2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SSE --check-prefix=SSE2
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+sse4.1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SSE --check-prefix=SSE41
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+avx2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=AVX2
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+avx512f | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=AVX512 --check-prefix=AVX512F
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+avx512bw | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=AVX512 --check-prefix=AVX512BW
|
2008-05-24 01:49:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <16 x i8> @mul_v16i8c(<16 x i8> %i) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v16i8c:
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm1
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm1
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm3, %xmm1
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm0
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm0
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm3, %xmm0
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v16i8c:
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm1
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm3, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-LABEL: mul_v16i8c:
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} xmm2 = <0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u>
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm2, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vzeroupper
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: retq
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-LABEL: mul_v16i8c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm0, %xmm0
|
2017-03-03 17:03:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vzeroupper
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-LABEL: mul_v16i8c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmullw {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovwb %zmm0, %ymm0
|
2016-07-09 08:19:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: # kill: %XMM0<def> %XMM0<kill> %YMM0<kill>
|
2017-03-03 17:03:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vzeroupper
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: retq
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <16 x i8> %i, < i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117 >
|
|
|
|
ret <16 x i8> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <8 x i16> @mul_v8i16c(<8 x i16> %i) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: mul_v8i16c:
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmullw {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v8i16c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmullw {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <8 x i16> %i, < i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117 >
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x i16> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <4 x i32> @mul_v4i32c(<4 x i32> %i) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v4i32c:
|
2015-02-16 20:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm1 = [117,117,117,117]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm0[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2015-02-16 20:28:18 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
|
2015-02-16 20:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm2
|
2015-02-16 20:28:18 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm2[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0],xmm0[1],xmm1[1]
|
2014-07-26 09:11:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v4i32c:
|
2015-02-16 20:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmulld {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0
|
2014-07-26 09:11:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v4i32c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpbroadcastd {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmulld %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <4 x i32> %i, < i32 117, i32 117, i32 117, i32 117 >
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x i32> %A
|
2008-05-24 01:49:40 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <2 x i64> @mul_v2i64c(<2 x i64> %i) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: mul_v2i64c:
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm1 = [117,117]
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v2i64c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} xmm1 = [117,117]
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsllq $32, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <2 x i64> %i, < i64 117, i64 117 >
|
|
|
|
ret <2 x i64> %A
|
2008-05-24 01:49:40 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <16 x i8> @mul_v16i8(<16 x i8> %i, <16 x i8> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v16i8:
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2015-04-30 16:23:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm2
|
2015-04-30 16:23:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm1
|
2015-04-30 16:23:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2015-04-30 16:23:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm3, %xmm0
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v16i8:
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm3, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-LABEL: mul_v16i8:
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} xmm2 = <0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u>
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm2, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vzeroupper
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: retq
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-LABEL: mul_v16i8:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm0, %xmm0
|
2017-03-03 17:03:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vzeroupper
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-LABEL: mul_v16i8:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovwb %zmm0, %ymm0
|
2016-07-09 08:19:07 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: # kill: %XMM0<def> %XMM0<kill> %YMM0<kill>
|
2017-03-03 17:03:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vzeroupper
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: retq
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <16 x i8> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <16 x i8> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <8 x i16> @mul_v8i16(<8 x i16> %i, <8 x i16> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: mul_v8i16:
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmullw %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v8i16:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmullw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2015-04-27 15:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <8 x i16> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x i16> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <4 x i32> @mul_v4i32(<4 x i32> %i, <4 x i32> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v4i32:
|
2015-02-16 20:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm0[1,1,3,3]
|
2014-07-26 09:11:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2015-02-16 20:28:18 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
|
2015-02-16 20:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm1
|
2015-02-16 20:28:18 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0],xmm0[1],xmm1[1]
|
2014-07-26 09:11:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v4i32:
|
2015-02-16 20:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmulld %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2014-07-26 09:11:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v4i32:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmulld %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <4 x i32> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x i32> %A
|
2008-05-24 01:49:40 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <2 x i64> @mul_v2i64(<2 x i64> %i, <2 x i64> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: mul_v2i64:
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm2
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm0, %xmm3
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm2, %xmm3
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2016-07-18 14:14:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm3, %xmm0
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v2i64:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm2
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %xmm3, %xmm0, %xmm3
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsllq $32, %xmm2, %xmm2
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm2, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <2 x i64> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <2 x i64> %A
|
2008-05-24 01:49:40 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-24 01:49:40 +08:00
|
|
|
declare void @foo()
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <4 x i32> @mul_v4i32spill(<4 x i32> %i, <4 x i32> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v4i32spill:
|
2015-02-16 20:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: subq $40, %rsp
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, (%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: callq foo
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa (%rsp), %xmm0 # 16-byte Reload
|
2015-02-16 20:28:18 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %xmm2 # 16-byte Reload
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm2[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0],xmm0[1],xmm1[1]
|
2015-02-16 20:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: addq $40, %rsp
|
2014-07-26 09:11:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v4i32spill:
|
2015-02-16 20:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: subq $40, %rsp
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, (%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: callq foo
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa (%rsp), %xmm0 # 16-byte Reload
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmulld {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %xmm0 # 16-byte Folded Reload
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: addq $40, %rsp
|
2014-07-26 09:11:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v4i32spill:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: subq $40, %rsp
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm0, (%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: callq foo
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vmovdqa (%rsp), %xmm0 # 16-byte Reload
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmulld {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %xmm0, %xmm0 # 16-byte Folded Reload
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: addq $40, %rsp
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
; Use a call to force spills.
|
|
|
|
call void @foo()
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <4 x i32> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x i32> %A
|
2008-05-24 01:49:40 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <2 x i64> @mul_v2i64spill(<2 x i64> %i, <2 x i64> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: mul_v2i64spill:
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subq $40, %rsp
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, (%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: callq foo
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa (%rsp), %xmm0 # 16-byte Reload
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm2
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %xmm3 # 16-byte Reload
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm0, %xmm1
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm2, %xmm1
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm3, %xmm0
|
2016-07-18 14:14:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addq $40, %rsp
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-09-05 14:43:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v2i64spill:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: subq $40, %rsp
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm0, (%rsp) # 16-byte Spill
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: callq foo
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vmovdqa (%rsp), %xmm3 # 16-byte Reload
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %xmm3, %xmm0
|
2016-09-05 14:43:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vmovdqa {{[0-9]+}}(%rsp), %xmm2 # 16-byte Reload
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %xmm2, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
2016-09-05 14:43:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %xmm2, %xmm1
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %xmm1, %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsllq $32, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2016-09-05 14:43:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: addq $40, %rsp
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2014-07-26 07:59:20 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
; Use a call to force spills.
|
|
|
|
call void @foo()
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <2 x i64> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <2 x i64> %A
|
2008-05-24 01:49:40 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-16 14:07:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <32 x i8> @mul_v32i8c(<32 x i8> %i) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v32i8c:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm2
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm3, %xmm2
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm4 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm4, %xmm2
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm0
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm3, %xmm0
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm4, %xmm0
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm4, %xmm2
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm1
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm3, %xmm1
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm4, %xmm1
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm2, %xmm1
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v32i8c:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm2
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm4 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm5 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm1[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-LABEL: mul_v32i8c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} xmm4 = <0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u>
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm3, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0],xmm3[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm2[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-LABEL: mul_v32i8c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm1
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm1, %zmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm0, %xmm0
|
2016-07-22 13:46:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-LABEL: mul_v32i8c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2016-03-26 17:44:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %ymm0, %zmm0
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmullw {{.*}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm0
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovwb %zmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <32 x i8> %i, < i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117 >
|
|
|
|
ret <32 x i8> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <16 x i16> @mul_v16i16c(<16 x i16> %i) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: mul_v16i16c:
|
|
|
|
; SSE: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v16i16c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmullw {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <16 x i16> %i, < i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117, i16 117 >
|
|
|
|
ret <16 x i16> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <8 x i32> @mul_v8i32c(<8 x i32> %i) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v8i32c:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [117,117,117,117]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm0[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm3[0],xmm0[1],xmm3[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm1[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm3[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0],xmm2[0],xmm1[1],xmm2[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v8i32c:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [117,117,117,117]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmulld %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmulld %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v8i32c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpbroadcastd {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmulld %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <8 x i32> %i, < i32 117, i32 117, i32 117, i32 117, i32 117, i32 117, i32 117, i32 117 >
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x i32> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <4 x i64> @mul_v4i64c(<4 x i64> %i) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: mul_v4i64c:
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [117,117]
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm3, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v4i64c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpbroadcastq {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsllq $32, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpaddq %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2015-06-16 14:07:24 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <4 x i64> %i, < i64 117, i64 117, i64 117, i64 117 >
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x i64> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
define <32 x i8> @mul_v32i8(<32 x i8> %i, <32 x i8> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v32i8:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm5[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm4 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm5[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm5, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v32i8:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm5, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm5 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm0, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm3, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm3[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-LABEL: mul_v32i8:
|
|
|
|
; AVX2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm3, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm3, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} xmm4 = <0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u>
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm3, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0],xmm3[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-LABEL: mul_v32i8:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm3, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm2, %zmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm0, %xmm0
|
2016-07-22 13:46:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-LABEL: mul_v32i8:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2016-03-26 17:44:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %ymm1, %zmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %ymm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmullw %zmm1, %zmm0, %zmm0
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovwb %zmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <32 x i8> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <32 x i8> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <16 x i16> @mul_v16i16(<16 x i16> %i, <16 x i16> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: mul_v16i16:
|
|
|
|
; SSE: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmullw %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v16i16:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <16 x i16> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <16 x i16> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <8 x i32> @mul_v8i32(<8 x i32> %i, <8 x i32> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v8i32:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm0[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm4, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm2[0],xmm0[1],xmm2[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm1[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[1,1,3,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm3[0,2,2,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0],xmm2[0],xmm1[1],xmm2[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v8i32:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmulld %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmulld %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v8i32:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmulld %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <8 x i32> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x i32> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <4 x i64> @mul_v4i64(<4 x i64> %i, <4 x i64> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: mul_v4i64:
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm4
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm4
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm0, %xmm5
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm4, %xmm5
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm0
|
2016-07-18 14:14:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm5, %xmm0
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm2
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm2
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm4
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm2, %xmm4
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm3, %xmm1
|
2016-07-18 14:14:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: paddq %xmm4, %xmm1
|
2015-11-25 06:09:31 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v4i64:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %ymm0, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %ymm1, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm3, %ymm0, %ymm3
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpaddq %ymm2, %ymm3, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsllq $32, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpaddq %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
2016-03-26 17:35:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2015-06-16 14:07:24 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <4 x i64> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x i64> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <64 x i8> @mul_v64i8c(<64 x i8> %i) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v64i8c:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm6 = xmm6[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm6
|
2017-01-24 19:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm4 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm5 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm6, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm6 = xmm6[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm6, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm6 = xmm6[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm6, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm6 = xmm6[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm5, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm6, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v64i8c:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm6 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm6, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm7 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm7, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm6, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm7, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm6, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm7, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm4, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm6, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm7, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm6, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm7, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm6, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm7, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm3, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm6, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm7, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm3[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm6, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm7, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm5, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-LABEL: mul_v64i8c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm2, %ymm2
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} xmm5 = <0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u>
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm5, %xmm4, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm5, %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0],xmm4[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm5, %xmm4, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm5, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm4[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm5, %xmm4, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm5, %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0],xmm4[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm5, %xmm3, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm5, %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0],xmm3[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-LABEL: mul_v64i8c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm2
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm2, %zmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm0, %xmm0
|
2016-07-22 13:46:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm2, %zmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm1, %zmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm1, %xmm1
|
2016-07-22 13:46:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-LABEL: mul_v64i8c:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2016-10-10 07:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %ymm0, %zmm1
|
2016-10-25 22:29:25 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vmovdqu16 {{.*#+}} zmm2 = [117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117,117]
|
2016-10-10 07:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmullw %zmm2, %zmm1, %zmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovwb %zmm1, %ymm1
|
2016-04-11 01:02:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vextracti64x4 $1, %zmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %ymm0, %zmm0
|
2016-10-10 07:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmullw %zmm2, %zmm0, %zmm0
|
2016-04-11 01:02:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovwb %zmm0, %ymm0
|
2016-10-10 07:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vinserti64x4 $1, %ymm0, %zmm1, %zmm0
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <64 x i8> %i, < i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117, i8 117 >
|
|
|
|
ret <64 x i8> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <64 x i8> @mul_v64i8(<64 x i8> %i, <64 x i8> %j) nounwind {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v64i8:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm8
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm8 = xmm8[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm8
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm9
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm9 = xmm9[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm9
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm8, %xmm9
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm8 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm8, %xmm9
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm8, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm9, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm5, %xmm9
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm9 = xmm9[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm9
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm9, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm8, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm5[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm5, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm8, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm6, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm5[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm8, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm6 = xmm6[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm6, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm8, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm7, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhbw {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm5[8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm8, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm7 = xmm7[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklbw {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psraw $8, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmullw %xmm7, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pand %xmm8, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: packuswb %xmm5, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v64i8:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm8
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm4, %xmm9
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm9, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa {{.*#+}} xmm9 = [255,255,255,255,255,255,255,255]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm9, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm4, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm9, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm5, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm8, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm9, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm5[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm4, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm8[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm5, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm9, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm5, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm6, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm5, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm9, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm6[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm5, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm9, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm7, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm3, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm9, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm7[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm3, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmullw %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pand %xmm9, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: packuswb %xmm3, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm5, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-LABEL: mul_v64i8:
|
|
|
|
; AVX2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm4, %ymm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm5, %ymm5
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm4, %ymm5, %ymm5
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm5, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vmovdqa {{.*#+}} xmm4 = <0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u>
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm6, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm5, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm5[0],xmm6[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm2[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm5, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm5, %ymm5
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm5, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm5, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0],xmm5[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm3, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm3, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufb %xmm4, %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpunpcklqdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0],xmm3[0]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-LABEL: mul_v64i8:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm2, %ymm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm5
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm4, %ymm5, %ymm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm4, %zmm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm4, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm0, %xmm0
|
2016-07-22 13:46:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm4, %ymm0
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm3, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm4
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm2, %ymm4, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm2, %zmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm3, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm3, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmullw %ymm3, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %ymm1, %zmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vpmovdb %zmm1, %xmm1
|
2016-07-22 13:46:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: vinserti128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512F-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-LABEL: mul_v64i8:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2016-04-11 01:02:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %ymm1, %zmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %ymm0, %zmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmullw %zmm2, %zmm3, %zmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovwb %zmm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vextracti64x4 $1, %zmm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %ymm1, %zmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vextracti64x4 $1, %zmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %ymm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmullw %zmm1, %zmm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vpmovwb %zmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: vinserti64x4 $1, %ymm0, %zmm2, %zmm0
|
2016-03-26 17:50:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512BW-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%A = mul <64 x i8> %i, %j
|
|
|
|
ret <64 x i8> %A
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-13 07:44:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; PR30845
|
|
|
|
define <4 x i32> @mul_v4i64_zero_upper(<4 x i32> %val1, <4 x i32> %val2) {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v4i64_zero_upper:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pxor %xmm3, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0],xmm3[0],xmm2[1],xmm3[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[2],xmm3[2],xmm0[3],xmm3[3]
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm4
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[0],xmm3[0],xmm4[1],xmm3[1]
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm4, %xmm2
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[2],xmm3[2],xmm1[3],xmm3[3]
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm0, %xmm1
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[1,3],xmm1[1,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm0
|
2016-11-13 07:44:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v4i64_zero_upper:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0],zero,xmm2[1],zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm1[2,3,0,1]
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm4
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm1[0],zero,xmm1[1],zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm3, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[1,3],xmm4[1,3]
|
2016-11-13 07:44:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-03-03 17:03:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v4i64_zero_upper:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} ymm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} ymm1 = xmm1[0],zero,xmm1[1],zero,xmm1[2],zero,xmm1[3],zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[1,3],xmm1[1,3]
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vzeroupper
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2016-11-13 07:44:58 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%val1a = zext <4 x i32> %val1 to <4 x i64>
|
|
|
|
%val2a = zext <4 x i32> %val2 to <4 x i64>
|
|
|
|
%res64 = mul <4 x i64> %val1a, %val2a
|
|
|
|
%rescast = bitcast <4 x i64> %res64 to <8 x i32>
|
|
|
|
%res = shufflevector <8 x i32> %rescast, <8 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 5, i32 7>
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x i32> %res
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-11-13 22:57:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <4 x i32> @mul_v4i64_zero_upper_left(<4 x i32> %val1, <4 x i64> %val2) {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v4i64_zero_upper_left:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pxor %xmm3, %xmm3
|
2016-11-13 22:57:52 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm4
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[0],xmm3[0],xmm4[1],xmm3[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[2],xmm3[2],xmm0[3],xmm3[3]
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm3
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm3
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm2
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm0, %xmm2
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm2
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[1,3],xmm2[1,3]
|
2016-11-13 22:57:52 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v4i64_zero_upper_left:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[0],zero,xmm3[1],zero
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm2
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[1,3],xmm2[1,3]
|
2016-11-13 22:57:52 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-03-03 17:03:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v4i64_zero_upper_left:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} ymm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsllq $32, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpaddq %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[1,3],xmm1[1,3]
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vzeroupper
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2016-11-13 22:57:52 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%val1a = zext <4 x i32> %val1 to <4 x i64>
|
|
|
|
%res64 = mul <4 x i64> %val1a, %val2
|
|
|
|
%rescast = bitcast <4 x i64> %res64 to <8 x i32>
|
|
|
|
%res = shufflevector <8 x i32> %rescast, <8 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 5, i32 7>
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x i32> %res
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-13 23:32:11 +08:00
|
|
|
define <4 x i32> @mul_v4i64_zero_lower(<4 x i32> %val1, <4 x i64> %val2) {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v4i64_zero_lower:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pxor %xmm4, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[0],xmm4[0],xmm3[1],xmm4[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[2],xmm4[2],xmm0[3],xmm4[3]
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm2
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm0, %xmm2
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm2
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[1,3],xmm2[1,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movaps %xmm3, %xmm0
|
2016-11-13 23:32:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v4i64_zero_lower:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[0],zero,xmm3[1],zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm0
|
2016-12-12 21:33:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm2
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm3, %xmm2
|
2016-12-12 21:33:58 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm2
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[1,3],xmm2[1,3]
|
2016-11-13 23:32:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-03-03 17:03:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-LABEL: mul_v4i64_zero_lower:
|
|
|
|
; AVX: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} ymm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsrlq $32, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vpsllq $32, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[1,3],xmm1[1,3]
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: vzeroupper
|
|
|
|
; AVX-NEXT: retq
|
2016-11-13 23:32:11 +08:00
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%val1a = zext <4 x i32> %val1 to <4 x i64>
|
|
|
|
%val2a = and <4 x i64> %val2, <i64 -4294967296, i64 -4294967296, i64 -4294967296, i64 -4294967296>
|
|
|
|
%res64 = mul <4 x i64> %val1a, %val2a
|
|
|
|
%rescast = bitcast <4 x i64> %res64 to <8 x i32>
|
|
|
|
%res = shufflevector <8 x i32> %rescast, <8 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 5, i32 7>
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x i32> %res
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-11-18 19:00:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <8 x i32> @mul_v8i64_zero_upper(<8 x i32> %val1, <8 x i32> %val2) {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v8i64_zero_upper:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pxor %xmm6, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[0],xmm6[0],xmm4[1],xmm6[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[2],xmm6[2],xmm0[3],xmm6[3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm5[0],xmm6[0],xmm5[1],xmm6[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[2],xmm6[2],xmm1[3],xmm6[3]
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm7
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm7 = xmm7[0],xmm6[0],xmm7[1],xmm6[1]
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm7, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhdq {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[2],xmm6[2],xmm2[3],xmm6[3]
|
2016-12-09 18:13:45 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm0, %xmm2
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[1,3],xmm2[1,3]
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm6[0],xmm0[1],xmm6[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm0, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhdq {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[2],xmm6[2],xmm3[3],xmm6[3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm3
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm5[1,3],xmm3[1,3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movaps %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movaps %xmm5, %xmm1
|
2016-11-18 19:00:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v8i64_zero_upper:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[0],zero,xmm4[1],zero
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm5 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm1[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm6 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero
|
[x86] use a single shufps when it can save instructions
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
2016-12-16 02:03:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm7 = xmm1[0],zero,xmm1[1],zero
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm2[2,3,0,1]
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm4, %xmm1
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm2[0],zero,xmm2[1],zero
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[1,3],xmm1[1,3]
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm3[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm1[0],zero,xmm1[1],zero
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm6, %xmm2
|
2017-03-05 17:57:20 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm3[0],zero,xmm3[1],zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm7, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: shufps {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[1,3],xmm2[1,3]
|
2016-11-18 19:00:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-LABEL: mul_v8i64_zero_upper:
|
|
|
|
; AVX2: # BB#0: # %entry
|
2016-12-16 02:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} ymm2 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm0, %xmm0
|
2016-11-18 19:00:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} ymm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero
|
2016-12-16 02:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} ymm3 = xmm1[0],zero,xmm1[1],zero,xmm1[2],zero,xmm1[3],zero
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
2016-12-16 02:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm1
|
2016-11-18 19:00:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} ymm1 = xmm1[0],zero,xmm1[1],zero,xmm1[2],zero,xmm1[3],zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmuludq %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vshufps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = ymm2[1,3],ymm0[1,3],ymm2[5,7],ymm0[5,7]
|
2016-11-18 19:00:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpermq {{.*#+}} ymm0 = ymm0[0,2,1,3]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512-LABEL: mul_v8i64_zero_upper:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512: # BB#0: # %entry
|
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} zmm0 = ymm0[0],zero,ymm0[1],zero,ymm0[2],zero,ymm0[3],zero,ymm0[4],zero,ymm0[5],zero,ymm0[6],zero,ymm0[7],zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} zmm1 = ymm1[0],zero,ymm1[1],zero,ymm1[2],zero,ymm1[3],zero,ymm1[4],zero,ymm1[5],zero,ymm1[6],zero,ymm1[7],zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: vpmuludq %zmm1, %zmm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: vextracti64x4 $1, %zmm0, %ymm1
|
2016-12-16 02:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: vshufps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = ymm0[1,3],ymm1[1,3],ymm0[5,7],ymm1[5,7]
|
2016-11-18 19:00:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: vpermq {{.*#+}} ymm0 = ymm0[0,2,1,3]
|
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%val1a = zext <8 x i32> %val1 to <8 x i64>
|
|
|
|
%val2a = zext <8 x i32> %val2 to <8 x i64>
|
|
|
|
%res64 = mul <8 x i64> %val1a, %val2a
|
|
|
|
%rescast = bitcast <8 x i64> %res64 to <16 x i32>
|
|
|
|
%res = shufflevector <16 x i32> %rescast, <16 x i32> undef, <8 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 5, i32 7,i32 9, i32 11, i32 13, i32 15 >
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x i32> %res
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <8 x i64> @mul_v8i64_sext(<8 x i16> %val1, <8 x i32> %val2) {
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-LABEL: mul_v8i64_sext:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2: # BB#0:
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[3,1,2,3]
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklwd {{.*#+}} xmm8 = xmm8[0],xmm1[0],xmm8[1],xmm1[1],xmm8[2],xmm1[2],xmm8[3],xmm1[3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm8, %xmm1
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $31, %xmm1
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $16, %xmm8
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm8 = xmm8[0],xmm1[0],xmm8[1],xmm1[1]
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[1,1,2,3]
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklwd {{.*#+}} xmm9 = xmm9[0],xmm1[0],xmm9[1],xmm1[1],xmm9[2],xmm1[2],xmm9[3],xmm1[3]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm9, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $31, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $16, %xmm9
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm9 = xmm9[0],xmm1[0],xmm9[1],xmm1[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckhwd {{.*#+}} xmm7 = xmm7[4],xmm0[4],xmm7[5],xmm0[5],xmm7[6],xmm0[6],xmm7[7],xmm0[7]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm7, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $31, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $16, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm7 = xmm7[0],xmm1[0],xmm7[1],xmm1[1]
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpcklwd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3]
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $31, %xmm1
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $16, %xmm0
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[0],xmm0[1],xmm1[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm2[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $31, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm3[0],xmm1[0],xmm3[1],xmm1[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm4[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $31, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0],xmm5[0],xmm1[1],xmm5[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $31, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm2[0],xmm5[0],xmm2[1],xmm5[1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrad $31, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: punpckldq {{.*#+}} xmm4 = xmm4[0],xmm5[0],xmm4[1],xmm5[1]
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm0, %xmm5
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm4, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm5, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm6
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm4, %xmm0
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm6, %xmm0
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm2, %xmm4
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm7, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm7, %xmm5
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm2, %xmm5
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm4, %xmm5
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm5
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm7, %xmm2
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm4
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm9, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm9, %xmm5
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm1, %xmm5
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm4, %xmm5
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm5
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm9, %xmm1
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm5, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm4
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm4
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm8, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: movdqa %xmm8, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psrlq $32, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm3, %xmm5
|
[X86][SSE] Improve lowering of vXi64 multiplies
As mentioned on PR30845, we were performing our vXi64 multiplication as:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi, 32)+ psllqi(AhiBlo, 32);
when we could avoid one of the upper shifts with:
AloBlo = pmuludq(a, b);
AloBhi = pmuludq(a, psrlqi(b, 32));
AhiBlo = pmuludq(psrlqi(a, 32), b);
return AloBlo + psllqi(AloBhi + AhiBlo, 32);
This matches the lowering on gcc/icc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27756
llvm-svn: 290267
2016-12-22 04:00:10 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm4, %xmm5
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: psllq $32, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: pmuludq %xmm8, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: paddq %xmm5, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-LABEL: mul_v8i64_sext:
|
|
|
|
; SSE41: # BB#0:
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm0[3,1,2,3]
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxwq %xmm3, %xmm4
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxwq %xmm3, %xmm5
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm3 = xmm0[1,1,2,3]
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxwq %xmm3, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxwq %xmm0, %xmm7
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm2[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm3
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuldq %xmm4, %xmm3
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxdq %xmm2, %xmm2
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuldq %xmm5, %xmm2
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm1[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm4
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuldq %xmm6, %xmm4
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmovsxdq %xmm1, %xmm0
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: pmuldq %xmm7, %xmm0
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: movdqa %xmm4, %xmm1
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE41-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-LABEL: mul_v8i64_sext:
|
|
|
|
; AVX2: # BB#0:
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm2 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxwq %xmm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxwq %xmm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vextracti128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %xmm3, %ymm3
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmuldq %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %xmm1, %ymm1
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vpmuldq %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-13 03:29:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: vmovdqa %ymm2, %ymm1
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX2-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX512-LABEL: mul_v8i64_sext:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512: # BB#0:
|
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: vpmovsxwq %xmm0, %zmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %ymm1, %zmm1
|
2016-12-12 18:49:15 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: vpmuldq %zmm1, %zmm0, %zmm0
|
2016-12-11 06:02:36 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX512-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
%1 = sext <8 x i16> %val1 to <8 x i64>
|
|
|
|
%2 = sext <8 x i32> %val2 to <8 x i64>
|
|
|
|
%3 = mul <8 x i64> %1, %2
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x i64> %3
|
|
|
|
}
|