 1 @ Tag_ABI_FP_denormal
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 21, 1 @ Tag_ABI_FP_exceptions
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 23, 3 @ Tag_ABI_FP_number_model
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 24, 1 @ Tag_ABI_align_needed
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 25, 1 @ Tag_ABI_align_preserved
; V7VE: .eabi_attribute 38, 1 @ Tag_ABI_FP_16bit_format
; V8: .syntax unified
; V8: .eabi_attribute 67, "2.09"
; V8: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; V8-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; V8-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
; V8: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; V8: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; V8-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V8: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; V8-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The default does have an FPU, and for V8-A, it flushes preserving sign.
; V8-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; V8-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; V8-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; V8-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; Vt8: .syntax unified
; Vt8: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; Vt8-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
; Vt8: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; Vt8: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; Vt8-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; Vt8: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; V8-FPARMv8: .syntax unified
; V8-FPARMv8: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; V8-FPARMv8: .fpu fp-armv8
; V8-NEON: .syntax unified
; V8-NEON: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; V8-NEON: .fpu neon
; V8-NEON: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
; V8-FPARMv8-NEON: .syntax unified
; V8-FPARMv8-NEON: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; V8-FPARMv8-NEON: .fpu neon-fp-armv8
; V8-FPARMv8-NEON: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
; V8-FPARMv8-NEON-CRYPTO: .syntax unified
; V8-FPARMv8-NEON-CRYPTO: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; V8-FPARMv8-NEON-CRYPTO: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; V8-FPARMv8-NEON-CRYPTO: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
; V8MBASELINE: .syntax unified
; '6' is Tag_CPU_arch, '16' is ARM v8-M Baseline
; V8MBASELINE: .eabi_attribute 6, 16
; '7' is Tag_CPU_arch_profile, '77' is 'M'
; V8MBASELINE: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; '8' is Tag_ARM_ISA_use
; V8MBASELINE: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; '9' is Tag_Thumb_ISA_use
; V8MBASELINE: .eabi_attribute 9, 3
; V8MMAINLINE: .syntax unified
; '6' is Tag_CPU_arch, '17' is ARM v8-M Mainline
; V8MMAINLINE: .eabi_attribute 6, 17
; V8MMAINLINE: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; V8MMAINLINE: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; V8MMAINLINE: .eabi_attribute 9, 3
; V8MMAINLINE_DSP-NOT: .eabi_attribute 46
; V8MMAINLINE_DSP: .syntax unified
; V8MBASELINE_DSP: .eabi_attribute 6, 17
; V8MBASELINE_DSP: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; V8MMAINLINE_DSP: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; V8MMAINLINE_DSP: .eabi_attribute 9, 3
; V8MMAINLINE_DSP: .eabi_attribute 46, 1
; Tag_CPU_unaligned_access
; NO-STRICT-ALIGN: .eabi_attribute 34, 1
; STRICT-ALIGN: .eabi_attribute 34, 0
; Tag_CPU_arch 'ARMv7'
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; Tag_CPU_arch_profile 'A'
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; Tag_ARM_ISA_use
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; Tag_THUMB_ISA_use
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .fpu neon-vfpv4
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU-NOT: .fpu
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .fpu vfpv4
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; Tag_FP_HP_extension
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; Tag_MPextension_use
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; Tag_DIV_use
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; Tag_DSP_extension
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK-NOT: .eabi_attribute 46
; Tag_Virtualization_use
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; Tag_ABI_FP_denormal
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
;; The A7 has VFPv3 support by default, so flush preserving sign.
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
;; Despite there being no FPU, we chose to flush to zero preserving
;; sign. This matches what the hardware would do for this architecture
;; revision.
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
;; The VFPv4 FPU flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; Tag_ABI_FP_exceptions
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; Tag_ABI_FP_user_exceptions
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; Tag_ABI_FP_number_model
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; Tag_ABI_align_needed
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; Tag_ABI_align_preserved
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; Tag_FP_16bit_format
; CORTEX-A7-CHECK: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A7-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A7-FPUV4: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .cpu cortex-a5
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .fpu neon-vfpv4
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 68, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A5 defaults to a VFPv4 FPU, so it flushed preserving the sign when -ffast-math
;; is given.
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A5-DEFAULT-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .cpu cortex-a5
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .fpu vfpv4-d16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 68, 1
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A5 defaults to a VFPv4 FPU, so it flushed preserving sign when -ffast-math
;; is given.
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A5-NONEON-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .cpu cortex-a5
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU-NOT: .fpu
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 68, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite there being no FPU, we chose to flush to zero preserving
;; sign. This matches what the hardware would do for this architecture
;; revision.
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A5-NOFPU-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .cpu cortex-a8
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .fpu neon
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 68, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .cpu cortex-a9
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .fpu neon
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 68, 1
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A9 defaults to a VFPv3 FPU, so it flushes preserving the sign when
;; -ffast-math is specified.
; CORTEX-A8-SOFT-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A9-SOFT-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A5-SOFT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A5-SOFT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A5-SOFT-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .cpu cortex-a8
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .fpu neon
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 68, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 28, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .cpu cortex-a9
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .fpu neon
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A9-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 68, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 28, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A8 defaults to a VFPv3 FPU, so it flushes preserving the sign when
;; -ffast-math is specified.
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A8-HARD-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A9-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A9 defaults to a VFPv3 FPU, so it flushes preserving the sign when
;; -ffast-math is specified.
; CORTEX-A9-HARD-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A9-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A9-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A9-HARD-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .cpu cortex-a12
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .fpu neon-vfpv4
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A12 defaults to a VFPv3 FPU, so it flushes preserving the sign when
;; -ffast-math is specified.
; CORTEX-A12-DEFAULT-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A12-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A12-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A12-HARD-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .cpu cortex-a12
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU-NOT: .fpu
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite there being no FPU, we chose to flush to zero preserving
;; sign. This matches what the hardware would do for this architecture
;; revision.
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A12-NOFPU-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A15: .cpu cortex-a15
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A15: .fpu neon-vfpv4
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A15-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A15-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A15-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A15-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-A15: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A15-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A15 defaults to a VFPv3 FPU, so it flushes preserving the sign when
;; -ffast-math is specified.
; CORTEX-A15-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A15-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A15-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A15-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .cpu cortex-a17
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .fpu neon-vfpv4
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A17-DEFAULT: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A17-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A17 defaults to a VFPv3 FPU, so it flushes preserving the sign when
;; -ffast-math is specified.
; CORTEX-A17-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A17-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A17-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A17-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .cpu cortex-a17
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU-NOT: .fpu
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite there being no FPU, we chose to flush to zero preserving
;; sign. This matches what the hardware would do for this architecture
;; revision.
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A17-NOFPU-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; Test flags -enable-no-trapping-fp-math and -denormal-fp-math:
; NO-TRAPPING-MATH: .eabi_attribute 21, 0
; DENORMAL-IEEE: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; DENORMAL-PRESERVE-SIGN: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; DENORMAL-POSITIVE-ZERO: .eabi_attribute 20, 0
; CORTEX-M0: .cpu cortex-m0
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 6, 12
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 9, 1
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M0-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-M0-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 34, 0
; CORTEX-M0-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; CORTEX-M0-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-M0-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-M0-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-M0-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-M0-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-M0: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-M0-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite the M0 CPU having no FPU in this scenario, we chose to
;; flush to positive zero here. There's no hardware support doing
;; this, but the fast maths software library might and such behaviour
;; would match hardware support on this architecture revision if it
;; existed.
; CORTEX-M0-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 20
; CORTEX-M0-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-M0-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M0-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .cpu cortex-m0plus
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 6, 12
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 9, 1
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-M0PLUS: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite the M0+ CPU having no FPU in this scenario, we chose to
;; flush to positive zero here. There's no hardware support doing
;; this, but the fast maths software library might and such behaviour
;; would match hardware support on this architecture revision if it
;; existed.
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 20
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M0PLUS-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-M1: .cpu cortex-m1
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 6, 12
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 9, 1
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; CORTEX-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; CORTEX-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-M1: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-M1-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite the M1 CPU having no FPU in this scenario, we chose to
;; flush to positive zero here. There's no hardware support doing
;; this, but the fast maths software library might and such behaviour
;; would match hardware support on this architecture revision if it
;; existed.
; CORTEX-M1-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 20
; CORTEX-M1-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-M1-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M1-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; SC000: .cpu sc000
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 6, 12
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 9, 1
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; SC000-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; SC000-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; SC000-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; SC000-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; SC000-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; SC000-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; SC000-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; SC000: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; SC000-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite the SC000 CPU having no FPU in this scenario, we chose to
;; flush to positive zero here. There's no hardware support doing
;; this, but the fast maths software library might and such behaviour
;; would match hardware support on this architecture revision if it
;; existed.
; SC000-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 20
; SC000-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; SC000-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; SC000-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-M3: .cpu cortex-m3
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; CORTEX-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; CORTEX-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-M3: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-M3-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite there being no FPU, we chose to flush to zero preserving
;; sign. This matches what the hardware would do for this architecture
;; revision.
; CORTEX-M3-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-M3-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-M3-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M3-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; SC300: .cpu sc300
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; SC300-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; SC300-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; SC300-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; SC300-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; SC300-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; SC300-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; SC300-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; SC300-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; SC300: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; SC300-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; Despite there being no FPU, we chose to flush to zero preserving
;; sign. This matches what the hardware would do for this architecture
;; revision.
; SC300-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; SC300-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; SC300-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; SC300-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .cpu cortex-m4
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 6, 13
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .fpu fpv4-sp-d16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 27, 1
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The M4 defaults to a VFPv4 FPU, so it flushes preserving the sign when
;; -ffast-math is specified.
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M4-SOFT-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .cpu cortex-m4
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 6, 13
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .fpu fpv4-sp-d16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 27, 1
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 28, 1
; CORTEX-M4-HARD: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The M4 defaults to a VFPv4 FPU, so it flushes preserving the sign when
;; -ffast-math is specified.
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M4-HARD-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-M7: .cpu cortex-m7
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 6, 13
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-M7-SOFT-NOT: .fpu
; CORTEX-M7-SINGLE: .fpu fpv5-sp-d16
; CORTEX-M7-DOUBLE: .fpu fpv5-d16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M7-SOFT-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-M7-SINGLE: .eabi_attribute 27, 1
; CORTEX-M7-DOUBLE-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-M7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 17, 1
; CORTEX-M7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-M7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-M7: .eabi_attribute 14, 0
; CORTEX-M7-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The M7 has the ARMv8 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-M7-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
;; Despite there being no FPU, we chose to flush to zero preserving
;; sign. This matches what the hardware would do for this architecture
;; revision.
; CORTEX-M7-NOFPU-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-M7-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-M7-NOFPU-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M7-NOFPU-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-R4: .cpu cortex-r4
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 7, 82
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-R4-NOT: .fpu vfpv3-d16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-R4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; CORTEX-R4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; CORTEX-R4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-R4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-R4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-R4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-R4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-R4: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-R4F: .cpu cortex-r4f
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 7, 82
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-R4F: .fpu vfpv3-d16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-R4F-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27, 1
; CORTEX-R4F-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; CORTEX-R4F-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; CORTEX-R4F-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-R4F-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-R4F-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-R4F-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-R4F-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-R4F: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-R5: .cpu cortex-r5
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 7, 82
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-R5: .fpu vfpv3-d16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-R5-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27, 1
; CORTEX-R5-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-R5-NOT: .eabi_attribute 42
; CORTEX-R5-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-R5-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-R5-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-R5-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-R5: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-R5-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The R5 has the VFPv3 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-R5-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-R5-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-R5-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-R5-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-R7: .cpu cortex-r7
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 7, 82
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-R7: .fpu vfpv3-d16-fp16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-R7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-R7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-R7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-R7-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-R7: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-R7-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The R7 has the VFPv3 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-R7-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-R7-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-R7-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-R7-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-R8: .cpu cortex-r8
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 6, 10
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 7, 82
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-R8: .fpu vfpv3-d16-fp16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 44, 2
; CORTEX-R8-NOT: .eabi_attribute 68
; CORTEX-R8-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-R8-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-R8-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-R8: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-R8-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The R8 has the VFPv3 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-R8-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-R8-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-R8-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-R8-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A32: .cpu cortex-a32
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A32: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A32-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A32-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A32-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A32-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A32-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-A32: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A32-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A32 has the ARMv8 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-A32-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A32-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A32-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A32-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-M23: .cpu cortex-m23
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 6, 16
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 9, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M23-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 34, 0
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M23-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 17, 1
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-M23-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-M23-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-M23: .eabi_attribute 14, 0
; CORTEX-M33: .cpu cortex-m33
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 6, 17
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 7, 77
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 8, 0
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 9, 3
; CORTEX-M33: .fpu fpv5-sp-d16
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 27, 1
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-M33-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 46, 1
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 34, 1
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 17, 1
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-M23-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-M33-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-M33: .eabi_attribute 14, 0
; CORTEX-M33-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
; CORTEX-M33-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-M33-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-M33-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-M33-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A35: .cpu cortex-a35
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A35: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A35-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A35-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A35-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A35-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A35-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-A35: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A35-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A35 has the ARMv8 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-A35-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A35-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A35-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A35-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A53: .cpu cortex-a53
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A53: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A53-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A53-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A53-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A53-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A53-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-A53: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A53-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A53 has the ARMv8 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-A53-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A53-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A53-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A53-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A57: .cpu cortex-a57
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A57: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A57-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A57-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A57-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A57-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A57-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-A57: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A57-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A57 has the ARMv8 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-A57-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A57-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A57-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A57-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A72: .cpu cortex-a72
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A72: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A72-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A72-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A72-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A72-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A72-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-A72: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A72-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The A72 has the ARMv8 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; CORTEX-A72-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; CORTEX-A72-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; CORTEX-A72-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A72-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; CORTEX-A73: .cpu cortex-a73
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; CORTEX-A73: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; CORTEX-A73-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; CORTEX-A73-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; CORTEX-A73-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; CORTEX-A73-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; CORTEX-A73-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; CORTEX-A73: .eabi_attribute 14, 0
; EXYNOS-M1: .cpu exynos-m1
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; EXYNOS-M1: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; EXYNOS-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; EXYNOS-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; EXYNOS-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; EXYNOS-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; EXYNOS-M1-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; EXYNOS-M1: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; EXYNOS-M1-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; The exynos-m1 has the ARMv8 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; EXYNOS-M1-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; EXYNOS-M1-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; EXYNOS-M1-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; EXYNOS-M1-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; EXYNOS-M2: .cpu exynos-m2
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; EXYNOS-M2: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; EXYNOS-M2-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; EXYNOS-M2-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; EXYNOS-M2-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; EXYNOS-M2-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; EXYNOS-M2-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; EXYNOS-M2: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; EXYNOS-M3: .cpu exynos-m3
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; EXYNOS-M3: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; EXYNOS-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; EXYNOS-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; EXYNOS-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; EXYNOS-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; EXYNOS-M3-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; EXYNOS-M3: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; EXYNOS-M4: .cpu exynos-m4
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; EXYNOS-M4: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 12, 3
; EXYNOS-M4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; EXYNOS-M4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; EXYNOS-M4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; EXYNOS-M4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; EXYNOS-M4-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; EXYNOS-M4: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; GENERIC-FPU-VFPV3-FP16: .fpu vfpv3-fp16
; GENERIC-FPU-VFPV3-D16-FP16: .fpu vfpv3-d16-fp16
; GENERIC-FPU-VFPV3XD: .fpu vfpv3xd
; GENERIC-FPU-VFPV3XD-FP16: .fpu vfpv3xd-fp16
; GENERIC-FPU-NEON-FP16: .fpu neon-fp16
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 6, 14
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 7, 65
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 8, 1
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 9, 2
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .fpu crypto-neon-fp-armv8
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 12, 4
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 36, 1
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 42, 1
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-NOT: .eabi_attribute 44
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 68, 3
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; We default to IEEE 754 compliance
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 20, 1
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 21, 1
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 23, 3
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 24, 1
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 25, 1
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-NOT: .eabi_attribute 28
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A: .eabi_attribute 38, 1
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 19
;; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A has the ARMv8 FP unit, which always flushes preserving sign.
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-FAST: .eabi_attribute 20, 2
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 21
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-FAST-NOT: .eabi_attribute 22
; GENERIC-ARMV8_1-A-FAST: .eabi_attribute 23, 1
; RELOC-PIC: .eabi_attribute 15, 1
; RELOC-PIC: .eabi_attribute 16, 1
; RELOC-PIC: .eabi_attribute 17, 2
; RELOC-OTHER: .eabi_attribute 17, 1
; RELOC-ROPI-NOT: .eabi_attribute 15,
; RELOC-ROPI: .eabi_attribute 16, 1
; RELOC-ROPI: .eabi_attribute 17, 1
; RELOC-RWPI: .eabi_attribute 15, 2
; RELOC-RWPI-NOT: .eabi_attribute 16,
; RELOC-RWPI: .eabi_attribute 17, 1
; RELOC-ROPI-RWPI: .eabi_attribute 15, 2
; RELOC-ROPI-RWPI: .eabi_attribute 16, 1
; RELOC-ROPI-RWPI: .eabi_attribute 17, 1
; PCS-R9-USE: .eabi_attribute 14, 0
; PCS-R9-RESERVE: .eabi_attribute 14, 3
; ARMv8R: .eabi_attribute 67, "2.09" @ Tag_conformance
; ARMv8R: .eabi_attribute 6, 15 @ Tag_CPU_arch
; ARMv8R: .eabi_attribute 7, 82 @ Tag_CPU_arch_profile
; ARMv8R: .eabi_attribute 8, 1 @ Tag_ARM_ISA_use
; ARMv8R: .eabi_attribute 9, 2 @ Tag_THUMB_ISA_use
; ARMv8R-NOFPU-NOT: .fpu
; ARMv8R-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 12
; ARMv8R-SP: .fpu fpv5-sp-d16
; ARMv8R-SP-NOT: .eabi_attribute 12
; ARMv8R-NEON: .fpu neon-fp-armv8
; ARMv8R-NEON: .eabi_attribute 12, 3 @ Tag_Advanced_SIMD_arch
; ARMv8R-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; ARMv8R-SP: .eabi_attribute 27, 1 @ Tag_ABI_HardFP_use
; ARMv8R-NEON-NOT: .eabi_attribute 27
; ARMv8R-NOFPU-NOT: .eabi_attribute 36
; ARMv8R-SP: .eabi_attribute 36, 1 @ Tag_FP_HP_extension
; ARMv8R-NEON: .eabi_attribute 36, 1 @ Tag_FP_HP_extension
; ARMv8R: .eabi_attribute 42, 1 @ Tag_MPextension_use
; ARMv8R: .eabi_attribute 68, 2 @ Tag_Virtualization_use
[ARM] Add hardware build attributes in assembler In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe ABI compatibility. This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in ARMSubtarget. If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same .eabi_attribute is specified twice. This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid. The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted: Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812 llvm-svn: 300547
2017-04-18 20:52:35 +08:00
; ARMv8R: .eabi_attribute 38, 1 @ Tag_ABI_FP_16bit_format
; ARMv8R: .eabi_attribute 14, 0 @ Tag_ABI_PCS_R9_use
define i32 @f(i64 %z) {
ret i32 0
}