llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/constant-builtins.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

56 lines
2.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only %s -verify -pedantic -std=c99
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only %s -verify -pedantic -std=c11
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only %s -verify -pedantic -std=c17
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only %s -verify -pedantic
#if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
// expected-no-diagnostics
#endif
// Math stuff
float g0 = __builtin_huge_val();
double g1 = __builtin_huge_valf();
long double g2 = __builtin_huge_vall();
float g3 = __builtin_inf();
double g4 = __builtin_inff();
long double g5 = __builtin_infl();
// GCC misc stuff
extern int f();
Simplify the scheme used for keywords, and change the classification scheme to be more useful. The new scheme introduces a set of categories that should be more readable, and also reflects what we want to consider as an extension more accurately. Specifically, it makes the "what is a keyword" determination accurately reflect whether the keyword is a GNU or Microsoft extension. I also introduced separate flags for keyword aliases; this is useful because the classification of the aliases is mostly unrelated to the classification of the original keyword. This patch treats anything that's in the implementation namespace (prefixed with "__", or "_X" where "X" is any upper-case letter) as a keyword without marking it as an extension. This is consistent with the standards in that an implementation is allowed to define arbitrary extensions in the implementation namespace without violating the standard. This gets rid of all the nasty "extension used" warnings for stuff like __attribute__ in -pedantic mode. We still warn for extensions outside of the the implementation namespace, like typeof. If someone wants to implement -Wextensions or something like that, we could add additional information to the keyword table. This also removes processing for the unused "Boolean" language option; such an extension isn't supported on any other C implementation, so I don't see any point to adding it. The changes to test/CodeGen/inline.c are required because previously, we weren't actually disabling the "inline" keyword in -std=c89 mode. I'll remove Boolean and NoExtensions from LangOptions in a follow-up commit. llvm-svn: 70281
2009-04-28 11:13:54 +08:00
int h0 = __builtin_types_compatible_p(int,float);
//int h1 = __builtin_choose_expr(1, 10, f());
//int h2 = __builtin_expect(0, 0);
int h3 = __builtin_bswap16(0x1234) == 0x3412 ? 1 : f();
int h4 = __builtin_bswap32(0x1234) == 0x34120000 ? 1 : f();
int h5 = __builtin_bswap64(0x1234) == 0x3412000000000000 ? 1 : f();
short somefunc();
short t = __builtin_constant_p(5353) ? 42 : somefunc();
// The calls to _Static_assert and _Generic produce warnings if the compiler default standard is < c11
#if __STDC_VERSION__ < 201112L
// expected-warning@+9 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
// expected-warning@+9 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
// expected-warning@+9 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
// expected-warning@+9 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}} expected-warning@+9 {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
// expected-warning@+9 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}} expected-warning@+9 {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
// expected-warning@+9 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}} expected-warning@+9 {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
#endif
// PR44684
_Static_assert((__builtin_clz)(1u) >= 15, "");
_Static_assert((__builtin_popcount)(1u) == 1, "");
_Static_assert((__builtin_ctz)(2u) == 1, "");
_Static_assert(_Generic(1u,unsigned:__builtin_clz)(1u) >= 15, "");
_Static_assert(_Generic(1u,unsigned:__builtin_popcount)(1u) == 1, "");
_Static_assert(_Generic(1u,unsigned:__builtin_ctz)(2u) == 1, "");
#if __STDC_VERSION__ < 201112L
// expected-warning@+3 {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
#endif
__SIZE_TYPE__ strlen(const char*);
_Static_assert((__builtin_constant_p(1) ? (***&strlen)("foo") : 0) == 3, "");