maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/Demangle/ms-cxx11.test

151 lines
5.9 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[MS Demangler] Add ms-return-qualifiers.test. This is a copy of the tests from clang/CodeGenCXX/ms-return-qualifiers.cpp converted to demangling tests. llvm-svn: 338330
2018-07-31 07:22:39 +08:00
; These tests are based on clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-cxx11.cpp
[MS Demangler] Add rudimentary C++11 Support This patch adds support for demangling r-value references, new operators such as the ""_foo operator, lambdas, alias types, nullptr_t, and various other C++11'isms. There is 1 failing test remaining in this file, which appears to be related to back-referencing. This type of problem has the potential to get ugly so I'd rather fix it in a separate patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50013 llvm-svn: 338324
2018-07-31 07:02:10 +08:00
; RUN: llvm-undname < %s | FileCheck %s
; CHECK-NOT: Invalid mangled name
?a@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@BAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) const> FTypeWithQuals::a
?b@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@CAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) volatile> FTypeWithQuals::b
?c@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@IAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) __restrict> FTypeWithQuals::c
?d@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@GBAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) const &> FTypeWithQuals::d
?e@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@GCAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) volatile &> FTypeWithQuals::e
?f@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@IGAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) __restrict &> FTypeWithQuals::f
?g@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@HBAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) const &&> FTypeWithQuals::g
?h@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@HCAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) volatile &&> FTypeWithQuals::h
?i@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@IHAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) __restrict &&> FTypeWithQuals::i
?j@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A6AHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void)> FTypeWithQuals::j
?k@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@GAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) &> FTypeWithQuals::k
?l@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@HAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) &&> FTypeWithQuals::l
?Char16Var@@3_SA
; CHECK: char16_t Char16Var
?Char32Var@@3_UA
; CHECK: char32_t Char32Var
?LRef@@YAXAAH@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl LRef(int &)
?RRef@@YAH$$QAH@Z
; CHECK: int __cdecl RRef(int &&)
?Null@@YAX$$T@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl Null(std::nullptr_t)
?fun@PR18022@@YA?AU<unnamed-type-a>@1@U21@0@Z
; CHECK: struct PR18022::<unnamed-type-a> __cdecl PR18022::fun(struct PR18022::<unnamed-type-a>, struct PR18022::<unnamed-type-a>)
; First, we have the static local variable of type "<lambda_1>" inside of "define_lambda".
; decltype(lambda), where lambda = [] { static int local=42; return 42; };
?lambda@?1??define_lambda@@YAHXZ@4V<lambda_1>@?0??1@YAHXZ@A
; CHECK: class `int __cdecl define_lambda(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1> `int __cdecl define_lambda(void)'::`2'::lambda
; Next, we have the "operator()" for "<lambda_1>" which is inside of "define_lambda".
??R<lambda_1>@?0??define_lambda@@YAHXZ@QBE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall `int __cdecl define_lambda(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1>::operator()(void) const
; Finally, we have the local which is inside of "<lambda_1>" which is inside of "define_lambda".
?local@?2???R<lambda_1>@?0??define_lambda@@YAHXZ@QBE@XZ@4HA
; CHECK: __thiscall `int __cdecl define_lambda(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1>::operator()(void) const
??$use_lambda_arg@V<lambda_1>@?0??call_with_lambda_arg1@@YAXXZ@@@YAXV<lambda_1>@?0??call_with_lambda_arg1@@YAXXZ@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl use_lambda_arg<class `void __cdecl call_with_lambda_arg1(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1>>(class `void __cdecl call_with_lambda_arg1(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1>)
?foo@A@PR19361@@QIGAEXXZ
; CHECK: void __thiscall PR19361::A::foo(void) __restrict &
?foo@A@PR19361@@QIHAEXXZ
; CHECK: void __thiscall PR19361::A::foo(void) __restrict &&
??__K_deg@@YAHO@Z
; CHECK: int __cdecl operator ""_deg(long double)
??$templ_fun_with_pack@$S@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl templ_fun_with_pack<>(void)
[MS Demangler] Add support for $$Z parameter pack separator. $$Z appears between adjacent expanded parameter packs in the same template instantiation. We don't need to print it, it's only there to disambiguate between manglings that would otherwise be ambiguous. So we just need to parse it and throw it away. llvm-svn: 341119
2018-08-31 04:53:29 +08:00
; $$Z is a parameter pack separator.
??$func@H$$ZH@@YAHAEBU?$Foo@H@@0@Z
; CHECK: int __cdecl func<int, int>(struct Foo<int> const &, struct Foo<int> const &)
[MS Demangler] Add rudimentary C++11 Support This patch adds support for demangling r-value references, new operators such as the ""_foo operator, lambdas, alias types, nullptr_t, and various other C++11'isms. There is 1 failing test remaining in this file, which appears to be related to back-referencing. This type of problem has the potential to get ugly so I'd rather fix it in a separate patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50013 llvm-svn: 338324
2018-07-31 07:02:10 +08:00
??$templ_fun_with_ty_pack@$$$V@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl templ_fun_with_ty_pack<>(void)
??$templ_fun_with_ty_pack@$$V@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl templ_fun_with_ty_pack<>(void)
??$f@$$YAliasA@PR20047@@@PR20047@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl PR20047::f<PR20047::AliasA>(void)
?f@UnnamedType@@YAXAAU<unnamed-type-TD>@A@1@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl UnnamedType::f(struct UnnamedType::A::<unnamed-type-TD> &)
?f@UnnamedType@@YAXPAW4<unnamed-type-e>@?$B@H@1@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl UnnamedType::f(enum UnnamedType::B<int>::<unnamed-type-e> *)
??$f@W4<unnamed-type-E>@?1??g@PR24651@@YAXXZ@@PR24651@@YAXW4<unnamed-type-E>@?1??g@0@YAXXZ@@Z
[MS Demangler] Create a new backref context for template instantiations. Template manglings use a fresh back-referencing context, so we need to do the same. This fixes several existing tests which are marked as FIXME, so those are now actually run. llvm-svn: 339275
2018-08-09 01:17:04 +08:00
; CHECK: void __cdecl PR24651::f<enum `void __cdecl PR24651::g(void)'::`2'::<unnamed-type-E>>(enum `void __cdecl PR24651::g(void)'::`2'::<unnamed-type-E>)
[MS Demangler] Add rudimentary C++11 Support This patch adds support for demangling r-value references, new operators such as the ""_foo operator, lambdas, alias types, nullptr_t, and various other C++11'isms. There is 1 failing test remaining in this file, which appears to be related to back-referencing. This type of problem has the potential to get ugly so I'd rather fix it in a separate patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50013 llvm-svn: 338324
2018-07-31 07:02:10 +08:00
??$f@T<unnamed-type-$S1>@PR18204@@@PR18204@@YAHPAT<unnamed-type-$S1>@0@@Z
[MS Demangler] Create a new backref context for template instantiations. Template manglings use a fresh back-referencing context, so we need to do the same. This fixes several existing tests which are marked as FIXME, so those are now actually run. llvm-svn: 339275
2018-08-09 01:17:04 +08:00
; CHECK: int __cdecl PR18204::f<union PR18204::<unnamed-type-$S1>>(union PR18204::<unnamed-type-$S1> *)
[MS Demangler] Add rudimentary C++11 Support This patch adds support for demangling r-value references, new operators such as the ""_foo operator, lambdas, alias types, nullptr_t, and various other C++11'isms. There is 1 failing test remaining in this file, which appears to be related to back-referencing. This type of problem has the potential to get ugly so I'd rather fix it in a separate patch. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50013 llvm-svn: 338324
2018-07-31 07:02:10 +08:00
??R<lambda_0>@?0??PR26105@@YAHXZ@QBE@H@Z
; CHECK: __thiscall `int __cdecl PR26105(void)'::`1'::<lambda_0>::operator()(int) const
??R<lambda_1>@?0???R<lambda_0>@?0??PR26105@@YAHXZ@QBE@H@Z@QBE@H@Z
; CHECK: __thiscall `__thiscall `int __cdecl PR26105(void)'::`1'::<lambda_0>::operator()(int) const'::`1'::<lambda_1>::operator()(int) const
?unaligned_foo1@@YAPFAHXZ
; CHECK: int __unaligned * __cdecl unaligned_foo1(void)
?unaligned_foo2@@YAPFAPFAHXZ
; CHECK: int __unaligned *__unaligned * __cdecl unaligned_foo2(void)
?unaligned_foo3@@YAHXZ
; CHECK: int __cdecl unaligned_foo3(void)
?unaligned_foo4@@YAXPFAH@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl unaligned_foo4(int __unaligned *)
?unaligned_foo5@@YAXPIFAH@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl unaligned_foo5(int __unaligned *__restrict)
??$unaligned_foo6@PAH@@YAPAHPAH@Z
; CHECK: int * __cdecl unaligned_foo6<int *>(int *)
??$unaligned_foo6@PFAH@@YAPFAHPFAH@Z
; CHECK: int __unaligned * __cdecl unaligned_foo6<int __unaligned *>(int __unaligned *)
?unaligned_foo8@unaligned_foo8_S@@QFCEXXZ
; CHECK: void __thiscall unaligned_foo8_S::unaligned_foo8(void) volatile __unaligned
??R<lambda_1>@x@A@PR31197@@QBE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall PR31197::A::x::<lambda_1>::operator()(void) const
?white@?1???R<lambda_1>@x@A@PR31197@@QBE@XZ@4HA
; CHECK: int `__thiscall PR31197::A::x::<lambda_1>::operator()(void) const'::`2'::white
?f@@YAXW4<unnamed-enum-enumerator>@@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl f(enum <unnamed-enum-enumerator>)