maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Fuzzer/test/value-profile-cmp.test

8 lines
398 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[libFuzzer] new experimental feature: value profiling. Profiles values that affect control flow and treats new values as new coverage. llvm-svn: 278839
2016-08-17 03:33:51 +08:00
CHECK: BINGO
RUN: not LLVMFuzzer-SimpleCmpTest -use_value_profile=1 -runs=100000000 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
[sanitizer-coverage/libFuzzer] instrument comparisons with __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp[1248] instead of __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp, don't pass the comparison type to save a bit performance. Use these new callbacks in libFuzzer llvm-svn: 279027
2016-08-18 09:25:28 +08:00
RUN: not LLVMFuzzer-SimpleHashTest -use_value_profile=1 -runs=100000000 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
[libFuzzer] one more puzzle, value_profile cracks it in a second llvm-svn: 281066
2016-09-10 02:00:04 +08:00
RUN: not LLVMFuzzer-AbsNegAndConstantTest -use_value_profile=1 -runs=100000000 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
[libFuzzer] one more puzzle for value profile llvm-svn: 281106
2016-09-10 05:58:42 +08:00
RUN: not LLVMFuzzer-AbsNegAndConstant64Test -use_value_profile=1 -runs=100000000 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
[sanitizer-coverage/libFuzzer] instrument comparisons with __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp[1248] instead of __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp, don't pass the comparison type to save a bit performance. Use these new callbacks in libFuzzer llvm-svn: 279027
2016-08-18 09:25:28 +08:00
[libFuzzer] new experimental feature: value profiling. Profiles values that affect control flow and treats new values as new coverage. llvm-svn: 278839
2016-08-17 03:33:51 +08:00